By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
They should narrow their review perspective to the segment the vehicle belongs to.
* Pluses over other segment vehicles.
* Minuses over other segment vehicles.
If they want to make some pointers about engines on X segment, etc., they should be separate.
IMHO, Freebie exceeds expectations by meeting many compromises (seats, space, etc.) that are opposites. That fine balance is its forte'.
Sam
PS - We got Freebie back from the sunroof repair. Shouldn't do it again, but I don't plan to test it.
Funny PS
--Can't find an elephant in a living room Dept.--
The dealer "briefly lost" our Freebie in its own repair facility. (Misplaced it in their parking lot.) Someone had to search the lot, until they found it. And I thought I was a bad when I misplace my keys...
After following the freestyle forum for months, I'm surprised no one has done a comparison between the 500/freestyle to the volvo counterparts (s60/v70).
I know they do not compete in terms of luxury and styling (I still believe volvo to be some of the nicest designs), but comparison in terms of utility.
I would like to have a wagon with room and some luxury, and considered a CPO v70 2.5T. The power is similar in terms of HP, but I noticed that the V70 had a higher towing rating. Any thoughts about why? You would think an NA engine would have better towing specs that a turbo (never driven a turbo, can't comment).
Second, I have a fear of turbos over the long haul (too many horror stories about saabs blowing blue smoke after 60K). My fear is that although the volvo would offer more "luxury" in a slightly used v70, I would worry about the mechanics at going to 100K.
The same goes for the 500...the volvo s60/80 are beautiful inside and out, while the 500 is styles more conservatively like the Passat (another car to consider until you hear about the reliability).
Any thoughts comparing the 500 to a CPO volvo s80 and a freestyle to a CPO v70?
If you can get them both for the same price, what are your thoughts? Do the seats fold down in the s80? Gas mileage comparisons? Acceleration concerns? Let's discuss.
GregC
I personally don't consider a Volvo to be a dependable car, CPO or not. Safe, yes! Now Ford isn't exactly the most dependable either (past history). So if I were considering a certified previously owned vehicle, I would lean to Lexus, Acura, or Infiniti (my preferences). But let's consider your comparison:
1)Comparable price (CPO V70 to Freestyle)
2)Luggage Capacity: edge to Freestyle
3)People Capacity: edge to Freestyle (comfort especially)
4)Acceleration: edge V70 (although Freestyle not far behind).
5)AWD: a wash.
6)Style: individual preference but I think the Freestyle looks awesome.
7)Luxury: Freestyle Limited has everything but NAV like a fully optioned V70.
So it sounds like personal preference and if you need a "name badge". I personally love this CVT transmission, having driven it in an Audi A4 3.0. That may be the difference. Those are my thoughts.
Chuck
After many weeks of waiting, my Freestyle Limited is finally being built (started today). It just happens I'll be in Chicago Wednesday through Friday on business, and I was wondering if buyers are able to visit the plant.
I'm not looking to pick it at the plant (although I've heard how this happens), but I though it would be *very* cool to see my baby fresh off the assembly line.
I personally don't consider a Volvo to be a dependable car, CPO or not. Safe, yes! Now Ford isn't exactly the most dependable either (past history). So if I were considering a certified previously owned vehicle, I would lean to Lexus, Acura, or Infiniti (my preferences). But let's consider your comparison:
1)Comparable price (CPO V70 to Freestyle)
2)Luggage Capacity: edge to Freestyle
3)People Capacity: edge to Freestyle (comfort especially)
4)Acceleration: edge V70 (although Freestyle not far behind).
5)AWD: a wash.
6)Style: individual preference but I think the Freestyle looks awesome.
7)Luxury: Freestyle Limited has everything but NAV like a fully optioned V70.
So it sounds like personal preference and if you need a "name badge". I personally love this CVT transmission, having driven it in an Audi A4 3.0. That may be the difference. Those are my thoughts.
Chuck
What time of year do the insurance industries publish data? Do you know? (--anotherwagon--)
****************
No, I don't. Based on Volvo ratings & three-row side bags, I doubt anything other than 5 stars.
Sam
Source: Ford Media
Had two Volvo turbos - replaced them both and heard many more turbo horror stories.
We have had a LOT of Volvos - Still considering another but really would like to see a Ford take its place.
Also, if I was told correctly, the V70 isn't AWD you have to go to XC70 to AWD. Plus all (most) the goodies that came with the Limited Freestyle are in 4 or 5 different option packages in the Volvos.
Then, if you are looking at wagons, there is rear facing bench seat vs. forward facing w/lots of room.
I do agree, the interior looks much nicer....
Had you noticed any reliability difference between the low pressure turbo, as in the V70 2.5T and the higher boost T5 models?
Do you think this in-house tranny be equal in terms of reliability to the current design (JAPAN)?
On a different topic, I think I can live and like the 500 with a few tweaks done by me.
1 - Add a soft cover to the center console.
2 - Add footwell, trunk, door, glove box and rear maplights
3 - Add sound proofing to floor, trunk floor, backseat and doors.
