By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
For reference, check out the current Consumer Reports. They test all the mid-size luxo SUVs, mostly car-based. Towing ranges from 3500-5000 lbs.
I'm hoping the 2005 SUW comes in at about the same size as the MDX and XC90 tested in that issue, minus the luxury content and price, of course.
More direct competitors might include the Pilot, Highlander, and maybe even the Explorer. I'm not sure the current capacity would cut it in that segment.
-juice
Bob
-mike
paisan with air bags? I thought you swore those off?
-juice
I agree with Brenda, I'd like the cladding to go higher. I had a Saturn for over three years and never a door dent. It looked new when I returned it after leasing it. I liek the look of the new Pathfinder also with the grey cladding similiar to the Forester.
My 5 month old Forester has four small dings in the rear passenger door already. I am quite frustrated and saddened. I am going to have them removed by a dent removal service, there is no paint damage, but it is gonna cost me.
Rebecca
Jon
They sell those pop a dent thingies (technical name?) online too.
Jon
-Dave
Brenda
Brenda: Thank you also. If the suction cups don't work I will have a pro do it. There were two small dents at delivery and the dealers contractor did an excellent job of pulling them out.
I think I figured out how they are happening. My cargo carrier opens on that side and to get out the cargo we use a step stool. I am always very careful not to hit the side of the car with any cargo as I remove it but my 16 yr old has helped put a few times lately with cargo and I think she is allowing it to hit the side. The dents are too high for another car, even a big SUV to have done it.
Rebecca
http://www.tvgadgetjudge.com/ding%20king%20review.htm
enjoy - ken
-juice
I wonder if a throw-back Loyale with just galvanized steel would sell well at a price to compete with the Aerio SX and Scion xB?
-juice
I'm sure the new Forester will handle the chores, as well if not better, than did the old Loyale. I can understand not wanting to dirty up a new car, however.
Question: Did the old Loyale have a dual-range tranny? If so, that might(?) be missed, considering your Forester's future role. Then again, maybe not, as the Forester has a much more powerful engine than the Loyale. Older (much less powerful) Subies needed the dual-range tranny more so than the new (much more powerful) ones.
Bob
as long as it's made in Japan! I would have bought one for sure two years ago. It would be the ONLY made-in-Japan station wagon (other than the Forester), and there are people,like me, who only buy Japanese cars if they are made in Japan.
No Bob, it didn't have a dual range tranny. It didn't even have 4WD! Sure, it waddled a bit in mud and I had to floor it at times until I got to firm ground but it never got stuck anywhere. The odometer reading was 143,102 kilometers.
What about the IS300 Sportcross. Pricey, though.
-juice
Speaking of snow, living in the great white north, did you use snow tires on the Loyale? If you put them on the new Subie, you need to do it on all 4 wheels.
Bob
WRX wagon is a hatchback. No, the Loyale was great for cargo capacity. The Forester falls a little short there (literally).
You may want to start your search here:
http://www.myperformancecar.com/
Caution: One of these links (on this site's home page) keeps crashing my computer. The other one seems to work fine. I don't remember which is the offending link, however.
Bob
Jon
Rebecca, my advice is to find a good dent removal outfit to remove the dents, I am all for DIY. repairs wherever possible but some things are better left to professionals and IMHO dents are one of them.
Cheers Pat.
-Dave
I personally like having the non-hiding wipers on my trooper, never have snow build up in that area. Also on the SVX there is a "winter" position for the wipers that leave them up on the window, so they don't compact the snow in there either.
-mike
Every study, at the time before the changeover, concluded that the parallel wiper stroke was more efficient and effective at clearing the glass than the clap-hands stroke. The clap-hands stroke left large blind spots in both upper corners of the windshield. That was especially a concern on the driver's side of the car.
It would be a wrong step backward in time for Subaru, or any other manufacturer to consider such a poor design.
-mike
Anyway, I didn't see any blind spots on the left or right.
-Dave
I use a tarp, if I have one with me. Or old card board boxes.
I rented a van that had wipers like that, the thing is one side has to wait for the other to get out of the way, so their speed is slower in a torrential down pour. I prefer conventional wipers, FWIW.
-juice
I think the Subaru's could benefit from the design, but first I would put windsheild heating elements on the lower priced Subaru models. I did not want to pay the difference between the Legacy L and Legacy GT models to get this option.
Mazda MPV
Dodge/Chrysler Caravan
Both with the inward sweeping wipers.
-mike
-juice
-mike
-Brian
Ken
http://www.seatshield.com/
Jon
Bob
Ed
-Frank P.
-juice
-mike
The Forester has been seamless and has performed up to all my expectations. With that said....what I really would like to see improved:
1. bigger gas tank or improved mileage
2. more torque/power in the NA H4
3. some kind of window visor/gutter arrangement to stop the water from dripping in the drivers side window .(I put on window visors)
4. something to stop the rear window from accumulating soo much crud (ok...this one might not be possible) deflector is near useless.
5. variable speed rear wiper that I can control as desired.
OK....thats my story and I'm sticking to it. Now if Subaru could tweek these small issues.....they will have made some good progress.
Bob
-juice
1. Re bigger gas tank/improved mileage- Hey, I've gone over 400 miles on a tank of gas and seldom fill-up before the 350-mile mark so I've no complaints there.
2. Re more torque/power- I think Subaru did an excellent job of addressing that with the XT. Oh, you meant the H-4 ;-) Well 165 ponies from a 4-banger is already pretty good so I'm not sure there's much room for improvement.
3. Re some kind of window visor/gutter arrangement- I'll grant you that water dripping in the window is kinda annoying but adding a gutter isn't easy to do with frameless windows (at least one that doesn't look dorky)
4. Re something to stop the rear window from accumulating so much crud- Well the deflector was supposed to be the fix for that. If that doesn't do the job, there's not much hope since the real culprit is the vertical rear plane of the vehicle. Besides, that's why the Forester comes standard with a rear wiper :-)
5. Re variable speed rear wiper- Couldn't agree more with you on this one and you'd think it'd be a low cost item. I guess there's just not much perceived demand.
-Frank P.
P.S. I've got you beat with 56k on my 01 Forester!
Ross