Chevy Uplander/Pontiac Montana SV6/Saturn Relay/Buick Terraza

1303133353656

Comments

  • vanman1vanman1 Member Posts: 1,397
    Ya, you might get a 1/2 extra MPG.

    ;-)
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    the SWB version is a lot easier to park.
  • gmhellmangmhellman Member Posts: 121
    My employee educator was on a trip to Ohio and her 95 Transport died. The dealer gave her 500 in cash for the vehicle with a blown engine. (Oil pumped died at 75 miles per hour and siezed the engine) She purchased 2005 SV6 Blue fully loaded and paid 30,125 plus tax, title, license. She got xm radio, heated leather with the 4 captians chairs. She said the the engine is so quiet that when she starts it with the remote starter she almost wants to turn the key to start when she gets in since there is almost no indication when it is running. She said the ride is very much imporved compared to the old transport and it is very quiet. I told her to keep me abreast of how the quality/ride goes as she drives it more.
  • vanman1vanman1 Member Posts: 1,397
    I think the old Transports had a 3.1L in them. No doubt the SV6 would be a Caddy in comparison.
  • stragerstrager Member Posts: 308
    on these overpriced vans before long. Why would anyone want a van, regardless of the macho SUV look, without a third row fold flat in the floor seat?
  • vanman1vanman1 Member Posts: 1,397
    Actually a similar Montana SV6 is listed C$3-4K less than my 04 Montana and has more equipment (all disc brakes, On Star ect) and a better interior. I don't see these vans as over priced at all. In fact they are much more realistically priced than many vans out there now.
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    I thought the third row row seats *were* fold flat? The Edmunds write up and pic seems to indicate that. I think the misjudgment that will hurt is no side curtain bags, which is totally inexplicable to me in what should be a family hauler. But while I'm sure there will be rebates, your estimate seems way overboard as to their size based on past experiences.
  • stragerstrager Member Posts: 308
    I believe the seats fold flat, but not into the floor like they do for all the other vans. Also what I meant to say is $7-10K below MSRP (after assorted incentives and rebates), not $7-10K in rebates.
  • wheelz4wheelz4 Member Posts: 569
    After doing a bit of investigation, I've come to the conclusion that these vans aren't quite the value they appear to be. When you option up a LWB version to Sienna or Odyssey like levels of equipment, they aren't really any cheaper, while having approx. 50 less h.p., four-speed instead of 5 speed autos, no side curtain airbags, a less-flexible interior, etc. etc.

    And is it just me, or do these vans seem almost non-existant? I mean, I've seen a couple on the road, but very few road tests, no advertising, no hype....GM really seams to be keeping them quiet.

    (maybe Oprah needs to give a few thousand away!)
  • sundevil99sundevil99 Member Posts: 20
    Just a thought on the quiet introduction...

     

    I don't know if production has ramped up enough to handle a large ad campaign. I've been in touch with several dealers in the Phoenix area. Most of them have told me they are ordering what they can. Some dealers have told me they won't have any until January. From what I can tell by tracking their inventory through their websites, they seem to be selling what invetory they are getting at a fairly brisk pace. Pretty good considering a lack of advertising. So, maybe they haven't been producing long enough to have any substantial inventory.

     

    I've got no insider knowledge, so that's just my guess.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    that most likely that production isn't fully ramped up yet and the factory isn't ready for a full blown ad campaign with Oprah handing out a few thousand of them to those lucky people who also got a G6:)
  • stragerstrager Member Posts: 308
    http://info.detnews.com/autosconsumer/autoreviews/index.cfm?id=16- 653

     

    Looks like these were designed to be "deal" vehicles in the best traditions of GM.
  • dan165dan165 Member Posts: 653
    There isn't much supply yet. I have seen ads for 05 Ventures and Montanas but the new vans likely won't see much advertising till the new year. Maybe the Superbowl.

     

    I have seen 3 or 4 on the road now. They look pretty decent.
  • just4fun2just4fun2 Member Posts: 461
    Last week while driving past my local Saturn dealer they had 2 (two) Relay's on their lot for sale. Today, both Relay's are gone.....Sold. Not bad for not having any advertising around here.

