Nissan Murano Maintenance and Repair

1101113151646

Comments

  • superdavidsuperdavid Member Posts: 24
    The expected unexpected finally happened, after having my Murano trouble free for a year and a half (only 7,500 miles), it finally happened.
    I was driving to the city to work today, all of sudden, the brake light and the battery light went on. (??!!) But I had to go to work to finish up my project, so I kind of put the problem aside and parked my Murano in a parking lot.
    But when I was going home after work, the brake light and battery light were still on. I continued driving thinking it was maybe some electronic problem. But, all of sudden, my car was losing power (in local street, near my house fortunately) and finally stopped. Then I realize that I have the infamous Murano Alternator Problem, the battery was getting drained and not charging. So I called my wife to jump the car and finally arrived home. (We had to jump the car several time, because each jump only lasted like 10 blocks or so and the car died again).
    Now I fell my luck with Murano went south, the Murano has been good, but if the alternator is a major problem, Nissan should recall the cars. I will bring the car to the dealer on Tuesday, and hopefully they will change the alternator and fix the problem.
    Yes, I am frustrated.....
  • gerapaugerapau Member Posts: 211
    Maybe I was a little misleading there tidester. It isn't illegal for you to get a better price and not go through your insurance. That is totally up to you (and probably the better choice). It just appears to me that it could be, or maybe should be, illegal for the glass shops to charge more to the insurance companies then they do to you and I. Maybe there is something that I am missing here but it seems to be routine for them to charge the insurance companies (probably their best customers) more for glass replacements then they do regular customers.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Thanks for responding heelntoe, I will take your 18MPG anytime or even the 17 MPG will do. I am a very good driver and I'm not happy with 16.2MPG. Although you are getting better mileage, like many, but there's a lot who are also having similar problem as mine. Let's face it, Nissan must have a problem with its CVT or with it's programming or else, we will never see many of this complaints. The major discrepancy on fuel consumption between the same car speaks volume that a problem exist and need to be adressed. Honestly, I like the car overall but the big factor why I bought this car is the expectation of good mileage. I won't be complaining about my 16.2 MPG is if my car is over 10 years old! Before I purchased my MO. I heardof 20MPG...but 16.2MPG is ridiculous.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Just to let you know, I cracked my windshield on my other car 3-4 years ago and the glass company paid for my $300 deductible and many places does the same.
  • golfanaticgolfanatic Member Posts: 2
    I have had two issues with my 2003 Murano SE. The second one is a BIG problem:
    1. The gas mileage is nowhere near the 20/25 on the sticker. I am averaging about 15.3 mpg using premium Hess or Mobil. My wife drives the car, and it is almost entirely city driving, but this is ridiculous. I rented a 4-Runner down in Ft. Lauderdale and averaged almost 18 mpg. Quite frankly I think that the mpg ratings are inflated to make the sticker look better.
    2. My Murano has now stalled on my wife four times while driving down the road. She will be cruising along in the city and suddenly the car shuts off. We noticed that it seems to happen when it is snowing out. I live in Buffalo, so that is about 90% of the time! The dealership can't find anything wrong. I found a posting on the Nissan website about a faulty transmission sensor, but they refused to check it since "it only effected 30 or so units". Seemed like replacing this $5 sensor would have been worth a try to me! Anyone have any ideas what the problem could be??? We are taking Nissan to court for the Lemon Law if we can't find a solution in the next few days. The car has been in the shop three times already with no solution, and Nissan corporate flat out refuses to do anything about it.

