If I understand Chevy's intentions correctly, the SS Supercharged Coupe will have the 2.0L engine (supercharged, of course), and the SS Coupe (non-supercharged) will have the 2.4L. I think the non-supercharged SS is due to come out after the supercharged SS, which may explain why the engine is listed on the Chevy site, but not available as an option (yet).
My guess is that it will be out in June of 05 as an 06 model. Once again, GM cannot launch a vehicle with all of the components ready. Why is this so hard for them to do???? The Mazda 3 has two engines available at launch both available with auto or manual transmissions. The G6 will also launch with only the 3.5 and later be available with the 2.4 and the 3.9. Why? Then GM wonders why they continually lose market share.
Technically yes. But the 2.0 is a limited production model available only in the coupe and only with a manual. The 2.4 is more of a mass production model with auto and manual.
I drove a 2004 Ion Red Line yesterday. With a nearly identical price I think I'd go with the SRT-4. I hope the Cobalt SS Supercharged is a much better car than the Ion. I wonder why they left the engine at 205 hp, as it's surely capable of more. I would really like to see the Cobalt compete with the SRT-4 and the WRX, not the Civic Si, Sentra SE-R, and Mazdaspeed Protege.
FWIW, Mazda is not as nimble as you think. I saw the Mazda6 wagon at NAIAS in April 2002 and they were not on the roads until more than 2 full years later!
I have some thoughts on the delayed introduction of certain trim levels or options or configurations etc. on new cars.
I think it has more to do with marketing than it does with the ability to complete a design or begin production in a timely manner. Most of these decisions are probably made with the bottom line being the determining factor. There are many financial reasons for not going all-out from the start. For one, it saves the auto manufacturer from losing it's...a lot of money...on a car that unexpectedly flops. In addition, introducing new options on a car after the "new" wears off is a way to keep interest up and therefore sales up. It's all about the money.
I know it seems like a long time, but the sedan didn't even come out until late 2002 or early 2003 right? So the wagon and 5-door were out about a year after that, which was the next model year. It seems like a long time from when you first saw one, but from a business perspective it sounds about right. It's not like the first sedan didn't hit the streets until two years after it was at the show.
Looks like a solid package. Built well, the Cobalt should sell well for Chevy. The Cavalier is a horrible car aside from the engine/transmission (rented one a few weeks ago). This car appears to be a quantum leap!
Cobalt will offer three coupe models and three sedan models. The MSRP for the Cobalt Coupe and Sedan will be $14,190. The MSRP for the Cobalt LS coupe and sedan will be $16,485. Pricing for the LT sedan will be $18,760. The Cobalt SS Supercharged will be priced at $21,995. Pricing includes destination and freight charges.
On the low end I see pretty good value. But I think each step up in model represents a too-big jump in price. We're gonna see a lot of base models, watch.
It seems like most Cavaliers sold are base models too, so I wouldn't be surprised to see the same with the Cobalt. It seems very unlikely to me that a lot of buyers are going to swallow the initial Cobalt price increase *and* step up to an even more expensive model. Of course, they will quickly sell every SS Supercharged they make, to enthusiasts, but that won't likely be a large percentage of sales. What really puzzles me is the LT sedan. I have no idea who is going to buy that model.
the Cobalt, even without having driven it, over a similarly priced but thoroughly unimpressive Impala. Personally, I am strongly 'rooting' for this little car. I want it to go head to head with the best- the 3, Focus (though that car has terrible resale value, which is surprising), Corolla, and Civic. At the prices indicated, and with strong amounts of standard features, I feel it is positioned to do well. Smart marketing move on GM's part in regard to the pre-introduction order upgrade.
In pictures and at NYIAS, I was impressed by the Cobalt sedans classy styling, seemingly high quality interior materials, and the standard equipment 145hp fuel efficient ECOTEC.
Finally, Car and Driver's preview article indicates that if GM got the execution right, there were enough significantly advanced components to truly make this a competitive entry.
