Did you recently rush to buy a new vehicle before tariff-related price hikes? A reporter is looking to speak with shoppers who felt pressure to act quickly due to expected cost increases; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com for more details by 4/24.
I am looking into getting a Solara Convertible in either Cosmic Blue or Silver. How does the Cosmic Blue look with the black top. I recently saw one with the tan top and liked the blue color, but would prefer the black top. I also found a Silver with pinstripes that looked good.
I had an opportunity to drive a 2005 Mustang convertible the other day. I guess I've spent too much time in GM cars - last Toyota was a new '82 Celica. I purchased a 2006 Solara SLE convertible and was unhappy with the ride and flexing. It felt like it had iron shocks -tighter than a drum. The people on this list who had Porsches obviously feel that the Solara rides beautifully - I drove a 944 so I can understand where they are coming from but believe me - the Solara doesn't drive like a GM or Ford car. Luckily I was able to sell it and only lost a couple of thousand dollars. I bought a 2000 Mustang convertible with 40k miles on it and it rode much more comfortably than the Solara with no convertible flexing at all. The 2005 Mustang had a similar ride but was tighter because it was new. The Mustang doesn't pretend to be a Lexus (which rides better than the Solara by the way) but feels more like what I was used to. Any prospective Solara buyer should discount what the car writers say about the car and actually drive it over bumpy city streets and less than perfect highways. I didn't have an opportunity to drive one. If I had I wouldn't have bought it. If you are used to a Toyota this one is light years better than a Corolla or Tercel or Celica but if you are used to GM, Ford, or Chrysler mid sized cars you need to take a rather extended test drive. The car is beautifully made and will be very dependable and the majority of the people on this forum love it. I didn't but you may. I think it depends what you are used to. This car may be a lot different.
Has it been six months already? That and nearly 4000 miles and I'm still stoked to roll in my Arctic Frost Pearl SLE with the tan interior and a carmel top. That's the upscale color combo and it really shines. Red and black are fine, that is to say fine for other people. I've been down the black-car road before, never again. I opted for the JBL CD changer as I usually know where I'm going and don't need to be looking down at some little screen to see the road ahead. The other option, stability control is on this car but I have not gotten that far out of shape in a corner, yet.
Performance: The gas mileage is on par with other mid-size cars that have a few less ponies under the hood. I can brag about that .029 coefficient of drag which is in Porches territory. The ride is nice but leans toward plush from my vantage point. My other car has a rim package and is lowered a couple inches so I'm used to more road-feel. I can't wait to wear out these Bridgestone Turanza tires as they squeal like a pig when trying to create some lateral G-force. Michelins baby! Learn to ignore the low-speed cowl-shake and you'll be a happy camper. It still disturbs me but this is my first rag-top and I'm just glad it doesn't make use of a stiffening bar ala the PT Cruiser.
Outside: I've gotten lots of positive comments on this car, more with the top down than up. We've taken to calling it "The Cream Puff" and my little sister throws in the adjective sizzlin as in sizzlin' cream puff but she drives a lumbering SUV so there's that. She loves those tail-lights and my NSX driving sales exec at work admires the "nice lines". The only car that I've seen since then that I wish I had considered was the Audi A4 drop-top. That thing looks sweet and doesn't rise toward the back so rear-ward visibility might be better. The rims are on the generic side so I may pimp them out with some chrome ones but they will be the same 17" diameter so the ride doesn't get too crunchy.
Inside: I was sold on the interior; it's elegant in a brushed metal, fake wood sort of way. The stereo is nice but there's a hole in the mid-bass response. It reproduces the thump of the kick drum but it doesn't go boom along with the bass guitar. As a bass player, I try to compensate by tuning the equalizer on the negative side and drive the volume to 50 or higher to rock out the jams. The climate control can bake cakes or freeze ice cream depending on the setting. I generally leave it set at 74 degrees unless I'm riding with the top down at night in where 80 degrees is a better setting.
Overall: It's my third Toyota and won't be my last. The Lexus-smooth engine with the 5-speed and the accommodating cabin stand out on this car. It's a fun car for a grown-up with kids. My daughter likes being picked up from school in the Cream Puff, that's all I need.
Just celebrated my first month with a 2006 red/tan SLE, loaded except the windshield which I am thinking of purchasing. Live in Tampa, FL, the weather has been great for top down driving and with only one day this pat month with the top up, I have gotten many miles, 2027 of enjoyment. A couple of thoughts for those who might be considering buying.
