Chevy Malibu Maxx

1232426282995

Comments

  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    "Well, the average customer is brain washed by the "anything imported, including Yugo, is better" mentality"

    too often it is true though, that's the part YOU DON'T GET.

    and for the consumer, perception is belief. If it looks like its built better sometimes its because it is.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    is sometimes the make or break decision. My friend wouldn't even look at the Chevrolet Venture when he went minivan shopping simply because he though Chevrolet cars were not that reliable or as reliable as the Nissan Maxima they had.
  • theo2709theo2709 Member Posts: 476
    I tried to suggest the new Malibu to someone I know who was Camry shopping and he said flat out "I'm not buying an American car". Detroit needs to change this quick.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    how will they change this????
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    Is to build cars better than the imports for a few model generations in a row in a majority of segments and all of fit and finish, powertrain, reliability, handling, ergonomics.
    Just like Camcord and Civic/Corolla did in the nineties against under-engineered and dated domestic vehicles.

    Or find new segments like the Maxx and hope it flies.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It'll be a long, hard road to redemption. Some GM ads even admit this, though they imply they're already back.

    Public perception will lag reality by about 5 years. Hyundai is only now getting taken seriously. The next entry-level Kia will have variable valve timing, yet it won't get any respect for years, is my guess.

    Perception hurts resale values. I just saw a Malibu ad for $1000 cash back on the brand new model, seems a little soon to me. Chevy might shoot themselves in the foot with their pricing strategy. Bad resale will only make people turn to imports.

    -juice
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Member Posts: 1,031
    ateixeira: i too have seen those ads from GM stating that they are now back from their era of "bad quality"...but is that actually true??? i honestly do now think so...
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Dunno, one thing Lutz has done is actually cut costs, i.e. thinner carpets, delete ABS as standard, etc.

    -juice
  • joey2brixjoey2brix Member Posts: 463
    The Malibu is a prime example of what's still wrong with GM. A car in the Accord/Camery class needs to be something special and unique to win sales. Does the Malibu look great and offer anything better then the competition? No. The web page for the Malibu even has a button for fleet sales info! That inspires a car buyer like me that the car's basically a commercial utility van!
    Chevy's still has the old Blazer, Tracker, and Malibu still being sold as '04's! Why bother?

    The Equinox: great looking, mediocre engine, 2 years late. SSR and HRR: PT Cruiser knock offs, 4 years too late for a retro look fad that's already fading by the gloomy sales of T'birds and PT's.

    Once Olds is killed off this year, Saturn will be moved into the fold for '05: Selling a few other GM cars with a few panel changes.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Umm...actually, it does.

    The front seat folds flat, and you can get a built-in factory DVD. The Maxx will be unique because Accord and Camry no longer come in wagons.

    mediocre engine

    On paper, maybe, with iron block and pushrods.

    But...go drive one. It's quick and very efficient.

    -juice
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    So when does the Maxx watch begin?

    When can we expect to see these at SOME local dealer somewhere?

    And who will be the first to:

    *see one
    *drive one
    *buy one
    *trade it off for something else?

    :)
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    When is GM going to put their money where their mouth is and increase that silly 3/36 warranty? I've been told that they will not increase the warranty as long as they are offering 0% loans. For my money, They can keep the 0% loan and show me they think their cars are at least as good as a Hyundia.

    I will be replacing my Saturn soon and the Maxx sounds interesting, but I don't think I should have to spend a few thousand dollars extra just to get the the same warranty Hyundia offers free.

    I want to buy American, but I don't have to.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    soggydog : Don't get too excited about that warranty. More holes than swiss cheese in it after 2-3 years. I'll take a better car any day and Hyundia still ranks among the lowest in long term quality.

    rctennis3811 : GM ranks in the top 5 in most quality surveys these days. Far cry from even just a few years ago. Most GM brands also rate higher than Toyota and Honda in satisfaction.

    ateixeira : $1000 isn't much by today's standards and it seems like everyone needs a little something to move cars these days. I see even Toyota is offering low interest loans on 04s already in the paper today.
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Member Posts: 1,031
    better satisfaction that Toyota and Honda??? hahahah, u must be drunk!
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    My son bought a 03 Hyundia nine months ago and it has been perfect so far. When you are on a limited budget, you can't afford to have a major repair bill when you are still making car payments. I know of one instance where Hyundia replaced an automatic transmission at 98K and another where they are replacing a engine short block at 60K. I like American cheese, but Swiss ain't so bad. Try it, you might like it.

