Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Importing Car into Canada from US

1293032343591

Comments

  • eieio2eieio2 Member Posts: 34
    I have two daughters who reside in the US so I am wondering if anyone has just titled in the US and insured under two names and used the vehicle in both US and Canada?
  • hoppshopps Member Posts: 2
    Hi Cobra5
    I live in Calgary and would like to contact you for info on a new Mazda. My email is jhopps@telus.net. Serious interest!

    Thanks Hoppy1
  • delwickidelwicki Member Posts: 27
    Hey Rob you may want to get a letter from RIV stating that clearly. We've already seen in this forum that it does not matter what US dealers/manufacturers, Insurance Overseers (IBC) or Provincial Government Regulations have to say on this matter. You will find no shortage of US dealers/brokers or aftermarket "providers" willing to take your money and leave you staring at a vehicle in your driveway that cannot be driven. Make sure the due diligence is done before hand. You don't want to be the next guy who is the subject of an article in his local newspaper. At least this matter is receiving more attention from the media.
  • crazy_canuckcrazy_canuck Member Posts: 9
    Here's the text of a letter I had my lawyer send to Transport Canada and RIV. Feel free to copy and paste as much or as little as you want for your personal needs.

    For the letter to be effective, it's important that it be sent by courier or registered mail and that you have a receipt for it. Also, the "DO GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY" line, in addition to be in all caps, is also bolded for added effect.

    Have fun!

    ===

    Montreal, October 31, 2007

    WITHOUT PREJUDICE

    Transport Canada
    330 Sparks Street
    Ottawa, Ontario
    K1A 0N5

    Registrar of Imported Vehicles
    405 The West Mall
    Toronto, Ontario
    M9C 5K7

    Sir/Madam:

    I am the attorney for [removed]. My clients intend to import into Canada a 2008 model Toyota Prius purchased in the United States. They have been told by representatives of both Transport Canada (TC) and the Registrar of Imported Vehicles (RIV) that they will not be able to import and register this vehicle in Canada because Toyota’s 2008 models do not appear on the list of admissible vehicles published on the RIV and TC web sites.

    TC’s policy is to not list a vehicle on the admissible list unless they have received a letter from the manufacturer stating that the vehicle in questions meets Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (CMVSS). My clients have contacted Toyota USA and they have stated flatly that they refuse to supply such a letter as their policy is to restrict exports of their vehicles from the US into Canada.

    The responsibility of RIV and TC with respect to the import process is limited to ensuring compliance with Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (CMVSS). My clients submit that the 2008 Toyota Prius meets all Canadian standards with the exception of Daytime Running Lights, which is a simple modification. The vehicle they intend to import is otherwise identical to those being sold by Canadian Toyota dealers in Canada.

    This letter constitutes formal notice that you are required to either:

    a) allow my clients to import and register a 2008 model Toyota Prius in Canada, or

    b) specify in writing, within three businesss days of your receipt of this letter, the specific Canadian safety standards that the 2008 Prius does not meet.

    Otherwise, legal action may be taken against you immediately and without further notice. Be advised that such action may include a demand for reimbursement of legal fees, costs incurred by my clients due to your delay or refusal to allow the import and registration, as well as punitive and exemplary damages.

    DO GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY.