1. The rear visibility is tough. I am 6'2" and it is tough to see out the back top up or down, but I like to sit low.
2. Get the 18" wheels, they make a big difference in the look and feel of the car.
3. As I said, 2027 miles and not one...not one problem. Hand washed it 4 times, no leaks. Fit is tight. No issues with ext or interior. Only thing wrong so far is the miles per gallon calculation, it is off by @2.5 mpg. So far getting on average 21.7 mpg, 60/40 mix of hwy/city driving.
4. Stares, everywhere!!! The car flat out is a head turner!!! Friend who has a Lexus SC cries with the thought of the price he paid, cost to maintain, and lack of room he has every time he sees my car.
I have had many cars, GM's, Dodge, Nissan, Toyota's, Acura's. To date, two stay with me always, a 1984 Supra and this one. I put 220K on my Supra before it was stolen, yes, someone wanted it, I expect to do the same with this one. Toyota has it right!!!
I highly recommend that anyone looking for a top down experience look carefully into this car and BUY IT! I will keep updating from time to time, especially after the first service.
They threw in the windscreen when I bought mine but I'd pay for it if they had not done so. Unfortunately, I lost one of the little clips that secure it to the back so I have to wedge the little strap under the head-rest for now. My wife's long hair stays in place much better with the screen installed. It's like having an open sun-roof as far as wind/noise is concerned. It adds a nice touch too.
I ordered the windguard with my 2006 SLE but, the car came without it. I'm about to have it installed at the dealer, but, the service manager said they've never done one before....any suggestions as to what I might 'look out for'....I'm a little nervous thinking about letting someone drill holes on the inside my my brand new car!
I hear what you are saying....a buddy of mine took delivery of an '05 Mustang GT convertible a few weeks ago. Needless to say, I took it for a nice spin and almost refused to give him the keys back...Something about a V8, 5-speed and no roof overhead..... Anyway, it is a GREAT car and a solid value but it cannot really be compared to the Solara. Other then the convertible top, they are different cars. The interior of the Mustang is cool to look at but CHEAP to touch and feel. Fit and finish is good at best, the Solara has Lexus like fit and finish both inside and out, which is really dumb to say now that I typed it since Lexus IS a Toyota..... Btw...the SC430 should do things better than the Solara..it is twice the price...One major drawback to the SC is in fact the ride..between the 18" wheels and run-flats, even the dealer service department admits that there are issues with "harsh ride" .
Nope - there is no comparison at all between a Mustang and a Solara. The '05 Mustang interior IS cheap looking (the '04 one looked better) and the fancy gages that are available in many colors on the '05 fade out in sunlight. In fact the next time I buy a car to put in the living room and watch television from it will definately be a Solara because that Lexus -inspired interior, the buttery smooth leather, and the fake wood that is better looking fake wood than in my Deville are real turn-ons. Just think, the car will be worth a fortune when I sell it because it will have less than 10 miles on it and I will have enjoyed every minute I sat in those super comfortable seats and smelled that new car smell. I'll even play the radio! As a daily driver though, I'll take the Mustang. No jitters, shudders, and flexing at 25-40 mph on less than perfect roads. Of course this won't occur in the living room so I'll be able to enjoy the real benefits of my Solara (if I still owned it). I suggested the living room bit but it was a tight fit to get it around the dining room wall so my wife nixed the idea.
Dont think all of that cheap looking plastic will remain in place and not rub together for long....Holy potential squeeks and rattles... Admittedly, the 'Stang was tight..but let's see it in a year or two....
I agree. The pre-2005 leather looks a lot nicer. One of the problems with the old 60's Mustangs as well as with many cars of that vintage was dashboard squeaks and rattles. I had to take several dashes apart on old Buicks and Fords and insert foam pieces here and there. My 2000 Mustang doesn't rattle at all - the dash seems to be pretty padded and solid. The 2005 leather upholstery looks like the naugahyde that I recall from summer camp days. The camp had a 1948 Chevy stake truck with similar upholstery.
The windscreen has two tabs that fit into two slots that are already located on the horizontal surfaces next to the back-seat side windows. You slide the tabs into the slots and then pull the skirt back toward the rear seat and use the little hooks to catch the back side of the rear seat. No tools, no drills, a couple minutes at most and that includes removing the wind-screen from the trunk and taking it out of it's included zipper/cloth bag. BTW, the windscreen fits very nicely in the trunk if you slide it in under the cargo-net area with the legs pointing toward the front of the Solara.