     

    I don't care for the Saturn car line up, but the Relay caught my eye last week. Doesn't have that "mini" van look, nice to have a breath of fresh air in the styling department. Of course everybody like something different.

     

    After seeing the Honda, Toyota and Nissan vans anything would be an improvement in the looks department.
  • vanman1vanman1 Member Posts: 1,397
    I agree. I was skeptical about the look of these vans with the "SUV hood", but I generally find myself liking them. The interior is very nice also. No they don't have "stow and go seats" but they fold flat enough for most people. Who knows, maybe the General will have a little hit with the experimental look vans, at least until the all new ones come in a few years.
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    I agree too--I find the appearance far preferable to your average minivan, and liked the interior of the Relay a lot. As long as the seats fold flat, I don't find the slight additional "height" of the floor (which has storage in the rear) a problem. Now about the lack of curtain airbags.... (dumb, dumb, dumb)
  • kfdmedkfdmed Member Posts: 130
    Lack of side head airbag protection for all three rows is a deal breaker for me and I suspect many potential buyers. I wont be purchasing a van until spring 2006. Is GM planning to add this feature to the 2006 or 2007 models?
  • lumbarlumbar Member Posts: 421
    I would love to have sat in on the meeting at which -that- decision was made. There are, of course, cost considerations, but to not even offer them as an option in a vehicle likely to be carting kids about is very strange indeed IMO.
  • just4fun2just4fun2 Member Posts: 461
    I don't believe that Side Air Curtains will protect kids since they will probably be sitting too low in the seats. I watched a report a while back on side curtains and for a short person the curtains wouldn't have helped the driver. Now, if you have teenagers they might be tall enough for the curtains to do the job.

     

    Should GM have at least offered them? Maybe, but if you are that worried about what could happen while driving don't forget about wearing a NASCAR approved crash helmet just in case the air curtains don't work properly.
  • vanman1vanman1 Member Posts: 1,397
    Air curtains should be offered, hopefully coming next year but I still think they have limited use in a van that sits up higher and I don't think they will help kids.

     

    Side air bags are available however and standard on some models. I have them in our 04 Montana.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    how much is it for GM to add these to each van anyways? $500? $250?
  • dannodanno Member Posts: 114
    I go to check out my delivered Uplander EWB tomorrow. LT model, DVD, Alum. roof racks, remote start, dual power doors, reverse sensors, Granite Blue.

     

    Probably take delivery next week. More news to follow.
  • dannodanno Member Posts: 114
    I took it for a test drive today. The dealer had 2 Ventures lined up beside 2 Uplanders. The Uplander looks substantially different than the Venture. More SUVish - no surprise. The Uplander is smooth quiet and seems to drive as a bigger vehicle. Probably because it is and you can see the hood vs. the Venture I drive now. There is a lot more room in the engine compartment. Easier to check fluids is a big plus. I like the 2 power doors and toys.....

    I pick it up Thursday, Dec. 23rd.
  • just4fun2just4fun2 Member Posts: 461
    I think that GM was wise to make their new vans more SUVish. The current minivan field has a drab appearance, not very exciting. The SUV arena has been very popular and by combining the looks of an SUV with the versitility of a minivan might be the key to this new vans appeal.
  • uplandishuplandish Member Posts: 2
    I've owned mine now for 3 weeks. I love it! Yes, there are the downsides like not having side curtain air bags, but after driving the Sienna and the Odyssey and the Caravan....this is a much more substantial feeling vehicle with tighter suspension. I have 2 complaints though. First, there is apparently a problem with the headlights and dash lights. You'll notice that they dim in and out...very little, it doesn't effect your driving, but it's there. The GM dealer showed us a write-up from GM saying that right now they aren't recalling or advising a fix. I guess once more people start complaining they'll do something about it. Also, we have a problem with our radio where one of the stations will just "blank out" and stop broadcasting on FM1....no problem with this station on FM2. But, previously we had an Astro AWD. This van has all the power of that one for towing.
  • just4fun2just4fun2 Member Posts: 461
    The flickering/dimming of the headlights/dash lights looks like the same problem that other GM products have. Look under the Venture post #1755 and it will take you to a link about this problem. It is a very simple fix ($5.00) or so for the part. You should not have to pay anything. Insist that your dealer replace this part/grounding screw on the alternator.
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    The TSB you reference shows application as being 2000-2001 versions of the previous generation of vans.