    Signature
    Your address and telephone number
  • doc911doc911 Member Posts: 56
    Gee...I wonder if Harper is scared? That is the dumbest thing I have read on here....I cannot believe a real lawyer would pen his name to that.
  • doc911doc911 Member Posts: 56
    then again...they're from Quebec...
  • rgreen3rgreen3 Member Posts: 1
    I am a little confused as to what can now be imported into Canada from the US. After checking the RIV website there appears to be only to cars out of GM/Saturn's entire fleet that can be imported. I assume most of this has to do with the CMVSS 114 engine immobilizer standard.
    I had planned a trip shortly to a US dealer to purchase a Saturn Sky. The dealer tells me that it has Onstar, lojack, and the electronic key to prevent starting.
    Does anyone know if the 2008 Saturn Sky made after Sept1 meets the guideline or if it doesn't can an after market immobilizer be installed.
  • northernkiwinorthernkiwi Member Posts: 15
    To date I have not had much luck with getting approval. RIV says go to TC who say goto Toyota who says its TC. It seems to be an neverending circle
  • veedub18tveedub18t Member Posts: 33
    From the Nov 8, 2007 VAFUS list, the 2008 Sky is not considered admissible.
  • mottiemottie Member Posts: 17
    Tom,I am in a similar situation with a 2008 Rav4.Heres what I have learned:If you have a relative buy the Rav for you,it can take up to 10 weeks in Washington state to get the title which means they cant sell it to you and it sits on the US side.Find one made pre Sept 1 or be prepared to go through the immobilizer nightmare.So far I haven't heard of anyone getting a compliance letter for it.Lastly when you present it to the border,tell them exactly what you paid the relative for the vehicle as the fine is 55% of the undeclared value.I found that part out the hard way.
  • sergelbergeronsergelbergeron Member Posts: 138
    Permit me to differ with some of the comments. I think this is a good letter. I thought my letter to Cannon was good but this one is better. I am still writting and will try to succeed to get my Prius 2008 - Aug 07 built into the country soon. I hear there will be a Press Conference mid -next week by TC maybe they will stop all this non-sense. Remember it is not the Conservatives that put in that rule 114 - so maybe they can stop it or reverse it. Continue writting to your MP's, MInister and other political parties. I think the media is also very interested based on yesterday and today's story in the Globe and Mail - so mail also your story to the papers. And the Prius is really a great car - can't wait to drive with the new Navigation system.
  • sergelbergeronsergelbergeron Member Posts: 138
    Doc911 - why don't you try to help - and leave Quebec - Ontario - Alberta etc out of this. This is a National problem. Cheers
  • sergelbergeronsergelbergeron Member Posts: 138
    dmollella - please send me an e-mail with your phone number - I have info but cannot write it for now. email serge@bergeron.ca
  • lozenlozen Member Posts: 19
    I agree this letter is excellent. Good Luck legal action always scares them.
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    Good job! crazy_canuck. We need more people like yourself. You are doing all of us a favor.
  • silver_foxsilver_fox Member Posts: 22
    Legal action scares them??
    Do you think they don't have legal council prior to publishing the list?
  • scrolllockscrolllock Member Posts: 126
    Good point serge! Check out RDI tonight.
  • scrolllockscrolllock Member Posts: 126
    I would not be surprised with anything these folks do and wether of not they have any council is not the issue. Cannon should be copied on all of these letters. Better yet send it to him directly.
  • clintbclintb Member Posts: 4
    @mars 25

    I was told the same by RIV on thursday, but not given the letter

    could you please forward it to me?

    email is clintb at gmail.com

    I had an opportunity to cancel my sale but proceeded with shipping after the RIV promised me an exemption would be guaranteed (not probable)

    have the conversation on a recorded line.... will have to make sure i save that recording!

    thanks
  • mars_25mars_25 Member Posts: 6
    check out posts#1555 (for letter content) and #1573 for jashall's email.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    but not sure if it has been answered. If a vehicle is on the admissible list, does that mean unequivocally that it meets the CNWSS 114 standards, and therefore no need for exemption letter, or clearance letter from manufacturer? Therefore, only document needed from manufacturer is recall letter? Are the Nov. 1, and built dates still relevant? (If I sound confused, it is because...well...I am!) :blush:
  • dreyfus1dreyfus1 Member Posts: 43
    Crazy Canuck
    Brilliant letter, I copied it to Red Flag deals. A few thousand of these should wake up the Minister of Transport.
    Vive le Quebec brilliant.
  • controlfreak1controlfreak1 Member Posts: 12
    Mottie,

    Actually, an easier way is to not start the registration/titling paperwork in the first place. I can't swear by it in Washington, but I paid a visit to the Oregon DMV website prior to my relative buying me my '07 Tundra and it says a purchaser has the option to either A) have the dealership start the registration/titling process prior to the vehicle leaving the lot (in which case you wait for the title to come through from the state) or B) get the MSO and a 21 day trip permit only at the lot and take it to the DMV branch to start the process themselves. Prior to the vehicle making it's way to the DMV, it gets transferred to you and exported with the MSO and no waiting on the title. Perfectly legal (no law saying it has to be registered before export and it travels at all times under the 21 day permit, plus your own insurance binder you have put on back home) and it saves the weeks or months waiting for the dang title. Check into it on the DMV site of whichever state you are exporting from - I doubt there would be a difference.

