Subaru Legacy/Outback 2005+

13132343637214

Comments

  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Yes.

    But then, Hondas have some Ford parts in them, Chryslers have parts from the world round. Soon Ford and GM will be jointly building automatic transmissions. Some BMW's have GM transmissions in them...

    Parts sharing is everywhere. Design and quality standards for the new Subarus, though, are 100 percent Subaru.

    The quality goes in before the name goes on. (Or was that Zenith? I forget!)
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Which Hondas use which Ford parts?

    Also, anyone take delivery of a 2.5i Sedan or Wagon yet?

    ~alpha
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    I have been reliably told that instrument panels in some Hondas are from Ford. There are also other Ford parts in Hondas, and some from Visteon, which is almost the same thing as Ford. (Visteon is to Ford as Delphi is to General Motors...)
  • ryanl1ryanl1 Member Posts: 55
    Your right.I'm being too naive about having a purebred Japanese vehicle.I guess they don't have rubber trees in Japan.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Well, the Legacy/Outbacks are made in the USA in Indiana, albeit with some Japanese parts.

    OTOH, Imprezas are imported from Japan, as is the Forester, if it really matters to you!
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    So far, the GM/FHI relationship has benefitted GM more than Subaru (witness the Saab 9-2). Right now, there is little to no GM influence on the Subaru vehicles. As I recall, the main benefit for Subaru was going to be better supplier availability and pricing deals. But there is really no GM influence on Subaru vehicles (thankfully) thus far (biggest thing was availability of OnStar on the high end Outbacks). In the future, look for GM to co-develop some vehicles with Subaru. We can only hope Subaru's standards prevail!

    Craig
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Well, for what it is worth, OnStar is no longer available on the new Legacy/Outbacks!
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    "Visteon is to Ford as Delphi is to General Motors..."

    Correct me if Im wrong, but I thought Delphi was no longer a part of GM.

    Im very intrigued by this whole thing. If Honda's IPs come from Ford, why do the ones Ford uses pale so badly in comparison? The Accords IP is outstanding.

    That said, I am a HUGE fan of not only the electrolumiescent cluster in the Turbos, but also of the gauges in the stock Legacy as well.

    Question: Does anyone know why SoA/FHI chose not to use Variable Valve Timing on the non-turbo engines. Kinda disappointing.

    ~alpha
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Right.

    And just as Visteon is still closely related to Ford, Delphi is still closely related to GM. Each has as its primary customer its old parent!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That was quick - GTs in dealers already? Wow.

    Congrats to all the new owners! Join the Subaru Crew threads under the Owners Clubs topics, you'll be right at home.

    RE: the tranny hesitation comments, keep in mind Bob and I drove broken-in models that had been driven hard on the track, perhaps that's proof that the adaptive trannies really work.

    I would not be surprised if under normal conditions they try to get the best fuel economy possible (23/30 per EPA) and that might explain it.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    The intercooler is a location for heat exchange, not air intake. A turbo engine obtains air the same way a normally aspirated one does -- through the intake plenum. The difference is that in a turboed engine, exhaust gases spin the turbine which in turn causes the air pump force-feeds more air into the engine.

    Most air intakes are designed to prevent water ingestion from rain.

    Here's a good link on how turbos work:
    http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm

    Oh, and water hitting the intercooler will help it's performance. In fact, some vehicles (like the STi) employ water misters on the intercooler to improve performance in short bursts.

    Ken
  • chassolchassol Member Posts: 95
    grove4,

    Thanks for the info. BTW I know how Subaru's work in snow I've driven them in Buffalo, NY and the Northeastern US during the winter months many years. I'm glad to hear all of your comments both positive and negative, keep 'em coming, that's what makes this forum so great.

    grove4 I too own a 04 F(orester) XT Auto. Fantastic car. I can only imagine what the GT Limited does (MT or AT). If I remember correctly the A/C has an auto cutoff when you really start to hit the higher RPM's. Don't know if this is in MT as well as AT FXT of not. All I can say is we have 30,000 miles on our since last June and it has performed flawlessly.

    Again grove4 - Thanks for all your reports.

    It appears the dealers nearest the factory in Indiana are getting the GT Limiteds before the South and other further away states. Hope my dealer sees their's soon.

    Best Regards,

    Chas
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I wouldn't worry about the water at all, it will just pass through the intercooler and drain away.

    The STi has misting nozzles so that the water evaporates and gives a cooling effect. I don't think rain drops will do quite the same thing!