     

    The new gerneration use a completely different charging system that GM is switching to. Even the alternator suppliers are different. The fix for the old car has no relevance here.

     

    And, as the post says, GM has set a notice that they are aware of the problem and will notify dealers when the fix is available.
  • just4fun2just4fun2 Member Posts: 461
    I guess that these vans are doomed from the start if GM is having problems like this and can't find a fix. I would stay away from GM if this is what a person has to put up with.

     

    A "new" vehicle released with problems will not help GM's image.

     

    Montanafan thanks for the info. Called my Buick dealer this morning and told him to take my name off the list of people interested in buying a new Buick van. Won't trade in my van for one of these anytime soon.
  • vanman1vanman1 Member Posts: 1,397
    Congrats to the new owners.

     

    Always little issues with all new vehicles no matter who makes them. Just hope there is nothing big. It's all pretty proven stuff in these vans so I can't imagine too much going wrong. These vans are definitely more substantial than our 04 Montana, I wonder if the short one would even fit in our garage.
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    Excellent system for eliminating new vehicle choices. What did the Buick dealer say when you called to say you were not interested in new van with problems? Did you also call Honda or Toyota or was Buick the only van you were interested in? And if if it was sorry for knocking you out of the market. Perhaps a 2006 will be in your future in a year or two.
  • just4fun2just4fun2 Member Posts: 461
    Haven't heard of this problem, but I am sure that GM will fix anything that dosen't work properly.....I wouldn't take a chance with a problem like this in the electrical system that might never get fixed. Who wants to spend 35k for a vehicle and have a known glitch? The people over at the Ody board are willing to put up with transmission failures, sliding doors that don't and EGR's that need constant cleaning, but that is not for me.

     

    Keep us informed when GM has a fix for this problem. Until then, I'll keep my Silhouette.
  • dannodanno Member Posts: 114
    I assume the Silhouette has been problem free from the start?

     

    In this day and age any manufacturer has recalls. Look at the new Sienna, fuel tanks recalled, radiators failing, and trannies hesitating. Good luck on finding any manufacturer without issues. You wil need it.
  • new2vansnew2vans Member Posts: 15
    .......in that after test driving a couple, the uplander has a substantial feel to it in comparison to other mini-vans. Because of the raised hood, I felt like I was driving an SUV instead of a van and the suspension was solid. I really liked the interior (heated front seats in 30 degree weather was great!), and was surprised to find that the 3rd row of seats seemed to have even more leg room that the second row. I was so impressed with it that hubby and I go and pick it up tomorrow! I had originally wanted it in AWD but the dealer informed us availability is extremely limited in those and will not really be available until spring. Hopefully, the stabilitrak and traction control will be adequate. It's got so many features to "play" with. I will keep you posted if I encounter any electrical problems and appreciate all the information I've received from this forum.
  • just4fun2just4fun2 Member Posts: 461
    My Silhouette has been trouble free for the last 3 years! If you buy a new vehicle and the manufacturer has a recall after you buy it is one thing,but to go in knowing that they are having problems is just asking for it. The person that just bought his Uplander and is having this problem didn't know about it until after he made his purchase, not his fault.

     

    When is GM going to have a fix for this? Maybe, 1 week, 1 month or 1 year? What if this problem screws up the rest of the electrical system? I guess that is why they have these boards so people can come and cry about what a bad van they bought even if they knew going in that it had problems.

     

    Sounds like the Ody board, my transmission needs replaced at 40k, I didn't think that this would happen to me!!

