Subaru Crew Cafe

1261262264266267343

Comments

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    That SOA posting has been updated a bit with further info.

    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showpost.php?p=21798040&postcount=67

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    ...as of this morning, the stop sale order has been expanded to include Legacy and Outback turbos as well.

    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showpost.php?p=21814918&postcount=169

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Not good.

    Though I wonder why a knock in engines sold in other markets would affect the 2.5T, given the US-spec engine is unique? :confuse:

    Guess they are being careful after the gasket issues.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    The 2.5 turbo is sold in many markets outside the USA.

    Bob
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    just when I'm ready to make plans for a new steed :(

    -Dave
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Buy used :)

    or take my advice on an H6.

    -mike
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Been searching.
    Found only one used '07 LGT Wgn, blue, with 14k miles for $24k @ Kolbs.
    Not my color preference though, but may go for it any way, if it'll still be there by then. Looking for Silver, first choice and White being the second.

    H6, but the price plus figuring out the sneaking it lower part with JDM Spec B suspension is giving me a headache :sick:

    -Dave
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It's too early to render a verdict. Let's wait and see.

    They might even offer a 100k warranty if enough people express a concern.

    I wonder if they got a bad batch of oil? Piston rings? :confuse:
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    If someone would only come out w/a cheap turbo conversion for the H6. *sigh* I know it's been done (with impressive results) but not for a reasonable price.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    To do it right though, it would cost a lot. Similar to the old conversion kits for the 2.5RS in the day. We installed a few but they were expensive and didn't address the compression issue.

    -mike
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Makes me wonder who ended up with that Cobb Tuning Tribeca. :shades:
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    With that said, I may get a 2010 leg with the H6 and turbo or SC it for the heck of it :)

    -mike
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Go SC. Least plumbing work. :)

    -Dave
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    *whistles* :shades:
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    eaves dropped on a Subaru forum in Singapore.

    "0.17% of all the cars with 2.5 turbo were affected.

    For those who are concerned, they said the noise will be a loud banging noise and not a soft knocking sound.

    "

    -Dave
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    OK, let's see how they can narrow it down to the affected batch of engines. Hopefully they can find a common pattern in assembly and pin point just those.
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Joe Spitz updated his cars101.com site with this tidbit on 4/17: "It's my understanding Subaru will be replacing a small number of turbo engines built after early January due to a manufacturing defect that could potentially cause early bearing failure."
  • nickelnickel Member Posts: 147
    I was driving my friend's Lexus IS250. He told me that the DVD is from 2006. After checking how nice the DVD is, especially the fonts used, I wonder if I can insert that unit in my Tribeca slot and work.

    Any comments?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I doubt it. Are they even from the same manufacturer? Subaru uses Kenwood, right?
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Even if the DVD is compatible, I doubt the font will be that on the Lexus.
    That's controlled by the firmware within the unit.

    -Dave
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Assuming the source is legitimate, it seems the problem has been identified and a test has been put together to sort out the affected turbo engines.
    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showpost.php?p=22001531&postcount=391
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    I hope the dealers are adequately compensated for the time that testing takes!

    AND why are copper fragments definitive for the problem? Just what component is involved?

    A full disclosure of the problem is needed.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm sure details will trickle out slowly.
  • jim265jim265 Member Posts: 1
    the dealer wants over $650 for what seems like alot of work for a car with only 30,000 miles. New plugs, transmission fluid change, coolent change, brake fluid, differential change, (plus basic oil change, tire rotation etc...) My car is running great, always change the oil every 3,000 miles.

    What are my options? Seems like alot of stuff is being done that is not necessary.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Check your owner's manual for the recommended 30k services. Most dealerships will push to do additional work. For instance, I'm pretty sure that the trans and diffy fluids only need inspecting at 30k. When I took my Subaru in for the 30k service, I had owner's manual in hand and lined thru all the additional items that were pre-printed on the dealership's 30k maint schedule.

    -Frank
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?p=22080315#post22080315

    This S402 was just introduced in Japan. I believe this is the first use of the twin-scroll turbo in the 2.5 engine, which puts out 281 hp.

    Also note that it has the same super-quick 13.0:1 steering ratio that's found on the JDM STI. Our STI has a slower 15.0:1 steering ratio—which is still pretty quick.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightline/4698

    This is a brilliant marketing move on Suzuki's part. It's sure to spur other automakers to re-think how they package their NAV units.

    I hope Subaru will pick up on this idea, and offer NAV as being standard across the board on all their models. Sooner or later this will be the case, and it would be great if Subaru's climbs on board early rather than late.

    Bob
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    I read an online article (CNET I think) the other day that pointed out all that was wrong with in-dash NAV units (I think it was ghost written by Juice :P ) Seriously though there were a number of valid points:

    - Market penetration (which Suzuki is addressing): something like only 1.5% of new cars sold have NAV units.

    - Price: in-dash units avg price is $2k which is at least double what most people are willing to pay.

    - Product development: auto manufacturers with there long product development cycles are not capable of competing with consumer electronics companies and their much faster development and production cycles

    - Technology: in-dash units are not intuitive and there needs to be some standardization of the user interface among the auto manufacturers (common button-ology).

    In order for in-dash NAV units to become common place, I think the auto manufacturers need to rethink how they offer them. I agree with Bob that making them standard across the line is a step in the right direction but first, they need to get the cost down and come up with a standard user interface. To address the issue of tehcnology obsolescence, I think they should develop a model that is either upgradeable or easily swappable when a newer unit comes out.