    Other than that, I actually love the car. Lots of space, great stereo, nice ride, etc. Too bad it is unreliable and hazardous to drive:)
  • mvs1mvs1 Member Posts: 462
    Just a quick note on glass in general. Depending on if it's a small crack 1" or spider and not a full crack splitting the glass in two. You could opt to have the crack filled. It's much cheaper then windshield replacement and also covered under insurance. It's extremely hard to detect where the crack was afterward. For instance to fix a 1" crack I paid $45 (insurance did) as opposed to the $300 for new glass. Glass Doctor (if in your area) and an oil change co. merged and offer this service. It's popular in the North East due to frequency of foul weather. Often times not advertised heavily since obviously they make less money.
  • gerapaugerapau Member Posts: 211
    easym1, while I understand your frustration at the gas mileage you are getting, you may find the following CR item interesting (CR Article). It is a CR article showing their achieved gas mileage for many different vehicals. Unfortunately the Murano is not there but many of its competitors are. The best city gas mileage they got for a midsized SUVs is with the Honda Pilot. It's city mileage was only 13mpg. If your mileage includes alot of city driving then maybe 16.2mpg isn't that bad. Stop and go traffic kills the mileage for any vehical the size of the murano. Also, keep in mind that until the CVT is warmed up you will get very bad mileage so if you do a lot of short trips (with the car cooling off between trips) your mileage will be low.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Thanks mvs1...I hope my post was not misleading...the $300 deductible was paid by the glass company and my insurer paid around $600 canadian if I'm not mistaken...Prior to that, it was just a little crack that was fixed for $50 but eventually got larger that's why I end up getting it replaced a year after the first repair...By the way, the same glass company that absorbed my deductible was the company referred by my insurer,
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    I phoned around yesterday different Nissan dealerships and finally talked to a service manage regarding my gas mileage problem. He told me that the FX is having the same problem. He mentioned a memo to put gas conditioner to clean possible carbon build-up in the system. He also mentioned that the Murano and the FX seemed to built carbon quickly than normal which can cause problem with fuel consumption. I will try this solution and will report back in few months.

    To golfanatic, try this and report back to us...I though my 16.3MPG was bad but your 15.3MPG is even worse.
  • heelntoeheelntoe Member Posts: 21
    I may be misinterpreting what you're saying here but... there's a common misconception that the Murano and FX are related. If I am, please forgive me for noting that the Murano, built on the FF-L (Altima) platform shares very little with the FX which is built on the FM (G35) platform and that the transmissions/transaxles and AWD systems are completely different. Although they look quite similar in form factor and many folks I've talked to believe they are platform-engineered twins, they are not. That being said, this would tend to place the fault moreso on the VQ-series engine, as the tech was suggesting, and not the CVT

    If you're going to get some fuel system cleaner, my best experience has been the Chevron with Techron stuff. I can't supply the engineering specifics of why but... a number of friends in the local Porsche club, fellow Miata enthusiasts and, generally speaking, my gearhead friends swear by it. If you've a Costco membership and one nearby, they sell a four-pack for like... $9.99. Usually a single at Pep Boys will run you $6.99. I buy a pack once or twice a year and use one in each car. The lawnmower, snow-blower, Kubota, etc. all split the last bottle. It works out well.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Thanks heelntoe. The service manager did not mention CVT but relate a similar problem with the FX where the culprit for both was carbon build-up...I'm a Costco member and I'll check the product that you mentioned...unfortunately,we don't have Pep Boys here in Canada.
  • dklaneckydklanecky Member Posts: 559
    If the Nissan 3.5 litre VQ engine has a propensity to carbon build up as the dealer states, then Nissan's in huge trouble as that motor is in probably 60% of the vehicles they sell. 350z, Murano, Maxima, a lot of Infiniti's, some Altimas, too.

    I think the carbon build up is just a dealer excuse to avoid delaing with the problem or better yet to sell you their fuel injector cleaning service for $99.