     

    A failing radiator can be replaced with another radiator, not even close to having an electrical gremlin.
  • sundevil99sundevil99 Member Posts: 20
    It's been over 7 years since my last vehicle puchase, so I'm a little amped up.

    It's true my opinions may change after owning and driving for a few months, but right now I'm really pleased with the purchase.

    The buying experience was great. I dealt strictly with the dealership's 'internet' departments. I'll never deal with a regular salesman again. I did nearly all of my negotiating through email. I involved over 15 dealerships. I only used the phone to close the deal. By the way, I was given the invoice price, they gave me 1/2 of the dealer hold back, and they added in $1000 worth of "GM Certificates". After the $1500 rebate that is currently out there, I ultimately ended up with $2300 under invoice.
  • dan165dan165 Member Posts: 653
    Is that a cash deal or did you get financing?
  • sundevil99sundevil99 Member Posts: 20
    As far as the dealership is concerned, it is a cash deal. I'm putting a large down payment myself and then financing the rest through E-Loan.
  • new2vansnew2vans Member Posts: 15
    that has a history of some problem or another? If that were that case, we'd have a very slim line-up to choose from. I'm very happy you are pleased with your Sillouette and I'd wish that for everyone that owns a vehicle. But I am very happy with the deal I received from my dealer. We've purchased from them before and have always walked away from the deal feeling good. We got it at $500 over invoice. Then, GM topped off my GM points to $2500 ($2000 for buying an '05 and extra $500 for Uplander). Plus the $1500 rebate and we also received a $500 military rebate. So with $4500 in total rebates, we walked away with it for about $4000 under invoice. I'm happy.
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    Happy as you should be. Thank you for your military service. Happy Holidays.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    Thanks for your military service and congratulations on such a good deal! You deserve it!
  • new2vansnew2vans Member Posts: 15
    Thank you for your kind comments. :) My husband did 6 months "over there" and it's so nice to have him home safe.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    today. It was an LS model. The interior looked very nice. Build quality seemed solid. I liked the driver's info display that showed mileage, compass, temp, filter life, etc. The front seats had leather trims. One auto power sliding door was standard. Didn't like the way the 3rd row foled. The headrests had to be removed for them to be completely flat. Cargo room behind the 3rd row could be better too.

     

    The engine could use a bit more power. The power train behaved in a very similar way as our Malibu, which really should've been expected. Road noise was surprisingly high. Maybe it was just too windy today. The van looked all right. The engine compartment looked modern and clean. The wheels and brakes were big.

     

    Overall, I wasn't blown away, but nor too disappointed either. It's a decent van, and could be a great value depending on the out of the door price. we'll be entering the market this summer. We shall see.
  • vanman1vanman1 Member Posts: 1,397
    Driving 300 kms on Sunday I saw no less than 8 CSVs on the 401. 1 was a Relay, 1 was an Uplander and the rest were Montana SV6s. I was surprised to see so many since there has been zero in the way of advertising so far.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    that these must be getting good word of mouth. Either that, or they must have some huge unadvertised specials on them.
  • dtownfbdtownfb Member Posts: 2,918
    I went out with my in-laws to help them purchase a minivan. My brother-in-law qualifies for the GM employee pricing so we looked at the GM minivans. They have 3 kids (4,3 and 1) and a minivan is a necessity at this point. After 7 hours of looking and driving minivans here are my impressions of the GM minivans:

     

    1) Interior space - Way too narrow. They give up 5-6 inches on all the other larger minivans and it shows in the interior space. The rail system is nice.

     

    2) Engines. Solid performance from the engine. You won't win a drag race but you also won't have any problems with your basic high speed merging and passing maneuvers.

     

    3) Standard 2nd row bucket seats. You have got to be kidding me. These seats sit right against the sliding door and they look like they are made for kids. I felt like I was sitting in a chair designed for a 5 year old. Also no arm rest. Too make it worst, the seats don't tumble forward or fold even semi flat to the floor. And there is not forward and back seat adjustment. Also with the seats so close to the doors, not sure I would feel very safe putting my child in the second row with the standard seating.