    Craig
  • Karen_SKaren_S Member Posts: 5,092
    Congratulations to the new owners! It would be greatly appreciated if you could also post your purchase experience in the Prices Paid topics. Links are provided in the sidebar.

    Thanks!
  • mfhmfh Member Posts: 37
    Thanks for all the great comments about the O5!

    In the Bay Area, 3.0Rs havent been at the 2 dealers Ive checked. They say any day now....

    The comments about low end power have been scaring me. As a relatively laid-back driver, acceleration to get on a freeway was fine with 01 H6 3.0. My problem was going from 65 to 70 to pass another vehicle quickly.

    How does 05 3.0R OB compare to old H6 3.0 with regards to acceleration in these 2 ranges. Id hate to give up good acceleration from 0 to 60 for passing power?

    How does one negotiate a deal for a car that is not on the lot yet? Sounds like people are paying from 2% over invoice to 1000 over invoice.

    thanks!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The H6 feels quicker mostly because the tranny is a lot smarter, it downshifts quicker and picks the right gear. In comparison, the old one hesitated more.

    Keep in mind we drove models that had a few hard miles on them, but the trannies impressed me big time. Closer ratios help too.

    It's so quiet that it might not "feel" quite that fast.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Nothing to be scared about, believe me. I drove one for about 12 - 15 miles, and it was fine, and quite powerful. It's much better than the '04 model, but it does like to rev.

    Best advice is drive one yourself, and see for yourself.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think the NVH is so much better that any speed will feel slower than before.

    As an example, go drive a Mitsubishi Outlander. That thing was so loud, the engine would scream even though the results were paltry acceleration. A bystander might think it was fast, given it was making so much noise...

    *chuckle*

    -juice
  • erics6erics6 Member Posts: 684
    Did a back-to-back test drive of the 2.5i wagon and a base Outback this weekend. Both are impressive! Quite an improvement over my old 00 Outback. I drove a silver Outback and an Atlantic blue 2.5i.

    First thing I noticed. Much quieter. I really like the 5 speed. The gearing seems shorter and more positive and the clutch has a positive engagement that the previous model just didn't have. Power was perfectly adequate in both cars. The interior was impressive. The comparison to a Passat interior is on target. Cloth seats were very comfortable and the new 3 spoke steering wheel is very nice.

    So what am I going to get. After driving both cars, there is no question in my mind... I'm going to get the 2.5i wagon. I'll add an aftermarket sunroof, a differential protector and hood protector and I'll be set. The Outback handling just isn't there for me. With the raised suspension and taller tires it doesn't meet my handling needs. It feels floater on the freeway. It just doesn't have the buttoned down feel that the 2.5i does. The 2.5i comes with almost everything I want now. It definitely is not a base model anymore. I really like the atlantic blue color.

    I know I'd like the GT even more, but I'm cheap and I don't want to pay for premium fuel and the speeding tickets I would get. The 2.5i meets my needs and I'll save a few bucks over the Outback. Now I'll settle in and wait for a year or so for version 1 bugs to be ironed out and for rebates to kick in.
  • mfhmfh Member Posts: 37
    Now, if I can just negotiate a price anywhere near invoice, Id be happy. My local dealer wants 1200 dollars above invoice to factory-order a wagon 3.0R. Seems a little steep. Any thoughts? I worry about waitng too long. The price could go up to MSRP if the buzz keeps up.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Eric - good choice, love that color, too. I'll be envious when you get it.

    Fitz had them for $200 over invoice, extremely reasonable. Check out the local no-haggle dealers if you have them. Van Bortel is one in NY/NJ I think.

    -juice
  • warpaswarpas Member Posts: 8
    The styling of the new OB strikes me as much more feminine than the outgoing model. It seems to have traded away much of the ruggedness and headed closer to, dare I say it, the Lexus sport-ute. It's very nice, just seems very different in character. Volvo xc70 here I come? Whaddya think?
  • vincentwangvincentwang Member Posts: 42
    I'm considering about 05 legacy for quite a while. Just saw Saab 9-2x today, seems very similar to Legaxy, even made by Fuji. So, what's the major different and which one has better value?

    Also, is 05 Jetta worth a wait? Still can't find enough information about it. I want to compare this with Legacy as well.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It is a more sleek design, and sleek is sexy, perhaps more feminine. I prefer that, though. And the Lexus RX330 outsells the Volvo by a long shot, FWIW.

    9-2x is a WRX wagon with a moonroof and all-weather package. Unless you really want those two you'll find a far better value at your Subaru dealer.