    I agree with the bottle of fuel injector cleaner and use one in each vehicle when I get the oild changed. For me every 5,000 miles.
  • chivazochivazo Member Posts: 6
    I just got a 2005 and I wanted to tell everyone I got 23MPG on mix driving on my very first full tank. I am using 87 octane. I don't know if they did something on the CVT computer but I am very happy. I am looking forward to better mileage once I break in the motor. This is a SL AWD. A few things I don't like about the car is the cup holders for the rear seat. They should have place them higher up and not at floor level. Also, the dimmer for the dashboard could have been more efficient. Besides that I am very happy with the car performance. We will see once I put some more miles in. Good luck with you car.
  • jmeitzjmeitz Member Posts: 15
    I agree, i have an 05 SL AWD and with City and highway i get 22 and if i am just doing hwy i can get close to 24 at 75mph. RPMS are under 2k though.
  • gerapaugerapau Member Posts: 211
    You know, chivazo, I have spent more than 2 years with my Murano now and about the only thing I would change is the rear cup holders. As you said, they are too low. They are also too sensitive. All you have to do is touch it a bit and it pops out. My kids have broken 2 of them now by touching it with their foot and then stepping on it. I have actually taped it shut so it doesn't happen again. By the way, the dealer replaced it both time free of charge because of some TSB on them.
  • drh2drh2 Member Posts: 3
    I have a 2005 SL AWD. city mileage is btwn 17-18mpg using 87 Octane, I havent taken any long trips yet. Other than the lower than expected gas mileage I love the car.
  • texiantexian Member Posts: 7
    Heck rigth now I'd love to have 16 or even 15mpg. I average 12 in town and about 19 if I'm on the highway. I still wonder why I got 25 while we were in Colorado and over 5,000'. The dealer doesn't give a darn, Nissan doesn't care.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Ttexian, I noticed that once you reset your OBC, it will give you a high MPG ( in my case 30MPG initially )and as you run your car weather you're in the city or highway, you'll find that the OBC's MPG will gradually decrease untill you attain the real world average. In my case, around 16.4MPG..( I know this is close because I double check with my regular calculation which is a little lower than my OBC ) .this is probably the reason why some are claiming that they get over 25MPG..and if I'm not mistaken , there were those claiming up to 28MPG.

    Or try using engine cleaner on your gas. If one of the service manager that I spoke with recentlyt is correct, it could also be the carbon build-up in your engne...I will try STP that I got from Costco after my next oil change and let everyone know if there's any improvement in my MPG.

    Honestly, if 20/25MPG is the rating for our Murano, anything below 17MPG should not be acceptable because 20MPG is supposed to be based on city driving, We are talking about Nissan here and no excuse for a new car to get 12MPG like yours.
  • jgendeljgendel Member Posts: 1
    I have a 2003 SL 2WD model and have had the drivers front door lock by itself if I open the rear cargo door. Luckily the rest of the doors did not lock. This has happened twice. The Custom menu on my model does not list the features you listed. Is this feature good on later models only? Other than that I love the car.
  • gokadengokaden Member Posts: 28
    Hi everyone,

    I've just had my 05 SL FWD for a month now, with 1700 miles on it. I've started to notice that whenever I hit the brakes from above 30 mph, I can feel a strong shuddering sensation, as if the brakes were misaligned or worn out. When I let me hands go of the steering wheel and brake from 30 mph, I can see the wheel rythmically shuddering quite pronouncedly.

    Does anyone else have the same experience? I didn't really notice this in the first 3 weeks of driving.

    I'm debating whether to take it into the dealer to have it looked at.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    You might as well get your car checked where you got it. I got a 2004 Murano and don't notice anything unusual like yours. It would be better if you drive along with the mechanic to show what's going on. If they say it's normal. try asking them if you can test drive the dealer's Murano. If the brakes does not function the same way as yours, insist on having your brakes repaired. Always consider your brakes a no# 1 serious safety issue...good luck gokaden!
  • gokadengokaden Member Posts: 28
    Hi easym1,

    Yeah, I guess with Safety being important, I'll just get the dealer to handle it under warranty. I wasn't sure if any other 05 Murano owners were seeing the same issue. I haven't seen any TSBs out, but the 05 is still relatively new anyhow.

