Subaru Crew: Suggestions for Subaru

1121315171847

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Good point about the slow-selling TS model, and I'll add that the Brigthon models were also dropped.

    Perhaps they could bring back some decontented Brigthon models with the 156hp 2.0l engine sold in Japan, just to help meet CAFE standards.

    But that definitely goes against the attempt to move upscale. It might even be seen as an attempt to compete with the Koreans, that could tarnish their image.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    For the next-generation Baja, assuming it continues to be built off the Outback platform.

    Since a good portion of Baja owners are homeowners, the issue of going to Home Depot to pick up some 4'x8' plywood occasionally pops up. The current Baja doesn't adress that problem. Here's a suggestion on how to remedy that:

    * Since the mid-gate reinforcing bar seems to be required with this unit body, I say offer a 2-way switchback: (1) The current fold-down panel would be retained, although a I hope it will become larger. (2) With the switchback up and in place, offer a retractable rear window, like the one found on the '04 Toyota Tundra Double Cab. This would act as the forward support for plywood to rest upon.

    * Offer a 2-position tailgate like that found on the new Chevy Colorado. This would act as the rear support for the plywood, when partially lowered.

    Subaru would then also need to offer some sort of forward vertical barrier to protect the driver and passenger from possible shifting loads. This could be a drop down (from the ceiling) cargo guard.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    ...and don't forget Class II towing capacity. ;-)

    -juice
  • joybelljoybell Member Posts: 275
    with upmarket luxuries, I hope the cars are still tough, reliable and versatile. Otherwise they will be purely urban cars, not fit for the "real" country life.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    If you want farm equipment, I suggest you go buy a john deere, cause there aren't many vehicles short of trucks that are situated for what you want to be doing. I fear you will be severely let down by your forester, because you have some very unrealistic expectations.

    -mike
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I agree with Mike on this one. Your arguments and justifications are getting real old here. Frankly I'm getting tired of trying to offer reasonable explanations, only to get some silly statement from you in retort. Perhaps you should move to some 3rd-world country. You can find all the stripped down vehicles you want there.

    This is my last comment to you on this subject. I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall, and it's not a whole lot of fun...

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Even bob has somewhat receeded in his demand for un-braked towing over 1000lbs! :)

    -mike
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    having a few creature comforts means Subarus have become wuss-mobiles is beyond me. Even F-150s with rubber floor mats and roll up windows comes standard with A/C and an automatic. Are they somehow compromised by having those features?

    This discussion/argument has become silly and pointless. The rest of you can continue to debate her. I've grown tired of it.

    Bob
  • jlemolejlemole Member Posts: 345
    I don't think Subaru ever had farming in use when making its cars. Sure they intended their cars to be capable in light off-road conditions, inclement weather, snow, etc. But for day-to-day use on a farm??? Absolutely not. If you need a farming vehicle, get a farming vehicle. Next we'll be wondering why Subaru doesn't offer a power takeoff on the Forester so you can pull a hay-baler behind it!

    P.S. In my teens, I worked on a farm for three summers. Besides the tractor, we used a 1938 Dodge PowerWagon with 4-Wheel drive for heavy hauling, and a Ford pickup for going to town, etc. For general getting around the farm, we actually had a Moke (like the ones they use in Bermuda -- no radio, a/c, or windows, metal seats with removeable pads, rubber floor mats.

    Jon
  • joybelljoybell Member Posts: 275
    Bring back the Loyale wagon with on-demand FWD, add a dual range tranny. I saw one on the weekend in mint condition. I was jealous. Enjoy your Wuss-mobiles. I won't be back here.
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    At the risk of getting flamed here, are we perhaps being a little bit mean spirited? IIRC, I thought that this thread was supposed to be in the form of a list for SoA to read and consider, inputted by real people with varying viewpoints. Hard discussions on the merits was what Future Models was for?

    Steve
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'd like to have a big machine gun and lasers on the front of subies as a stand alone option offered by subaru. And while I'm at it I'd like big bar-bumpers, and optional 33" tires.

    And while we are asking for crazy stuff, I want it to tow 10Klbs, get 100mpg, and have zero emissions.

    -mike
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Hmm...PTO on my Forester? I could put that to good use.

    joybell, come back, don't take it so hard. Yours may be a minority opinion but no less valid. Heck, even ballistic was convinced to rejoin us.