I think if I could wait till 07 with the new engine, this would be the way to go.
Mercury should add a Quite Tuning feature like Buick. Perfed seats and headlights just don't cut it. I do like the Zephyr concept.
You meant Quiet Steel...Your talking about what debuted on the Ford F-150 to help control unwanted noise ? Some of that is already being used, it's just not advertised as Buick is doing.
The Mercury version of the Freestyle will have improved interior fitments, and will be geared more as a Sports Wagon, than Cross-Over. Stay tuned for the "Meta One" Concept at the next round of Auto Shows in the next month, to give you an idea.
Here is what USAToday writes about the Buick LaCrosse:
"Buick wants quietness as a hallmark, and says it benchmarked the Lexus ES 300. LaCrosse is mainly without annoying sounds, either from the car itself or from the outside leaking in. Sandwich-construction panels known as Quiet Steel, pioneered on the '04 Ford F-150, mute harsh sounds..."
Want to read the entire article? Here:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2004-11-11-bui- - ck-lacrosse_x.htm
Still, according to Motor Trend measurements, the Buick Lacrosse is much quieter than Ford 500/Freestyle. The Ford (Duratec) engine revs louder than the Buick 3.8L or 3.6L engines, and is not as much isolated than buick. Seems that Ford reserves that quietness for the Lincoln version.
Yes, the quiet factor is mainly reserved for Lincoln and chances are you will see Ford using much more Quiet Steel. Although, to a certain degree don't expect tomb-like quietness either. Many people like hearing some sort of muffler/exhaust sound under hard acceleration.
Buick is trying to replace the spot where Cadillac was at, therefore chances are you might see much more tomb-like quietness in their vehicles over the Lincoln versions which are aiming for a younger crowd. Then again, with the buying demographics of the typical Buick buyer, can they hear to begin with? heh...
Lumber,
Yes Volvo is one of them. As you stated, the Aisin supplied 5 speed automatics have been giving them issues. NOT on the design itself, but the small little things that are attached to the tranny itself. A few other automaker's have, or will be, stepping up to the plate since it's affecting some other brands as well.
Another question for you. The vehicles at my local dealer are mostly in the 12,000 vin range now.Love the colorful sticker they all have on the back glass.
Has the spec stabilized now to include all the fine tuning the first 12-15k had post build?
Just curious where you got yours at just above invoice? I ordered mine from Bob Davidson Ford and felt good with $1250 off sticker. Good Job!
Chuck
Thanks,
http://popularmechanics.com/automotive/spy_reports/2003/1/detroit- _spy_report/
According to the spy shots (above) the mercury freestyle looks a lot like the freestyle - Is Meta One going to change that fact or is Meta One further out in the future?
What is a good guess to when the Mercury freestyle will hit showrooms - I would like to wait for it or else I may choose a Mazda 6 wagon over a frestyle. My Taurus wagon is at 199,000 miles and I would to upgrade within 6 months.
Is it true what the link says about the mercury freestyle having standard AWD but with the 6 speed transmission instead of the CVT?
If its close to the top of its torque capacity with the 3.0 Duratec, asssuming the Mercury gets the duratec 35 engine (the timeline before production is similar for both), its going to require a conventional 6 speed transmission.
Ride/handling like a xc volvo, not as sharp as a car, much better than a truck. Thought the seat squad was a little short for my 6ft3 frame. Headroom just enough (sunroof).
One major gripe. The view in the inside mirror is filled with the overhead compartment immediately behind it. Its near useless. Dealer told me the DVD makes rear view worse for taller people like me. Looking at one vehicle equipped with the DVD suggests I can believe it.
I really hope that this is something Ford can fix quickly without waiting for the 06 my.
Does anyone know how manufacturers measure the rear leg room distance. Freestyle states 33.3 - Pilot 30.2 - but actual room to me seems like 12 and 8/9. Is this seat back to seat back?
Anyone have 12+ tall kids riding in the back a lot?
THANKS<
If it has a bit more power and a better trans, it may be worth waiting for....any info
I'm also shopping it against the Pilot. Interesting in your opinion of the two.
I personally feel that Ford should follow Honda's lead and make safety features like side curtains standard as opposed to options. For example, I recently looked at a couple of Freestyle Limited's on a dealors lot that were priced about $32,000.00 but did not include side airbags. I can't image paying that much money and not getting side airbag protection in this day and age. Many customers will not notice but that only makes a stronger case for why safety features should be standard. I like the Freestyle more than the Pilot but I respect the Honda corporate commitment to the safety of their customers more.
I do agree that the stability control should be available.
So speaking as a Ford partisan:
Please Ford, make side airbags standard in all your vehicles on which they are currently available, make ABS and traction control standard on all vehicles on which they are currently available, make the Advance Track stability control system standard on all vehicle on which it is currently available. Furthermore, commit to make all these safety features standard on the vehicles in your line up as soon as possible when vehicles a redesigned or freshened. Do these things before they are federally mandated, and before all of your competition does so.
NOTE: Ford has the highest number of vehicles that earn highest on NHTSA (5 Stars) and IIHS (BestPicks) crash testing.
Here are my impressions on the Freestyle vs. Pilot so far.
First, if we bought a Freebie we would want the Limited. We are in the Atl market and have only been able to locate one over 70 miles across town. So we've only looked at SELs closer to home. We may venture to the dealer over the holidays but chances are it will be gone. So I haven't seen the interior of the Limited to know if I like it. Hopefully our dealers will start getting some inventory of Limiteds.
I do like the interior materials (not layout) of the Pilot. Although on the Freebie the grey/black appeal to me more than the tan.
Exterior color choices on the Limited are, well limiting. I would pick silver, red or blue but they aren't offered.
We like the look on the Freebie and the way it handles. I am a wagon fan.
My kids (6/12 - boys) like the center console that you can get. Can't get it on the Pilot - just the flip down tray. My 12 year old says the Freebie is "bombdiggity" and wants one today!
The legroom is more in the Freebie - but the seat would move up in both. (Limited for Freebie, I think). Like the shifter on the console vs. the steering column and the 3rd seat belt in the back of the Pilot seems wierd. Also, the side curtains as discussed above is another advantage. For kids, don't have to step up as much in the Freebie. Also the split bench is back is great. Don't think the Pilot has that.
I think the seats are deeper but not sure. Would like to have the option of a navigation system.
Your comment about visibility w/DVD is a little conserning - again would have to see one and see if it was a problem. Although, I don't know if I really want a TV in my car all the time.
Hubby thinks the Pilot drives like a van (yes, I know Odyssey) and the Freebie drives more like a car ( I know) but he thinks the Freebie is sportier. Coming from the Land Rover Disco II, the ride is quiet and I didn't feel too low to the ground. (My mom's Volvo 850 now seems tiny!)The Pilot felt bulkier. We had a nice drive in the Freebie.
Gas mileage is impressive compared to my current 13mpg w/premium only!
I am impressed with the safety features but don't know how they are rated. Also, am hoping for some more non-Ford reviews.
Truth be told, and I know I will get it here, but we would go with the Freestyle in a heart beat if it wasn't Ford.
Now to defend myself! I base that on doing some research that may or may not matter. It is a first year model - makes me nervous. Also, am concerned about depreciation and mtn. over time. I want to keep it a while so depreciation wouldn't matter as much, but can it last 100k+ miles like my many Volvos.
There are no cost of ownership numbers - but based on other Ford models, Honda ranks better there.
Is this really the year of the car, is the quality commitment finally there?
Also, impressions at dealerships, Honda has been helpful and professional.
The local Ford rep was eating and spitting sunflower seeds while talking to my husband. He said he had a seed stuck on his lip the whole time we talked. I know that is not a way to base anything but still...perception. We will try another dealer.
After purchase service - someone told me the Ford service reps are on commission. They also said that at times they would says cars needed repairs that they didn't to make quotas. This is a person who worked in a dealer's service dept a few years ago. Don't know if it still holds true or not. Don't know if Honda service is set up the same way.
The main thing the Pilot has going for it from our standpoint in the fact that it has the space we need and that it has the Honda reputation.
I have also checked some of the postings for Pilot and do realize folks have issues with them. (Which makes me feel better!)
Pricing - we have them at almost exactly the same. I have a drive out price on a Pilot EX w/ Leather and a Z Plan limited Freestyle (never gave me true drive out) and I think the Freebie inched a litte over the Pilot. So for us, pricing is the same.
So for now, still no decision. Thought about sticking w/the Disco until I looked a cost of ownership on that one! Whew!
Sorry to be so lengthy-
Towing - in a comparison the Freebie listed more towing capacity than the Pilot. However, no hitches yet. We would need a hitch for bike carrier, etc. no real towing that I know of. But from what I gather, nothing from Ford yet. Pilot already has them.
The price of the Honda and the Freestyle comes out close but also consider the longer power train warranty on the Honda. I don't know why American manufacturers Ford and GM are not offering the same 5 year power train as Nissan and Honda. This has to add some value to that vehicle.
I have to mention that dealer service at my closest Ford dealer is top notch.
Depreciation on the Freestyle. I heard that Ford is not selling the 500 or the Freestyle to fleet buyers. These are primarily the rental car companies. They are doing this to keep the residual value of the vehicle up. The three year residual value for the Freestyle is 50% I believe. That is substantially higher than some of their other cars that they do sell to fleet companies.
I would like to ask anybody that has an AWD model in the Appalacian or Rockies states to let us know if their fuel mileage is close to within the EPA guidlines for this vehicle (19-24).
However, the screen for the factory-installed DVD player, when open, entirely blocks your view out the back. Hence, we ordered a completely loaded Limited minus the DVD player, and we will be installing after-market behind-the-headrest screens for the kids (which we like better, since aftermarket screens tend to be brighter and offer more real estate for less $$, and multiple screens allows the kids to choose Playstation vs. a movie).
Take delivery Friday. I'll post more later. Bought an early Lincoln LS in '99, and because of that I was hesitant, but decided to take the plunge. AWD and all options