Acura TSX vs Acura TL

124678

Comments

  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    I think the old SLK may have been a bit lacking in the sport department, but apparently not so with the new one. Also, it is interesting to note that the SLK AMG only comes with the automatic.
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    We're looking at the SLK 350 without the AMG package...which is a cosmetic allure IMO...and don't want to wait forever with that special order. Already plenty of performance there with such a light weight body (quite a difference from our '04 BMW 7 series which is a tank that can perform...when not in the shop ).

    Believe the AMG comes 'automatic' because it has shift paddles on the steering wheel.

    THAT is something that would be nice in future editions of the Acura TL....shift paddles.
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    excuse my ignorence again, put what are shift paddles?
  • acraandyacraandy Member Posts: 8
    On the RL there are little paddles behind the steering wheel that allow you to shift the SportShift.

    Toyota used to put them on the MR2/Spyder too. On that car, they were on a sequential manual which is not an automatic but has a computer controlled cluch, making for a much more interesting experience. On a sequential manual you can make shifting mistakes, real mistakes that cost $$$$.
  • taxesquiretaxesquire Member Posts: 681
    it's a way for automatic cars to pretend they're manuals. You get 2 buttons or "paddles" or switches. One to upshift and the other to downshift. Other cars do this by having the shifter have a "manual" slot where you can shift by moving the shifter either up or down or to the left or right.

    Regardless, it's not the same. :(
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    IMO, all manumatics are gimmicky. My TL is always in full-automatic mode.
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    Basically the TL has the same 'paddle' function through the 'squential shifting' at the gear shifter level. Just that the paddles are are mounted on the steering wheel.

    I am not a fan of the paddle...as it is just a gimmick which is going to be sold big time on the new Lexus IS330. No biggie....but still would be interesting on the TL. Not missing much....and why I am not even considering it for the SLK through the AMG package.

    The TL performs very well in either the automatic or manual transmission.
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    I agree, plus my wife is afraid of making a mistake, and messing up the transmission.
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    You cannot make a mistake with the TL's sequential shift. It will automatically protect itself and shift up. Give it a try...show your wife....it won't hurt the car.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    Yes, apparently it's foolproof. You can be zinging along at redline, and if you decide to drop it down a couple of gears it just won't go. It would "remember" your command but wait for the revs to drop sufficiently before executing.

    I'm not really afraid of breaking it, but I just don't find it that much fun. You can't shift by intuition or by sound like you can with a real manual tranny. :cry:
  • acraandyacraandy Member Posts: 8
    Right, that is the difference between a re sequential manual, and a SportShift type transmission. The SportShift is still an automatic if you screw up.
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    LOL

    but my wife will mess it up some how? ;)
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    The only way she may mess up is forgetting to up-shift and cruise along with the the tach needle bouncing off the rev limiter! :blush:
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    This won't damage the transmission?
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    I don't think that will happen...as the TL will automatically up-shift to protect itself.

    Tomorrow...let me test it. Let it start automatically at 1st gear...drive slowly and see if it automatically shifts up. Believe it would. If not...I'll be posting from the Acura service center.

    btw...today was a narrow miss. A truck came into my lane and I almost was forced into the side barrier. Wow...what amazing pickup to allow me to power-out of harm.
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    Tomorrow...let me test it. Let it start automatically at 1st gear...drive slowly and see if it automatically shifts up. Believe it would. If not...I'll be posting from the Acura service center.


    LOL

    Yes the car has great power, glad to hear everything went ok.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    I think it will automatically upshift from 1st to 2nd only. After that, if you don't upshift, it will happily bounce all day off the rev-limiter. But I don't really think it would hurt the tranny (but I could be wrong since I haven't tried it! :P ), but it would make for a jerky ride, and result in horrible gas mileage! :cry: :sick:
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    Well...here is the results of my experiment... I am posting from home....and don't believe I need to visit the service center.

    I believe bodble2 is correct. It did go from 1st to 2nd. Was rev higher so I chickened out and upshifted. Hey...I wasn't going to burn out my tranny...and didn't want to hear my bad-boy TL scream for help.