    As an aside, I spent the better part of the morning chasing my tail trying to get answers on how I can get my wife's '08 CR-V across the line. We ordered it in mid-October and put a deposit down then. It is supposed to arrive at the dealership by the end of next week and we're basically up the creek. Started with RIV and asked about an exemption letter as we have money down on the vehicle prior to Nov.1 and, after waiting on the line on hold hold for 20 minutes, was told they were no longer issuing the letters as of today with the reasoning that CBSA wasn't letting the vehicles through even with the exemption. My next call was to a contact with CBSA at the local border crossing and told her the story I had been given. She called BS and said they were allowing the vehicles in with the exemption. Called RIV back and, again after waiting almost 1/2 hour to get through, explained to a different representative (notice how you never manage to get the same person twice? No accountability for BS answers that way) what I had previously been told and the response I got from CBSA. The new rep said the letters weren't being issued as of today because they had been instructed by TC not to give them out (see a trend here? "Pass the buck" is the name of the game). She said she couldn't help me (imagine that, eh?) but gave me a phone number at TC to call. Called the TC number and got busy signal after busy signal until finally it rang me through..... only to get put through to a voice mail box which, now wait for it...., was FULL. Talk about the run around. Waiting patiently for some new news next week after the holiday now - hopefully someone pulls their heads out of their arses and gets this fixed.
  • retiredtomretiredtom Member Posts: 19
    Great idea.
    I checked with th Minnesota DMV and they give a 31 day Non-resident temporary permit to allow you to move vehicle from state to place of residence.
    This will be great if I can get dealer to sell to me.
    Its worth a shot and will certainly save time and money.
    Thanks
  • retiredtomretiredtom Member Posts: 19
    The RAV4 Limited which I am buying is admissible with conditions.
    I have to get an aftermarket immobilizer put on after I cross the border. RIV says that at the inspection a recognized aftermarket system that meets the intent of CMVSS 114 has been installed.
    See my earlier post about Mastergard.com.
    I am going to the border in a couple of hours and I will get the story as to whether I can do this.
    Tom
  • retiredtomretiredtom Member Posts: 19
    B) get the MSO and a 21 day trip permit only at the lot and take it to the DMV branch to start the process themselves.

    I'm not sure what MSO means.
    Thanks
  • scrolllockscrolllock Member Posts: 126
    u got me thinking.... why can't u go thru all the paperwork without actually bringing the car into Canada.. The only time u really need the car is when you go to Canadian Tire.

    Tell your US dealer you will give him the check once u have the plates on, or arrange some kind of deal to flip it back if you fail. Smart dealers in the US would offer this service...

    Then take pictures for the border folks ( if required) when I went Thru they didn't need to inspect or look at the car... Just give me form 1 and I will pay the GST when I pass thru.... with My form 2.

    Just a thought
  • collin999collin999 Member Posts: 5
    Great summary of your experience to date. I'm picking up a Tacoma in Spokane on the 20th to bring back and your info is helpful. Here's a dumb question. If the Tundra and Tacoma are on the Not Admissible list because their immobilizer doesn't meet CMVSS114, then what are Canadian dealers doing to circumvent this? They are selling vehicles. Presumably they must abide by it as well. Are they all installing the Masterguard system?

