Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Honesty, I thought it was a miserable little car, but as far as small cars go, it wasn't too bad. Back then, I thought *any* little car was a miserable little car! At that time, I was driving a '69 Dart, and for whatever reason, he challenged me to a drag race. Now my Dart was just a slant six, but I walked him like a dog. I don't know how fast my buddy ever got his Horizon up to, but I backed off at around 90, and then slowed down so he could catch up to me, and then at the light he started cursing me out, calling me a psycho for going that fast!
Then I saw him a few days later, and he said his car wasn't running right! He said ever since he tried to race me, it just didn't seem to act right. Naturally, he tried to blame that on me. I honestly thought that in a drag race, he should've been able to take me. My 225 had about 110 hp (it was 145 gross), while his 2.2 had 96 hp. But then that little Horizon must've weighed about 800 lb or more less, and didn't have a p/s or a/c belt sapping power (I dunno how much power those accessories would really rob, though). Plus, I'm sure it would've been geared quicker than my Dart's 2.76:1.
I think the Neon would be a superior car IF they could keep the reliability up. The Omni/Horizon usually rated worse to much-worse than average, but back then, just about every small domestic car did, so it fit right in. Also, the engines and transmissions usually weren't the problem. It would be electrical-related, or something breaking off, stuff like that.
Today though, the Neon tends to blow head gaskets. It used to have a reliable tranny, because its tranny actually dated back to the OminRizon tranny! But now they have the 4-speed auto, which isn't as durable. That little 4-cylinder may not be too hard on it, though. Unfortunately, it still rates fairly low in reliability. Even a Cavalier is rated "average" by CR.
I think the Neon is a good handling little car, and it's one of the most comfortable little cars on the market...for my body, at least. But they just need to do something about its reliability. And figure out a way to get a power window motor to fit in the rear doors!
Oh, so I'm supposed to be talking about obscure cars? :-) Well, the other day I saw a MINT 1983? Honda Accord sedan. It really looked absolutely brand new -- I didn't get to see it close enough to determine whether it had been redone and repainted, or if it was really a shiny and rust-free original.
-Andrew L
-Andrew L
This got brought up on another list, and nobody over there can identify it.
Maybe they should come up with a new name! or re-use Dart, which i always liked.
It's funny, they're very trendy. You'll see executives driving them around.
-juice
In overall size though, a Dart would fall about midway between a Stratus sedan and an Intrepid. Those who remember the Dart or, worse, still own one (like me ;-), would probably balk at the name being put on a new small car.
The old Dart was known for being roomy for its class, comfortable, ultra-reliable, and an intimidating performer with the right engine options (you could get up to a 426 Hemi in 1968, and some of the HO 273 and 340/360 versions offer blistering performance, even by today's standards).
The Neon actually fits most of those categories. It's roomy and comfortable (to me, at least...it and the Toyota Corolla are the only small cars I really feel comfortable in nowadays), and the high-output engines are impressive in their output. Even the base 132 hp engine was pretty awesome when it first came out. Unfortunately, one category where these things are the Anti-Dart is reliability.
If Chrysler can keep what's good about the Neon, and up the reliability/durability of the thing, then they'll have the right to call it "Dart". And hopefully, it'll use the same font that Ford does, so you can still swap the "D" and the "F", just like you could back in the day ;-)
Here's a site that might be helpful:
http://www.carsfromitaly.com/others/index.html
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
They were also thinking it was some kind of kit-car, because the headlights in the one pic look like they're off a '40 Ford!
The Picasso is a really cool car though, if you can get past the looks (hey, it is a Citroen). I think it's like a top 5 seller in England actually.
The urban areas themselves have decent roads.
Have you seen the Renault Kangoo? Now *that* is seriously ugly.
-juice
Duster? nice...
-juice
-Jason
Is it something obscure enough that I should walk over to that other building so I can say I saw it? ;-) Sounded like a pretty cool car, but I think I'd be afraid to drive something like that!
-juice
I'm still thinking OSCA, Siata or some even more obscure Italian car. I hope Shifty's expert comes up w something.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
The cars that are in dealers now actually aren't Z8s, they're Alpina Roadster V8s. The main difference is the drivetrain. The Z8 had the 5 liter 400 HP V8 from the M5, and a 6-speed manual. The Alpina has a 4.8 liter 375 HP V8 and a 5-speed automatic. I suspect it would have sold better if it had had that configuration all along.