    Ed
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    Mike,
       I already looked into it; they interfere with the bumper absorbtion , so Subaru will never go for it. I think aftermarket is the only option. Personally, I was willing to settle for auto-feed paint ball guns mounted in the fog lights, with easy-acccess mounting of a remote CO2 canister, but I think those guys in DC may have caused a chill in the mobile paintball market.
    Mark
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Thanks, yeah I figured I'd have to go aftermarket! I'm actually in talks with a company in China currently to get nudge bars made for the subarus.

    -mike
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    Fibber is absolutely right. If you drive off everyone with a different point of view, this will become a very boring place.

    james
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Machine guns are decidedly low tech. I once proposed grill mounted laser guided surface-to-surface missiles for resolving issues with bad drivers.

    Seriously, cut Monica some slack. We don't all want the same thing, and she is entitled to express the minority opinion.

    Steve
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I've long been a person who has expressed minority opinions here. Anybody remember my requests for a Subaru Jeep Wrangler-eater? Or my request for a full-fledged Subaru truck? Or my requests for greater towing, and better off-road ability on certain models? Clearly opinions outside the mainstream on these boards. So, I've long been a champion of minority opinions around here.

    What I have problem with is someone who constantly complains about the same thing over-and-over-and-over-and-over... knowing full well, that those complaints (requests) will never be addressed. At least they won't unless Subaru changes its gameplan, which is highly unlikely.

    Bob (feeling old & grumpy)
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    FWIW, I would suggest that you simply don't engage her if you think she is that far off base. The data collector (Patti's asst.) will log her suggestions as a singular vote. But I wouldn't discourage her from participating.

    When I was younger, I too liked basic & stripped. I went out and bought a new base level '79 Ford Fiesta with A/C as the only option. You couldn't get any more stripped than that during the '70's!! Today my base '02 OBW (which is reasonably well equipped) is my concept of basic transportation. I think we tend to want more creature comforts as we age....

    Smile, life is too short.

    Steve
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    It has to do with the state of automotive industry for non-3rd world consumption. Just isn't gonna happen. It would be like someone suggesting on here that we go back to carburated, 4-wheel drum brakes, no power steering, no airbags, no safety glass, etc.

    -mike
  • subkidsubkid Member Posts: 94
    I managed to calm down after reading a first couple of your posts and let it go, but now, at the end of the day, you don't get any more slack from me. So...

    you wrote to joybell:
    "... Your arguments and justifications are getting real old here. Frankly I'm getting tired of trying to offer reasonable explanations, only to get some silly statement from you in retort. Perhaps you should move to some 3rd-world country ..."

    and

    " ...This discussion/argument has become silly and pointless. The rest of you can continue to debate her. I've grown tired of it..."

    and

    "...What I have problem with is someone who constantly complains about the same thing over-and-over-and-over-and-over... knowing full well, that those complaints (requests) will never be addressed..."

    I hope, buy now, you understud by yourself how arrogant and immature those comments were. And I certainly hoped that you will rid us, all silly people, of your eternal wisdom after the first one made. Didn't happen on either account. Obviously, your understanding of a term "discussion" is that anybody not starting to see things your way after a while, should shut up and go away. Well, tells a lot more about you and certainly adds a credibility to your opinion on any subject.

    As for defining majority and minority in any group, arrogant, immature, loud and impolite ones are just the most visible, not a majority. And, as far as ideas on this "wishful thinking forum" are concerned, not a single one deserves more or less consideration than the others.

    Yet, in the real world, majority of Subaru owners actually care more about lining in their car's trunk than for the difference in acceleration between 5.3 and 5.6 on 0-60 track.

    K
  • jlemolejlemole Member Posts: 345
    I don't think anyone was getting agitated about Monica expressing her opinion that Subaru offer a basic "stripped-down" trim level. But to harp on the fact that Subaru wasn't directing their marketing efforts at people like her, when that is an extemely small segment of Subaru's market, was getting a little overdone. Subaru's "market" in North America is not people with farms looking for a vehicle that you can throw muddy farm equipment in, yet drive to town for dinner. Heck, I even tried to help her by giving her a link for waterproof seat covers. But to constantly harp that Subaru was becoming too "upscale", and by correlation, that its core market (us) were forcing Subaru into becoming a "wussy" car became exasperating. Subaru does not have North America's farming community in mind when it designs its cars, and I can't say I blame them.

