By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
And Ranger was a trim level on the F-100 (maybe 250 & 350 also) in the late '60s / early '70's.
And of course everyone remembers 3 on the tree and 4 on the floor. ;-)
DaveM
Cheers Pat.
But a modern car with a 5 or 6 speed ????????
DaveM
Pat: 3 words when dealing with that article: consider the source. Either he's yanking someone's chain, or he's just a nimrod. PC run amok.
Cheers!
Paul
The hybrid assist is only at stop lights, still it's a step in the right direction. Plus, it has four 115v outlets in the bed (which are turned on by a switch on the dashboard), and the generator can power for up to 32 hours, if your house loses its power.
Bob
Ken
Actually it sounds like juice and I are both "tweeners". We missed the good times the boomers had but we can't be slackers like Gen X'ers!!
http://world.honda.com/HDTV/news/2003-4031127a/
Bob
I'm near the tail end at age 43. The one's at the very tail are now age 40.
The baby boomer generator is 1946 to 1964.
Probably more than you ever wanted to know about boomers: http://www.bbhq.com/whatsabm.htm
Interesting, I'm actually a tweener (1960 to 1964/5).
http://www.tweeners.org/usatoday.htm
DaveM
Cool video on DI and lean burn technologies. Honda must've learned a little something from supplier Isuzu. ;-)
The mileage obtained is amazing, though.
-juice
I learned to drive manual on a '68 F-100 Ranger and a '62 Falcon, both three-on-the-tree and neither with power anything. The Ranger was a handsome truck, though hindsight being 20:20 I have to wonder how Ford got away with using the tire-chewing Twin-I-Beam front suspension for so many years. We could never keep it in proper alignment for very long.
Ed
I'll probably be in the market for a new home computer in the next 6 months. I've been using Windows for a while, but I am contemplating going back to Mac. I guess I'm one of those people who after using the iPod started to think, why not completely switch over to Mac. My main home applications are email/browsing, photos, music and potentially video anyway.
Price-wise, I'd like to keep it under $1,500.
Here's what I'm considering: 17" 1.8GHz iMac or Single 1.8GHz Power Mac.
I currently have a nice 18" NEC Multisync monitor that I could reuse with the Power Mac.
Thoughts?
Ken
I know a while back, most people I knew who were familiar with both platforms, also preferred the MAC.
The new OSX is great. It's much more stable than the old OS9, and it's very different from OS9, so there is a learning curve to deal with. If you should crash in one program in OSX, you don't have to re-boot. The crash just affects that program. At least that's true most of the time.
As you know, MACs are more expensive than PCs, and from a business standpoint could create a problem in terms of transferring files; I'm speaking mainly about font issues though.
Speaking of fonts, Adobe now sells what is called "Open Type" which works on both the MAC and PC platform. I just purchased the whole Adobe Open Type Font Folio, which includes every font they make. I'm very slowly in the process of converting over to Open Type.
Craig is also a MAC guy, and he's been on OSX longer than I have. I'm sure he can elaborate on this far more than I can.
Bob
~Colin
I've only crashed my powerbook once (doing a huge video) wheras I crash PCs on a regular basis! ;-)
Another advantage is most of these viruses tend to be Windows based rather than OSx based, which means you can laugh at all your friends with PCs. ;-)
As for iMac vs Powermac, the only advantages of the Powermac is expandability. You can add a second monitor to the Powermac (with the right card) but I don't think you can do this with the iMac, although I'm not sure about the newer ones.
If you don't care about expandability, the iMac is just fine. Nice, slick little package.
Turn away from the dark side. . .
;-)
tom
-juice
Get a PC, and help keep America's tech support happy! ;-)
tom
-juice
Ken
I did have something that was almost a mac though-- far better at the time, even. I got an Amiga 500 when I was about 12. 13, maybe.
~Colin
Bob
Besides, you can run a PC emulator on the Mac and run most of your PC stuff anyway! ;-)
Mac vs PC, Chevy vs Ford, Boston vs NY, Dogs vs Cats, spiderman vs superman . . .
we could go on forever! ;-)
tom
The OS is rock solid and stable, and very powerful. Even if you never touch the Unix shell, you'll appreciate running on a Unix OS. I absolutely love having machine uptimes easily over a 100 days! In fact, it's like a contest with me, and I am always disappointed when I have to reboot after installing software or an OS update!! The machines can run forever as long as there is power.
Ken, my biggest advice is to get as much RAM as you can reasonably afford. I consider 768MB to be the bare minimum for solid performance under 10.3. My new 15" PowerBook has 1.25GB RAM and my PowerMac at work has 2GB. My PowerBook came with only 256MB, and it was a real dog until I upgraded it. RAM is especially important if you want to run a lot of apps (I usually have 15-20 running at work) or do heavy duty work like video editing or computations. Apple RAM is overpriced, so I always order RAM from a reputable 3rd party (make sure you buy from a vendor who tests their RAM). Places like www.macsales.com have done well for me.