Can one of you lucky enough to already have a 2006 Solara look in your owner's manual for the motor oil requirements? I'm curious whether Toyota still allows 10W-30 for warm weather climates, and whether SL oil is still acceptable or SM oil is now required. Thanks!
Thanks DadMan...The holes (slots) weren't there...the dealer (service department) had to cut the holes and install the pieces on the horizontal surfaces next to the windows....I guess they had to take the inside panels off because the pieces attach inside...I don't think I explained that very well!!!! Anyway, I had it done last Friday and that was the last day we had sun around here so I was able to drive home with the top down and try it out...LOVED IT! I'm in Massachusetts and it's been raining here for weeks now....can't wait for summer!! Thanks for the trunk storage tip, I hadn't figured that one out yet....
The 2006 manual states - API grade SL "Energy Conserving" or ILSAC multigrade oil is recommended. SAE 5W-30 is the best choice...If SAE 5W-30 is not available, SAE 10W-30 may be used. However, it should be replaced with SAE 5W-30 at the next change.
I read a while back that the body was altered on the Solara Convertible to make it handle better. (maybe the cowling?) Can someone confirm this and if so what year were changes made. I know it was in the last couple of years. We are looking to purchase a late model. Thanks, Jim
Bought my 2006 SLE Convertible last month from Jack Safro in Milwaukee, WI. They said they weren't offering deals on the convertables and from what I can tell on this forum they were right. Nevertheless, I got my $31,500 MSRP Solara for under $29,000, so I'm pretty happy!
A couple of comments on the forum: 1) This is a great place to read about other's experiences and get questions answered. 2) Don't believe anything dspencer or tyresmoker are writing, it changes from post to post. They're probably a couple of kids that don't even own a car just messing with us here.
My experience so far:
Likes: 1) Arctic Frost Pearl with Tan Top/Interior is the Best! Especially when viewed up close. Well worth the $200 paint charge (what's up with that?). I love the Lexus-like styling. 2) Interior is far superior to anything under $40,000 in comfort and amenities. We test drove the Saab convertible and couldn't get over the cheap plastic-everything interior. 3) Ride and power are perfect for what it is, a sporty (not sports car) four passenger convertible. 4) I defy anyone of normal size to ride 100 miles in the back seat of a Mustang, or most other convertables for that matter. Plus, this one has an actual trunk, which means you could take it on a real live trip, with luggage and other people. 5) Toyota quality - say no more. Anyone that buys the crap Detroit is selling these days deserves the headaches (been there, done that). I've owned 5 Toyotas and don't have any complaints yet.
Dislikes: 1) Drive-by-wire lag in acceleration. I was about to take it back for service when I found out from postings on this site it's normal. Funny, I didn't notice it on the test drive. This is only a problem for normal drivers. If you have a lead-foot you'll never notice. 2) Upgraded JBL CD Changer Stereo has typical factory-installed mushy bass response. Can't be compensated for with EQ. And why doesn't it play MP3s? Expected more from JBL. 3) Rear-visibility. Although improved on the 2006 model, it's still not good with the top up. I can deal because I'm used to hauling a boat with my 4-Runner. Still, some bigger side-views would help. 4) Wheel styling is nothing to write home about. Maybe after this car is paid off I'll buy something decent.
Have to wait a few months for the winter driving review, but it's front-wheel-drive, which should really help.
According to C&D 2005 marked a ground-up redesign for the convertible. Prior to that the body was really a modified coupe. I don't have all the details of what that means, but it supposedly added structural integrity.
I fell in love with the Solara SLE V6 Convertible (Arctic Frost Pearl with Tan Top/Interior). What do you think I can get this car for? The dealer says he can sell it to me for $1000 over invoice, making it $30,600. I read on another post that someone got if for under 29K. I am just curious what I can actually get this car for.
2) Don't believe anything dspencer or tyresmoker are writing, it changes from post to post. They're probably a couple of kids that don't even own a car just messing with us here. Changes from post to post?... Yeah...Pal, I had a Solara convertible in my garage probably before you even knew they existed...(delivery- March 2004). My posts change? Where? I have been on this board since it began telling it the way I see it. As far as dspencer..it is his opinion, just as it it yours...if he prefers his Malibu, let him...