    Jon
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    Thank you, someone needed to say that. I too am one of the "oddballs" who would like to see a "basic" Subie so that I could consider returning to the fold. I have said before that I would like to see a real "Justy" again or something of comparable size. Not all of us are able to afford, or want to pay even if we can, all of the "bells and whistles". I want a reliable, strong car with decent ground clearance, without all of the latest and greatest gadgets which will eventually cost a small fortune to repair when they eventually fail. I see a great number of ancient Subarus in the Comox Valley. I wish there were the modern equivalent still available.

    I have been feeling somewhat sick about the treatment Joybell was given. I hope we will not see this type of rudeness repeated.
    :-(

    Ross
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    but I won't because this thread will turn into a free for all. Now can we get back on topic?

    Bob
  • hondafriekhondafriek Member Posts: 2,984
    I agree that Bob may have expressed his views in pretty strong terms, but I can see where he is coming from.

     I also have read the many repetitive posts from Joybell and frankly her expectations are totally out the window, there is absolutely no auto manufacturer offering the type of stripped down auto that she craves, that includes offerings from so called 3rd world auto makers, and I do not care how you decontent it, a Forester will never be farm implement.

      Having said that I support her right to lobby for what you want, but also to realise when you have flogged a horse to death and let it go.

      Cheers Pat.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I will pass on the CHAT tonight. I'm in no mood to be on my good behavior, and am not sure I can even pull it off...

    Bob
  • ladywclassladywclass Member Posts: 1,713
    i'd like us to stop "arguing" about it ... is it quite possible that it's a "classic male-female" discussion problem? Joybell feels she's not been HEARD (i.e. that what she WANTS is valid - and after all it IS a "want") ... while all you guys have tried to do is to FIX her from WANTING the WRONG things ...
    cut it some slack .. she stated what she wanted and all you guys did was tell her why it was wrong to want it .... i agree with a couple of earlier postings ... if you thought it was tedious ... just ignore it ... you don't HAVE to have the last word just because it's primarily a male-dominated board ....

    i have enjoyed being a part of these boards and have learned an AWFUL lot about my car from you guys ... i've even felt fairly well tolerated for my "off-beat" postings ... but did this discussion HAVE to fall to this level and take over this whole board??????

    Brenda (repeating ... can't we all just get along? ... and I DO hope to see all you guys in chat tonight if I can remember to get there!!!)
  • Karen_SKaren_S Member Posts: 5,092
    I guess I was relying too much on the usual comraderie and good will that is the norm in Subaru Crew and assuming that this would pass quickly.

    As you all know, everyone is entitled to state their opinions/comments in the TH. However, when the discussion turns to personal jabs, then it is no longer constructive. You can disagree with someone without resorting to this type of exchange. And I think we are all aware that no matter how vehemently we argue an issue, you are not going to sway someone if they are strongly opposed to your way of thinking. All you can expect is to possibly enlighten them to how you came to that conclusion and possibly give them food for thought. None of us have the corner on what's the best for everyone.

    SO, let's move on and be friends again.

    <Pollyanna out>
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    I agree that the gadgetry can be a little overwhelming in some new cars and Subaru has such great engineering emphasis that we are seeing some "cutting edge" technology on Subies years before other makes. However, that stuff is never cheap to repair. My wife's Audi A6 is a prime example of state-of-the-art gadgets that set your "personal expenditures" budget back three months every time one of them stops working right. I swear I will never buy or even think about an other Audi for that reason, only.
    Mark
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Well stated.....
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    The body design of all Subaru goes through a windtunnel for Cd test to optimize the body lines.
    Does this test incorporate how projectile(s) react to the design?
    It seems like the newer body designs are magnet to projectile(s) kicked up from vehicles in the front. My '03 WRX as an example, the front bumper took some beating before I could get the clearbra on versus my '98 OB and '99 OBS [no clearbra] which shows no scars accept those that were self inflicted.

    Ok what I'm getting at is, come up with designs that are slick and appealing but not stone magnets so they'll remain slick and appealing.

