By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
& they're all FWD Euro models, including 5-sp & 6-sp manual, w/ Euro plates & convex driver-side mirror. It's one hell of a "plush Mazda3"!
Isn't it amazing that the G35 is so horrible and yet C&D put it on the 10 best list again? If the car is so unsafe that it can't be driven without the stability control, you'd think that it wouldn't be on the list. Stability control should be an additional safety measure, not a substitute for learning how to drive properly, IMO. I guess I'm stuck in the old school where you learned the cars limits and your own.
I had this happen on one of my vehicles. (not the Mazda!)
Of course you'd THINK it would just revert back to regular brakes, but no..... that would be too easy! When I hit the brakes, it actually turned on for a second, pulsed the brakes a few times, then failed and kicked itself back to regular brakes, then turned on again for a second, and then off, on, off, etc., etc...
All in all, I managed to sail through a (thankfully empty) intersection with hardly any braking power at all. I figure it actually increased my braking distance by 3 to 4 times. (which in a 4500 pound car was already considerable.) Luckily, I realized what it was doing and just applied gentle, constant pressure to the pedal, brought the car gently down to a slow, safe speed and hobbled home. Anyway the point is, these advanced safety systems (ABS, DSC, TC, etc) should never be a replacement for driving skill -- they make cars safer but at the risk of making the drivers less proficient.
Agreed.
That's why you should turn off the stability control & practice on an open area such as empty parking lots when the road is wet.
Even when they ranked it 1st place ahead of the much-weaker-engine 325i in the March '04 issue, they still found
1) its sport suspension/tires MUCH less comfortable than the 325i's already-firm (lowered than std)sport suspension/tires over rippled surfaces.
2)"At the track the G35 demonstrated a willingness to rotate that was regard as handy by some and a little DISCONCERTING by others but was only evident with the dynamic-control switched off. Regular owners would likely LEAVE THAT ON."
That's why all G35's got the stability control std.
C&D drivers are not CR drivers. At least they weren't complaining about the G35 w/ the traction or stability control switched on. & they didn't even mention about the not-so-predictable oversteer when lift off as mentioned by CR, which tested the one w/o sport suspension/tires.
Neither did cars have airbags back then. We're talking about TODAY'S standard here.
At least the Mazda3 is still much safer than the G35 to handle at the limit when not using the stability control.
The G35 is still recommendable 'cause the stability control is std. Not like some tipping SUVs that can't be cured, including the BMW X5, which wasn't recommendable due to the reliability alone.
By the way, according to the TV news last night, the American Focus is now twice as reliable as the BMW 7-series, eventhough that's not saying much.
The Mazda3 is available w/ DSC all over the world except us who think small cars have to be cheaper than the Camry, which offers optional stability control.
There was an article issued from the National Hwy Safety(or something like that) someone posted in the Mazda3 thread many months ago. It sez research has shown the stability program saves lives many times more than airbags.
The government might as well require all cars to be equipped w/ stability control std, while make the air bags(just bunch bags full of air! ;-) ) optional to keep the price down. By the way, the VW Passat only charges $280 for the stability upgrade from the std traction control.
I highly recommend the DSC for the Mazda3 'cause, unlike some numb-steering boring cars, this car is so much fun driving at the limit that you'll be spoiled to go that fast frequently, & you will need to use the DSC someday or more often, unlike the expensive airbags that will probably never be used.
And the only negative (in their opinion) - hat it "needs revvin", in my mind, is actually a positive!
BTW - nice discussion you have going here - I might have to go try out a 3 at my dealer
One can only have so much faith in people actually driving well.
I'm SOO happy...I'll finally have my own set of wheels again, after driving a loaner that I hate for a week. Incidentally, it's also my FIRST BRAND NEW CAR, thereby making me all the happier.
Of course I ORIGINALLY wanted one without the CD/Moonroof package, but apparently those are REALLY hard to find except as a stripper; apparently that's the first thing they put on them.
See:
creakid1 "Mazda3" Oct 12, 2003 5:05pm
I like safety, but I don't want something doing the driving for me if it decides I'm not doing a good enough job.
Besides, it's a moot point anyway. MazdaUSA doesn't have any plans on offering DSC on the 3. I asked. "No plans, but we'll record your e-mail for product planning." Usual form letter. I figure if they were going to offer it here, it'd be on there...they're probably going to save that and the auto climate control (which they can keep, excep it leaves a blank spot in the driver info panel...) for a mid-life option boost to keep interest in the car going. That's just a guess on my part, of course, but it makes sense, doesn't it?
Obviously this is the up and coming technology and from what I've read it sounds great. I personally have not driven a car with it yet, so I have no idea what it's like driving with it turned on vs off. It sounds like you have had some experience with it and are quite pleased. I guess we'll have to wait a few more years until more cars have it available here. I would love to see how it would perform on icy roads here in New England. If it works as claimed, it would prevent a lot of accidents, although I still think a lot winter accidents are caused by driving too fast for the road conditions and could be prevented by driver experience. I would hope that stability control wouldn't lead to more people driving beyond their ability for the conditions at hand because now they are thinking, I can't crash, the computer will save me, similar to the SUV drivers who think they can still drive 75 mph in a snowstorm because they have 4 wheel drive. It's quite common here in the Northeast.
Honestly, I don't think stability control would be able to deal with ultra-slick conditions where the problem is lack of traction. Since a stability control system works by actuating the steering, throttle, and brakes, and in slick conditions brakes and steering probably aren't going to be working right anyway....well, get the idea?
Volvo's got some sort of roll-stability system in the XC-90, don't they?
Many drivers can only sit comfortably in the 3 when the seat is fully raised, the 3 inches can be a blind spot.
Even my '90 Pro didn't have it. Only when I replaced the cracked windshield did I noticed the Chinese-made windshield came w/ that blue upper tint.
Blocking their view of what, low-flying aircraft?
Traffic lights. I had that problem on my old 96 Chevy Corsica. Unless I stayed way behind the big white "stop line" the whole light was in that tint band, and it was really hard to distinguish depending on the time of day. Depends on how tall you are (taller is worse) generally.
Anyways, the Mazda3 I ordered way back arrived at my dealership a couple weeks ago, and I got a peek at it before it went into their underground storage (I plan on taking delivery April 1). Not good - 2 rotors had one groove on it and 1 rotor had at least three grooves (so I'm pretty concerned about it and will head to the basement tomorrow and run my fingers across to feel how deep those grooves are). Anyone got pads/rotors replaces/turned on their Mazda3? Did it help?
BTW, there wasn't a recall for this problem, but they replaced a lot of them under a TSB (hint to all you Mazda3 owners).
Personally, if I had a Mazda3 and the rotors looked that bad, I would keep after Mazda until they replaced them. There is no excuse for it.
So is that what those little black dots are on the top center of the windshield, around the rear-view mirror? I was wondering what that was for.
mazda6s, thanks for the low-flying aircraft comment. Too funny!
The only blind spot that bothers me is when you're trying to make a lane change to the left. I had a Subaru wagon (i.e. tons of window) right before this and was always accustomed to turning and glancing over my left shoulder. When I do that now all I see is the interior of my car. I had to buy one of those what I like to call a "geriatric mirror" - the 2" wide stick-on fish eye ones for the left side view mirror. I just have to train myself to actually use it now.
http://www.adamspolishes.com is his web site.
The detail spray he sells is beyond belief!
Beside finding some great detailing stuff, I autoX'ed my 3 hatchback, it worked pretty good.
I don't like the tires. I'm thinking of going up to 18's with a ultra performance tire. Any Ideas?
Speaking about DSC and other electronic safety options, I agree that drivers should be able to control their cars in case the devices do not work. Student pilots are always trained to land the aircraft at night without the landing lights on for that very reason. It's easy with the lights on to tell where the ground is, but on a moonless night with the lights burned out, that's a whole different ballgame -- everything looks black.
I also wonder about the electroluminesant gauges, how long do they last? Can they burn out unexpectedly? What has to be replaced, after the warrenty, and at what cost?
Technology is great as long as it works when you need it most.
Here's another note: Don't replace the fog light bulbs with those fake xenons. The light they put out blinds on-coming drivers because it can't be cut-off at the top like real xenons, instead, it scatters in all directions. This according to cartalk.com -- the guys you listen to on PBS.
For buyers: Take the time to get what you want; or be stuck with wanting what you got.
fowler3
Fowler3: May not be able to cut off the top of the fogs, but I don't know if you can do that with the low beams either; they're projection headlights. The NICE thing about having ultra-whites in the fogs though, is they can be switched OFF when not needed, unlike the low beams.
I think the projector headlights do cut off the top of the beam. Looking closely at the headlights you can't see it as clearly as on the 3's halogen units.
What, you don't switch off the low beams when NOT needed? That's odd.
mazda6s: Goodyear Eagle RS-A tires at $159 are still expensive. As far as I can tell those 17" wheels and low-pro tires are pretty, beyond that, their value is all negatives: Expensive to replace; Short life; Can easily damage the wheels driving at the limits; No protection for the wheels near curbs, etc., etc.
My first thought seeing them up close: They are too skinny to hold air long if punctured, such as by a nail. I got a nail in a tire recently, probably drove on it a couple days before noticing it was getting flat. Pumped it up again and it held until I could get it repaired the next day.
With almost every vehical on the road sporting alloys, having the 17's is not the big PLUS it use to be. IMHO. I would sell them to some dweeb and put Mazda's 16" alloys on the HB. Hey, it's only an inch difference.
fowler3
fowler3
I know one very short guy who's always after long-leg chicks putting those 18-19" alloys on his GS430.
Only a secure guy like me never bother to go over 16". I'm happy w/ "only" 16". ;-)
I believe the side sill extension is supposed to take the place of a mud flap but it isn't doing the job.
creakid1: I agree, but I said that earlier. What is needed is an alloy ring which attaches to the outer rims of alloy wheels, about 1/2-inch wide, which would give the appearance of a 17" wheel using 16" tires on same-size alloys. It would simply hide a 1/2-inch of the tire making it look like a low-profile.
fowler3
Hmm, ok, lemee elaborate.
That's what I was trying to say.
gee: You ARE a hater.
creakid: He wants the long-leg chicks too put the 18-19" alloys on HIS car?
mazda6s