    -Frank
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    In a perfect world—and I've posted this before, I would like to see portable nav units that can be docked and plugged into the car. When "docked" it would make use of the larger 7" or 8" in-dash touch screen from the car. Think much like loading a CD on to your computer; or even more apt, Bluetooth, or Ford's Sync, in which the car's screen is used.

    For that to happen all the players in the NAV game need to unite and agree upon a common platform, much like what we have with computers (Windows and Mac OS).

    Also, these car docking units need to be upgradable, so that when new technology occurs, they can be made compatible.

    Regardless, what Suzuki is doing is a great leap forward from where we are now.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Sssshhh, I'm freelancing.
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    Doesn't even need to be standard, just an option for all models. Up here, one has to buy the Premium to get nav and b/u camera in an Outback. That means you have to get the 3.0 which is arguably Subie's least competitive engine and certainly not what we want.
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    Until it's as easy to load POI and map updates like you can via USB to nearly all the handheld "portable" GPS devices, I'm not much in favor of forcing NAV. Just think on how quick that NAV will be out of date. In a year, likely. And for the price of an update disk, you can purchase a new portable with the latest features AND map data. The portables just offer more right now that the factory NAV just can't match. (So, I guess I'm partially agreeing with Juice and with Frank, Bob, and everyone else :) ) I don't think any GPS will settle on one type of standard though, just look at differences in AM/FM/SAT radios even from the factory.

    I've got 2 portable GPS: an eTrex handheld for GeoCaching (walking) and a Nuvi 200 for our cars. The ability to upload favorite locations, POI, etc on both of these makes them far more useful, IMO. Bigger screens are nice, sure, but not necessary. And by the time car NAV's get the ability to upload POI, etc., the portables will have more useful features. And for less than half the cost of a factory car NAV.

    -Brian
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://www.cars101.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=352

    I thought the days of letting a turbo idle for 30 seconds before shutting down wee long gone. I guess not.

    Bob
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Ford has been running a TV ad recently that states that Ford's reliability is now equal to Toyota. What are they basing that on? I know Ford has made big strides in improving reliability (the only place to go was up :) ) and Toyota has slipped a bit but I personally wouldn't call them equal in the reliability dept.

    -Frank
  • dcm61dcm61 Member Posts: 1,567
    Read the fine print. IIRC, it's based on the 1st 90 days. :sick:
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    And 90 day reliability has been touted by every manufacturer that comes out on top.
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    I always consdered the 90 day reliability to be "stuff we didn't screw up during assembly". Longer term reliability relates more to quality materials and engineering/design IMHO.
  • bigelmbigelm Member Posts: 995
    There's a thread about it over at Nabisco.... I guess I could say we had fun with it :)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Wifey wants a widescreen like my 200W.

    I think I'll give her this one, and buy myself a Nuvi 680, for the MSN traffic and gas prices.

    I've been testing a GPS for a manufacturer (sorry, cannot reveal the name) that has both and I think it would be cool if the info were more up to date. The traffic seems to be about half hour out of date. The gas prices are about a day old.

    Still, it's useful as a reference for gas prices. You often find 12 cents/gallon lower prices less than a mile away.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/05-01-200- - 8/0004804750&EDATE=

    All model lines are up, with the Forester up 49%, thanks to the redesign. Also, Forester wins MT (June issue) crossover SUV comparo.

    Bob
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    Great news all around for Subaru. Note Forester outsold typical sales leader Outback by quite a large margin... I know it's early, but it seems the new model's a hit!

    The one thing I can't understand is why Legacy sales have picked up dramatically the last couple months. I'm thrilled, as this reaction to Legacy is long overdue, but I'm puzzled. It was overlooked the first few years of this generation, and suddenly near the end of its run sales jump up. There aren't any substantial changes in the product, and there aren't any substantial changes in incentives from previous years. Even the '09s with the new Harman Kardon sound systems aren't out yet to potentially affect sales numbers. ... Anyone have guesses?
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    There aren't any substantial changes in the product, and there aren't any substantial changes in incentives from previous years. Even the '09s with the new Harman Kardon sound systems aren't out yet to potentially affect sales numbers. ... Anyone have guesses?

    Perhaps traditional Legacy buyers do NOT want a larger vehicle that is coming. I'm one of them...driving an 05 VDC Outback. I have sat in the 09 Forester and would choose it over the Outback at this time. With the back seat foot room problem solved, the Forester will probably get most Outback 2.5i wagon buyers. Others may be betting on higher prices for the next Legacy and are not willing to spend more.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Incredible really, given the market is tanking badly.

    The best part is that Forester sales are up 49% and that has not hurt any other model. No cannibalization whatsever.

    Just incredible.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I looked on motortrend.com and it's not up yet.

    What competitors did it beat?
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I don't know. I was just repeating what was stated in the link. The usual suspects I would assume.

    Bob
  • dcm61dcm61 Member Posts: 1,567
    I looked on motortrend.com and it's not up yet. What competitors did it beat?

    Obviously the Outlander wasn't included, because otherwise it would have won. Yet another "paid advertisement" by Subaru. ;)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    :D

    You read me like a book!

    Hilarious!
  • redrose1redrose1 Member Posts: 49
    We have an 05 Outback - 6 cyl. We are planning to buy a Forester soon - we can"t decide between a turbo or a non-turbo. Any suggestions?

    We use it for city driving and some long road trips.

    Thanks!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.