    Collin999
  • lozenlozen Member Posts: 19
    Its the same vehicle. It is just a scam by the manufacturers to keep CDN's from buying US cars
  • lozenlozen Member Posts: 19
    Saw all the Chrysler dealerships in Edmonton now offering US prices. Did not bother to compare them But if one dealer starts the floodgates should open. Any manufacturer that sees the stats on amount of cars coming in to Canada has to wake up.
  • mottiemottie Member Posts: 17
    I didn't realize you had the option to take the MSO if you were registering in the state the buyer lives in.When I bought my Tacoma in June I got the MSO in Washington and a 3 day trip permit and it was almost too easy.My only question would be if someone else is buying the vehicle,their name would be on the MSO and there is nowhere to sign it over to you.
    Got my plates the other day,but it could be the new year before the title comes.Anyone know if its legal for a US citizen to deliver my Rav across the border.I would feel better if the car was at least in my garage
    Good luck with the CRV,that was my other choice
  • eieio2eieio2 Member Posts: 34
    2008 corvettes, and any other 2008 GM car or truck are now inadmissible to be imported into Canada. The only exceptions are these crappy ones:
    Chevy Aveo
    Cadillac Catera
    Saturn Astra
    Pontiac Vibe

    This has to do with CMVSS 114, which is the standard set by Transport Canada for the manufacturer's electronic immobilization system in a vehicle (the car alarm).

    The Canadian government has very specific requirements on how long it will take to physically get to vehicle ECU's so that they cannot be modified or replaced to steal the vehicle. There are some weird aspects to the rules though that make them a pain for the design engineers, as well as the service centers who might have to remove parts that were intentionally designed to be difficult to remove easily and quickly.

    GM has made all 2008 US cars and trucks, with the exception of the ones listed above, with a different security system then the 2008 cars and trucks in Canada.

    To me, it doesn't make any sense. This is an insurance issue, not a safety issue so Transport Canada really shouldn't be involved.

    It does, however, provide GM with a great way to get nearly all of their 2008 US cars and trucks on the RIV inadmissibility list.
    http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety...n/VAFUS/list/VAFUS.pdf

    I expect the other car brands will follow this method of making it impossible to bring up new cars and trucks to Canada, forcing anyone who wants to by a new vehicle to fork out the additional cost that Canadian dealer are told to list their cars at.
  • bloogenebloogene Member Posts: 15
    In todays Business section of the TO. Star pageB2

    is the following headline,

    Auto-Industry exports
    record September gain.

    Exports 37.7 Billion
    Imports 35.1 B

    SO WHY THE BARRIER ????,
  • carman23carman23 Member Posts: 11
    If this was the case, then all vehicles would be admissible as long as an aftermarket immobilizer that met the intent of CMVSS 114 was installed. This is stated in TC's list of admissible vehicles document.

    I believe that it is simply the manufacturers telling TC that their US vehicles do not meet Canadian safety standards, with no explanation...while they probably do meet the standards!

    If it was simply the immobilizer that was stopping people from importing vehicles, there would be no problem as we could just fork out the extra $500 and get an aftermarket one installed. Whether it voids the warranty or nor is another story...
  • easym1easym1 Member Posts: 218
    silver fox, having legal counsel doesn't necessarily mean that they are absolutely immune to legal action...this is the last thing that they ever want because this time, they could be placed under the scrutiny of a microscope once a single case againts them takes into effect. This letter will surely make them think twice.
  • controlfreak1controlfreak1 Member Posts: 12
    MSO is the Manufacturer Statement of Origin. Basically serves as the title until the vehicle is actually titled. You can export with either a copy of the title or the MSO (if a new untitled vehicle).
  • controlfreak1controlfreak1 Member Posts: 12
    Bill of sale from them to you (relaitve to you) serves as proof of purchase. You can download blank ones online to fill out.
  • generaljunkgeneraljunk Member Posts: 9
    smccarten: Did you find anything more on importing the 2008 CRV? I want the 2008 Odyssey and its not on the RIV. What dealer offered to sell you a 2008. Could send me a email at generaljunk[removethis] @ rogers.com

    Paul
  • eieio2eieio2 Member Posts: 34
    I am wondering why they don't include the VEHICLE as admissable subject to *** having installed a tested and approved immobilizer that is specifically approved by the INSURANCE BUREAU OF CANADA

    Unless they just want to stop new vehicles from being imported to Canada.
  • gtxkarl1gtxkarl1 Member Posts: 32
    I just bought a 2008 Sienna but with a build date in August, which according to riv is OK to bring into Canada. I just found out that it's going to take me 30days to get my MSO.I was wondering if anyone Knows if I can bring it in to Canada without an MSO and only the original bill of sale? Also has anyone managed to get a recall letter from toyota? If so could you pass on any information on who to call.