    Basically, all I'm saying is that if GM thinks the car is so good, what's wrong with backing it up with a little better warranty?

    Some bean counter in GM has probably figured out that extra warranty protection cost X amount of dollars in profit.
     
    When people go with a car like Hyundia and get good service out of it, they will likely buy another and another. On the other hand when someone buys a GM auto that turns out to be high maintenance, they may never buy another.

    In fact I have a hard time getting my wife to even look at a car on the Chevy lot because we had a bad experience with a 78 Malibu and a 83 Caviler. I don't think she knew Saturn was made by the same company. Back then it was almost kept a secret. I think they should keep it that way.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    I once saw 03 Camry LE sedans in the paper with $800 cash or 0% for 36 months plus $500 cash. (Toyota Summer Selldown 2003)
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    After 3 years the warranty is not bumper to bumper (at least it's not anymore) and it's not transferable. Maybe the warranties were better back when you bought, can't say.

    Regardless, Hyundia still ranks on the bottom of long term reliability and until that changes I wouldn't even look at one.
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    OK: I finally woke up and saw your flag. I think the warranties for Hyundia are different in the US.

    I don't think Hyunida is by any means a perfect car, but their learning curve has been sharper than most other manufactures and they are sure taking sales away form the big three. At first it was entry level, but now they have moved up to mid stream.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I agree, $1000 is not much, but look at how soon that appeared. It'll double or triple before the end of the model year, I'd bet on that. That will erode resale and hurt the first few that bought Malibus.

    Camrys have $800 incentives at the end of the model year.

    Buy American. OK. But what's American? Chrysler is now owned by Germans. GM is bringing platforms designed in Europe, Ford too.

    The Subaru Outback is built in Indiana and GM is the biggest shareholder in their parent company. The PT Cruiser is made in Mexico and profits are sent to the parent company in Germany. Which is more American?

    Globalization has made it a basically moot point.

    FWIW, Hyundai's warranty in the US is 5/60 B2B and then 10/100 powertrain. If you sell it, only the 5/60 portion transfers, but it's still bumper to bumper.

    So even a 1 year old, used Hyundai has a better warranty than a new Chevy.

    I think Chevy could at least match Toyota, Nissan, and Subaru with a 5/60 powertrain, 3/36 B2B. They can't leap frog Cadillac's warranty, no way.

    -juice
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,344
    Warranties have little or nothing to do with actual quality. They are a marketing tool just like other incentives. Some use cash back or low interest, others use warranties or a combination of all. One could in fact argue that the longer the warranty offered, the worse is the quality of the vehicle and the manufacturer is using the warranty to try and offset that. Certainly that was the case with Chryslers 5/50 powertrain warranty in the 60s which was an industry first.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    I see Hyundai plastering the 5/60K warranty AND $1000 loyal owners cash on all new 2004 Hyundai Elantras.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Warranties are an incentive in a way, though probably less so for say Toyota and more so for Kia. I'd prefer to not pay for 5 years and get a better car instead. I find most issues with car come in the first year or two and then many years latter when stuff wears out.

    As for the American thing, I try and buy from GM, Chrysler and Ford because they employ the most people in Canada and do the most R&D here also. I also own stock in at least 2 of them in my pension and mutual funds. That said I wouldn't buy if I thought they were inferior but I personally have great experiences with GM so I will likely stick with them.
  • soggydogsoggydog Member Posts: 67
    If you're saying, "Warranties don't matter, it the quality that counts" I think i've heard that before, only exchange the word "size" for warranty. The only equalizer is money.

    How many of those who say warranties aren't a big issue then turn around and buy the extended warranty?