OR
It could be another ION. (It is on the same platform, after all).
You hit the nail on the head. the car I own now requires premium fuel, great power but a little pricey at the pump. Anyway the Cobalt is definately on my list of cars. An LS Sedan is what I would be looking at, would get an LT but flat out do not want leather seats.
The premium fuel requirement perception is sometimes is more then the reality.
20,000 miles per year driven with a car that gets 20mpg, would use 1,000 gallons per year. If there is a $.15 difference between regular and super (will the run up in prices $.10 has been common here in the northeast), the additional cost would be $150 per year or $2.88 per week. Remember regular isn't free, look at the difference. There maybe other reasons not to buy a car that requires premium (insurance, maintenace, purchase cost) but gas cost may not be as big as thought.
And if that woman really exists and gets her cooking oil free, she is a very lucky woman. Salvage outfits pay BIG money to pick up restaurant grease. There is a big market for it. Restaurant owners paying to have it hauled off or giving it away as opposed to being paid for it are missing out...
Sounds more like an urban myth to me....
Not even to mention that once there were more than a few cars that used the stuff, the price for it would escalate.
Biofuels? Sure. Cheap or even free? Fuhgeddaboutit.
alpha: for its displacement, no doubt. But it won't win any fuel economy contests against the Scions or Civics of the world.
A long time ago, nearly a previous life, I worked at a fast food joint and the grease from the grill was recycled. My boss told me they made soap out of it, if you believe that.
Very true that it won't win any fuel sipping contestes to the Scions and Civics but it will not leave its owners wondering why the A/C seems to be so weak.
Irritating problem with the Xb in warm southern climates. One of my best friends has the same issue with his Matrix. A/C just doesn't get very cool and its because the engine does not have enough horses to give max output for the A/C.
There was a TSB issued for the Pontiac Vibe on the A/C. Apparently it had something to do with the temperature probe. Being that the Vibe and the Matrix are the same design that may be the issue with the Matrix. Of course it does not mask that the more pwerful the engine the better the acceleration would be with the A/C on.
The Cobalt is officially a new vehicle rather than a future vehicle as of Wednesday, so we'll be moving this discussion over to the Sedans board!
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name. 2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h) Review your vehicle
I'm not sure which criterion we use as the marker for moving a vehicle from our Future section to New, but I *think* it's when the vehicle starts shipping to dealerships. I'll see if I can find out for sure.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name. 2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h) Review your vehicle
Yeah, I'm going to let this discussion hang out here for awhile, til we start seeing them hit the lots.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name. 2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h) Review your vehicle
Oh no I don't think its bad at all. I just thought it was leaning more towards the cute factor than muscle. But the second video "Bump" seems to be more masculine than the other one. Maybe im just reading too much into it.
Overallall, both are very good and I think they'd do well for the Cobalt if Chevy runs them as commercials.
My favorite is the second one entitled "Bump". Particularly love the way the Vette turns around to scold the Cobalt. Very cool!
Yeah, the "pesky brother" thing is what I was hinting at. Thats why I said "Bump" seemed more masculine.
Unfortunately, I didn't watch much of the olympics so I didn't see any of the commercials outside of the opening ceremony and the only one I saw then was the discontinued Vette commercial which I personally thought was great.
Well it seems a lot of "Do Gooders" didn't agree and their complaints caused GM to stop the ad.
Personally, I think that if some parent somewhere lets his 10 year old sneak out of the house and take the Vette (or any car for that matter) on a worldwin tour, then the parent is to blame.
Comments
The G6 will also launch with only the 3.5 and later be available with the 2.4 and the 3.9. Why? Then GM wonders why they continually lose market share.
Sorry! The exception proves the rule? ;-)
FWIW, Mazda is not as nimble as you think. I saw the Mazda6 wagon at NAIAS in April 2002 and they were not on the roads until more than 2 full years later!