    -Dave
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    the heat of moment for me has passed, or so I thought until I read Brenda's post. This was not ever for me a male-female dominance issue as you stated. Oh well, as others have suggested, time to move on...

    Speaking of Hurricane Isabel, we have been without power since 9:00 PM last night, with no idea as to when it will be restored. Same with the cable. I'm only here because I ran an extension cord from my generator to my computer; clearly a stop-gap solution.

    Bob
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Good to hear that you have power (home made...). My S-in-L is south of you, listening to her food defrost!!
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    This isn't my area, so this is just a guess. But I would think that the two desires are hard to achieve at the same time. My thinking goes that cars with high frontal Cd have a compressed box of air in front of the header panel that probably helps push debris up and over the car. Add on deflectors do just that. Slippery front ends just cannot stop stuff from striking.

    Steve
  • Interesting theory about the rock chips. This certainly isn't my area of expertise either, but the Jeep Wrangler comes to mind when thinking about a high Cd. Wranglers' grills and A pillars just get hammered with rock chips, and they have very high Cd. Maybe it's more like a bell curve where too much Cd becomes self defeating?

    Personally, I think modern paints play a significant part in how prone a car is to rock chips. Today's paints seem much harder and more brittle. They're great at resisting environmental contamination and UV damage compared to old-style single stage paints, but the rock chips are a major issue.

    I would love to see Subaru and other manufacturers address this since it seems so common now, and rock chips age a car very quickly.
  • hondafriekhondafriek Member Posts: 2,984
    I think that the paint on the front bumper of my Gt is more flexible than previous cars I have owned.

      Case in point I have two indentations in my front bumper were some ignorant yo yo tapped it in a parking lot, the indents are from his licence plate bolts but the paint is not broken at all.

      Cheers Pat.
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    also lets the stuff keep coming straight at your windshield, erego more chips in the windshield. The more-vertical/flat front end either takes the hit straight-on or most things blow over the top of the car, lifted by the huge airdam on top the hood. It seems I gather a lot more smashed bugs, especially butterflies, on my windshield now that the front end is more aerodynamic.

    Mark
  • glycinemaxglycinemax Member Posts: 74
    Take basic Outback (04/05MYs is what I'm going off of) and switch out front and rear bumpers and side cladding for a Forester X treatment (solid all-the-way-through material). Cockpit treatment can be left as is or simplified along the lines of the Forester (think' wood versus brushed aluminum). Finagle a full size spare into the cargo well. Make cargo area (and back of backseats) out of firm rubbery material that can be wiped out (hosing might be going to far). AND offer a turbo H4 diesel/MT/moonroof package with cloth seats. CY 2006 US goes ULSD.
         
    Subaru is starting to explore flat four diesel for European market, I thought I had read. Could future cars be globally produced and certified? Then I could special order this from Europe if marketing indicated not enough demand to stock dealer lots. Possible? Small aircraft diesel engines are being explored by Subaru right? ...or was that someone else. Possible joint venture w/ Isuzu (GM) like Honda European Civic or VW and DaimlerChrysler?

    On another note, friend in Colorado love's his OB but would like to have bigger wheel wells to deal with snow packing.

    Lookin' forward to y'all's feedback.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Bob- Don't be so quick to discount Brenda's observations. She never said that it was a " male-female dominance issue" but rather a male-female communications issue (on a "male-dominated board). It's certainly true that women often times just want to have their concerns heard while the typical male response is to try and fix the problem regardless of whether a fix was requested. But hey, we can't help ourselves, it's in our genetic make-up :-)

    Now, can I take a crack at my dream mobile? I'll take a black Forester XS MT but with the STi's engine, moonroof, gray leather interior, heated and cooled power front seats, tilt and telescoping steering wheel with stereo controls, beefier rear sway bar, front strut tower brace, anti-dive suspension tuning and 17" wheels. Oh yeah, and bring back the cassette player ;-)

    If Subaru were to offer the above for $30k, I'd buy it tomorrow!

    -Frank P.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Wow, I missed the whole thing! :o)

    Here is a photo of a "soft wuss-mobile [that is not] real":

    image

    A picture is worth 1,000 words.