    In the fall of 2000 I was looking to buy a smaller Crew Cab truck. I narrowed it down to three, Ford sports track, Chevy S-10, and Nissan Frontier. Both Ford and Chevy were more expensive and Nissan had a 5/60 drivetrain warranty. I now have 30K trouble free miles on my Frontier and still have the security of two years remaining on the drivetrain warranty. If I had gone with Ford or Chevy I would be out in the cold.

    Warranties are going to be at least a part the picture when I look to replace the Saturn.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Warranties are always part of any purchase. All I'm saying is, it's not in the top five of things most people look at when buying.
  • exalteddragon1exalteddragon1 Member Posts: 729
    "Buy American. OK. But what's American? Chrysler is now owned by Germans. GM is bringing platforms designed in Europe, Ford too.

    The Subaru Outback is built in Indiana and GM is the biggest shareholder in their parent company. The PT Cruiser is made in Mexico and profits are sent to the parent company in Germany. Which is more American?

    Globalization has made it a basically moot point.

    FWIW, Hyundai's warranty in the US is 5/60 B2B and then 10/100 powertrain. If you sell it, only the 5/60 portion transfers, but it's still bumper to bumper.

    So even a 1 year old, used Hyundai has a better warranty than a new Chevy.

    I think Chevy could at least match Toyota, Nissan, and Subaru with a 5/60 powertrain, 3/36 B2B. They can't leap frog Cadillac's warranty, no way.

    -juice"

    MODERATOR: I promise I am talking about the Malibu :)
    1.)
    Don't give up so easily. Crysler merged with Diamler. Then German managment used the 'wolf-pack' stragetgy like they did with WWII u-boats to destroy crysler managment (I watch too much History channel). They forget about American law, and many former managers are fighting to get their company back.
     
    2.)
    Just b/c GM and Ford are bringing platformes desgned in Europe, this does not mean the product is european. Those platforms are desrgned by ford and GM subsidiaries like Opel and Volvo, respectively. Your still buying United States Product, thank G-D.

    3.)
    The Chevy Malibu has one thing that the accord and camry don't, and that its made by our brothers and sisters in America. It sounds childish butthe top 3% of tax payers pay 70% of US taxes. GM and Ford are in those top 3%, and those taxes go to schools, roads, parks, and the water we bathe with. An Accord or Camry don't have that, they pay mostly operating taxes here. Lutz talks about this issue in general in an Edmuns interview with him.

    I don't mean buy American just because its American, but should that not be a factor in our descision? Someone said how he doesn't care about GM's cost structure, only about what he gets for his product. Well, alright, but remember JFK? "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    #1 sounds interesting, but for now we can agree the company is under German control.

    Many "American" cars are assembled overseas.

    I think as a tie-breaker, sure. But they have to compete with product, not with buyer pity.

    Any how, my country is Brazil, guess I'll have to buy a Golf (made in Brazil) or a Mini Cooper (engines made in a Chrysler plant in Brazil). ;-)

    -juice
  • exalteddragon1exalteddragon1 Member Posts: 729
    But don't generalize it to pity, pity and patriotism are different. Besides, its not something a company should BANK on. I mean, if ppl can't get passed the OHV on the Bu's engine and must have a V-6, get a Cam/Cord.
    But if fuel economy matters more, or if you just don't care about engines as long as they work good, then is it not fair for patriotism to play some role in your descsion making??? Think of the ppl your supporting, too.
    But in your case, 100% I understand why you see it that way. You live in Brazil, so you don't care were the car comes from. Thats why the chevy's you have are not all made in America (are any?) I don't see a Malibu either. Strange, with its awsome fuel economy, why not sell it there?

    You said you wana buy a VW, check this out, do any of these cars interest you??? P.S. look at the Omega. Nice, IMO.

    Does anyone think a Bu coupe would look nice? I think the clean design would lend itself well to a coup body.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think it becomes pity when you think the car is inferior and buy it anyway. I think we essentially agree on that.

    Patriotism is being proud of a good home-grown product, and supporting it and/or buying it.