-juice
I think it has more to do with marketing than it does with the ability to complete a design or begin production in a timely manner. Most of these decisions are probably made with the bottom line being the determining factor. There are many financial reasons for not going all-out from the start. For one, it saves the auto manufacturer from losing it's...a lot of money...on a car that unexpectedly flops. In addition, introducing new options on a car after the "new" wears off is a way to keep interest up and therefore sales up. It's all about the money.
But I actually sat inside the wagon in April 2002, it was not roped off or anything.
-juice
Dunno but it just seems old to me, not new, as it was back in April 2002.
-juice
-juice
They should have kept it at right under $20k. I bet rebates get it there in no time.
-juice
We shall see. There is room for rebates though we will definitely not see anything close to Cavalier type incentives.
-juice
It seems like most Cavaliers sold are base models too, so I wouldn't be surprised to see the same with the Cobalt. It seems very unlikely to me that a lot of buyers are going to swallow the initial Cobalt price increase *and* step up to an even more expensive model. Of course, they will quickly sell every SS Supercharged they make, to enthusiasts, but that won't likely be a large percentage of sales. What really puzzles me is the LT sedan. I have no idea who is going to buy that model.
-Andrew L
I think I saw a Malibu Maxx with a DVD player in the back seat for less than that.
-juice
In pictures and at NYIAS, I was impressed by the Cobalt sedans classy styling, seemingly high quality interior materials, and the standard equipment 145hp fuel efficient ECOTEC.
Finally, Car and Driver's preview article indicates that if GM got the execution right, there were enough significantly advanced components to truly make this a competitive entry.
OR
It could be another ION. (It is on the same platform, after all).
~alpha
-juice
20,000 miles per year driven with a car that gets 20mpg, would use 1,000 gallons per year. If there is a $.15 difference between regular and super (will the run up in prices $.10 has been common here in the northeast), the additional cost would be $150 per year or $2.88 per week. Remember regular isn't free, look at the difference. There maybe other reasons not to buy a car that requires premium (insurance, maintenace, purchase cost) but gas cost may not be as big as thought.
So the SS models might require premium and if so, no harm done.
-juice
I'm not sure if the Cobalt will be a fuel sipper, though. Displacement is pretty big for a compact car.
-juice
~alpha
Sounds more like an urban myth to me....
Not even to mention that once there were more than a few cars that used the stuff, the price for it would escalate.
Biofuels? Sure. Cheap or even free? Fuhgeddaboutit.
A long time ago, nearly a previous life, I worked at a fast food joint and the grease from the grill was recycled. My boss told me they made soap out of it, if you believe that.
-juice
Irritating problem with the Xb in warm southern climates. One of my best friends has the same issue with his Matrix. A/C just doesn't get very cool and its because the engine does not have enough horses to give max output for the A/C.
Fuel sipping engines come with some drawbacks!
-juice
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
I didn't think the Cobalt would be out for at least another month or two.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
The Cobalt vidoes are really cute. Might get more women buying them than men though. Will be interesting to see how people take to them.
-juice
Overallall, both are very good and I think they'd do well for the Cobalt if Chevy runs them as commercials.
My favorite is the second one entitled "Bump". Particularly love the way the Vette turns around to scold the Cobalt. Very cool!
If anything, the Bump ad almost makes the Cobalt seem like the pesky younger brother, not sister. It just seems like something a male would do.
-juice
Unfortunately, I didn't watch much of the olympics so I didn't see any of the commercials outside of the opening ceremony and the only one I saw then was the discontinued Vette commercial which I personally thought was great.
-juice
Personally, I think that if some parent somewhere lets his 10 year old sneak out of the house and take the Vette (or any car for that matter) on a worldwin tour, then the parent is to blame.
Trying to pin blame on a commercial is just bull.
C'mon, he was clearly day dreaming...
Do we need disclaimers for our dreams, too?
-juice