I'm dispencer. I'm 64 and a retired senior level Occupational Safety and Health Manager for the Federal Government -worked at EPA, GSA, and Dept. of the Navy. I'm also a retired Navy Reserve Commander with two tours in Vietnam. I own a real estate agency in the Southwest -I'm far from a kid. I didn't like my 2006 Solara SLE convertible because I didn't like the flexing, shuddering, and the ride on the roads that I usually drive on and at the speeds that I drive. Thousands of people love Solara convertibles. I'm not a Toyota fan -I prefer bigger cars. I prefer the ride of my Deville and Avalanche and the Mustang is more fun than the Toyota was. The Toyota was lots nicer inside though. I wouldn't have ordered the Toyota if it had not been for all the advocates on the Edmunds Forum. I figured if so many people liked it I would too. If I had driven smaller Toyotas or other foreign cars I would probably consider the Solara a great improvement. Anyway I'm always interested in the viewpoint of others who are actual owners and drivers. Your comments match the comments of the professional reviewers so I'm obviously out in left field. Anyway -Nothing ventured nothing gained. I tried the car out and sold it . I'm happy with what I have now just like you are and I'm entitled to my opinion just like you are.
I will say this though. Many people on this forum have had a number of Toyotas. I have friends who drive nothing else . If you are used to Toyotas you will love the Lexus-like Solara. If you are used to GM cars which drive much differently you may have to get used to a Solara. GM tries to make their small cars drive and ride like full size cars. Sometimes they succeed and sometimes they don't. The present Malibu Maxx has a very comfortable ride -much like a LeSabre with the Sport suspension. The Solara handles much better and feels tighter . I drove my Solara about 80 miles to its new owner and it was fine on the Interstate -no flexing - just a good smooth ride. It also did well on a smooth city street. The problem was driving 25-45 mph on bumpy roads or washboard surfaces, This is when the convertible flex and the tight suspension was obvious. Unfortunately those are the predominate roads down here. Toyotas are fine cars and recently there is very little difference between the top of the line ones and a Lexus. Detroit needs to get its act together and build competitive cars. I prefer GM cars but most Toyota drivers don't.
Ok, I owe a you retraction and an apology. If you're not who you say you are you should be. Two questions, though:
1) Who buys a $30,000 car without driving it first? 2) If you prefer the GM-type no-road-feel, loose-steering ride, how can you say you prefer the Mustang's ride qualities over the Solara's? Since the Mustang has a tighter, bumpier, sports car type ride that statement makes absolutely no sense to me.
I am loving my Red 2006 Solara SE convertible. It rides like a dream, looks good, and I will enjoy every moment of good weather that I get to drive with the top down. I sold my black 2001 Ford Mustang to get this vehicle and I am happy that I did. I'm in my late 20's and this is my first convertible...I am now hooked on convertibles and Toyota vehicles. It may not be really fast or provide a sports-car ride...but it is plenty sporty and provides room for luggage and passengers. I am soooo glad that I waited to get a red Solara...great color!! Some minor cons: The top opening button and all-windows down button should light up at night and be more easily distinguishable. The backseat is somewhat difficult to get into and out of. Rear Visibility takes getting used to, but I haven't had any major problems. I agree with 1840sky's comments, but I for the most part I really like the stereo (it is big improvement over the stock radio in my Mustang)
Your first question- Nobody within 400 miles had a convertible I could drive. I've had Toyotas before and have rented lots of them. I hadn't driven the convertible but drove the SLE coupe which was ok - suspension was a little stiff but I figured it was just because the car was new. It handled very well. I also read a lot of reviews and looked at the Forum - everybody loved the convertible.
