Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Got a Quick, Technical Question?

15657596162114

Comments

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    How do you know it's hitting the crank and not something else?
  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    Other possibilities:
    -You don't have your original dipstick.
    -You don't have your original dipstick tube.
    -The rebuilder jammed the dipstick tube in too far.
  • dmendeldmendel Member Posts: 16
    Recently started to hear a rattling noise from what seems like the right side front-end of my 99 Toyota Corolla, when driving over even small bumps in the road. I took it to my local dealer who always services the car and was told that it needs new rear struts, and new front and rear sway bar bushings and links -- a roughly $1,000 repair job.

    Here is my question: What is the minimum that I can get away with in terms of repair so that I won't feel and hear the rattling in the front end? Can I get away with just replacing the front sway bar bushings or the links, or both -- and just leave the rear alone? Will that have any noticeable effect? Or do I need to have everything done?

    I ask this because I am imminently planning to buy a new car and was planning to trade in the Corolla towards the purchase. Obviously I don't want to spend $1,000 when I will soon be getting rid of it. But I also don't want the appearance of any major mechanical problems when I get it appraised by the dealer.

    Thanks if you can answer this question, or direct it to someone who can.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,733
    Yes, the links will most likely take care of the rattle. I'm not entirely familiar with a '99 Corolla. Are the rear struts a coil-over design? If so, that may explain the expense of the repair ... although $1k still seems really high, regardless.

    On my Volvo, the front-end rattle is commonly a result of failed endlinks. They cost about $30 and take a half hour to install. (this could be a more difficult process on your Corolla, but I doubt it.)

    Instead of a dealer, try an independent mechanic who knows Corollas. Ask if front endlinks will take care of the rattle and how much it will cost. Point out that you are trading the car in, so you want to do as little as possible.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • bishopk99bishopk99 Member Posts: 11
    Folks,

    I posted this to other boards in CIVIC with no replies. Hopefully, this board will get one:

    I have to get my car smogged (I live in California) and need to clear a check engine light to do this.

    I just spent over 780.00 on trying to get my check engine light to go out on my subj Civic. The final answer is "you have a bad computer" and to replace will cost 980.00. Well, if they ran diagnostics on it in the first place to correct a temperature Hi/Lo sensor and a transmission part (which makes the car run excellent now) how can that be. Now the answer is you need a new computer?

    I own a car made in Japan, with a JHMED VIN...

    it ststates on the computer:

    37820-PM5-A550
    601-139748
    8 B
    with a manufacture date of 87-12-24

    It is a 1.5L engine with automatic transmission.

    I bought this car new in 1988, it has over 178,000 miles, it drove me to 5 ships and 5 shore stations and will be featured in my retirement ceremony after I get to 25 yrs in the Navy. Everyone hates it but I loove it. It is my baby blue car!

    Are there compatability issues with the computers, some folks tell me that any computer in that family will work (1988-1991). Is swapping this out easy to do; can I do it myself?

    Happy Holidays!

    Kevin, Senior Chief, Unitied States Navy
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Isn't there a money limit on how much you have to spend to comply in California? Have you called DMV about this? You might be able to skate on this by going to a smog referee.
  • snilzelsnilzel Member Posts: 1
    I just bought this car and noticed that the low coolant light stays on and sometimes goes off for a few minutes periodically. Does anyone know what this could mean?
  • nosirrahgnosirrahg Member Posts: 872
    When I ordered my 2000 Impala many moons ago, I checked off the $35 engine coolant heater, even though I live in Arkansas where it rarely gets cold enough to use. I've kept the car garaged at night until just recently when the addition of a 3rd car to the household pushed mine outside. :cry:

    Well, tonight the temp is supposed to drop to 15-degrees Fahrenheit. I happened to remember the coolant heater and got my manual out, and it suggests using the heater when the temp drops below 0-degrees, and plugging it in for at least 4 hours.

    So, my questions are 1) would I be okay to use the heater if outside temps are in the 15-20 degree range, and 2) if so, how long should I leave it plugged in?

    I don't want to leave it plugged in all night if it might cause any damage to the car, but by the same token I don't want to go out an hour before and plug it in and have it make no difference...and I REALLY don't want to go outside at 3am to plug it in 4-hours before I leave!!

    Suggestions?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Should be fine as long as your coolant is topped off. What they are telling you is to not use it when it's really warm outside, as the coolant could boil off.

    Have you thought about hooking up an outdoor timer to the electrical cord?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    You might have low coolant in the plastic expansion tank. The coolant light is usually activated by a kind of float switch like in your toilet tank.

    If the coolant looks full up at the "cold" mark, then maybe the coolant float switch gets stuck once on a while.
  • done37done37 Member Posts: 64
    If the only thing wrong with the computer is that it sends a CEL in error and all your Sensors and emission components are working properly you should pass smog. I haven't lived in California for a while so they may require you to clear the light regardless if you pass smog or not. If so, I would disconnect the illumination of the light as long as the ECU and emission devices are working properly. I know many of the Honda tuners will put ECU's from different Hondas in there rig to increase performance, but I think that would increase your Chance of of CEL.

    I remember there was also a rule in the smog laws that you only had to spend a certain amount on your vehicle to make it smog exempt depending on the year of your car. That may have changed, but if it hasn't, you may have exceeded that amount already. Regardless, they should let you thru because of your service to our country.

    Don
  • redvwredvw Member Posts: 40
    I recently heard on Motorwatch radio that a 10 year old radiator should be replaced. I have 1 1997 Honda Civic with 140,000 miles. The coolant was changed every 2 years with factory fill. I have also been using wetter water for the past three years. I am not having any cooling problems. Is it necessary to replace the radiator in this car? :confuse:
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    You could examine it externally for corroded, flaking cooling fins and internally for clogged tubes. If it looks great inside and out, it's probably fine for now. I haven't heard of the necks breaking off in these cars like they do in some.
  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    No.
  • wtd44wtd44 Member Posts: 1,208
    I've been doing business with a particular local radiator shop (on an as-needed basis, which is seldom) for several decades, beginning as a teenager. A good radiator specialty shop can save you a lot of loot and keep your old radiators functioning for many, many years and miles.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Some cars have a history of breaking radiator necks, so on those cars I'd definitely consider a new radiator as a preventative measure. Like a BMW from the 90s, for instance.
  • crankshaftcrankshaft Member Posts: 105
    With todays labor rates and much lower replacement prices,I would buy a new radiator instead of having a shop repair your existing unit if you have to go that route.Shop prices can easily exceed half the price of a new radiator.
  • ray35ray35 Member Posts: 5
    I drive a 2005 Cadillac CTS with dealer installed 20 inch MHT Wheels. The engine is the 3.6 V6. After 6000 miles of driving I heard a noise coming from the left rear wheel. Upon taking the wheel lug cover off I found a lug nut with the stud broken off inside of it. Also there was one lug nut and stud broken on the hub but movable with my finger. Cadillac replaced the two studs. At 8400 miles I was driving over a speed bump behind another car and I heard a subdued pop followed by a humming sound that pulsed faster as I sped up and slower as I slowed down. I got out of the car and saw nothing wrong with the wheels. I thought I had better go home slowly and have my wife roll the car so I could observe the wheels turning. I did not make it home. The wheel broke off the hub completely and caused the car to swerve and jump. I was able to pull over and have the car towed to the dealer. They will not take responsibility and said I had to hit something. I DID NOT HIT ANYTHING. Any thoughts on why the studs broke?
  • ray35ray35 Member Posts: 5
    I failed to mention a very important fact, the same left rear wheel was the one that broke again. Only this time 5 studs instead of two.
  • nosirrahgnosirrahg Member Posts: 872
    Quick follow-up...I opted to go for broke and plugged the heater in and left it on all night; dreaming of hopping in the next morning to a warm engine that would provide instant heat for the interior. However, in my haste to get in from the cold that evening, I apparently got mixed up with my extension cords...I store two cords on the same spool, and it seems I plugged one into the wall, and then plugged the car into the OTHER cord...so instead of a warm engine, I got 19-degrees F of stupidity! I was SO disappointed when I jumped in and turned on the key and that @#$* temp gauge didn't budge! :cry:

    Oh well...I checked the weather here and it won't drop much below 30-degrees for the next two weeks, so if might be next year before I get a chance to actually see how well it works.
  • burdawgburdawg Member Posts: 1,524
    How does the offset on the MHT wheels compare to the stock wheels? I'm assuming they are a good bit wider than stock, and most likely have a higher offset. With that in mind and if it is the case, you may need to use a stronger aftermarket stud to counter the forces caused.
    Also, you may want to have the runout checked on that wheel to see if it's vibrating while turning.
    Of course it goes without saying that the torque used when the lugs are tightened could also be a factor.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,669
    I'd be getting the data on the offset like burdawg says compared to original equipment and optional wheels. I suspect he's right on the hubcap's nose with that.

    I'd be talking to the dealer who installed the wheels rather than any blame for Cadillac. Aftermarket wheels are always a danger.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • blazer_manblazer_man Member Posts: 3
    Because with the engine running the tube jumps in time with the crank. I rebuilt it myself and there was only the one dipstick in the garage that I was working in. It was originally a late model 350 block. If it is some how a bigger crank, would the connecting rods even clear the edge of the block in the journel area without the machining?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    It really sounds like the dipstick tube is in too far somehow, or the dipstick stop slipped up higher?? This is very weird.
  • rossross Member Posts: 17
    I bought a 95 Corvette with 59K miles about 6 months ago. It is a toy and I don't drive it daily. About a month ago, I tried to start it after not driving it for a couple of weeks and it would not start. I put a small battery charger on it and it started after a couple of hours charging. I drove it some and it started fine a couple of times after that. I had not driven it for a couple of weeks again and it was dead again Saturday. I put the charger on it and then got in a hurry and decided to jump it off with my F-150. The cheap jumper cables started smoking and I disconnected them. (Yes, they were hooked to the correct posts.)The electrical system seems dead now. I put the charger back on it and it kept slamming the needle back and forth. I looked in the manual and it appears that I may have thoroughly screwed up. I wasn't supposed to connect the negative jumper cable to the negative post on the battery. I am going to replace the battery first, but does anyone have experience with this? I did not have time to get a new battery as I had to go out town for a personal trip and then had to take a business trip, which I am still on, but will return to work on it Saturday. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I think a new battery will solve this problem, sounds like.

    Jumping a completely dead battery like that is a no-no. It should always be brought back to life slowly over the course of a long overnight charge at low amperage.

    Also never try to charge up a dead battery with your alternator.
  • ray35ray35 Member Posts: 5
    The dealer that installed the wheels was Cadillac of Whittier. I would think they would have made sure that the wheel was proper before selling the car to me brand new. My son who is involved with drag racing says that when the wheels were installed someone tightened that wheel too much, stretching the studs. That's why two studs broke the first time I had trouble with the wheel. He said that the Cadillac dealer should have replaced all five studs at that time because the two that broke put further strain on the remaing 3. Six months later he figures the 3 weakened studs broke and then the two remaining new studs could not hold the wheel on so they broke at the same time. What do you think about that?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Those studs are pretty tough. I don't think a torque wrench could break them or even weaken them....unless Cadillac is using cut rate Chinese stud materials....who knows?

    I agree with the offset problem for the moment. That should be checked.
  • blgibblgib Member Posts: 1
    The check engine light on my Civic just came on as I was driving. Looking in the owners manual, it seems to be emission related, although the manual also says not to drive too long with it on as engine damage may occur. Talking with the local dealer's service dept., I was told that it may just be a computer glitch and that I should drive it for several cycles (full engine warm-up and cool down) and it should self correct. This problem causes the lights to pulse(dim and brighten) at about a 1 sec interval and the speedo works erratically (120+ mph indicated at times, even at a standstill, seems to be related to engine rpm) I'm thinking speedo sensor or possibly voltage regulator (some ac on the dc line?). Anyone have a similar experience. Just under 100k miles, serviced regularly. Thx.
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    only comment is that if the new battery works, then i'd try to drive the car more. short / infrequent trips won't keep a battery charged.

    actually, if i could get it started with a new battery, i'd probably bring it right on over to an autozone or other auto parts store that has one of those battery / alternator testers. you might have a bad alternator...
  • burdawgburdawg Member Posts: 1,524
    I don't think you damaged anything, and it won't hurt to connect the negative jumper cable to the negative terminal on the battery, but it's safer to connect the positive terminals first, then connect the negative cable from frame to frame (assuming negative ground of course). That way if a spark should occur it most likely will be away from the battery and won't cause the hydrogen gas that could be around the battery to explode.
    The jumper cables were most likely inadequate to carry the high current from the good battery to the dead one and overheated. Remember that a charged battery can output hundreds of amps and if the dead battery was real low it will try to put as much current into it as it can. In this situation the resistance in the cables becomes a factor and they get hot fast.
    As Shifty said you shouldn't jump real low or completely dead battery. Use the battery charger and let it charge slow.
    If the battery keeps going dead and it tests good, look for a constant drain in the electrical system of the Vette, or a bad charging system.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    That's correct...the admonition to not connect both jumper cables to the battery is to prevent an explosion. Remember, the battery can give off hydrogen gas and they really can explode right in your face. I have personally witnessed this.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,669
    The last connection made to complete the jumper circuit should be on a grounded part of the motor--away from the battery. That's when the spark will occur.

    We don't connect a jumper to the motor ground and then the positive to the battery because that will give a spark on the battery.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • moomilymoomily Member Posts: 4
    Hi. I am looking for recommendations for a remote starter. Does anyone have any models/brands to recommend? We have a ’99 Honda Accord, if that makes a difference. I’m looking for a good, reliable model that has a range of 500 feet or so (of course, more would be okay too.) I don’t need a lot of bells and whistles; all I’m really interested in is the starter part. Ideally I’d like the kind you can install yourself, but should I not even bother with those?

    Thanks so much! This is supposed to be a Hanukkah gift for my husband but due to my procrastination it is going to be more like a New Year’s gift!
  • ssssssssssss Member Posts: 2
    I have a 1994 Isuzu pickup, 2300cc, 4ZD1 engine, 155,000 miles.Recently purchased. Truck was running great for about 2 weeks around town and highway, then got to where it would not idle and would only run about 30 mph. I ran the fuel tank low a couple of times and may have picked up some rust from the tank. Overhauled the carb and installed an additional filter at the carb. Drained and filtered the gas 3 times to get the loose rust out of tank. Runs great up to 45 mph and then gets real doggie. Checked the fuel pump pressure, running, by putting a t-connection in-line. Pressure should be 3.5 psi (mechanical). It reads 4. However when I increase the rpm substantially, the pressure drops to 2 psi. Is the fuel pump pressure supposed to remain constant? Any suggestions? Thanks. Steve
  • naceresnaceres Member Posts: 1
    I have a quick question. I was driving and all of a sudden my stereo lights flashed on and turned off. The same happened with my dash lights and headlights. The car won't start now. Any idea what's wrong? