Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I got a recall letter from VW last Friday. It said it effected some '04 & '05 Passat TDi. The recall is coded "VY", and my dealer had to order the parts (essentially a fuel pump and some clips that hold it all in place or at least together). The recall letter said some clips were faulty from the supplier, and if they failed they would cause fuel to leak (potential fire hazard).
It suprised me that they did not have a few "recall kits" in stock to do the work when I was already in for a 5K mile service! Now, I get another trip back to them.
I tried to find the recall on-line, but it seems not to be posted. I found a site with the same deatils for the Jetta, Golf and Beetle TDi-PD engine, but it did not list the Passat.
I had a Jetta TDi for 2 years, and never had any problems. In that car, the glow plug light would stay on for 8 chimes or so, but the engine always turned right over as long as i waited. The Passat seems much quicker to warm up with the glow plug light staying on for a couple of chimes, max.
Could it be an oil viscosity issue? The RO says they used 5 quarts of part number VWN G 052 167 A2 to refill the crankcase.
Besotten by Passatan
This is my first VW. So far, I feel great about it. Every weekend, I would opt to drive my Passat TDI as opposed to my SUV MB ML350 which uses so much gas. There is one recall on the Passat for diesel fuel pump, but I think it has been fixed if you bought the car in January 2005 or later.
If your budget is only 26k, I think 2005 Passat TDI is a good buy. It will retain its value quite well. It ranks #2 for the most fuel-efficient car next to #1 Toyota Prius.
Good luck.
Just remember that an unreliable car of today is about the same as the most reliable cars from a decade or two ago. This is becaue all cars are more reliable now.
Your help is appreciated.
The 505.01 is formulated to minimize cam wear. The PD injectors are timing using the camshaft -- so minimizing cam wear is critical to the operation of the engine
Look at the AMSOil European Engine Oil (product id AFL). It matches the latest VW requirements.
The other major brands like Castrol and Mobil and Chevron, even the Delo, do not match VW.
Hope this helps.
It is off by a constant instead of a percentage.
; ^ )
On the other hand, I've never had one be off by 4 mpg, either - the errors on our '02 C240 MB tend to be on the order of 0.5-1.5 mpg, with 1.0 being a good average...always on the optimistic side.
As for the pump recall, I took it to the dealer yesterday. They fixed it within an hour.
Also, how many b5.5 TDI were built? I'm interested in getting one in California, but it needs to be used, and I need to be able to find one when the time comes.
Lastly, how will the change in diesel fuel (2006) effect existing TDI engines (in addition to the increased cost)? Will any modifications need to be made to cars prior to the new fuel standards?
Actually CASTROL TXT 505.01 is used by many European auto specialists and VW dealerships as is the Motul Specific oil and Havoline 505.01 oil that meets VW requirements.
So there appear to be plenty of choices and more on the way.
The Passat is competent from a standstill. It is no racecar by any means, but it can get you out into traffic with no worries. Where it really shines is passing and merging (so basically it shines at +30mph acceleration).
I have been really really pleased. I didn't think I would be impressed with an auto diesel, but I am. The engine works great for the size of the car.
Also, first fill-up, averaged 30.6mpg, 100% city. Not bad for a brand new mid-sized car that's nowhere near broken in.
My other half is looking to replace a Tahoe. He was looking at the Jeep Liberty CRD. He did not like it. Too small, cheap feel, engine was noisy and they want too much money for it.
He really wanted a 4-Wheel Drive diesel, but I finally got him to think about a passenger car instead.
He test drove the Passat TDI yesterday. He LOVED the Passat TDI.
I also did! Time to trade in the Jetta for the Passat TDI. The new Jetta TDI won't be out till June. The new Passat won't be out till July and the TDI later.
The engine and auto trans were perfectly matched. The car hauled butt. I accelerated from a dead stop on an uphill on-ramp and was at 70 before the end of the ramp. The transmission kept the engine at about 4000 RPMs (the max HP range)the whole time and the transmission shifts were absolutely smooth.
Have you all found any negotiation room with the current Passat TDI pricing, especially now that the new Jetta and the new Passat has been announced?
I know VW is offering $500 customer loyalty and this dealership had about 5 Passat TDI on the lot. I am used to waiting for the Jetta TDI to arrive and if lucky getting $500 under MSRP.
Please let me know. Thanks!
You can make the deals, I also got 3.9% financing from VW, and that wasn't even being "offered" on the TDIs (the gassers were eligible for 1.9% average TDI rate was 4.99%).
I drove a Passat TDI sedan and came close to buying it, but would rather the wagon....but the TDI wagons are rare around here. Hmmmm. But the truth is, my car is still running (Pontiac 6000 thank-you very much) and well, when the time comes...I hope a Passat Wagon TDI crosses my path.
And can we have some concrete evidence, not speculation, please...
I can see CA trying to get rid of all the pre-2006 diesels by making them NOT exempt, and forcing them to pass smog or be destroyed/sold.
CA currently makes the smog rules harder each year, just to force people out of older cars. Currently, you need to put a car on rollers to simulate driving, but it's really an attempt to get people with bad transmissions to spend more money (the smog program of CA is sponsored by the Bureau of Automotive Repair...hmmmm).
Thanks!
There are thousands of old MB 300D & VW diesels still on the CA roads. They are not smog tested as there were no tests available. You can still drive a 1970 Pontiac that has no smog control devices. CA would have a hard time making anything retroactive. Actually most of the diesel cars built in the last few years should run better on ULSD. It is available in limited areas of CA. Most of the TDI people say they run better on ULSD. The way the law is they cannot make you repair your car if it is up to OEM standards. In other words a 1990 car has less stringent emissions tests than a 2004 vehicle. A friend that owns a smog station claims the whole system in CA is flawed and pretty much a joke. You can take a car to 10 different stations and get 10 different results.
Just found this forum - what are my Passat TDI options here in California? I can hardly find a single used Passat TDI in the whole state, was there a gap for a few years? How come? Do I have to drive to Florida to get a new one? Can I get a used one in AZ or CO and bring it in? Is there a problem with our fuel here?
Thanks,
Foster
-You can buy a used one and register it legally in CA, but the car needs to have some miles on it [I've heard 7500, but you need to talk to DMV to get a definitive opinion]. No need to "drive to Florida" - new ones are for sale legally in every state surrounding CA - WA, OR, AZ, NV, ID, etc. etc. The issue isn't having to travel far to find a new one - the issue is getting the DMV to allow you to register it in CA. The minimum mileage thing means you have to drive it for quite some time outside of CA before they are going to allow you to register it.
-Personally, I'd look for other alternatives - a Passat 4 cyl can easily be made to exceed 30 mpg, and given the escalating price of diesel, might actually make more economic sense right now. Same could be said for the Japanese alternatives - 4 cyl Accord, Prius, etc. I wouldn't beat my head against the wall that CARB has thrown up in the path of diesel ownership in California. I think the technology will eventually result in a true 50-state diesel again, but not for at least another couple of years.
There is also a loophole where if you have a car that dies out of state, you can purchase a NEW tdi replacement for CA, but the dealer has to certify the car is DOA (drain the oil out of a junker in a VW dealer lot and let it run dry).
There's a well know TDI club on the net with more info.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a Passat gasser requires premium unleaded (turbo 4 and 6cyl), does it not? AND, if this is the case, in my neck of the woods, Premium is $2.35/gal and diesel is $2.12/gal....and regular is $2.09/gal. So, if the gasser takes premium, well, it's obvious.
I have been averaging 35mpg in my Passat TDI with mixed driving (70%C/30%H).
So let's, for arguments sake, say that the Passat gas takes regular (I'd still like to find out if it takes premium or not) and you can average 30mpg out of it, and going on the priced above. If I drive 100miles in my TDI it will cost me $6.06 in fuel. If you drive 100 miles in your gasser and use regular, it will cost you $6.97, or $0.91 more. If you use premium it will cost you $7.83, or $1.77 more. And that is IF you are actually able to squeak 30mpg AVERAGE.
Throw in oil changes every 10K miles instead of every 3K, higher resale value and whatnot, I'd say even with rising fuel costs, it is still overall cheaper to own and maintain a TDI. That's just my $0.02.
That said, I find it ironic that TDI fans and critics go on and on about the fuel economy issue, while diesel pick-up owners rave about their trucks' torque and mention better fuel economy as an "Oh, by the way."
What sold me on a Passat TDI wagon when I went to the dealer to buy a Passat sedan with a 1.8T and manual transmission last year? The torque! And, by the way, 40 mpg driving secondary highways.
Thus, my point about the Passat gasoline 4 vs the diesel.
Look, I'm a diesel fan, but the question originated from someone living in CA and pining for a new TDI. My reaction is to look at the alternatives and not fuss too much about it. CA happens to be one of those places where diesel costs more than premium unleaded right now, and has for many months.
I'm in San Diego and would like to have a Diesel car. I just called my local biodiesel station. B20 is $2.69 number 2 diesel is $2.49, regular unleaded is $2.42. I think in the Bay area diesel is much higher than down here. Most is extra road tax in CA. Plus the diesel in CA is less than 300 PPM currently. That was what the EU was until December 2004 from what I have been told. Here is the interesting thing. A few weeks ago when #2 diesel was $2.19 B20 was $2.63 per gallon. I am thinking that biodiesel will fall in line with regular unleaded and #2 diesel when they all reach $3 per gallon. I would like to find a source for B100 here, so far no luck. I just do not see the incentive to buy a VW Passat unless it is a TDI. There are so many gas cars that get decent, not great mileage with fewer reliability issues. I know my local VW dealer does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling when I visit the showroom. If I can find a used VW TDI wagon Passat or Jetta with over 7500 miles at a decent price I will jump on it.
regarding 87 octane giving less mpg, has anyone tested that with a 1.8T? it's easy to believe it will give less performance. i own two volvos too, each tuned for premium fuel. i've run many 'experiments', some very controlled - and am quite sure that the 87 octane does not result in lower mpg - xc90 2.5T, v70 2.4T.
maybe the volksy turbo cars react differently to the 87 and do get an mpg loss, though. i wonder how much. seems like it varies from model to model whether the 87 octane causes mpg loss.
in my various Z28s i did find an apparent mpg loss of about 10% with 87 octane. but those cars had such absurd power/torque that i didn't notice any power loss. i think they launched better with the low-octane fuel , and i had my best 1/4 mile run with 87 octane - maybe due to better launch... oh, i should mention that running the 87 in the Z28s was not a good idea in hot weather. ping ping ping. i notice the power loss with 87 in the volvos in the summer/heat more too...
anyway, here's hoping that diesel prices will drop a bunch this spring/summer - below premium - and maybe below 87 octane too... that's what usually happens.
I heard the tiptronic trans. is a porsche product, is that true and how reliable is it?
http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=102071
The transmission is not a Porsche product, per se; it is produced by the VW group for all of its family members [VW, Audi, Skoda, Seat]. Porsche has its own version, given its need to deal with higher hp and torque.
Unfortunately, our dmv chief is thinking of installing GPS systems in all cars to track miles driven in CA as an additional tax and to punish hybrid drivers who "aren't paying their fair share of gas taxes because they use less gas"....
My brother has a Eurovan 03 and has tried a few time using 91 versus 87 and it came out cheaper to run 91 at 20 cents a gallon more. Not sure on the numbers but he did a cross country trip and recorded the mileage the whole trip. He also noticed his mileage increased at high altitude. No idea why.
Thanks
#695 of 760 Re: 05 Passat Wagon TDI vs 05 Mercedes E320 CDI [yuppy007] by gagrice Feb 12, 2005 (1:44 pm)
Bookmark | Reply
The market for used VW TDI cars in California is good. One VW dealer in Los Angeles buys them with 7500 miles and sells them at or near new MSRP. I would think in a year you could get your money back along with a trip to California. A quite a few sell on eBay also. I have considered both cars to keep at our home in Hawaii. It is just difficult justifying $60k for a vehicle to sit and depreciate over there. Plus the wagon would be more practical. It sounds like the 2006 Jetta will kind of take the place of the Passat with very close to the same dimensions.
Are you getting decent mileage with the Passat? I assume the handling is good.
http://mauigreenenergy.org/dieselsforsale.htm
Thank you very much!!
Stujo