    Chevrolet do Brasil is basically making last-generation european chevy cars. I'm not particularly fond of them, most are about 10 years behind in technology.

    We're a globalized family. I'm from Brazil, my wife an immigrant from the Middle East, and our kids are American.

    I guess my approach to cars is similar, give me the best of all worlds. If it takes a Japanese engine, Italian styling, German engineering, American marketing, and a Korean warranty, so be it.

    I drove and liked the 'bu. The V6 is torquey, and fuel efficiency is exemplary. I think someone looking for that would be happy, and would not have to call it pity.

    -juice
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Member Posts: 1,031
    well, it probably WOULD look nice, but where would that leave the Monte Carlo?? also, it would mean that GM would have to put a stronger engine in it to compete with the new Accord Coupe and Camry Solara
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Member Posts: 1,031
    to whoever posted that the Omega is nice from Chevrolet Brazil...

    wow, just checked it out, but it looked a little too familiar. FYI, the Brazilian Omega is actually a Holden Calais, Commodore, Berlina from Australia and is the four-door version of the Holden Monaro a.k.a Pontiac GTO
  • exalteddragon1exalteddragon1 Member Posts: 729
    so what. The intorrior looks nice, the exterrior is cool too. I don't understand why companies have to rename cars for different markets, other than exceptions like GTO cuz it means something here.
    A company can build name recognition if its sells a car wiht the same name in many countries, like the ford focus, for example.

    To the guy who wanted a Bu coup to have a bigger engine...
    way back when camcords had smaller engines than American counterparts, the hype was al about fuel efficiency. Well, now the Bu is more fuel efficient than cam/cords, so if someone wants a coupe (car) that they don'thave to thump down gas money for, they can choose a bu.
    I wonder if anyone wants to ask them if they will do a Bu coupe, they could move the Monte Carlo to a performance category with a v-8 and RWD.
    If a Bu will have more styles and choices it will also score higher in mag comparos. Possibly peoples garages...
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Volume for coupes is very small, probably not worth pursuing.

    They already offer the Maxx, which is kind of a 5-door hatch, what about a full square-back wagon? Call it a crossover if you must.

    -juice
  • jerrywimerjerrywimer Member Posts: 588
    Or rather, it is, but it's fairly commonplace now. I think most people have this idea that foreign companies have the ability to turn things around in practically no time- terrible quality, materials, performance, reliability to top-notch quality, materials, performance, and reliability in a single model makeover.

    On the other hand, my perception is that people are just the opposite with domestic companies (and not just car companies either).

    It didn't help that the domestics muddled along for much of the last 20 years with merchandise that was often just rehashed versions of previous offerings, with the addition of new features, but no real improvement to the core quality or reliability for most of that time. :(
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Hyundai had more room to improve, first, and now many have average or better reliability ratings. Plus that warranty really eases any concerns.

    Some GM cars are great, others are mediocre, if you are to believe the folks that report on reliability.

    So it's still a risk, and there's just 3/36 on the warranty to back you up.

    CR rated the old Malibu "Good" but still could not recommend it based on their survey results. The new one should improve, their overall rating is now "Very Good", and perceived quality was slightly better in my test drive.

    -juice
  • jerrywimerjerrywimer Member Posts: 588
    That's true juice. The 1997 Malibu I traded for my Trailblazer impressed me in the showroom and on my test drive. The initial build quality seemed to be high compared to the other stuff GM / Ford had been building at the time. However, long term reliability was a nightmare (and that's why I ended up with a Trailblazer now, instead of keeping both cars for another year or two..)

    So I admit that the domestic companies have had their share of problems, and do have something to prove. It's still amazing to me that we give the Japorean brands so much more latitude and benefit of the doubt than the domestics though.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Just curious, but how many "good years" did you have?

    Our 626 gave us 5 good years. Then years 5 through 7 were horrible, I spent a small fortune keeping it running, so we dumped it.

    My Forester has given me 5 good years and counting. Knock on wood.

