Are you a current or recent car shopper who bought an EV and then installed solar – or who had solar already, making the decision to go electric easier?
OR
Are you a recent EV buyer (past 3 months) as a result of manufacturer incentives and dealer discounts on these vehicles, including year-end deals? Were you convinced to buy an EV after finding a good end-of-year deal, or due to uncertainty around which EVs will no longer qualify for full/partial EV tax credits in 2024? A national business reporter is interested in speaking with you. Please reach out to [email protected] by 12/15 if interested in sharing your story.
OR
Are you a recent EV buyer (past 3 months) as a result of manufacturer incentives and dealer discounts on these vehicles, including year-end deals? Were you convinced to buy an EV after finding a good end-of-year deal, or due to uncertainty around which EVs will no longer qualify for full/partial EV tax credits in 2024? A national business reporter is interested in speaking with you. Please reach out to [email protected] by 12/15 if interested in sharing your story.
Comments
Wouldn't it be nice if GM designed a new Astro (based on the Colorado) and styled it along the lines of the new Sienna or Quest? Families who own boats or pull trailers would have the option of purchasing a minivan with an impressive towing capacity. As it currently exists these families are forced into the SUV market.
GM wouldn't care about losing Suburban sales to Astro sales as long as the profit per vehicle on the new Astro would match the Sub's. Not likely, I know, but if GM is interested in returning to prominence it better start thinking outside the box.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? [email protected] - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
Adding SV6 to the existing name seems somewhat indecisive. GM is moving Pontiac away from basic transit. To demonstrate this, it is switching to more performance style names such as GTO and G6.
GM should show its faith in the trend by naming the mini-van just SV6.
Its rare that a name would influence what I would buy but If there is little other differences, the next van will be a Montana SV6 rather than an Uplander. I would not want to be confused with a Highlander or an Outlander
http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content.mv?port_code=autoweek&cat- _code=carnews&loc_code=index&content_code=06889743
Why buy a Saturn when I can buy essentially the same vehicle at my Chevy dealer and pay lots less. Its why I own a Chevy rather than a Pontiac. Saturn atleast gave you something unique.
there is a rumore that GM will stick the new 3.6L Global V6 in the new minivans, but they'll be tuned less than the CTS and Rendezvous..probably about 240-245 HP only..but still a great improvement over the old ones!!
and why is it names Montana SV6?? Remember the Transport?? It was called Transport, then Transport Montana, then Montana, and now Montana SV6....GOODNESS!!! just call it SV6 to blend closer to the upcoming G6!
Sorry this is really off topic. I remember a few months ago libertycat was probably the biggest poster here, then he sort of disappeared. Does anyone know what happened to him?
As everyone else upgrades, they go from being a decent van having a few unique or key features (such as the 8 passenger seating, good mpg) to a dinasoar that can only be sold at a low price.
At best pre-production. I am betting concept and that you will not have the final interior, exterior details.
To me, a concept is is either a prototype or an design exercise put together by hand in a studio, a pre-production model uses actual parts for the final vehicle but is assembled by mechanics rather than on the assembly line, and a production model is the final vehicle, made on the assembly line.
Per the attached from Saturnfans, the Relay will not be available until Fall, '04.
http://www.saturnfans.com/Cars/Future/saturnvanandconvertible.sht- ml
If that is correct, I doubt the models at the LA show will consist of actual parts for the final vehicle as there would be none made yet. It certainly would not have rolled off the assembly line. Clearly, it will look exactly, or very close to exactly how the final product will look.
Relay looks very Volvo like at first quick glance, is an appealing green with charcoal lower accent. Terraza has the new big round Buick grille, and big Buick chrome wheels (car is red). Very car like hood-fender-grille set ups. Look to share parts from grille back. On the sliding door on the right, no visable parts to indicate that it opens like the previous GM vans. Maybe it is just from reading about them, but they do look a little less "van" like then the current Generation. Says 3.5L 200hp V6, removeable second row seats, fold flat third row, stability control, all wheel drive, "overhead rail system with optional DVD player".
That would go over well, (not)
not enough power to move a big minivan.
It'll probably be the same thing with this.....when they need an all new blockbuster, lets just rehash an underpowered engine, slap a really ugly exterior on it, and a cheeseball interior.....but give em HUGE rebates!
OK, I haven't seen the new GM vans yet, but if the level of effort is comparable to Fords PIECE OF CRAP freestar.........
Relying on a 200hp engine for a slug van does not give me good vibes about the rest, especially knowing its not a brand new chassis either.
No wonder all the domestics are going down the tubes.
The van, in 4.2 liter form, has 201hp and a mountainous 265 ft-lbs of torque hooked up to a very smooth shifting four speed automatic. On paper, this looks like a huge loser, but as a practical matter, it performs quite well. The engine never has to work hard, stop and go traffic performance is on par with the best, and hopefully through intense development, will prove to be a reliable pairing. It isn't going to scare Honda, Toyota or Nissan in absolute performance, but that isn't why people buy minivans. Would I be happier if Ford put a 220hp SOHC 4.0 liter V6 and a five speed automatic in the Freestar? Of course, but it isn't necessary. Most drivers will tromp on the throttle during a test drive and realize that the Freestar squirts away from a standing stop quite nicely.
GM could do the same thing with its new vans. There is no reason why the 3.5 liter V6 from the Malibu couldn't power a minivan. If memory serves me correctly, Mazda produces a fine van with a 3.0 liter Ford V6. Nobody complains about that van being under powered.
OHC are generally more efficient in use, and its probably best that GM use the 3.6 in their new minivans
the mazda van is noticeably smaller and can 'get by' on its smaller mill, but would benefit greatly from more power. Overall, to me, the Mazda van is the most attractive minivan currently made. Its not a FAT SLUG like all the other ones. A nicer dash and shifter similar to the Siennas would be welcome improvements.
I do like the Venture aside from powertrains and the fisher price thing. To me its a no nonsense design and has good space utilization. The short model to me just looks to be a useful vehicle.
I did like the simplicity of the new Freestar dash design, but on the whole the interior screams CHEAP and TACKY. Why not just keep the Windstar? Why bother putting out CRAP? Go look at the inside of a Sienna and look at the Freestar. Why didn't Ford just buy a bunch of Siennas and rebadge them?
GM has a big opportunity here to get a leg up and out do Ford and Chrysler at least. history suggests they can't match the interior quality of the 'imports', but maybe they can get close.
I would like to see minivans here evolve to vehicles more like the Japanese Mitsubishi Grandis, Toyota Wish, and Japan only new Odyssey.
If the new 3.6 fits that would be a welcome upgrade that would really help these products stand out and be more competitive. Sure the 3.5 will start and run, but it won't make an impression to a potential buyer as anything superior to the competition.