Second. -My 2000 Mustang is just a fun car for shows and good weather driving with the top down. It isn't a serious commuter. It didn't replace the Toyota. Nothing replaced the Toyota except a check in the bank. I have other cars for serious driving as well as the company Avalanche. The Mustang is a V6, not a GT, Cobra, etc. so it has a suspension system similar to a base coupe. It is not really tight and the shocks have some give. Of course it has 42,000 miles on it and is 5 years old. It is a Ford which means that it feels looser than a GM car. I haven't had a problem with lack of road feel. The Mustang convertible feels like a normal rental car but since it is a convertible it has been beefed up to avoid flex -of which it has none. It also doesn't have those rear seat headrests that block visibility. It essentially has the same visibility as the coupe. I'll probably buy a 2006 Mustang convertible eventually and will also keep the 2000. The 2005's have lots of problems judging from the Forum owners. The Mustangs have a club, newsletter, shows, meets, etc that I'll get involved in. This may sound tacky to the Toyota/Lexus crowd but it should be fun. I went through the sports car phase in my life and never again. When you get my age you end up with crowns and tooth-jarring rides are not for me. I think that the Solara ride is just fine on good roads and Toyota buyers love it. I'm not an advocate of road feel. If everything rode like my 2003 Deville I'd be very happy. The Solara convertible is a fine car -much more sophisticated than any Ford, GM car or Chrysler ever built. This is why Toyota is such a great seller. Most people love them. I'll never buy another one but I doubt that anyone at Toyota will commit hari-kari because of my decision.
A reporter with a national newspaper would like to speak with professional women who for the first time are buying a fun car or truck they have been longing to own but were not able to buy before because it wasn’t practical. This vehicle purchase is a splurge. The reporter would like to speak with first time buyers of full-size trucks, convertibles, Miatas, Porsches or Jaguars. If you fit what the reporter is looking for, please email a brief description with contact information to Kirsten Holguin at kholguin@edmunds.com as soon as possible.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name. 2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h) Review your vehicle
Just bought a 2005 Solara Convertible SLE. White with tan top and tan interior. The boot is black, though. This does not sound right! Shouldn't the boot be tan??
What happened is that alot of Toyota customers complained that the beige boot got grimy (also the shifter knob and ebrake handle).So they substituted it with black or grey. I've just ordered a white one, beige interior. The dealership is going to swap it with an 04. You could always order a beige one from a Toyota parts department. Your boot should have been at least be grey to match the top trim of your car. Black does not sound right.
"for $1000 over invoice means: Invoice: $26,829 $1000 over invoice sub total: $27,829 tax (if 7%): $1948.03 shipment: $540 Reginal adjustment: 190 Total cash price(deal): $32,455.06, which is how much you will pay for this car? Any other fees such as doc.fee?
Thanks for sharing your experience. I would appreciate if you could tell me if $29,000 was payed for you to drive it out of door? I mean $29,000 was all you payed for the car? including tax, shipment, regional adjustment, doc. fee, title...? Thanks!
I had all the seals replaced on my windows, and they no longer leak. I would press the dealer to make the repairs. I brought mine in 3 times before they would do it, and the 3rd time, I brought pictures! But the leaking has stopped.... finally!
I have a 2004 Solara convertible (White with Tan top, this seems important to everyone :-) ), which I had to have the entire top replaced, including all bars, belts, etc. The explanation was the alignment was off which created the fabric to rub against the molding and the fabric to tear. It was suppose to be completed in 3 days, and my car was in service for 35 days! All the parts were on back order from overseas! I also had problems with the windows leaking water, and had to bring it in 3 times, finally I took pictures of the leaks in order for the dealer to fix it... what a waste of my time. My convertible is now starting to vibrate and rattle again, which is how I found the problem the 1st time! IM SCARED TO BRING IT BACK! AND THE DEALER HAS BEEN NO HELP AND A JOKE! Time to file the Lemon Law, any suggestions?
I'm really suprised at the problems. Nobody else seems to have vibration and rattling. In my brief experience with the Solara the top was pretty stable and I only had convertible flex on less than perfect roads. I'd look for another Toyota dealer if I were you and call the zone office.
It was $29,000 w/o tax and title. Everything else included. It should be noted however that we traded in a '98 Buick LeSabre for $5,000. Unknown what the price would have been without a trade.
What is the experience like to have a dog on board a convertible in the backseat? I am thinking of getting a Toyota Solara convertible. I frequently--not always--take my dog with me. In a normal sedan or SUV she is quiet and either sleeps or looks out the window. For a convertible I guess you MUST have a wind screen, but how does the dog behave with the top down?
I have had my dog (a Newfoundland) in my convertible without a wind screen and she was fine. I guess it depends on the dogs personality. Hope that helps.
I ordered it about 3 weeks ago and am going absolutely crazy waiting, This is my first brand new car and I was so ambivalent in making the final decision about the purchase. I live in NY and the weather is less than perfect for a convertible, but I have had the luxury of driving a convertible Jaguar xk8 for a few months, which sealed the deal for me wanting an affordable convertible of my own. I just want to say that this forum also helped a lot in my decision making process. It is good to have all this feedback. Thank god it was more positive than negative.