    So in some ways....maybe it is cooler than I thought. Maybe it would be kinda fun to use the sequential more.
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    Thanks for the experiment, sounds pretty fool proof, but not my wife proof! ;) I could just see it now, going 90 on the freeway, she puts it in reverse :cry:
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    You don't need sportshift to do that! :P
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    LOL !!! True, but if you just have a pure AT, much less likely. :P
  • stillageekstillageek Member Posts: 114
    Funny thing about throwing it in reverse at speed. Years ago I owned a 1997 Saturn SC2 automatic. When I test drove it the salesman said to "throw it in reverse" while going 60 MPH on the highway. I gave him a funny look, decided it was his car, and did it. The engine reved down to idle, but it did not go in reverse. I bought the car (not based on this feature, but back then Saturn's were unique and reliable). While I owned it I used that "reverse while moving forward" feature many times to get tailgaters off my bumper. When I move it to reverse the reverse lights go on. I would assume most computer controlled automatics would act the same....but I won't be a ginny pig on the TSX.
  • taxesquiretaxesquire Member Posts: 681
    Hmmm...on one occasion that I recall, I shifted into reverse at too high a speed (while parking - probably going 5 mph or something) in an Isuzu Rodeo - hardly a technological wonder. Anyway, the car stalled, but I didn't ruin the transmission or have any noticeable ill effects.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    Computer-controlled or not, I don't think I want to test that theory! :P
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    LOL, my wife will destroy this car's tansmission unless she in full AT mode, believe me, and I am more clutsy than my wife. :P
  • mikes2mikes2 Member Posts: 43
    Hi everyone, I too am in the midst of trying to decide between the TSX and TL (and some others who will remain nameless ;) ....

    The car will be mostly driven by my wife (I get to stay in my RSX-Type S!), and it will be the family hauler (with two car seats in the back. So, space is a concern - I wondered if anyone can comment on actual experience of the amount of room inside the two cars.

    On paper, I was interested to note that the interior dimensons aren't that different (particularly headroom and legroom, and the TSX even has more rear hiproom! Oddly enough, the TSX appears to have a bigger trunk as well. The biggest difference appears to be front shoulderoom, where the TL is obviously much wider.

    We're going from a Maxima (which has tons of room), so not sure how we'll handle less space - shouldn't be a problem (I think!), though concerned that the TL has the smallest trunk of all 3 (Max-15.1cu. ft./TSX-13cu. ft./TL-12.5cu. ft.). When we're on a roadtrip, we can easily fill a trunk, especially when the stroller comes along!

    Anyway, people's actual experiences welcomed!

    Thanks,

    Mike
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    I own both a TL and TSX so perhaps I can assist.

    Although the interior dimensions of the TSX aren't all that different...the TL 'feels' and appears to have more room. In the front...the two seats are set further apart with a wider center c. The dash curvature and depth gives a sense of more space. Also the front seats of a TSX has more back bolsters so you feel more confined.

    In the back seat....I would say that the 'feel' of the TL is also larger. The doors are wider...so that makes it feel that way. The TSX would easily accomodate two baby seats..and may be the easier of the two to manage by its configuration.

    Trunk...the TSX wins. The reason is that it has folding rear seats...so you can haul all kinds of junk. That is not to say that it does not have room and is very usable based upon its layout. (for instance...tell us what other cars you are considering and maybe we can help). Especially comparing the trunk of a TL to a G35.

    I really like and recommend both cars. The TSX is used as our errand car that we beat around in and is the kid hauler (no way am I going to have my kid and her friends in my TL or other car I have). The TL is still somewhat my everyday car that has some snap.

    Recommendation....test drive both...load in the family...and give it a go.
  • taxesquiretaxesquire Member Posts: 681
    Trunk...the TSX wins. The reason is that it has folding rear seats

    If he's got to car seats int he back, those seatbacks aren't foldin'!!!

    I suggest you take both carseats with you when you test drive. If the TL is longer, then maybe it'll take longer for your kids to kick thru the seats!!! I have a TL and a 2.5 yr old, and when the passenger seat is comfortably positioned for my wife, my son can put his feet up on the seatback.

    With the TL's trunk, I have no problem getting a regular carseat in there, and think I could probably get 2 strollers in there, but I don't think there'd be enough room for 2 strollers and enough luggage for an overnight stay anywhere. I don't think the remaining room in the trunk and the floors of the backseats would be enough for your clothes and all the baby-stuff needed; especially if they're on formula!!!

    I'm also not sure if I could get a bouble-stroller in there. We have an oversized jogging-type stroller that's not a true jogging stroller b/c the front wheel turns, and I can't fit it in the trunk.

    The TL and TSX are great cars, but I can't imagine going on daytrips with my wife and son comfortably in anything, but a minivan!!! Did anyone ever tell you the Oddessey is the Acura of minivans?!? ;)
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    I have to agree with most of your observations. I had a TSX for a week as a loner, and was not that impressed, simply because I expected to drive away with a TL. I was, at first looking for faults with the TSX, but over time was very impressed with the car. It's a great car, the TSX that is.
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    Ok...you caught me on the folding seats. What I meant was that if you knew you were going to be buying stuff at HomeDepot...you would store the car seats...fold the seats...and drive solo to haul. Also...I had 'honey-do' assignments of where my wife would buy something she saw...then I would go fetch.

