By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-juice
Take that a little further and you might see other Mazda6 based vehicles offered as hybrids. The next Lincoln Aviator and a Ford variant. Possibly a Volvo or two. Just to name a few.
It seems to me that a lot of hybrid competition is going to be out there in the next couple of years so experimenting with an RX-8 hybrid just doesn't seem all that off the wall to me.
-juice
I agree with you, Ateixeira, the RX-8 is currently much to low of volume for a hybrid version. And the sad thing is the RX-8 volume will go lower,if it survives at all even though it corners almost as good as a go-kart!
YMMV,
MidCow
Anyway the rotary engine is not very fuel efficient and deos not seem like a good match for a hybrid version.
YMMV,
MidCow
Let's take note, dealerships are many times required to buy a certain number of a specific model upon introduction. If it sells or doesn't all depends upon the city/market they are in. If it doesn't, they could trade with another dealer that IS selling them, to push it off their lots and make way for something they might be selling better of.
Flop is, when your aiming for 100K (Nissan Titan) and your not even close because they over estimated their market.
http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=101199
Possibly true, but I never trust anything that man says, after his claim that Ford was going to go "green" very quickly back in the late 1990's. Still waiting for it to happen, while I follow that Expedition down the road...
Even though the Escape hybrid is out, let's compare volume and look at CAFE...
-juice
http://www.bluewaternetwork.org/
___You do know the Ford Excursion is greener then the Toyota Sequoia and Land Cruiser, right? You also know Ford has sold more PZEV’s then any other company IIRC, right?
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
___2000 Honda Insight 5-speed #203 - 92.5 lmpg
Another factor. The Toyota Tacoma has the worst rollover rating of any PU sold in the USA....
I'll take the Ranger..
Oh, don't get me started on "green" Toyota Motor Corp...
Does anybody here actually have one? Pros? Cons?
Thanks
___Look up the 2004 Toyota Sequoia 2WD or 4WD over at the EPA’s fuel economy site: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm. Both receive a big ** 0 ** on their emissions scores. There isn’t a Ford or GM that scores this bad!
___It looks like the just listed 2005’s finally cleaned up there act. Have you seen any 2005 Sequoia’s around your locale recently or are they all the older ones?
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
We're talking real world mileage, people. Just like every other engine on Earth, from Prius Hybrid to Ram Hemi, you ain't gittin' EPa numbers on economy. Or are you?
After several real world road test, including Edmunds.com and MT SUV of the Year, the Escape seems more likely to get you around 25-26 MPG than 30+ overall. Same with a Prius, getting 45 MPG instead of 50+.
Yet, see tests of 4-cylinder SUV's like Rav4, and CRV. They are testing around 22-23 MPG overall!
So is the $30k Escape Hybrid really all it's hyped up to be? Is it worth $30k ONLY if it get 30MPG? Is it too heavy, at 3800+ lbs, over 500-600 lbs. more than the others?
Is it giving "V6 performance"? It doesn't tow like a V6. It's 0-60 runs are more like a Rav4 than like a Escape V6, which also has lost some speed on it's fastball, with a weight gain over the years. It has the torque to "feel" like a six, which is probably what Ford means. But MT says it runs out of steam at midrange.
Is it better to save $8-10k and get a Rav4/CRV, and lose only 3-4 MPG, and get similar performance? Which is the better value?
DrFill
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_- id=8777&page_number=1
I average 25.1 mpg with my '98 Forester, which was rated 21/27. So with that kind of improvement I'd move into the high 20s.
You could save $10 grand if you got an X model instead of the Escape hybrid. About $6-7 grand even if you got a Premium/heated leather/moonroof.
Subaru sells a PZEV Outback in California, but not a Forester. The Outback gets 23/28 (22/28 with auto) and is rated PZEV.
So there are plenty of alternatives out there.
Ford kinda cheated and compares hybrid prices to its V6, but I agree, performance is closer to the Escape I4, and then you're looking at an $8000 premium for the hybrid.
-juice
Meanwhile the Japanese have *5*:
Old Prius
New Prius
Insight
Civic
Accord
America is falling behind.
So US has two now and more soon.
-juice
Within the next year or two, Ford is adding a hybrid Mariner and Tribute (both are built in the same plant as the Escape) as well as the Fusion hybrid (I'm guessing the Merc variation will get it too) to the mix. Rumors of a hybrid Freestyle have also popped up. Who knows what else? Any Lincolns or PAG vehicles?
Also, Ford took so long to get the Escape out because they wanted to do it themselves and do it right. That takes time no matter who you are.
The Sequoias we have are all 2005s and that's what I am basing the emission comparison on for both.
Isn't the same V8 used in all three large SUVs? Why is the Land Cruiser and LX470 still in the pollution toilet?
I guess they'd rather use proven technology (diesel) than unproven hybrid technology?
I don't really know what DCX is working on but I've never heard of a hybrid being developed by them either. That's not to say they aren't though.
I have nothing against diesel, in fact I prefer the traditional ICE over anything else, but it's never going to be as clean as a hybrid system.
Chrysler may have started on their hybrid before Toyota. Their first 1997 ESX was an attempt to build an Intrepid size car that got 80 mpg. The last model built the ESX3 is capable of 72 mpg. They do not feel people will pay the additional $7500 for a hybrid Intrepid. Chrysler would not approve until they reached the 80 mpg goal.
http://www.allpar.com/model/intrepid-esx3.html
1997 = Toyota PRODUCTION vehicle (Old Prius)
Toyota was always ahead on the curve.
If Toyota focused on hybrids instead of diesels for Europe, that probably seems like a dumb idea now.
-juice
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/motoring/story.jsp?st- ory=584161
Ford has the same opportunity with the Escape
The truck is dark gray metallic, and has side curtain air bags, cargo cover, and 115v plug as options. Is there a con? Still seeing how long it needs to warm up in the mornings before it hits critical mass for all-electric power. Also to see how it performs in cold weather. It's garaged at night, but is parked outdoors during business hours. Best part about the deal? Purchased at invoice, Uncle Sam and Uncle George (Pataki) tax breaks that put cost of vehicle in realm of '05 XLT.
Perhaps it will be tough. Diesels aren't as happy with shutting down as often, at every light for instance.
Maybe only if it's warm enough.
-juice
I can see a mild hybrid diesel getting a small improvement, but not a dramatic one like the Prius.
-juice
That's my concern. Diesels would probably prefer to stay idling just to stay warm.
-juice
40 mpg is not big deal over there, many cars match that already.
-juice
http://media.ford.com/newsroom/feature_display.cfm?release=19373
Also try McDaniel Ford in Hicksville LI. Did an order from them but in meantime got better immediate deal upstate, so canceled. They are good for service and have trained Hybrid techs.