    Any how, think about this: in a high-tech world, the Forester X seems pretty basic to me - steel wheels, mechanical AWD with no electo-nannies, mechanical suspension with no prone-to-fail air bladders, manual A/C, etc. Add rubber floor mats, rubber cargo liner, dog divider, ...

    I've seen some selling for about $18,500 with freight included. That's for AWD, too. Not bad. The average new car is $24 grand, so the price is, at least, basic.

    Let's try to make suggestions and allow others to make suggestions, and leave it up to Subaru to interpret what is do-able or not.

    Perhaps Monica will get her wish if Subaru opens up a plant in South America and start to cater to less affluent folks in rural areas there. Of course it would probably have a 90hp diesel if that was the case.

    My dad had a Toyota Land Cruiser in Belize, that had rubber floor mats, steel wheels with knobby tires, manual low range, 5 speed manual with a big 4 cylinder diesel engine! The cars exist, for UN-spec missions in 3rd world countries. Still, it had power windows, locks, and stuff. Economies of scale make it cheaper for Toyota to include that stuff. A/C is standard too.

    -juice
  • Great thoughts, Juice. I concur 100% with allowing each person to express their own opinions and then leaving it to Subaru to sort out what they will implement.

    Just out of curiosity, have you verified the authenticity of that photo? There seems to be a lot of funky pixel artifacts around the car, as if it's been blended into the background. But it's hard to tell with a low res image. Digitally manipulated or not, that's a pretty sweet image.

    -Ty
  • amsbearamsbear Member Posts: 147
    I bet that was pretty spectacular as well.

    Alan
    98 OBW Ltd
  • jlemolejlemole Member Posts: 345
    I've now had my 02 Outback wagon for just over a year. I love the car and look forward to driving it every day. I'm in it alot, as I've racked up almost 31,000 miles since 9/3/02. My biggest comfort complaint is the need for a telescoping steering wheel. I have long legs and I keep the seat almost all the way back. The reach for the steering wheel is long enough to be uncomfortable on long trips. Other than that:

    -- put the cruise control activation switch on the steering wheel

    -- putting a notch below "D" on the shifter

    -- illuminate the window, lock, fog lamp and cruise control switches

    -- though not of as high a priority, radion volume and tuning switches on the steering wheel would be nice.

    Other than that, I think this car was an incredible bang for my buck!

    Jon
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Better Anti-Theft System
    One that is friendly to the user/owner and a Royal PITA to those who want to steal, not the other way around.

    -Dave
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Again that's one of the Euro/Aussie items that we don't get! I think they get an engine immobiliser standard, as well as a few more anti-theft choices.

    -Dennis
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    Jon, Somebody must have had the same complaint. The next Gen OB/Legacy dont come with telescoping steering column, but the column has been extended and lowered and the seat lowered in relationship to the pedals to create a more natural driving position.
    Mark
  • nine51nine51 Member Posts: 77
    I agree with the post above, the security system is a bit of a pain to use. The necessity of having to have the remote to dissarm the system without setting off the alarm is the biggest pain. You can't just unlock the car with the key without setting off the alarm.

    2nd, we have an 02 Legacy GT wagon with keyless entry. It would be really nice to have the flashing parking light feature when locking or unlocking the door, like the security system has. I turned off the horn honk feature because it's a disturbance to the neighbors, and attracts too much attention. Many times when you push the lock button and the door is still unlocked, you can walk away without locking the car and not know it. If the lights would flash on lock and unlock, you would know it worked. That's a good feature of the security system.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Why do people have to turn it into a gender thing? I would say the same comments I did to anyone from a bum on the street to the president of the country to anyone out there, male, female, alien. When someone asks for something REPEATEDLY that is just not happening, it is encumbent upon the community to explain that what they want isn't happening. Of course if we all want to be happy live in the fake world, we'll say "yes joybell, your comments will be incorporated into the next design", and the proceed to laugh our butts off knowing full well it isn't going to EVER happen. I'm all for giving input here, but when someone is off base, we tell em (like when we tell bob he is never gonna see 5000lb towing from a 4-cylinder subie)

    -mike
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    My '92 SVX had telescopic and memory tilt. As did my '88 and '91 XT6s.

    -mike
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    Sometimes you can't avoid being irritated, but you can avoid being rude.

    I realize that pointing this out boarders on rudeness. Please forgive me. Can we move on now? :P

    james
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.