    I just haven't been able to break myself down to get a minivan....Guess my rationale is that if it doesn't fit in my car...I will gladly pay $60 bucks to have it delivered. My analysis goes that I compare the additional holding costs for a minivan/suv (gas, maintenance, etc) and consider how it compares to the number of hauls that wouldn't fit in my trunk.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    "additional holding costs for a minivan"

    Don't forget the immeasureable cost to your male self-esteem from being seen driving a minivan! :blush: :P
  • mikes2mikes2 Member Posts: 43
    Thanks to all the replies!! To be more specific, we have a 5 year old in a booster (that easily is removed and switched between cars) and a 1 year old in a baby seat that, once fitted in as tightly as they recommend, might as well be welded into one of the rear seats! ;) We also only have 1 (bulky) stroller to cope with, at least for a year or two I expect.

    The comments about not having enough room for roadtrips is exactly my concern, and the suggestion that I actually load in everyone is a great idea. One of the local Acura sales guys was great and happy to let us test drive them for a day, and I think I'll take him up on that.

    As for a minivan, I needn't worry about that, since they're really more space than we need, and the Odessy isn't cheap at the EX- with leather stage, so my wife isn't pushing that!

    I guess my fear is the TSX will prove to be too small, but the TL too nice - especially for the 5 and 1 year old to spill drinks on, drop food into and use the seatbacks as foot rests on, in their slushy, salty, muddy, etc. boots (I'm up in Canada, so winters can be harsh on the interiors! ;) . The TL is also probably more car than my wife wants or would appreciate (cars are strictly appliances to her - she compares shopping for them akin to shopping for hammers :surprise:

    That then leaves me with non-TSX and TL alternatives :cry: . I won't take this thread off topic, but if the TSX and/or TL aren't in the picture, am left wondering what to do - Accord? Legacy Wagon? Ugh! :confuse:
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    I hear what you are saying... I cannot answer if the TSX is too small...so test drive it with the whole family.

    As I mentioned...the trunk layout is great...and can fit much. Don't just judge a trunk by the reported cargo volume...layout is important.

    As for spilled drinks...a few things. You definitely want leather seats...so you can wipe up. One thing that is weird about Acura (which I wish they would change) is the location of the cup holders in the rear seats. It is integrated into the fold-down arm rest....not a good thing with kids. Keep an eye on that.

    Hmmm..what else to consider. Accord perhaps...as the ride is pretty darn good and closest to the Acura's.

    Good luck.
  • taxesquiretaxesquire Member Posts: 681
    As I mentioned...the trunk layout is great...and can fit much. Don't just judge a trunk by the reported cargo volume...layout is important.

    Totally agree. The closer a trunk's shape is to a true rectangle, the more usable space there is. A huge trunk that is unusually-angled (b/c of wheels, dvd systems, whatever) hurts the usability factor.

    One thing I wonder about with kids in my TL is the perforated leather. If a drink is spilled on unperforated leather, you can wipe it up, but if it gets through the holes... If it's going to be your main family-hauler, I'd think twice about a car with perf leather.

    Suggestions for other family sedans? I hear the new Toyota Avalon is a blast, and I think it's bigger than the TL. I enjoyed my Passat very much. It didn't have perf leather and the trunk layout was the best I've seen. The revised Jetta is bigger, also has a good trunk layout, but is underpowered. I understad the Nissan Maxima is a nice-riding big vehicle, too.
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    You know, if you have a 5 and 1 year-old, and your wife doesn't really appreciate cars, the TL or the TSX would be too much car for her AND not really appropriate for your current family situation. If you want to stay with the Honda family, I would suggest taking a look at a CR-V -- roomy, easy to drive, very utilitarian, and kid-friendly. A base Pilot is also a consideration, although I find the Pilot too bulky (especially the width) for Canadian roads and parking lots.

    If you go outside Honda, something like a Legacy wagon or Outback are worth considering.
  • popperpopper Member Posts: 41
    Was out yesterday kickin' tires at Tulsa Acura dealer and counted a total of 3 TSX's (all auto) :( Then I start counting TL's- over 30! What's up with that?
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    Go to Norman or Stillwater :P
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    You may have counted 3 TSX in the 'front' lot...but there may have been many more in the 'back' lot that are not out on display. Either because they are not prepped...or because they wanted to showcase the TLs.

    Another reason...the delivery schedule flushed in a bunch of TLs...all timing.
  • jg88jg88 Member Posts: 59
    Back when we had small children, I had an '87 Saab 900 that is not too much bigger, if not a little smaller, than a TSX when it comes to rear seat space or trunk space. It had fold-flat seats in the rear for transporting longer items and we used it as a semi-wagon. For trips, I bought a car top carrier that added 20 cu ft of additional trunk room. If you know you need extra space but still want the TSX, check out the Yakima or Thule websites. Personally, I recommend the longer box carriers for streamling the vehicle v. the short, fat boxes.

    The night before the trip, put the carrier and rack on the car. Never wait until the last minute, this always takes longer than expected.