    -juice
  • jerrywimerjerrywimer Member Posts: 588
    One good year of ownership.
    Problems:
    -worn / warped brake rotors, twice (the first time just after the car was a year old. GM hadn't admitted there was a problem before I'd replaced them twice either, but my second replacement was aftermarket versus OEM, and I had no more problems with them)
    -alternators. Replaced 3 times.
      -- The first time it died on the way to a parts store for the replacement. Unknown to us (and the mechanic doing the replacement, evidently), the pulley on the first replacement wasn't quite right, leading to later problems..
      -- The second replacement (the first, despite the bad pulley, lasted almost 2 years) died less than a month before I traded the car off.
    -Drive belts. I lost count. Directly related to the first replacement alternator pulley issue, the belts were worn very quickly. The first actually broke while on the interstate, and the car overheated as I manhandled it to the side of the road (no power steering, ugh!). Unfortunately, the cause of the wear wasn't discovered for quite a while (that was the reason the first replacement alternator was replaced, when we finally discovered what was eating the belts so quickly).
    -Drive belt idler pulleys. There are at least 2 (maybe 3, don't remember and don't have the car to check on, so..). Replaced 2, one time. Closely related to the alternator issue too.
    -Drive belt tensioner. Replaced once, same as above two items, related to the alternator.
    -Slow loss of coolant. Started when the car overheated with the broken belt on the interstate. None of the shops seemed to be able to find out where the leak was though. So I kept a jug of DexCool handy, though the issue seemed to have self-cured by the time I traded the car.
    -Front sway bar mounts. Replaced under warranty at the 18 month mark with a "redesigned" part.
    -tires. The el-cheapo Firestone Affinity tires wore out fast! I replaced them with Bridgestone Potenza tires, and was about to replace those at trade-in (was looking at Goodyear Aquatread III's).
    -A/C switch cutting itself off. I lived with this issue, since the dealership refused to cover it under the warranty, and wanted to replace the entire control head assembly for about $200. Given that the A/C DID work, but sometimes required me to turn it back on, I thought it was a better decision not to replace it.
    -Dash guages going out. Only some of them, but included the gas guage. This was a result of a blown fuse caused when the second replacement alternator went bad while on a road trip. Replacing the alternator and the fuse fixed the issue (or so it seemed). The alternator was definitely the culprit, because less than 2 miles before the guages went, I had a nasty noise start coming from the alternator, as the brushes started coming apart.
    -A/C compressor. Along with the guages, I lost A/C on that same trip, because of the same fuse. Unfortunately, something in the compressor was also going bad, maybe because of the alternator, but there wasn't any way to be sure. A local friend who is also a Delco mechanic at the nearby Chevy dealership contacted someone higher up to see if the issue had been seen elsewhere, because it was new to him. Issue- when using A/C the fuse would blow (knocking out the guages mentioned earlier), sometimes immediately after turning it on, other times as much as a few hours later. Final analysis from On High- 3 other cases, each required replacing the compressor. Cost to me- est. $800.

    The car was paid for more than 2 years prior to the final alternator replacement, but was also outside of warranty. I had planned to keep it, and trade the Toyota (the MUCH older of our two vehicles) in another year or so for an extended cab pickup truck or SUV, and use the Malibu for general around-town and work commutes. The fact that the Malibu kept sucking money unexpectedly from my budget made the decision for me. IMO, it is better to have a known payment coming out that I can budget around than to think I have $x dollars for recreation, miscellaneous expenses, and investments, only to have my car eat it (or worse, have spent it, THEN have the car break). So I traded it off.

    One good thing came of the whole experience. I will NEVER buy a first model year of any vehicle again. My TB was a second model year, produced just past midway through the model year, so I'm fairly sure most of the really big issues have been dealt with. Unfortunately, it also leaves me stuck with the almost 12 year old Corolla for another year or two, but at least that car, beaten up as it has become, is relatively reliable.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Sorry to hear about your experience.

    Actually, my Forester is a first year model (gulp!), but it was built in the 2nd half of the model year, perhaps some kinks were already ironed out.

    Perhaps the Maxx will be better, given the 9-3 has been on this platform for a while.

