By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Obviously you had some problems if you needed to use 4-low
-mike
I can see why. At the Pine Barrens, I aired down to 18psi, which was ok for conditions. We had to drive about 2-3 miles to find compressed air. I wouldn't want to be at 10psi for that long!
-juice
Bob
-mike
Same goes for ANY non-road driving, it can void your warranty.
-mike
Sandy was good at 18psi, I bet she'd be great at maybe 12psi or so.
-juice
26.05088937
25.96589505
24.90994098
27.65957447
24.94201778
26.4916937
26.47570451
This with the original spark plugs!
-juice
Greg
-mike
Greg
-mike
-Colin
http://www.haagendazs.com/preprm.do?id=9
But, a 2003 MB SLK 320 might be worth it.
-Dave
One year, I had a beach pass for Island Beach State Park (deep, hot sand). The first 3 out of 4 times on, I got stuck. I was airing down to about 15-18 psi's. After I dropped it down to 12/13, the car went through the sand like buttah. Went on the beach another dozen or so times and never got stuck again. Although I had only about 3 inches ground clearance. :-)
-Dennis
The Isle of Man TT is arguably the most dangerous road race in the world. For a week in early June, on the tiny island called the Isle of Man, motorcycles hurl down the back roads and through the tiny towns of the Isle of Man. The course is a lap around the island, which is roughly 34 miles. It is incredibly dangerous. The big bikes hit speeds approaching 180 mph in open areas, and through the towns are often well over 100 mph. Hit a curb, a stone wall, or a building; and... well you get the picture.
The on-board cameras almost make you sick as you watch. There is nothing—I repeat NOTHING more exciting to watch in terms of motor sports than this race. If you get a chance, watch it. You won't be disappointed. I know the Speed Channel will be repeating it, probably all summer.
Last nite they showed the ultra-Lightweights (125cc), lightweights (400cc), and open production (1000cc) bikes. The open race was dominated by Suzukis, which were hitting over 150 mph. I can't wait to see the Grand Prix full-race bikes!
Bob
but I concur-- absolutely unbelievable stuff.
-Colin
I remember (back when I was riding, 25 - 30 years ago) reading about the incredible two-wheeled duals between Mike "The Bike" Hailwood and Giacomo Agostini, back in the 1960s. Hailwood was a factory Honda rider, and Agostini was riding for MV Agusta. Back then, Honda was racing 5-cyclinder 125cc bikes, and 6-cylinder 250cc bikes, as well as 4-cylinder 500cc bikes. IIRC, MV Agusta was racing 3-cylinder 500cc bikes. MV Agusta also competed in the smaller classes too, with multi-cylinder bikes.
There were also a number of famous car racers, who used to race bikes there before getting into car racing. John Surtees comes to mind.
Bob
Which makes me wonder why Audi would name a car after the TT. I'll have to catch a replay on Speed (the channel, that is).
-Dennis
-Colin
Steve
Steve - That's so sad. :-( My condolonces.
-Dennis
Bob
Back then sidecar racing was mostly dominated by BMW-powered vehicles. The boxer twins were excellent for this application. However, some of the Japanese 4-cylinder bike engine were beginning to make headway as powerplants of choice. Two extraordinary vehicles that I remember were: a sidecar powered by a 500cc (or 750cc?) Yamaha 4-cylinder 2-cylce engine, like those being used by Yamaha's factory grand prix bikes at that time; and a sidecar powered by a Mazda rotary engine, which also had a steering wheel! It's incredible to watch the passenger (monkey) shift from side-to-side during cornering.
I used love watching that stuff at Summit Point. I could roam through the pits and BS with everybody; it was very casual. Great fun!
Bob
Sorry to hear that, Steve. I tend to bike slowly with my toddler in a chair behind me, not to mention on pavement.
-juice
-juice
I'm sorry to hear of your loss.
..Mike
..Mike
Having said that, I also know there are some cyclists who seem to think they own the road, and who don't pay a lot of attention (or ignore) motor vehicles. This can be very frustrating to car drivers on narrow, hilly country roads.
Bob
-juice
My condolences.
KarenS
Host
Owners Clubs
Serge
Bob
In Bill's case, his bike went into oscillation on a paved downhill run for reasons unknown. Bike helmets don't help much at 50mph.
Steve
Cyclists have the rights and responsibilities of motorists in all states when riding and they, as well as motorists, MUST learn to obey the law and SHARE THE ROAD.
Don
I don't understand how they expect bikes and cars to share the road? I mean no offense but bikes can't go nearly as fast as cars don't have signals etc. etc. If there is a bike lane or bike path that's fine, but I find 75% of the time bikers drive on the road as if they were a car, except with disregard for all "car" things like stop signs, traffic lights, signals etc. They are quite dangerous if you ask me... Then the fact that they don't pay taxes to ride on the road is a total other issue...
-mike
If you look at the history of road construction in this country, bicycle advocacy groups were the force behind building paved roads in most areas of the country.
The bike/auto conflict problem in this country is due in large part to the "superior" status that has been accorded to the automobile and their drivers. In most countries, bikes represent a legitimate form of transportation that preceeded the car as the primary means of transportation. Therefore there is a history of bicycles as an important means of transportation.
Just my opinion (I'll get off my soapbox now)
Ron
Steve, I'm sorry for your loss as well.
In most countries, bikes represent a legitimate form of transportation that preceeded the car as the primary means of transportation. Therefore there is a history of bicycles as an important means of transportation.
The pony express used to be an important means of communications
-mike
Now I agree that given the current infrastructure in most US cities (including mine) mass cycling is a hazard to both drivers and cyclists. You're right about the dangerous situations that can and do occur.
In order to address the growing problems of urban sprawl, pollution and increasing commute times we need to look beyond just building wider roads and putting more cars on the road. The bicycle is one alternative mode of transportation that makes sense.
Oh, by the way, last time I looked the people in Seattle and Madison were eating pretty well.
Ron
I really don't know the numbers, but I'd bet its pretty equal in numbers (cars vs bikes). My family has 5 two wheeled bikes and only 2 cars. There is a BIG number of bikes in that 5 to 15 age group that can't drive.
(just razin' ya...)
--jay
-mike
I know, I know... you're probably thinking that I'm advocating for "more govt intrusion".
But, unless we require ALL cyclists (including kids who ride on the street) to obey the rules of the road, how do you establish the legitimacy of a bicycle operator in the eyes of motorists?
I think this is the first of many steps.
Ron
Most recreational riders aren't quite like that.
I tend to ride on trails. They built a really nice one where a train used to run from Bethesda to Georgetown. There's another along Beach Drive, separate from the road (which is closed on weekends).
Either way, it's a good idea to bike the way you should downhill ski - always in control. And yes that means staying out of the road when there are cars.
-juice
-mike
It was a "racing chair", 42 MPH downhill in a 25 zone. (Yes, the guy is crazy) The judge dismissed it.
-james
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20020603/od_nm/naked_dc_1
Speaking of Jim Foxworthy...
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~scook/html/redneck.htm
Bob
As for the friendly controversy raised here, I believe that bikes have an equal right to the road, but to deserve that right the bicyclist must obey all traffic laws - including stopping at stop signs. There is also a measure of common sense that must be introduced. A bicyclist riding at 10-15 should stay well out of the way of the faster traffic where safe - but where the road is narrow I would hope and expect the auto drivers to give a little consideration as well.
Steve
Also, it should be mandated that cyclist travel in the direction facing traffic oppose to with traffic. That way, you see me I see you. More so that you see me the driver and not do 'death wish' maneuver(s) unless that is what he/she really wants.
-Dave
- John
- John