    Thanks for the feedback!
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    You're welcome. Please let us know how it goes.
  • howardp1howardp1 Member Posts: 1
    How do you access the brake and tail lights on a 2003 Nissan Murano. My right brake light is out, I was able to remove the interior panel, followed the wire to the bulb but did not know how to pop it out
  • jmaxejmaxe Member Posts: 198
    Have not seen the Murano lights but every other one I've removed, including Altimas, you have to twist the socket a quarter turn or so and then pull it straight out.
  • numbersixnumbersix Member Posts: 4
    I'd like to purchase seat covers to protect the leather when we take the vehicle out for skiing, biking, hiking, etc., but am concerned about side airbag safety. Are full seat covers a hazard with respect to the airbags? If so, anyone know ofseat covers that are airbag safe? Any that are designed specifically for the Murano? Thanks...
  • gerapaugerapau Member Posts: 211
    Easym1, I may be the one who you remembered claiming to get 28mpg with my Murano. I did do this over a 600 mile trip last Christmas. The weather was bad and I drove just about 50mph the whole trip (all highway) without any real variation in speeds. I calculated the mileage using pen and paper and not using the on-board computer. I actually did the whole trip (actually just a bit less than 600 miles) without refueling but was running on vapours when I arrived. I haven't repeated that mileage since though (since my normal highway driving is usually done going quite a bit faster than 50). I usually average between 17 and 18mpg with most of that being city driving. On longer highway trips I average between 20 and 22mpg depending on speed.

    As far as 17mpg being acceptable or not, as I mentioned before, you will probably find that many vehicals owners cannot match their epa ratings. 17mph is actually not bad compared to other similarly sized vehicals (12 is on the low side though). I have yet to own (after having 5 cars) a car where I matched the epa ratings. The EPA tests are conducted in a lab using a standardized schedule of stops, starts, accelerations, etc.... This schedule is supposed to simulate real world driving but for the most part is outdated and inaccurately reflects the way we drive. The results were usually so far from reality that in the 80's the EPA decided to actually adjust their results by 10%. This means that the EPA actually gets 10% better fuel economy then they state (meaning they actually got about 22city/28highway for the Murano). They are also currently taking another look at revising their testing strategies because they realize their results are no longer accurate in many situations. Take a look at the EPA site to see how they test (actually the manufacturers do the testing and the EPA confirms a small number of the tests). If you take a good look at it you will see that during the tests acceleration is very slow and in the highway test average speed is 48mph. Not many of us actually drive that speed and on our highways we would probably get run over if we did. Some time when you get the chance take your Murano out on the highway and drive a steady 50mph. You may be surprised at your mileage.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Thanks gerapau, You are one of the fortunate ones who's getting better mileage on your Murano. 17 and 18 MPG city is excellent compared to my ave 16.3MPG between city and highway. If I'm not mistaken, I've seen a posting of 15MPG city driving which I believe to be more realistic in comparison to what I'm getting and I consider myself as a good driver.

    In the past, I mentioned in one of my postings that I test drive my MPG average in one of our less busy highway with windows close, no passenger, no A/C, using only FWD, @100km/hr speed max and a very nice weather but never achieved beyond my target of 18MPG average.

    I would like to believe that your 28MPG is achievable on the conditions you mentioned when you did your trip but I don't think that even an EPA test based on a near perfect condition can show that 28MPG is realistic based on your speed.

    But, I could be wrong too!
  • gerapaugerapau Member Posts: 211
    The EPA would easilly be able to match my mileage if they simulated a drive at the speed I was going over the distance I went. Remember, they lower their actual results by 10% to get their published values so their actual highway mileage for the Murano was about 26.5mpg. On top of that, their test is only done over a distance of roughly 10 miles and the initial start and final stop are included in their mileage. This means that they could get 26.5 mpg driving an average of 48mph and stopping and restarting every 10 miles. If they kept a constant speed over a long distince I have no doubt that they would get much better than 28mpg.

