By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
i wouldn't buy a new accord coupe today if only for the lame color choices....
off topic, but i wonder when a redesigned acura CL is due; its current design has been out some years now yes?
Honda Automobile Division
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
1919 Torrance Blvd
Torrance, CA 90501-2746
Unfortunately, they don't have an email address or website link that I can find to send my opinions.
If Honda sells 400,000+ Accords like they have been doing the past several years. (Coupes and Sedans combined) Where is the incentive for them to change when possibly 1000 people send letters complaining about the looks of the car?
1,000 complaints
400,000 purchases
Hmmmmmm?
If anyone has any links to reviews of the 6 speed or knows of any car magazine that has done a review on this model please let me know, thanks.
Car and Driver (I think) did a comparison test between a 2003 EX V6 6-speed and a 2003 MB CLK320. Good article.
What was Honda thinking???
As with anything, its a matter of tastes.
got quoted good price on the '03 EX-L 4cyl MT coupe ....$21k so I estimate that would be near $23 OTD. SF-BAY
$23k vs $16k OTD [for the '01 EX MT I got a few days ago...super clean and and still under warranty.]
I saved an initial cost of $7k...which is a big deal to ME [saving for the casa]. and less stress to me due to not worrying about anyone dinging, bumping, etc. a BRAND NEW car. maybe I saved $10 Giving myself $3k for avoid extra emotional stress?
So I will see you guys on the highway [from behind -so I'll be seeing the '03s best view] and see you over in the regular accord coupe group. Maybe a newer coupe is in my future? but that 04 acura TSX is sweet-tight and zippy! I'd like to see a review comparing the two. different I know, but would be interesting comparison.
cheers
e
midnight_stang: I think the interior is the best thing about the new coupe. The seats are much more comfortable than the previous model. I did, ironically, have trouble getting comfortable in the new coupe even though it has a new telescopic feature on the tilt wheel. Honda as well as the other imports could learn one thing from GM, that is how to make a proper tilt wheel. In my '00 coupe, there is a very narrow comfort range due to the fact that the wheel doesn't low tilt enough. If someone drives my car it takes me forever to get back into the comfort zone. In the new coupe, it seems even more difficult. The seating position is now, unfortunately,lower and the wheel doesn't seem to tilt lower to compensate. Have you, or anyone else,noticed this?
1) a pivot that kinda extends the seat belt forward so it's easier to reach after entering vehicle. on my 1999 solara, the seat belt was easy to reach cause there was a pivot that moved the seat belt forward so it's easier to reach.
2) a pivot for the head rest-- again, so it pivots forward and you can actually rest your head on the headrest without it being uncomforable-- the solara had this.
i have a 2001 coupe now-- i miss those two items that my solara had-- but the coupe has a better center armrest and coinbox.
there is a crease down the side of the '03 coupe...it just isn't crisp enough imo...
http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-article?article_id=113992
I have my windows tinted and so far I haven't noticed the tint to be any different where the dot matrix pattern is. Don't know what the dots are for though.
As for the driving position, once I got used to the higher dash I am more comfortable in my 03 than I was in my 99 sedan or my 01 coupe.
Seems like every new car uses those grab-type door handles, I wish the Altima had them..
The styling on the Accord coupe/sedan has definitely sparked controversy, yet remains pretty conservative at the same time. With a cd of .30 for the sedan, and .29 for the coupe, they are becoming significantly more efficient. I suspect more and more cars are being designed using CAD, which means they start with a highly efficient exterior shell, and they design head lights and other elements around that. I think this is partially what is driving the funky styling that we are seeing on Hondas, BMWs (check out the 7 and 5 series...whoa), and a few other models. Efficient doesn't necessarily mean pretty.
But I agree that the styling on the Accord coupe can be improved with just a few little tweaks. Go to VTEC.com to see photos of the new Honda Inspire, which is basically the Japanese version of our US Accord. The Japanese version gets a normal grille, integrated fog lamps instead of these cheap-looking dealer-installed aftermarket lamps that we get, a stronger character line, slightly sleeker rear end that helps a lot, and turn signals in the side mirros (a la TSX). How can the same Accord look so much nicer in Japan, when it's basically the same car? Honda is concerned that if they made our Accord look too nice, fewer people would buy Acuras...
However the Accord's driver's seatback release lever, located much higher, is better (if one uses the coat hanger often).
As Accord owners, we probably know already that Honda's "design language" and overall philosophy differ in many areas from Toyota's. Accords tend to grow on a person over time while Camrys/Solaras give almost instant gratification or repulsion as the case may be.
Myself, drove away from the Toyota dealership feeling that my 03 Accord coupe was the better personal choice.