    I Paid $24800. US for the Sienna LE (about $23,800 cdn) and it has all the same features as the Canadian LE model which retails for $38,750.cdn. Even with a lot of negotiating it'll be tough to match that in canada.
  • mechiemechie Member Posts: 8
    I have it on good authority that Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) 'got rid' of its last automotive engineer earlier in the year, apparently as a cost saving measure.

    Since Transport Canada would now be requiring all new vehicles to contain immobilization in one form or another (setting aside the degree of effectiveness), why bear the cost of an in-house expert?

    A resonable person would conclude that this also means we shouldn't hold our breath that:
    a) IBC would add any more aftermarket systems that it recognizes
    b) IBC would continue recognizing the aftermarket systems it already recognizes
    c) We'd be hearing anything substantal from IBC on CMVSS 114 and the way Transport Canada/RIV is 'administering' matters...

    Yup, I'd suspect this entire fiasco is at the feet of our Feds...

    The plot sickens...
  • clintbclintb Member Posts: 4
    Hey Tri Biker

    what does the Oct Listing say about 2008 Acura MDX?

    It was under the MPV section... i thought it said "all are admissable"

    could you send me the Oct VAFUS? clintb at gmail.com
  • hong2hong2 Member Posts: 5
    Hey are you sure you can bring into Ca? 2008 Sienna is in the inadmissibility list, as i know, or because it was built bf 1 sept. ?
    .
  • retiredtomretiredtom Member Posts: 19
    I checked with Mastergard and they say that the US Immobilizer has different software and does not meet Canadian Specs.
    I checked at Cdn Customs and the RAV4 Limited can pass thru Customs and be fixed with an aftermarket immobilizer before the final Inspection. Mastergard also said the Warranty would not be affected.
    I also ordered a Remote Start from the Dealer. Mastergard said Cancel it as it would create problems. So I'm having it installed at the time of installation by the Certified Mastergard technicians. In my case it is at CAA.
    Customs also told me that they had a vehicle come thru with an aftermarket immobilizer that was installed in the US and it met the standard. Don't know who did this but a search should find it.
  • retiredtomretiredtom Member Posts: 19
    Just checked with US Customs and I was told I had to have Title.
    I'll make another call and question them on the MSO.
    Do you still have to wait until the State gives you Title before you go RIV ?
    I'm still not sure how this works.
    Once you have title you just have to go thru the RIV hoops to change the Registration to Canadian and get your plates. Am I correct in this?
  • gtxkarl1gtxkarl1 Member Posts: 32
    I called riv twice about the sienna and both times they said if it was built before sept 1 it was ok. Also on the list it says any 2008 toyota passenger vehicle is admissible except those in the inadmissible list which does not have the sienna in it. It only appears on the inadmissible list in section 5.4 as a vehicles built after sept 1 2007. That's the way I understand it and also the way riv says it is. None the less I will be nervous until i get it home.If anyone has brought a 2008 sienna over please let me know.
  • eieio2eieio2 Member Posts: 34
    retired tom - do you know if you can get a MasterGard immobilizer installed on a 2008 Cadillac after you bring the car over the border.
  • amnestyamnesty Member Posts: 17
    No problems bringing in vehicles on an MSO. If you bought the vehicle from a U.S. friend who bought from the dealer (because the dealer wouldn't sell to a Canadian) simply have your friend re-assign the MSO. No one at the border really looks at your MSO or title for that matter. The americans just look at the car to make sure it's the same as the title then the Canadians just check to see if the title is stamped by the Americans. Same goes for the MSO. Title and MSO are really just issues when you go to register your vehicle - not RIV'ing it or importing it.
  • hong2hong2 Member Posts: 5
    any good news..? did you finish the impoting?
  • amnestyamnesty Member Posts: 17
    Here's my story. Purchased a 2008 Sienna October 26. Very difficult to do and had to purchase from a third party. All taxes easily avoided in the U.S. Woke up on Tuesday morning and found the Sienna was now inadmissible. Puked - just a little. I called RIV immediately and got confusion. Called TC and got the same thing. Lady from TC called me back and told me to email them with all the particulars of my case and that maybe something could be done. I called my federal employee brother in law. He started looking into things from that end.