    05 Jetta would only be worth the wait if they put the Golf R32 drivetrain in it and chopped the price substantially.

    -juice
  • dlydrvrdlydrvr Member Posts: 18
    How does Subaru's AWD differ from VW's 4Motion?
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    The longer you can hold off, generally the easier it is to negotiate a good price. Being the first on the block to own one can be expensive. Right now, for that car, it's a "seller's market."

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    4Motion depends on which model you're talking about. On the Golf, it's FWD based, and sends power to the rear axle when there is slip.

    On the Passat, 4Motion is actually Audi's Quattro system, basically a Torsen center diff with tracion control on both axles.

    Funny thing is the Audi TT uses VW's 4Motion, but they call it Quattro because it's an Audi!

    Confused?

    Subaru has 3 systems of their own, but at least all 3 have something in common - they are 100% full-time in terms of sending at least some power to both axles.

    -juice
  • bblachabblacha Member Posts: 160
    Thanks Eric for sharing your impressions. That's exactly the situation I'm in - deciding btw. OB and Leg 2.5i stick-shift; too cheap to buy GT (those costs pile up - insurance, maintenance, loan payments, speeding tickets, gas mileage, premium gas.) Too bad the OB is floaty - I much prefer its beige interior. Good to hear power is adequate. Any signs of clutch chatter at all, without the dual-mass flywheel? How's the Leg2.5i handling?

    Can't wait to find a chance to test-drive for myself.
  • snowbirdsnowbird Member Posts: 120
    Juice: Would you care to compare these two cars that I am considering. I know Lexus probably has an edge on prestige and interior luxury (and costs more), but what about in terms of performance and safety. Many thanks.
  • bgsintthbgsintth Member Posts: 16
    I sat in a base 2.5i wagon and a 3.0 Limited Outback this past weekend. I was mainly interested in improvements in an interior space, and did not have time for a test drive. The rear seat seemed a definite improvement, in terms of space over the '04, but only a smidge. Enough so that I could sit behind myself comfortably with my legs slightly splayed.

    In the front my head was brushing the headliner in the limited due to the sunroof, enough that it would drive me nuts. So, if I want leather, I will have to buy a base and add aftermarket leather. The dealer said they could do this themselves, and would not even have to subcontract out for it-crazy. Seems they learned this new trade with the stick/leather dilemna in the FXT.

    I liked the new driver-oriented cockpit in the Outback, though I prefer my WRX's seats.

    Will the OBXT and GT have more sport-oriented seats?

    Overall, I like the improvements, though I wish we could configure options (e.g., Leather w/o sunroof) and it had a tad longer wheelbase and rear seat room. Still a Subaru-good thing.

    I'm in the dilemna of going with either the X3, and trading interior room for the better performance of the Subaru. The X3's longer warranty and, maybe, better residual may place the lease price in the same realm as the OBXT. I'm still about 5 months from purchase, so I'll wait and see what way the wind blows. If I was single, it would be a GT-wagon hands down.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Just got a flyer from BMW on an X3 lease, and it doesnt seem all that impressive. They're pushing base 2.5i's with auto on this lease special, and the numbers are avaliable at www.bmwusa.com/X325ioffer

    Also, are you saying the X3 is more spacious than an OB?

    Its quite interesting how people prefer options. I myself would really like an options pkg or individual options that allowed for moonroof WITHOUT leather, which I find an annoyance in most weather conditions, and especially in dark colors.

    ~alpha
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I would love all the features of the Subaru Ltd models without leather.

    Craig
  • cusafrcusafr Member Posts: 184
    Thanks for the information and the link.

    CUSAFR
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I would love the leather without all the other features - sunroof means no fit.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I have not driven a Lexus since the previous generation RX300. I think it's less sporting, a bit softer, and the tree growing out of the dash (shifter) looks kinda odd to me.

    The RX's biggest problem? The Highlander, it's both bigger and cheaper. But even that doesn't feel remotely sporting. It's just not my cup of tea. If I were filthy rich I'd buy one for my Aunt Helena.

    Yes, the GT has better seats, more bolstering, still not as much as the WRX, but you notice it.

    -juice
  • snowbirdsnowbird Member Posts: 120
    Juice: Thanks for your insight. I knew I was not comparing apples to apples, but wanted another perspective. Unless the new Subaru really disappoints, which I doubt, I would personally prefer it over the Lexus because it seems a LOT sportier, judging from what I've read so far. BTW, I am not that "filthy rich" either.
  • shizumaatshizumaat Member Posts: 12
    Anyone know if the US/Canadian outbacks will be getting the remote on the key like in Japan? It sure would be nice not to have two things in my pocket! Audi, VW, Land Rover, many have this, and it's a nice feature.