    Last night I had to go out of town for one of my kids hockey games. It was about 75km each way and just for fun I tried to keep my speed at 50mph. I didn't calculate my mileage by hand but reset the computer when I left and it said that I averaged 9.1l/100km (25.8mpg) over the trip.

    Something funny that I noticed last night. The American Nissan site has the Murano's epa mileage at 20city/24highway (for awd). The Nissan Canada site has it at 8.8l/100km city and 12.0l/100km highway. This converts into 26.7mpg city and 19.6mpg highway. I guess that Transport Canada is even more generous in their estimates of highway mileage than the EPA.

    In the end it is really difficult for you or I to compare our city mileage against anyone elses. We all drive differently with different amounts of stop and go traffic. Too many variables for our compairisons to be very accurate.
  • tigger5753tigger5753 Member Posts: 43
    I've been averaging 15-17 MPG on mixed hwy and city driving. I took a trip to Newport RI from Boston a few months ago, and i averaged 23.5 MPG on the highway going about 70 MPH (2000 RPM).. on the way back, I averaged 20.5 MPG going about 80 MPH..
  • satristasatrista Member Posts: 15
    My 05 Murano is awfully new, but I'm on my 3rd tank of gas (first one, not full - from the dealer).I've gotten 18 MPG in the city on the two tanks I've put in. This is a pencil and paper calculation and not the OBC (it was running 19). Mostly stop and start with a little bit of highway driving. I'm really pleased thus far. BTW, I'm using 87 Octane and not the premium stuff.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Hi friends, can I simply replace my regular Murano headlight with the Xenon bulb without affecting the system. I would assume that the Xenon may have a higher electrical demand. I was checking out those Xenon.s at e-bay. Can anyone recommend a good quality one? Will the replacement be straightforward?
  • bigben3bigben3 Member Posts: 2
    I am so glad that I found this forum. I used to think that I am the only one against
    Nissan & Co. Just today I took my MO-2003 3.5 to the dealership for third time!
    First, staff there was acting as they do not get what I was talking about:
    Car uses 13 MPG in the city - or 250 miles on tank.. and that is not normal for the car with 13000 on it.Their attitude in general:
    "...so what ? this is almost normal...bla bla bla.." First two times they told me - they check it, and everything is o.k. according to computer readings. Just FYI
    there is a note that I gave them in writing:
    Signs of defect :
    - car used to go ~ 380 miles on a tank ( ~ 19MPG) in the city , now only 250 on a tank ( ~12.5 MPG)
    - car used to go ~ 500 miles on a tank on the freeway, now only 400 with AC Off and while driving at 70 MPH.
    - AVG (MPG) screen is “frozen” at 16.6 MPG and driving conditions can not make an impact for this number to change, whereas actual MPG IN THE CITY IS ~ 12.5 .
    - car started to perform poorly at acceleration, in order to accelerate on the freeway , overdrive must be used all the time.
    - once you take foot from the gas pedal, speed of the car decreases more rapidly comparing to as it used to be. It feels like parking brake is applied a bit.
    We use Premium gas only all the time.
    Of`course they did not the cause for third time as well...
    But when I picked car from the dealership I told that I am aware of problem Nissan has with this cars and they actually admited it !
    Unfortunately it did not solve the problem...
    it looks like this particular dealership knows nothing abot reprogramming of
    CVT.
    I would be glad to hear what I can do about it?
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    bigben3, your MPG is even worse than mine. Although some posted good fuel mileage, there are lots like us on the other side of the fence...Last summer, i complained about my gas mileage problem and the first thing I heard from the service manager is I NEVER HEARD ABOUT IT!..But they still checked ny car and advised me that all settings shows nornal on their computer test and the service manager advised me to try higher octane and wait .till I got a certain KM....Just recently I called them back because I did not see any improvement...guess what? ..once I told the service manager that I got bad fuel mileage on my Murano, the first thing he said is I NEVER HEARD ABOUT IT!

