Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Welcome Toyota Tundra - III
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Since the Tundra is now classified as a full size truck capable of doing everything the Big3 can do and in some Toyota owners opinion better and is now about the same price as the Big3, why then do you not see Dallas cablevision, City of Denver public works, Mr. X plumbing of Los Angles, Big Home construction Co., etc, buying and using this truck? I mean think about it, if it's all everyone is saying why do we not see any being used in the same manner as the Big3?? Don't get me wrong, I considered the Tundra (since I have owned a 89 xcab 4x4 (for 6 yrs) and a 95 T100 xcab 2x4 SR5 (for 4 yrs)), but the rear seating was the deciding factor. No need to reply, just something to think about.
Samir
I don't think it is necessary to change to oil yet but you certainly wont hurt it.
I am really glad my truck has been good so far, it is very disturbing to read messages from owners who are having problems. I expected that there would be more messages anyway based on the volume of trucks they sell. I mean if Toyota sells a 100K and Chevy sell over 1M there is bound to be more complaints. I know one thing to be absolute, if I have any continued problem(s) (something that the shop just can't figure out) or lots of problems that they fix but then another pops up, I will definately being trading for a Tundra. But like I said earlier.....so far so good.
Yea, never thought about how chevy & ferd build those "el cheapo low cost" trucks to win bids.....good point.
The Tundra fits perfectly between the S-10 and the Silverado. (in size anyway, not price) They could rebadge it as the Tundrado, or Silverundra. I know GM and Toyota do this already with the Prizm and Corrola so why not with Trucks too.
I think we all need to keep in mind that this is only sheet metal we are talking about, not the answer to life, the universe and everything.
Thanks
606
cliffy1, OK, I get it...Ha Ha..or since it's the Xmas season...Ho Ho !
606
Anyone see any way the back seat on the Tundra could be made better with (uncharacteristically-effective) aftermarket equipment? Say a bracket to remount the seat at a better angle at the expense of some reduced leg room? I haven't sat in one yet but I will probably own one soon.
I was leaning toward a Silverado or Superduty Ford for a upcoming vehicle purchase. Reliability (read Toyota) has taken on new importance over the size and gadgetry of the American cars.
Siverado owners take heed, our Christmas suburban story:
While I was out buying a cell phone (so my wife and I could stay in touch in case one of us had car trouble) - my wife was stranded on the freeway in lanes with our 95 suburban (trans digested itself). Cars were moving past on either side at 75MPH. Lucky there wasn't a tragedy.
The GM tech didn't even open-up the trans, he knew what it was, he'd seen it before - quite a few times I would bet. Sadly, reluctantly, and with some element of shame of defeat (my wife is from Japan) I have owned my last American vehicle.
That's just great. Game over. If you can't trust Toyota, who can you trust?
I guess I have to just humor the family and get a Toyota; and if it fails, then I'll be vindicated and can get a plush Silverado.
That's just great. Game over. If you can't trust Toyota, who can you trust?
I guess I have to just humor the family and get a Toyota; and if it fails, then I'll be vindicated and can get a 6.0 Silverado.
Trucks4me is a bitter chevy owner. He has been banned from this site before under a different name (rubluetoo). Most of what he writes is pure fantasy. He has spread lies and rumors galore. Eventually the monitors will ban him again. In the meantime try your best to ignore him.
My only reason for not considering the Tundra is the back seat. I've got two small kids, and I was planning to use the truck to haul our camper across the country next year. I figured the back seat would be uncomfortable even for them (4 and 7) for that long of a trip.
We are dead set on getting the truck, but we are going to wait to see either what the sequoia suv will look like and cost, or if they give us all that foot. Sequoia is scheduled to be out Oct. 2000.
My girl is 10 and rides in the back seat of the Tundra. She says she's comfortable on the 5-6 hour trip to OR, but then again we don't encourage whining. I periodically ride in the back with her and her carseat bound 21 mo old brother, just to hang out with them. I'm 5'11" and find it tolerable but not luxurious. It's comfortable enough I can fall asleep back there. I love the current size of the truck and really wouldn't change it. When I sat in the sierra backseat it had a more reclining angle but the lumbar section curved the wrong way which is awful for your back in the long run. Although the cab is longer the seat angle gobbles up any extra space you might have gained. I guess people will always tend to think bigger=better. I saw a ford superduty crew cab long bed. It had a ridiculous looking, weinerdog appearance kind of like those stretch limo's.
I've sat in the back of our 98 Camary, and personally, between my Camary and my Tundra, I would rather sit in the back of my Tundra. Leg room is about the same between the two, unless you have someone tall sitting in front of you.
(quote from 4-Wheeler on them limited ones)
...carry-over parts from previous
models, including a transmission from the T100,
and a transfer case from the Tacoma.
This is a good one here. Guess that "full size" truck borrows much from them littler ones. Serious now, can you imagine if Silverado shared a trannie and transfer case with that S-10 now? This tells much on them "full size" ones now. What say on this one here?
The Silverado's rear seat could be manufactured by Lazy Boy furniture company but I still would not own one.
By the way, I am glad the Tundra is smaller than a so-called full size truck. If it was exactly the same size I would never have bought the Tundra.
For years GM's had the boxy big grille and little style to it. When they "redesigned" it, all they did was soften the box.
Penrose: Most compact and mid size cars have a problem with back seat room when the front seats are positioned all the way back. Especially if the person in the back seat is tall. I've never sat in the back of a T-100
Are you sure it's physically starting? Some Toyotas have an extended crank, i.e. instead of going broom hum hum hum, it goes broom broom broom hum hum hum. Example 4Runners, they have a 10-second start, i.e. it could take 10 seconds to actually start. Please do not try this if you are sure that it is physically starting, if that is the case take it into the dealer near you, you may need to leave it over night so that they can start it in the morning or late at night.