One benefit of the G5 is that you can order it with a better graphics card if that is important to you. In fact, the G5 is a whole lot more flexible in terms of customization and upgrading than the iMac. If you can stretch your budget a little, a dual processor G5 is the ultimate. The performance is really awesome with two processors -- you will never feel the machine even break a sweat. If it's a computer you plan to keep for a long time, a dual G5 with lots of RAM and a good graphics card will age very well.
That said, it's hard to argue against the new iMac! It's got a G5, nice screen, and awesome design. Price is pretty good too. I wouldn't mind having one on my desk! Since the iMac has limited RAM slots, it's even more important to max that out with RAM early on.
Finally, here's what I have lurking in my home office:
http://members.cox.net/craig.hunter/g5-cluster.jpg
Those are four dual-processor 2GHz G5s, which I just got last week and have not even set up yet! They will be used to run ground vehicle aerodynamic simulations for some consulting work on a DOE grant. When I was considering the computing performance, size, power consumption, etc... and rolled that into a price/performance comparison, the G5 was hard to beat. I would have needed about 10-12 single processor Pentium4 machines to get the same price/performance as the four dual-G5 units.
Now I just need to develop some fun applications for all those spare GigaFlops....
Craig
p.s. Ken, if you need any more info or want to pursue possible discounts on hardware, contact me at "craig dot hunter at cox dot net"
Bob <1 G4 dual-boot 1.25GHz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD & another older G4 not even worth mentioning>
Craig
ps: Bob, I can always rent out some spare CPU time to you on the cheap!
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/12/05/BUGUN- A46SB48.DTL
Craig
I find that I upgrade computers every 5-8 years and I don't have the need for a top of the line unit. I'd get the iMac because it's compact.
Jim
Mac 512 > Centris 610 > iMac > iBook
+Work supplies me with a laptop PC.
Thanks for the in-depth reponse, Craig. That photo of your G5s was pretty awesome!
Glad to know that Macs can take multi-button mice. I guess this is an example where they put form over function.
Halo affect: Yup, I get the Chronicle and when I read that article, I thought "hey, that could be me".
Here's a noob question: can Macs use a DVI monitor? Like I wrote earlier, I have a nice 18" LCD monitor that I could reuse and shuffle some of that money towards buying more CPU.
Ken
I have a 1-button mouse and it's fine. If you "Control-click" it gives you the same features as the left/right click mouse.
Bob
Craig
Mac has a really nice 23" studio display- you might want to upgrade from your 18". ;-)
tom
That's what I have and love it. Believe it or not, I've got the dock at the bottom completely filled left to right with apps. If you really want to splurge, get the 30" monitor.
Bob
At that point, my monitor would be bigger than our TV!
One thing at a time. :-)
Ken
I have a flat-tube 32" and though I rarely watch it I am seriously thinking about a part-time job at Best Buy next Christmas to get a nice fat discount on a Big 'Ol HDTV. not sure what kind-- I like plasma but the maintenance prospects a few years out are scary. Probably not a big tube though; love the image, hate the size, weight and cost.
~Colin
tom
Bob
Have you considered DLP as an alternative? They've come a long way and don't have the same burn-in issues as plasma. They're also less expensive than plasma or LCD.
Ken
I could definitely see the use of a 30" display -- sometimes I manage to run out of room on my 22" when doing heavy CAD work.
Craig
I had a rental DC minivan for the week- it has fake carbon fiber trim on the center console. An interesting choice for a minivan, I guess they're trying to be sporty?
It's a very unispiring vehicle and no where near the quality and comfort of the 3 Japanese vans, which is a shame. Maybe the next one will be better? It's going to have to be to compete.
tom
http://www.freep.com/money/autonews/mercedes8e_20041208.htm
Bob
Mine is 91". You can get them for $2-3 grand, good quality/resolution.
My 2 year old can carry it, it's so light. The projector sits on a shelf, and I bought canvas by the yard at an art store and basically just put it up on the wall, so it takes zero space.
My speakers are suspended, so it really feels like a theatre. Bob's seen it, I think Lucien might have also.
My point is if you have the right space for it, you can have a much better home theatre for about half the cost of a fancy plasma.
91".
But does size really matter? ;-)
-juice
And even then I'm concerned about Nissan's cost cutting lately.
-juice
The rate we watch TV, I'd be replacing the bulb every 1-2 years and that could get expensive.
Craig
-B