    Regarding the reprogramming of the CVT's, unless this it's a safety issue, I don't beleive that Nissan would be kind enough fixing it...many but not all dealerships will simply DENY,DENY,DENY and hope you go away...and it's true to any car company.

    Wheather Nissan likes it or not, there is really a fuel mileage problem on many of it's Murano's or else we won't be talking about it.

    Also based on some postings that I read, the 2005 seemed to have better fuel mileage than 03-04 models...or maybe, there's still not enough 2005 out there to compare...or maybe Nissan has done the tweaking on it's 2005 to improve MPG...or probably was able to refine some adjustments to avoid the previous faults....in any events, I hope Nissan listens...this was my first nissan for me and my family and it's up to them not to make it our last.
  • bigben3bigben3 Member Posts: 2
    I just spoke with another MO owner, ( my day was devoted to this car entierly)
    he has similar problem with gas mileage ~ 14 or in the city. He performed
    freeway test ride ( as I did too) with no AC , windows closed and he averaged less than 19... we decided to think about class action case if odds are there,
    with you there three of us already, if you decided to go for it.
    Simply calculations will show that such a difference in MPG from what Nissan promised will cost us ~ $ 4000 on 100000 miles.
    regarding dealership staff -you described their attitude toward this issue as you were there with me.
    P.s. my mileage calculations I did with pencil, this is not what ia shown by comp.
  • dklaneckydklanecky Member Posts: 559
    What are you folks with the low mileage running for tire pressure?

    I've got an 03 SE AWD that has 35,xxx on it. I use premium gas as the owners manual suggests for best performance and I run 37lbs of air cold pressure in the tires. I have averaged 19.8 MPG over the life of the vehicle, with about 50% highway and about 50% city driving. It's been my experience that the mileage will be below average if your driving is normally short trips, in town, lots of stop and go driving. There is a lot of energy expended in getting this ~4,000 lb vehicle moving, but once it's moving it gets good gas mileage for it's size. It also seems to me that the CVT needs time to warm up before it is really efficent.
  • skinnydogskinnydog Member Posts: 20
    "I have the murano sl awd but cant understand how AWD functions if it goes off after 19 MPH. after 19 MPH you get front wheel drive. with awd off all the time what type of drive do you get..

    I'm in the process of buying. My understanding is that the AWD drive system is like may on the road today that are front wheel drive biased, in that they are basically a front wheel drive car until there is slippage in the front tires and then they shift power to the rear wheels to compensate. Many cars do not have the feature that allow you to lock in AWD at low speeds. Having this is an advantage and allows for better traction in really hazardous road conditions where you need to drive very slowly.

    The Murano does not have the same sort of AWD system that Audis and Subarus have which are fulltime AWD systems.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    I love to join the class action but the problem may not be with Nissan alone on the posted rate but with EPA..I've seen some articles that advises EPA to change the way they measure mileage rating on vehicles because of this problems similar to Murano.

    One area that Nissan surely have a problem is the wide discrepancy on MPG consumption as you've seen/read here on many postings..I don't believe that bad driving is all the cause of MPG loss but I would blame inconsistency on manufacturing this car or setting tolerances or could be, as one of the posting said...a software program on CVT...I am just guessing here but the fact remains...we have a problem.

    Regarding the OBC on mileage, it will always be off most of the time due to many factors like warm-up and stops..