What did you think of the XK8? I was interested in a used one - they are pretty reasonable -but the lack of a dealer closer than 215 miles turned me off. I drove Jags in the '60's -the big MKX sedans and they were far ahead of anything built over here.
I absolutely love driving the car, it is a pleasure compared to all the junkie cars I have driven. Theer's a huge problem with the suspension on the terrible roads here in NY. Maintainence on the car is obviously expensive. And the car is definitely not meant for bad weather driving and has horrible control on slick roads.
I have a heavy foot and even at high acceleration the ride is very smooth. Undoubtedly, I would prefer to keep this car if it was anyway possible, but my budget cant accommodate the maintainence and the gas of an 8 cylinder car.
Dealer's invoice is different from Edmond's, so it is hard to say about your paying. But it would be much easier if you could tell how much you paid for this car with all options and tax and title.....
The wet rode handling problem is a suprise. Jags are supposed to be much more dependable since Ford bought the company. There are a lots of parts shared with the Lincoln LS. You will like the Solara but I didn't like it on rough roads. We have a lot of less than perfect roads out here in NM. The interior is very impressive and the seats are comfortable.
I was given a quote of $28922 for the SLE with VSC and floor mats,first aid kit etc. This is about $1000 over Edmunds Invoice price. I will most likely get the Blue with Black top. Is this a good deal? I am located in upstate NY.
Comments
Toyota Camry Solara: Prices Paid & Buying Experience
MODERATOR
Need help getting around? claires@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Tell everyone about your buying experience: Write a Dealer Review
either Cosmic Blue or Silver. How does the
Cosmic Blue look with the black top. I recently
saw one with the tan top and liked the blue color,
but would prefer the black top. I also found a Silver
with pinstripes that looked good.
I think it depends what you are used to. This car may be a lot different.
Performance: The gas mileage is on par with other mid-size cars that have a few less ponies under the hood. I can brag about that .029 coefficient of drag which is in Porches territory. The ride is nice but leans toward plush from my vantage point. My other car has a rim package and is lowered a couple inches so I'm used to more road-feel. I can't wait to wear out these Bridgestone Turanza tires as they squeal like a pig when trying to create some lateral G-force. Michelins baby! Learn to ignore the low-speed cowl-shake and you'll be a happy camper. It still disturbs me but this is my first rag-top and I'm just glad it doesn't make use of a stiffening bar ala the PT Cruiser.
Outside: I've gotten lots of positive comments on this car, more with the top down than up. We've taken to calling it "The Cream Puff" and my little sister throws in the adjective sizzlin as in sizzlin' cream puff but she drives a lumbering SUV so there's that. She loves those tail-lights and my NSX driving sales exec at work admires the "nice lines". The only car that I've seen since then that I wish I had considered was the Audi A4 drop-top. That thing looks sweet and doesn't rise toward the back so rear-ward visibility might be better. The rims are on the generic side so I may pimp them out with some chrome ones but they will be the same 17" diameter so the ride doesn't get too crunchy.
Inside: I was sold on the interior; it's elegant in a brushed metal, fake wood sort of way. The stereo is nice but there's a hole in the mid-bass response. It reproduces the thump of the kick drum but it doesn't go boom along with the bass guitar. As a bass player, I try to compensate by tuning the equalizer on the negative side and drive the volume to 50 or higher to rock out the jams. The climate control can bake cakes or freeze ice cream depending on the setting. I generally leave it set at 74 degrees unless I'm riding with the top down at night in where 80 degrees is a better setting.
Overall: It's my third Toyota and won't be my last. The Lexus-smooth engine with the 5-speed and the accommodating cabin stand out on this car. It's a fun car for a grown-up with kids. My daughter likes being picked up from school in the Cream Puff, that's all I need.
Another day in Paradise...
Dad/\/\an
1. The rear visibility is tough. I am 6'2" and it is tough to see out the back top up or down, but I like to sit low.
2. Get the 18" wheels, they make a big difference in the look and feel of the car.
3. As I said, 2027 miles and not one...not one problem. Hand washed it 4 times, no leaks. Fit is tight. No issues with ext or interior. Only thing wrong so far is the miles per gallon calculation, it is off by @2.5 mpg. So far getting on average 21.7 mpg, 60/40 mix of hwy/city driving.