    Wednesday: found out about letters of exception, or amnesty. Called RIV and was told no problem there's a grace period, you don't need a letter. Called RIV 6 more times and had my brother in law do the same and collected names. Every one said amnesty or grace period. I asked numerous times for a letter and was told they'd fax one to me - never recieved.

    Thursday:Picked up the 2008 Sienna XLE AWD Limited and drove to the border, arrived late, access denied. Customs refused to recognize RIV's authority and knew nothing about an amnesty - inadmissible and turned back.

    Friday: morning shift at customs refused to call RIV and called TC. TC knew nothing about amnesty. Access denied. They got pushy and threatened to impound the vehicle. They would not call RIV. I held my ground and appealed for empathy (not a customs strong point). My brother in law and I started calling RIV on the pay phone since the border does not have cell coverage!!! People at RIV stated grace period, customs agent wouldn't walk across the desk to the pay phone. He wanted a direct line - they couldn't give one because they're an inbound call centre. Asked them to fax the letter as the agent finally said he would accept only something in writing. RIV agent wanted to email, customs agent didn't have email - I'm on the edge of a stroke but with customs you can never let them see you sweat - so nice as pie I'm eating it up talking to customs and RIV agents who can't understand why they can't talk directly - finally I get the RIV supervisor and he tells me he'll get me the letter and fax it to the border in 20 minutes. After a lot of persuading he gives me his direct line which I provide to the agent. The agent then calls him and gets the verbal but he still insists on something in writing. 2 hours go by, I'm now at the border for 12 hours, still nothing. The border superintendent is nice and I seem to be winning over the customs agents with my staying power. Still no letter. I call RIV, the supervisor won't take my call. The story gets scary now - the agent on the line tells me that TC has put a stop to the amnesty and that there's a big anouncement on Tuesday that inadmissible cars will not be allowed in no matter what. I die inside a little bit but the customs agents are watching so I hold it together and pretend it's all good - but I'm sick. I gently demand to speak to the supervisor but he won't take the call even though I hear him in the back ground. I refuse to get off the phone or be transferred and I guess the agent could hear the pain in my voice and she showed empathy. They are telling her that the letter was faxed twice and if the border didn't get it then they can't fax it again because TC has tied their hands. I plead and reason and plead. Finally the RIV guy goes out on a limb and faxes the amnesty letter to customs for me. The customs guys finally accepts RIV's authority and at 13 hours I'm sure they wanted me gone so they stamp my form 1 and away I go. I a copy of the letter and the cover sheet (since the letter is so generic) just to prove that RIV sent it to me and it's not a forgery.

    About 2 hours later the phone rings and it's the superintendent at the border telling me we should not have gotten through and that they have been slapped by TC for letting me through.

    About an hour later some guy at TC calls and essentially says good luck RIV'ing the van and that 99.9% it's going to have to go back to the U.S. - I have no idea who the guy is but he's mad the vehicle made it across.

    Now I'm scared, even though I finally have the letter from RIV and a stamped form 1 from customs. I fax my recall letter my form 1 my amnesty letter, and my bill of sale.

    Saturday: RIV has my payment but have not processed my forms. They don't process on the weekend. No sleep for me.

    So here I am, I have the van in the country, I have a stamped form 1, I have a letter of amnesty from RIV but I still feel anxious. I have a feeling letter or no letter RIV is waiting for the TC announcement Tuesday to do anything. They tell me they are processing the forms on Monday so I guess I'm back to pleading and reasoning and pleading some more. This is crazy but I don't have a good feeling about the impending TC anouncement - I think it will be very bad. Has anyone called for a letter from RIV recently or called and asked about amnesty? I'd call myself but I've called so many times I've probably spoken to every agent. I'm saving my calls and my strength for Monday's battle.
Sign In or Register to comment.