    We can only hope that Nissan is paying attention to this problem...but then again, it would be easy for then to simply DENY,DENY,DENY.
  • sb13sb13 Member Posts: 1
    I to have experienced an unusually high number of annoying noises in my 2004 Murano. It only has 8K miles. When I accelerated from a stop or accelerated up a hill there is a vibrating noice coming from the front passenger side. I can not figure out what it is. Has anyone had this problem? It sounds like it could be the front speaker, but I am not sure. Also, has anyone been able to find a screen protector for the navigation screen? Mine is already getting scratched up.
  • andytommoandytommo Member Posts: 33
    I love my Murano, I really do, which is why I'm upset about this 'problem' which won't go away. I bought my SE AWD new in Sep '04, and the day after I got it, I pulled up to a traffic light, something in the engine went clunk, the revs fluctuated, and the check engine light came on. Ugh.
    I went to the dealer, who ran some tests, and told me the computer had received an unexpected signal from the transmission. It should be fine, they reset it and sent me on my merry way.
    A week later, the same thing happened, but I was 300 miles from home. I called the dealer and asked if it was ok to drive all the way back, to which they replied yes, of course. I took it in again, and they ran some more tests. They had it for 2 days, and the tests came back inconclusive.
    They took it back again a few weeks after that, to test some more, and after 2 days found that the TCM computer module thing (the computer that controls the transmission) wasn't working properly, and needed replacing. However, they told me that mine was apparently only the 3rd in the country to have a problem (should I feel special about that?!!) and so there weren't many spares lying around.
    Apparently though, Nissan HQ were taking this seriously now, and so they took a TCM out of a demo model somewhere, Fed-Exed it over to my dealer, and my car went in for the 4th time. I was assured it should only be a quick job, so I wouldnt need the rental car they gave me for long. After the 3rd day, I called them back..."Oh, I was about to call you, Im afraid the TCM we put in made it worse, infact, your car became undriveable, it won't work with your engine serial number, so we've put your old one back in, and we've ordered a new one from Nissan HQ'
    So, for the 5th time, a couple of months later, I take my beloved Murano in to be butchered...again. This time, apparently they fixed it, and all should be good....so they said.
    However, although my car has remained driveable all this time, I'm not happy with it........and this is what I would like some feedback on, before I go back to the dealer.
    About 80% of the time when I pull up to a traffic light, or stop sign or whatever, when I slow down, and i get to around 20mph, there is an ever so slight jerk, the tachometer (revs) suddenly drop by about 500 for half a second, then jump back up again. It feels and looks like a cross between the car shifting down a gear (which it doesnt have, so it cant be doing that) and the car stalling for half a second, before regaining its composure.
    Like I said, the car is still driveable, but even now, after they supposedly fixed the TCM, my Murano is still doing what it did that first time the check engine light came on. And if its not supposed to do that, even though its driveable now, I dont want the transmission dying on me 500 miles out of the warranty.
    So please, when you next slow down and coast up to a traffic light, just take a look at your tachometer, and tell me if yours does the same, or is it just mine. If thats the case, then Im going to take it back again, and threaten them with the Lemon Law, which I really don't want to have to do.
    Thanks guys.
  • homeounerhomeouner Member Posts: 145
    From Homeouner My MO has the same jerk on slow down at apx.20-25 MPH. I call it a slight lunge, caused by the stepping motor reacting because the speed is still being reduced. I've had the car 13 mos. & 17000 miles & have got used to it. It sounds to me that your trans has the control prob. as you mentioned. Ile look at tach. next time I drive it, I know now my tach does not drop momentarily 500 RPM. My trans upon first start up in morning has a whining or pump noise which dissappares upon warm up? I just received a CD from E bay on the complete shop manual. I have not looked at it yet so I dont know if I have been ripp off yet. Mabey it might have some info. on tran. re programing.
  • bugster1bugster1 Member Posts: 1
    Yes, we had the same problem. It happened about a month after we purchased a 2003. We took it in and the service person typed it as a stuck accelerator. It then happened again. We took it in and the service person said he cant fix what is not happening. (we should have logged the complaint) Well, to make a long story short. After a little over 25k miles it finnaly happened to them after taking it in 5 times. They got the code off of the computer but corp wanted them to drive it more and get a reading while it was doing it. Two weeks later they pulled the transmission and replaced it. They had to pull the trans again because the main seal did not seal. We demanded a new one. (my wife loved the vehicle). of course they wouldnt give me the lemon law, so i lost on depriciation. I would rather have a new one than the one that has been taken appart like that. So I took it up the &%^#$ and purchase another one. We so far havent had any problems with the 2004 after 15000 miles. We will cross our fingers. Its been 6 months, the other Murano is still on the used car lot. good luck
  • alstonblalstonbl Member Posts: 3
    I just got my 2004 Murano (I have had it for one year) back after my alternator failed. I was stopped at a gate going into a military installation. When I hit the gas pedal, I didn't get any power. I coasted to a parking spot then turned off my car. It wouldn't start back up. Knowing how hard the Phoenix Arizona weather is on batteries, I thought my battery died so I tried to get a jump without any luck. Then I was told that it probably was my alternator. Of course, all of this happened while the dealership was closed! I had to wait 24 hours while the dealer got the part. You would think that they would have alternators in stock. I have never heard of this problem until I read this site. Good luck everyone!
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Hello friends,