    -juice
  • orangelebaronorangelebaron Member Posts: 435
    Does anyone know when the Maxx will be on dealer lots the earliest?
  • jerrywimerjerrywimer Member Posts: 588
    To be fair, not all of the '97 Malibus were such lemons. It's just that the first model year cars tend to have a much higher chance of problems. Since your Suburu is a later production model from that year, there's a good chance that at least some of whatever problems existed in the beginning were addressed. (I know Chevy did the same thing with the Trailblazers, making running changes to some things).

    I really did like that Malibu, for what it's worth. The cost was just too high.

    As far as the Maxx goes, I'd think that it will have a better record from the start. GM seems to be making major strides lately. Many of their recent introductions have had far fewer reported problems than even second or third year models of older vehicles. But once burned, twice shy fits me well, so I'll let others buy them and find out for sure what (if any) problems there are, giving GM a chance to fix any wrinkles before I put money down on one.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Funny you should say that. I saw a light green Maxx today at the mall literally 20 minutes after testing a Malibu LS sedan (see Malibu forum for details). The sales man told me next month but there is was much to my complete surprise.

    I will tell you i liked what I could see but there were cars parked all around it so I couldn't get a very good look all around it. They must be hitting dealers now guys!!
  • jerrywimerjerrywimer Member Posts: 588
    I think I've managed to swing my wife's opinion in favor of the new Bu over other choices, with the upcoming Equinox next down the list, assuming it has the remote start feature available too. That was one of the really attractive things about the new Malibu that caught her attention, since I'm military. There's a good chance that whatever housing I end up with at the next base won't have a garage, so the ability to warm up the car before going out to get into it really is a nice perk.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Thanks for the heads up. Wonder if it drives any differently than the sedan, given the longer wheelbase?

    -juice
  • tomcat630tomcat630 Member Posts: 854
    "Many American cars are built overseas"

    I don't think that "many" is correct, more like a few. Chevy Aveo is one, but most that would not be US built would be from Canada or Mexico.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,344
    The show Motoring 2004 on TSN in Canada had Graeme Fletcher do a review of the Maxx. His overall verdict was pretty positive considering he normally does not like domestic cars. He rated the ride and the interior at 5 out of 5 and gave his worst marks to handling and bang for the buck. The video showed an astounding amount of rear legroom. He quoted a price of just over $30K in Canada for the model he tested. All in all it was positive and he obviously liked the car.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Suspension on the sedan is biased towards ride, which is very good.

    -juice
  • rich4757rich4757 Member Posts: 1
    Well I work at the plant that builds the Malibu's, just thought I would say to any of you wondering we have been building the crap out of them the last couple of weeks, about a third of them are Maxx's.

    Someone mentioned a few pages back about a new Saturn similar to the Maxx. From what the mostly uninformed workers like myself have been told it will either be built here alongside the Malibu's or at the plant where the Grand Am is built. Don't expect it for a few more years.

    Just from seeing them in the plant I think the Maxx looks better than the sedan. We also saw a picture of a Malibu tricked out like a car from Fast and the Furious with a much more powerfull engine, sound system, bigger wheels, ground effects and the rest. It looked real good. It was built to show the possibilities of what the aftermarket could do for the car. I wish we would run them as a limited run each year to help hook younger buyers back to American cars. Get them to buy the supped up car now and the regular Malibu, Impala or something else when they are older.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Hey, that's cool. Good job building the ones I test drove at that intro event Chevy hosted. Especially that torquey V6.

    Stick around, you'd be a good resource if any questions pop up. Talk about an inside view - you build the things!

    -juice
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    The Maxx I saw in a parking lot the other day was nice and it does indeed look better than the sedan IMO. It would have looked even better if it was clean but we has some snow flurries so I understand.

    At C$30K + he must have had a nicely equipped Maxx. I think they start in the C$27-28K range. I'd like to see that show, maybe they will re-run it. If I bought a Maxx I would go base with remote starter option as even the entry level is very well equipped. In terms of handling I suspect (knowing Graeme) he was looking for a sport wagon which this is not.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.