By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Kind of like the "L" versions of the BMW's?
First time, you are interested on why you have a dislike for it, but know you are jus dissin the auto. Its still a max, and it will still live up to Max capabilities, with a little more, so we know ur mad bout it, but you dont need to be constant with it, I see your urge to complain, but seriously you come up with the same comment every time, and if your not gonna buy it, fine, we've heard it once, dont need to hear it again, it wont make Nissan change the grill(although most including i dislike it)
thats all
Also, the G35 sedan doesnt have 280? surprised...
However, my logic stands as thus: unlike the 01 Altima, which was a cheap econo car. The 03 Max is a good looking, respectable sedan in its own right while the 04 will be a totally new design (doesn't even resemble the previous generations).
Thoughts?
If you go below 28, you get Alty & its crappy interior. You also get the Accord V6 and its nice interior, but then again that Accord exterior design!
I think a good reason why Japanese automobiles built in Japan are better than American built Japanese automobiles is the fact that Japan has no military. The agreement they signed after WWII stated that they are not allowed to have a military (or something that resembles that. I am not totally sure). Without having to spend any money on a military, think of how much more they can spend on building materials as well as the factories and people they employ at said factories. It now makes sense why the build quality in Japan would be better than here. I don't know how much the U.S. spends on military, but I would gather it is a quite impressive amount.
That said, I am gonna stick to the fact that products built in Japan are always going to be superior to Japanese products built stateside. It just makes sense to me.
Obi
If you want RWD, Nissan wants you to look at the G35 instead.
Yeah....go and look @ the G35 for 3-5 k more money.
I'm waiting to see the performance specs of the
'04 model Max compared to the G35. This could prove
to be an interesting scenario with the Max now rated @ 265 hp. What do you think?
berbel
I only find I get torque steer on my '02 if I gun it at 0-15 mph. It doesn't really bother me, but you have to be aware of it. I was willing to accept it in the current model Max is exchange for the higher horsepower, but I was hoping that they would address it in the '04.
(taste)
Mnn so your point is what? Your a whiner? Whiners keep Nissan in business? You obviously care about the car deeply. If you decide to NOT buy the car because you don't like the front grille versus safety, price, features...well that is your prerogative.
If we don't like the car, for whatever reason, we can discuss it in this forum as well as make our feelings known to the Nissan Corp.
(taste)
I would certainly agree with you. Likewise others such as myself are free to make counterpoints to what we feel to be inane points.
Brand loyalty is important to car manufacturers all over the world.
(taste) Yes I would agree with that.
How do think GM or Honda stay in business, considering the dull crap they push out year after year? Buyer loyalty!
(taste)
GM - Because they are one of two domestic US auto manufacturers and have been in the business a long time in the worlds largest car market. Second they are providing huge incentives and financing these days which is why they have actually INCREASED their marketshare (mostly at the expense of FORD) in the last year.
Honda - Reputation and product.
So I think, in time, Nissan will heed the will of their consumers, especially if sales go down.
(taste)
This cannot be empirically proven on a car that hasn't even been released to the marketplace. Maybe you will be right. Maybe you will need some cheese with your whine when Sales increase...
And, by the way, I don't happen to like pepper in my flysh*t!....
(taste)
Uhmm... thing you misunderstood the analogy. I suggest you reread.
and maybe $30,000.00 USD is nothing to you, but that's $45,000.00 CDN, plus 15% tax, and that's almost a year's salary to us "whiners".
(taste)
How much you earn or do not earn is none of my business. My point is a simple one. If you are purchasing a mass produced car deciding not to buy it because of the front grille points to a lack of good decisionmaking skills in my book BECAUSE the purchase is not a superflous one for you. It is a major decision. If you have money to burn then you can buy on aesthetics because anyone who spends 100K+ for a car is not buying for functionality. They are buying for status, personal tastes, or just a whim.
So I need to be EXTREMELY pleased before I part with my hard-earned money.
(taste) Works for me. If you feel a very elegant front grille is your #1 priority for buying a car (over the above stated reasons) far be it from me to stand in your way.
You must be very young.
(taste) Maturity is not defined by age only enhanced by it. My age (as is yours) is irrelevant to this discussion.
Stir that.
Honda = Bland
Toyota = More Bland
Nissan = Exciting and Fun
Obi
Speaking of Honda I did purchase a new Ody in 2003 because family transportation was needed. The NAV + Dealer added DVD is an incredible way to travel for space/comfort/and sanity. I don't care how uncool driving a Mini is I love it.
As for the Max it is a nice FWD drive sport sedan for the middle class. If you take it more seriously than that you are taking yourself far too seriously. Call me when you are ready to spend $50,000+ on a car and we can talk aesthetics.
taste - that's YOUR opinion. Maybe you'll be proven correct, but don't preach it as gospel to us. Personally, I don't like the grill, but the main reason I wouldn't buy the new Max is the price increase.
Do you drive an Eagle Talon or something? Sad....Very sad.
Obi
Let's not kid ourselves: Nissan hasn't gone bold and aggressive with their styling of late purely for the sake of being bold and aggressive. They've done it to survive, because the direction they took in the '90s simply didn't work and nearly drove them out of business. Had the "old" Nissan been more successful, we would'nt be seeing such radical design changes today.
Put it this way: did the Buccanneers change their game plan at halftime of the Super Bowl? Only with slight tweaks, because it was working beautifully and they were winning the game. Were the Raiders forced to alter their game plan in response? Significantly, since they were getting killed.
Now, tell me -- between Honda and Nissan, which one is the Bucs and which is the Raiders in this analogy?
http://www.nissan-techinfo.com/nissan/pdfs/og//maxima/2004-Nissan- -Maxima.pdf
Also, there is a link somewhere in that site to the 2004 Maxima Navigation system manual.
They just have very different philosophies. Take their SUV's. The Hondas maximize the utility value, the Nissans maximize the excitement value. Both are probably near the top of the industry at what they do. Yes, Nissan did change strategy, and it's working incredibly well!
judgement until I actually see the car in person.
It can't be any worse than that of the Passat with
that huge "VW" placed in the middle or is it the
other design characteristics that seem to be displeasing so many?
berbel
Nissangirl....GREAT POSTS!!
But if you look, everyone has completely bashed the interior of the Altima, but I dont see that hurting sales too much. I would DRIVE the new Maxima first before all the Nissan-Bashers pass judgement. I would be willing to bet its 10x better than previous models, although I have to say, I melt everytime I see a 2003 Max SE with Xenon headlamps, good show Nissan. Does anyone know if the 04 Max will have HID?! I hope so.
Finally, anyone seen the new Titan to come out this fall...Im not a truck person, but if I was, this would be at the top of my list for the interior, very nice.
The Maxima was reasonably fast, 6.3 seconds 0-60 with a 14.8 second 1/4-mile. Driving impressions were good; they said it felt more refined than the Altima, which is on the same platform. However, it suffered from torque steer just like the Altima does, and they suggested that it would benefit from the limited-slip differential or an AWD option. Estimated price as equipped was $34k.