He also said that there was a button marked "sport" on the dash, but didn't know what it was. This lady actually made the comment about the car being so fast it was dangerous, and her husband had replied "then you should press the sport button!"
What would that button do, anyway? I'm guessing it changes the suspension settings or something like that?
It's a fake. The headlight rims are from a '39 Ford for one thing. DOH!
But they said it did indeed look "Osca-ish" to them, too, but not really, as they probably have owned or brokered Oscas at one time.
-juice
Also, sadly enough, sometimes people take real cars and butcher them up, so that's also a possibility.
But I think you could safely say this-- that to a whole bunch of people who buy and sell every car known to man throughout the world--they don't recognize the car as anything familiar. And these are people who actually know what a Woodhill Wildfire is.
About as rare as the BMW 850.
There's a guy locally who owns an 850csi - aka the M8. They came with a 6-speed manual, a lot more power than the "standard" 850, bigger brakes and a Motorsports tuned suspension. I think only a couple of hundred were imported to the US.
Unbelievable indeed.
Steve, Host
-juice
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
-juice
Hey, I like that Aspen :-) Though you're right -- the Aspen and Volare were known for rust problems and painfully slow acceleration. Overall, the previous Dart and Valiant were probably better cars, though I like the look of the Aspen and Volare better.
-Andrew L
-Andrew L
Regards... Vikd
They were also some of the better performers of the time, being available with a 360-4bbl right up through the end in 1980. The Roadrunner and Aspen R/T were some of the faster cars of the late 70's. They also made fine police cars. The Michigan State Police clocked a '79 Volare at 0-60 in 8.7 seconds, and 0-100 in 22.8. That's actually faster than the current Impala, Intrepid, and Crown Vic police cruisers clock in at!
Sure, it's easy to poke fun at them today, but then again, look at what they competed against...Nova, Maverick, Granada, Hornet, and later, the Fairmont and, to a lesser degree, the downsized Malibu/LeMans, etc.
This car had a well-maintained 360 4-bbl. and was an absolute blast to drive on the highway. It was quick, solid as rocks, very comfortable and had seating that was much better and thicker than the '77 Volare that I owned.
The only thing that this Aspen lacked was a decent radio. It was AM only and the antenna connections were probably loosened when the Motorola police/fire band radio was installed. Being that it was in a "plain white wrapper", it did turn a few heads, as unmarked cars will do.
Then this morning saw what I guess was an early 80's Cadillac maybe a Seville - the one with the humpback or bustle-back trunk. Tan on black, lots of chrome and this rather large flying lady hood ornament - I assume that wasn't stock.
Those fake convertible carriage roofs were also popular items. Oddly, I think the Seville is one of the few cars that they don't look that bad on. With its angular lines and frameless windows, it can almost get away with that look!
I always thought that Ford did a somewhat better job with their similarly-styled Continentals (were they Continentals or Town Cars?)of the time.
The sloped-off rear was a popular design fetish in the 70's, although nobody really took it to the extreme that Cadillac did with the '80-85 Seville. The '74-76 Buick Riviera shows a hint of it, especially the way the rear window crease continues down below the beltline, into the rear quarter panel. The '77-79 Mark V also had a pronounced slope in the back, as did just about every personal luxury coupe back then.
I think one of my favorites of that style is actually the '81-83 Imperial! Probably that and the '77-79 Mark V. I'm starting to like the '74-76 Riviera, but for what I admit is a stupid reason...that car ended up in the "Grand Theft Auto" videogame series!
Then, this morning, on the drive to work one of the new Maserati coupes drove by. Sweet, high pitched V8 sound, too. He was heading to DC, near Georgetown.
What was really surprising is that is saw a 2nd Maserati, yellow convertible this time, later on the same drive! And those are rare! We were on the Whitehurst Freeway in Georgetown.
If you've seen Kevin Costner's "No Way Out", that's the bridge I'm talking about.
-juice
Pics don't do it justice - it really is breathtaking.
-Jason