4. Stares, everywhere!!! The car flat out is a head turner!!! Friend who has a Lexus SC cries with the thought of the price he paid, cost to maintain, and lack of room he has every time he sees my car.
I have had many cars, GM's, Dodge, Nissan, Toyota's, Acura's. To date, two stay with me always, a 1984 Supra and this one. I put 220K on my Supra before it was stolen, yes, someone wanted it, I expect to do the same with this one. Toyota has it right!!!
I highly recommend that anyone looking for a top down experience look carefully into this car and BUY IT! I will keep updating from time to time, especially after the first service.
They threw in the windscreen when I bought mine but I'd pay for it if they had not done so. Unfortunately, I lost one of the little clips that secure it to the back so I have to wedge the little strap under the head-rest for now. My wife's long hair stays in place much better with the screen installed. It's like having an open sun-roof as far as wind/noise is concerned. It adds a nice touch too.
Cheers!
Dad/\/\an
Anyway, it is a GREAT car and a solid value but it cannot really be compared to the Solara. Other then the convertible top, they are different cars. The interior of the Mustang is cool to look at but CHEAP to touch and feel. Fit and finish is good at best, the Solara has Lexus like fit and finish both inside and out, which is really dumb to say now that I typed it since Lexus IS a Toyota.....
Btw...the SC430 should do things better than the Solara..it is twice the price...One major drawback to the SC is in fact the ride..between the 18" wheels and run-flats, even the dealer service department admits that there are issues with "harsh ride" .
As a daily driver though, I'll take the Mustang. No jitters, shudders, and flexing at 25-40 mph on less than perfect roads. Of course this won't occur in the living room so I'll be able to enjoy the real benefits of my Solara (if I still owned it). I suggested the living room bit but it was a tight fit to get it around the dining room wall so my wife nixed the idea.
Admittedly, the 'Stang was tight..but let's see it in a year or two....
The windscreen has two tabs that fit into two slots that are already located on the horizontal surfaces next to the back-seat side windows. You slide the tabs into the slots and then pull the skirt back toward the rear seat and use the little hooks to catch the back side of the rear seat. No tools, no drills, a couple minutes at most and that includes removing the wind-screen from the trunk and taking it out of it's included zipper/cloth bag. BTW, the windscreen fits very nicely in the trunk if you slide it in under the cargo-net area with the legs pointing toward the front of the Solara.
Cheers!
Dad/\/\an
Hope this helps.
With the windscreen in place can you access things on the back seat?
Would it preclude having a dog in the back?
Thanks,
Jim McConnon
A couple of comments on the forum: 1) This is a great place to read about other's experiences and get questions answered. 2) Don't believe anything dspencer or tyresmoker are writing, it changes from post to post. They're probably a couple of kids that don't even own a car just messing with us here.
My experience so far:
Likes:
1) Arctic Frost Pearl with Tan Top/Interior is the Best! Especially when viewed up close. Well worth the $200 paint charge (what's up with that?). I love the Lexus-like styling.
2) Interior is far superior to anything under $40,000 in comfort and amenities. We test drove the Saab convertible and couldn't get over the cheap plastic-everything interior.
3) Ride and power are perfect for what it is, a sporty (not sports car) four passenger convertible.
4) I defy anyone of normal size to ride 100 miles in the back seat of a Mustang, or most other convertables for that matter. Plus, this one has an actual trunk, which means you could take it on a real live trip, with luggage and other people.
5) Toyota quality - say no more. Anyone that buys the crap Detroit is selling these days deserves the headaches (been there, done that). I've owned 5 Toyotas and don't have any complaints yet.
Dislikes:
1) Drive-by-wire lag in acceleration. I was about to take it back for service when I found out from postings on this site it's normal. Funny, I didn't notice it on the test drive. This is only a problem for normal drivers. If you have a lead-foot you'll never notice.
2) Upgraded JBL CD Changer Stereo has typical factory-installed mushy bass response. Can't be compensated for with EQ. And why doesn't it play MP3s? Expected more from JBL.
3) Rear-visibility. Although improved on the 2006 model, it's still not good with the top up. I can deal because I'm used to hauling a boat with my 4-Runner. Still, some bigger side-views would help.
4) Wheel styling is nothing to write home about. Maybe after this car is paid off I'll buy something decent.
Have to wait a few months for the winter driving review, but it's front-wheel-drive, which should really help.