     

    4) 2nd row captain chairs (optional). A definite improvement in comfort (and size) but now the seats are too close together for anyone other then a kid to get into the third row (cupholder and tray are hooked to the driver side captain chair and also that 5-6 inches). If getting regular access to the third seat is not an issue, go with the captain chairs. You still have the issue of the seats not tumbling completely forward or into the floor. This could be a deal killer if anyone shops any other van in this class.

     

    5) 50-50 third row seat - Should have went with a 60-40 like DC. But still it is nice having the added flexibility of the split bench seat. I see no way to fit 3 people in the third seat (goes back to that extra 5-6 inches in width).

     

    6) Rear storage area - Not sure who told GM that they did not need to either fold the seats flat or not to include the deep well behind the seats. They are sorely lacking in usable storage space behind the third row when compared to their competition. The container system they have is nice but......I rather have the space. This will be a deal killer for anyone who has kids, travels with kids, needs the minivan for space and movign people. For example, my inlaws use a dual stroller for their kids. The stroller would take up the entire storage area behind the third seat plus they would have to fold down one of the seats for their luggage and other belongings. That space is very limited as well.

     

    7) Front seat and dash - Definite improvement over the Venture. The front seats were very comfortable. The dash was nice. I have to agree that the Relay dash did fit image of the vehicle better then the Terraza's.

     

    8) Exterior styling - This is purely subjective. If you have a minivan, why not have it look like a minivan. The Relay looked like they added the back third as an afterthought. I thought they did a better job with the styling with the Terraza. The Uplander was pretty vanilla. Not sure why GM is tryign to market vehicle any other way but as a minivan. Those are the people that will buy it. You will not convince someone shopping for an SUV to look at this vehicle. If people want a SUV, they can buy a Trailblazer, Tahoe, Rendevouz, Suburban, Equinox, Vue, etc.

     

    We also test drove the Dodge GC SXT. Hands down much better then the GM minivans. It had nothing to do with the quality of the materials. they all were comparable. I think my brother-in-law stated it best when he said, "Gee it looks like Dodge put more thought into this minivan then GM". I had to agree. the Stow and Go system is very nice and the 2nd and 3rd row seats fold completely into the floor. The cabin was more open (that extra 5-6 inches in width helps).

     

    The Gm minivans do have some nice features like standard DVD players. Although you have to be in the second row (or very flexible and nimble to cahnge the DVD) to change the DVD. The rear 115 volt plug is nice (part of an option package).

     

    Overall I left with the same feeling that I had when I test drove the Freestar last year... confused and disappointed. There are too many other minivans that much better then these on the market for the same price. Or you can wait until the $5000 rebates come and they will come soon.
  • samnoesamnoe Member Posts: 731
    ...Front seat and dash - Definite improvement over the Venture. The front seats were very comfortable. The dash was nice. I have to agree that the Relay dash did fit image of the vehicle better then the Terraza's...

     

    Why do you think that Relay dash is better than the Terraza's?

     

    By the way, I saw a Montana SV6 today, and the dash (gauges) has regular light-blue color with red needles - like the uplander and other. Is it the first Pontiac to loose the red-colored gauges?
  • kfdmedkfdmed Member Posts: 130
    Thanks for the detailed review. I want the most space I can get. Looks like a GC, Odyssey, or Sienna for me.
  • dan165dan165 Member Posts: 653
    No red on the Pontiac? That is surprising. They are even more badge engineered than I thought.

     

    ;-)

     

    I suspect some of the SV6s on the road are rentals. I have seen 2 around here with "Discount Car and Truck Rental" stickers on them.
  • dan165dan165 Member Posts: 653
    Only big issue with Chrysler is transmissions. Otherwise they make nice vans.

     

    I don't suspect many adults ever sit in the second row and the Stow and Go seats are no better in terms of comfort. The narrowness is carried over from the Venture so that should be no surprise to anyone. Over all though, I agree the Chrysler vans are better.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    The Minivan Ranking board has been reopened for a knock-down, take it to the mat, er, friendly discussion. Please check it out.

     

    Steve, Host
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.