    When we replaced the Saab with an Explorer EB in '95, we still used the car top carrier for trips. Two kids in the back seat, dog + cooler + sundry objects in the storage area with the box on top carrying duffels, golf clubs etc. We also have a bike carrier that holds four bikes that uses the 2" hitch receiver.

    When we replaced the '95 explorer last year with an '04 expedition -- yep, still use the carrier on top. Now the kids bring friends, even more gear, same dog, same bike carrier.

    Oh yeah, another car trip investment -- get yourselves a "Suspension Theatre" with a portable DVD player that slings between the two front seats and the kids can watch movies with the headphones while you play the music through the front speakers.

    Or, as suggested above, get a small, fun wagon with a roof rack that you can attach the car top carrier -- with kids, you will never have enough room in any sedan/wagon/SUV you get anyway.
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    The more I find out about the TSX the more I like. Also, the more I see it on the road the more I like it's style. I don't regret buying a TL, but the TSX is a very nice car, and the practical side of me says, it's a great buy, and very sporty. By the way I did have a TSX loner for 4 days. :)
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    I was looking at the new Lexus IS330 on their website....after reading much about it on Edmunds...and you know what? The Lexus IS330 kinda resembles the TSX up front...and from the sides. Or is it my imagination?
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    Any chance of your adding a TSX in your garage as a stablemate to your wife's TL? ;)
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    There is definitely some resemblance.
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    Uh, no! :P
  • frisconickfrisconick Member Posts: 1,275
    Could you give us a link delmar? That would be a radical design change, and a big nod to Acura's styling, the Alfa front view. :P
  • delmar1delmar1 Member Posts: 744
    Are you refering to my comment regarding the Lexus IS330 styling to be similar to the TSX? Oh...just to go the generic www.lexus.com and they have a big link to the IS site with multiple images in the 'what's new' section.

    Now...when I say similar....I don't mean exact (ie the grill is not the same...but the basic lines and angular features are similar)....so don't shoot me folks and call foul.
  • fredvhfredvh Member Posts: 857
    Does anyone have a link for some pictures of the New 2006 TSX?
  • mrdjmrdj Member Posts: 2
    Hi,
    I'm active duty Air Force currently stationed in Korea and I'm due to relocate to England for another 3-year assignment in January and I'm looking to purchase a new car enroute. I'm stuck between the '06 TL and the '06 TSX and I've driven both
    cars (both '05 models with 6-speed tranny) and I really liked them both. Originally, I preferred the TL because of it's Bluetooth and nav system, but
    now that the '06 TSX offers Bluetooth, it seems to be a better bargain. When I get back to England, I'll be facing a 130-140 mile roundtrip commute everyday, so fuel economy is very important to me. But performance is equally important, which is why I don't want a Civic: Plus I own a 94 Mustang GT and I just sold a very nice 95
    740i BMW due to electrical problems, so luxury and performance are equally important as fuel economy. I owned an Integra before and know first hand of Acura/Honda reliablity. I read that the new TSX recieved an increase in power and I also read a review from 2 years ago that said it combined the best of what Acura/Honda offered in one chassis, but that review came out before the new TL. But I am curious what the HP ratings for the 06 TSX would be under the old calculation method. Also, whatever car I buy has to double as a family car because a have two small children, ages 1 and 3. I don't plan on going crazy with upgrades, and since Acuras seem to come pretty loaded as standard, I'll probably opt for leather and nav. My driving style is more performance than cruising. Some may suggest the new Civic Hybrid or Accord Hybrid, but I don't think the Civic will meet my performance demands and the Accord is ugly, at least in my opinion. And the regular Civic gets great mileage, but again it's not really a
    performance car, but I will test drive it when I get home. So there you have it, '06 TSX vs '06 TL. Given everything I've stated above, which car would you choose if you were doing 30,000 miles a year and you wanted comfort, performance and economy? :confuse:
  • taxesquiretaxesquire Member Posts: 681
    The TL beats the TSX in the performance category hands-down. I'd expect the TSX to get better mileage, and it still handles well - just doesn't ahve the flat-out acelleration of the TL. Up until the end of your post, I was thinking "TSX" - then you mentioned your kids. While I don't know the rear seat measurements of either car, I think your family would be more comfortable with the larger TL. Can't comment on the TSX, but it's easy to get the carseat in and out of the TL. The latches are placed conveniently, as opposed to some other vehicles where they are deep in the seat or narrowly set.

    PS - you won't be disappointed with the 6MT - shifts really smooth and the brembo brakes are great!

    PPS - I think leather is standard with both vehicles.
  • fredvhfredvh Member Posts: 857
    Leather IS standard on both the TL and TSX. Have you seen the new 2006 Accord? They have changed the rear quarter and, imo, it looks a lot better. You could save some money over the TL and TSX and get better mileage with the I4. You also could get the cloth interior seats if you wanted.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.