Changes from post to post?... Yeah...Pal, I had a Solara convertible in my garage probably before you even knew they existed...(delivery- March 2004). My posts change? Where? I have been on this board since it began telling it the way I see it.
As far as dspencer..it is his opinion, just as it it yours...if he prefers his Malibu, let him...
1) Who buys a $30,000 car without driving it first?
2) If you prefer the GM-type no-road-feel, loose-steering ride, how can you say you prefer the Mustang's ride qualities over the Solara's? Since the Mustang has a tighter, bumpier, sports car type ride that statement makes absolutely no sense to me.
Some minor cons: The top opening button and all-windows down button should light up at night and be more easily distinguishable. The backseat is somewhat difficult to get into and out of. Rear Visibility takes getting used to, but I haven't had any major problems. I agree with 1840sky's comments, but I for the most part I really like the stereo (it is big improvement over the stock radio in my Mustang)
Second. -My 2000 Mustang is just a fun car for shows and good weather driving with the top down. It isn't a serious commuter. It didn't replace the Toyota. Nothing replaced the Toyota except a check in the bank. I have other cars for serious driving as well as the company Avalanche. The Mustang is a V6, not a GT, Cobra, etc. so it has a suspension system similar to a base coupe. It is not really tight and the shocks have some give. Of course it has 42,000 miles on it and is 5 years old. It is a Ford which means that it feels looser than a GM car. I haven't had a problem with lack of road feel. The Mustang convertible feels like a normal rental car but since it is a convertible it has been beefed up to avoid flex -of which it has none. It also doesn't have those rear seat headrests that block visibility. It essentially has the same visibility as the coupe. I'll probably buy a 2006 Mustang convertible eventually and will also keep the 2000. The 2005's have lots of problems judging from the Forum owners. The Mustangs have a club, newsletter, shows, meets, etc that I'll get involved in. This may sound tacky to the Toyota/Lexus crowd but it should be fun. I went through the sports car phase in my life and never again. When you get my age you end up with crowns and tooth-jarring rides are not for me. I think that the Solara ride is just fine on good roads and Toyota buyers love it. I'm not an advocate of road feel. If everything rode like my 2003 Deville I'd be very happy. The Solara convertible is a fine car -much more sophisticated than any Ford, GM car or Chrysler ever built. This is why Toyota is such a great seller. Most people love them. I'll never buy another one but I doubt that anyone at Toyota will commit hari-kari because of my decision.
ClaireS, Host
Coupes & Convertibles | Vans & Minivanns
MODERATOR
Need help getting around? claires@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Tell everyone about your buying experience: Write a Dealer Review
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
What happened is that alot of Toyota customers complained that the beige boot got grimy (also the shifter knob and ebrake handle).So they substituted it with black or grey. I've just ordered a white one, beige interior. The dealership is going to swap it with an 04. You could always order a beige one from a Toyota parts department. Your boot should have been at least be grey to match the top trim of your car. Black does not sound right.
Invoice: $26,829
$1000 over invoice
sub total: $27,829
tax (if 7%): $1948.03
shipment: $540
Reginal adjustment: 190
Total cash price(deal): $32,455.06, which is how much you will pay for this car?
Any other fees such as doc.fee?
Thanks!
I brought mine in 3 times before they would do it, and the 3rd time, I brought pictures! But the leaking has stopped.... finally!
I have a 2004 Solara convertible (White with Tan top, this seems important to everyone :-) ), which I had to have the entire top replaced, including all bars, belts, etc. The explanation was the alignment was off which created the fabric to rub against the molding and the fabric to tear. It was suppose to be completed in 3 days, and my car was in service for 35 days! All the parts were on back order from overseas! I also had problems with the windows leaking water, and had to bring it in 3 times, finally I took pictures of the leaks in order for the dealer to fix it... what a waste of my time. My convertible is now starting to vibrate and rattle again, which is how I found the problem the 1st time!
IM SCARED TO BRING IT BACK! AND THE DEALER HAS BEEN NO HELP AND A JOKE!
Time to file the Lemon Law, any suggestions?
Thanks
I have a heavy foot and even at high acceleration the ride is very smooth. Undoubtedly, I would prefer to keep this car if it was anyway possible, but my budget cant accommodate the maintainence and the gas of an 8 cylinder car.
floor mats,first aid kit etc. This is about $1000 over Edmunds
Invoice price. I will most likely get the Blue with Black top. Is
this a good deal? I am located in upstate NY.