    Also, it's a little obscure, but has anyone noticed if the new models are any better at warming/cooling the back seats? Vents under the front seats to keep rear passengers toes warm are really nice...

    Thanks
  • bblachabblacha Member Posts: 160
    Nope, remote and key are separarte:
    http://www.pbase.com/image/28484123

    I was thinking about just carrying the key and disabling the alarm, but that's impractical as there's only one keyhole on the whole car (driver's door.) Maybe I'll just carry the remote and keep the key under the seat to start the car.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Where it will be VERY handy to anyone who breaks into the car or knows you store it there.

    NOT a good idea.
  • ebony5ebony5 Member Posts: 142
    FWIW The rear window visablility factor; lack of, is a deal breaker for me in the Rx330
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Sorry, didn't mean to imply I thought you were rich, I was just saying, if I had money to spare, that's what I'd do. I really do have an aunt named Helena. :-)

    Didn't sit in the back long enough on our Ride-n-Drive to comment on the climate control, plus it was the desert so we used A/C the whole time.

    Actually, that brings up a funny point, they asked us to use recirc because it's so dusty in Vegas. They also said we could try the moonroof out, but to leave it closed during our drive to keep the cars clean.

    And they were right, every time the wind blew you'd see a clowd of dust.

    -juice
  • dlydrvrdlydrvr Member Posts: 18
    Thanks for the info.
    I'm glad Subaru did not make up a dorky name for AWD.
  • snowbirdsnowbird Member Posts: 120
    Ebony5: Good thought. Juice, thanks again. Now all I need is to test drive one. You guys in the States are lucky on pricing. I am from Toronto, Canada, and all the dealers around here are asking for full MSRP claiming this is a "hot" car. Perhpas I should wait till things cool off a bit. Enjoying this forum very much.
  • erics6erics6 Member Posts: 684
    No clutch chatter. The dual mass flywheel is only for the GT. I do think the clutch feels better than the 00-04 did. I'm going to wait a bit to see if there are any version 1 problems in the first year. I like the beige interior too, but it is a lot harder to keep clean.

    Eric
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    I was suprised that all the 05 Outbacks I've seen do not have the rear windows factory tinted. I thought that was one of the "consumer driven" requests that lead Subaru to go for the truck designation??

    Also I noticed that the sticker for the Outback classifies it as a "truck" but IIRC vehicles like the Pilot are designated "special purpose". I just wonder what the difference is.
  • seminole_kevseminole_kev Member Posts: 1,696
    I'm thinking about a base 2005 Legacy 2.5 Wagon 5spd manual and trying to get a little info here and there. I looked at some other boards, and while I appreciate their "enthusiasm" for peformance (like the STi models and such) I'm just looking for a daily driver. So I'm having trouble finding some opinions on the base version.

    In general, how "peppy" is the base 2.5 motor with a manual tranny? I don't need it to lay down 20ft strips of burnt rubber, just be able to go up a highway on ramp with some people and light cargo aboard. What is the fuel economy really like with the AWD? How is the cloth seating in the base model (is it durable, comfortable)?

    Also, I realize this is a long shot question, but I've emailed Subaru and haven't heard back yet - Does anyone know if there is going to be a Subaru dealer in Oklahoma City or Edmond, Oklahoma area again? There was a dealer right by me that dropped Subaru just this year from the line of cars it carries. Now the nearest dealer is in Norman, OK (about 30 miles away through the main traffic artery, which I'm just not gonna do for servicing). Currently they are not effectively servicing the Metro Oklahoma City/Edmond area, which is decent sized area. Especially since Subaru is pushing upmarket, the northwest side of OKC and the Edmond area are (on the average) the higher income areas. (Not trying to sound snobby at all, just that they're not in a large market area that everyone else has a dealer in.)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Good point on the tint, rob, it was totally MIA. They didn't look any different than the Legacy windows. And the Baja's windows are dark, so that was just a bogus claim.

    kev: we were only able to drive a base model with the automatic. It felt as quick as my wife's 2002 5MT model, so I think a new one with a manual might even feel kinda peppy, but try it first.

    Seats are much, much better than the ones in our 2002. That's one of my biggest complaints about our Legacy, actually.

    -juice
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I had a 2000 Outback with the 2.5 engine and a manual transmission. The power was more than adequate, and the car was a lot of fun to drive. I know the 05 model is better in all regards.

    Craig
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    One last thing - all the Outbacks (all gold for some reason) I've seen have had contrasting cladding. Yet the red one in the pics that you or Bob posted had red cladding.

    Any thoughts on that?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.