    There are 2 tsb's on ECM ( The engine computer ECM calculates the proper amount of injected fuel ).

    The tsb's shown on ALLDATA are 'ENGINE CONTROLS'-ECM replacement procedures and the other is ECM reprogramming.

    I don't know if the tsb relates to FUEL CONSUMPTION so, I called the Nissan dealership where I got my Murano. The service manager advised me that the TSB got nothing to do with fuel consumption but I do suspect that I could be right.

    For those of you who are having MPG problem...here are the tsb numbers: 00-052C issued April 2004 and 00-006C issued Oct 2003...

    I hope someone can verify the meaning or what this tsb is all about.
  • leebyleeby Member Posts: 8
    I am having a similar problem. As I am finishing up my vacation in LA and about to drive back up north to Washington, my check engine soon light came on and my accelerator would not work. I had to floor it to get out of the driveway. While driving, the transmission would not shift out of 1st gear and while flooring the gas pedal, the RPM would not go above 4000. I proceeded to stop at a near by establishment to check the car out. Everything seemed to be fine. The gas cap was tightened, engine oil was ok, etc. I then proceeded to test out the transmission again and now the gears were shifting and the power felt normal again. The check engine soon light was still on. I called a dealership and they told me a woman had a similar problem and the mechanics could not find the source of the problem. She drove it back home and after a couple of days, her transmission died and the dealership had to replace the whole transmission. I need to get this fixed because I need to get back to work. My murano has 16,000 miles and for it to have a problem like this is very unacceptable. I heard the CVT transmission is not reliable and that Nissan was the only carmaker to say they got the technology to work. I guess they were wrong! I will give feedback as soon as the dealership lets me know what the problem is. As for now, I am never going to purchase a Nissan again and may start looking for a different car. It serves me right for not sticking with a Honda/Toyota.
  • dklaneckydklanecky Member Posts: 559
    I don't see any of the tsb's you mention for the Murano on Nissan's site, http://www.nissanhelp.com/Bulletins/Murano/2003/1.htm
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    dklanecky.
    I got it from this site..http://www.alldata.com/TSB/044256_en.html
  • eieioibeieioib Member Posts: 1
    I've gotten 700 miles on my white SE. I'm surprised at how much dirt accumulates at the rear of the vehicle, I wash it and put a few miles on her and the rear surfaces are filthy. Does anyone else notice this particularity?
  • jetmecjetmec Member Posts: 1
    Hi I'm new to this forum I just got a 05 sl w/l Murano. :)
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Welcome to Edmunds, Jetmac, and congrats on the new Murano. I'm sure others would like more details (at least tell us the color!) and feel free to report on your buying experience over in Nissan Murano: Prices Paid & Buying Experience.

    Steve, Host
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.