Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
As for the '82 CE, enjoy the ride, it won't be current but if it's clean and you like going for local cruises you will probably have a blast telling people how long it's been 'in the family'.
Randy
Randy
As to current electronic cars being collectible I just wonder about fixing systems in 25 or 35 years. Upgraded any Atari 64k computers lately? That was only 20 years ago. My Father-in-law is keeping some Model-A's on the road and we are keeping an early 70's MB running but to get it fixed, either the parts are available or you can get somebody to make something. Will that be true in the future? I'm not real sure.
Randy
Given the large numbers modern Corvettes are being produced in, best to just drive these cars and wear them out. If you're thinkin' 1953 model prices, it's not going to happen.
Probably the last rare Corvette was the ZR1 and even those you have maybe over 7,000 cars---not exactly a scarcity,.
Oh, I guess the Calloway twin turbo would be worth quite a bit more money than a stock car.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/06/automobiles/06AUTOS.html
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
Shifty
Guess I think the review is a mix....one helluva car performance-wise but has some drawbacks.
Cannot argue with you there but for the $$$, it seems like a great sled.
So...tell us what you really think.
My basic approach to comparing cars is that generally, usually you either "get what you pay for" or you get a bit "less than what you pay for". I can't recall anyone selling a $100K car for $50K however.
Actually the article does make one good point, though--that a car on paper is not the real car, and without living with it you can't reallly make an informed commentary.
I personally think the C6 is a great leap forward. I just sold my Lexus IS300 SportCross and ordered one. 2 years ago I couldn't have imagined I would ever own a GM car again (last one was in 83).
Given the popularity of the C5 and the good press, I probably would have done the same as GM did this time around. But DEFINTELY the bar has to go up next model, or the C6 will be left behind. You KNOW the Japanese and Germans are busy busy busy as we speak.
The trouble with the HUD is you can't really say you weren't looking at the speedo the next time you get pulled over and the cop asks you how fast you were going??
So we have a car that offers amazing performance for a bargain price, great handling, the best ride of any sports car the reviewer has ever driven, and the article slams it for . . . not being GM's version of a Lancer Evolution.
Don't get me wrong -- the Evo is a great car, as the C6 is also a great car. They're great cars because the designers decided to take an idea and push that idea to its extreme. Personally, I'd love to see GM come out with a high-revving AWD sports car to compete with the Evo and STi. But it wouldn't be a Corvette.
What the C6 is, is the best Corvette ever, and the NYT writer just doesn't get it...
I'll also agree about the HUD and not being able to ignore how fast you are going, it keeps you aware all the time. Just wish I didn't know how much less they will cost in a couple years and the C5's at home are great so I'll wait. How much is enough.
As to the oil consumption, my 2002 doesn't seem to have any issue on the road in normal driving but I do top off a 1/3 to 1/2 quart at the track and it is usually down to full after a day and a half, so I keep an eye on it. Makes me wonder about those that report this with only normal driving. The wife's 2004 has yet to add between changes.
Randy
I drive my car hard and I'd be concerned if it didn't use a little oil.
The one area where I don't seem to agree with all the track junkies is with the brakes. I'm still running stock, lines, rotors and pads and while I'm not setting track records I've gotten within about 3 to 5% of those in my power to weight class running stock suspension and street tires. For me the stock brakes seem to match well with the rest of the setup. Although, since I'm just a little paranoid I am changing out fluid and pads regularly, not a place to come up short. Next time out will be first visit to Reno-Fernley in early April so going to find out how altitude impacts things. Have to go watch some CSRG at Sears Point later this month.
randy
I'm a big believer in flushing out the brake fluid if it's been stressed. Also I read a chart once that plotted brake efficiency against the amount of water absorbed in brake fluid that's been in there a while, and it was pretty frightening. It doesn't take much water at all to cut your brake efficiency way down.
My '01 Z drank some; my '03, not a drop.
But, my basic theory is that stock pads don't generate as much heat as race pads since they simply don't stop you as fast, which is why the fluid doesn't get as hot, which is why the stock lines are acceptable if you simply don't push too hard. Anyway, as the Miata's I some times chase to pass seem to figure out, hitting the brakes is not the best way around the track, learning to carry speed seems to lower my times a lot more than relying on the engine to make up what I lose in entering a corner slower than I need to. It's a fun set of issues to occupy a day or so at any track, and even an evening once in awhile for some bench racing when on the road.
Off to Reno-Fernley in a couple weeks, a good track to carry speed.
Randy
The 2006 Corvette Z06 will take on all comers, except for some exotics. Plus, the factory backs the new Corvette C6-R in the American Le Mans Series, like the C5-R.
Bring on the Z06!
mmmm...I smell Kentucy-fried Porsches!
awd is nice but it just wouldn't make sense in a Corvette. I can't think of a Ferrari being having awd.
Go Corvette!
BTW, in testing the Vette's were only a couple tenths faster than the Aston DBR9, and what looked like a privateer C5-R was only just back of that, should be good racing.
http://www.americanlemans.com/paddock/paddock_active.aspx
Go to live radio if interested.
And for live timing, the C6 leading GT1 early:
http://www.imsaracing.net/2003/lt/ltc.html
Randy
http://www.vetteweb.com/
Good luck with the project!
Randy
C6-R from the 12 Hours of Sebring.
Just back from a 3 day school at Reno-Fernley raceway with Next Level Driving School with 30 Corvettes and 33 drivers. Great showing of folks that want to get to know more about driving a performance car. Several C-6's and a mid-year to round out the mostly C-5 and a few C-4's attending. The track is a 2.2 mile road course that is higher speed than both Sears Point or Laguna. Great place to work up to speed.
Now, getting back through the snow storm over the summit wasn't the best close to the weekend but didn't slow me down too much that I couldn't catch one session at Sears Point in the afternoon. Fun weekend.
Randy
One year, on a late September time frame road trip, I caught a Rocky Mountain snow storm "just right". I was on the road pitch black AT NIGHT, high altitude, when a storm dumped a good bit of snow! When I arrived in Pagosa Springs, CO, it was snowing and continued to shower snow and over night hit 20 degrees! Great for a soak in the outdoor hot springs, with 20 degrees and the stars peeking through and snow flakes drifting all over! The subsequent travel days were mercifully free of snow! I had nightmares of coming back in the spring to retrive the Corvette!!
Cut and paste if the whole link didn't take.
Just a rehash of the details with a little speculation.
If the General were smart (which he is obviously not), he would bring this car to market EARLY this summer...like NOW! To introduce this car (as an '06) in the fall is moronic IMHO. A sports car...a spring, summer, fall ride depending on where you live. To put out this car in the 4th quarter is STUPID!
Yet, I want one and will have one...depends on pricing and that will govern my purchase. At 65K, I'll have one early...more than that, I'll wait a bit.
If you have crossed paths with such as this, perhaps you have witnessed a definitive method of reference upon which finance companies rely for an accurate appraisal of the added loan value of the aftermarket convertible top, rather than a wild guess or zero due to the fact that it isn't in a book.
Please give me a solid idea to give to a finance company's appraiser so that he will not value it at or near zero because of the absence of written evidence in a book.
Thanks for any help.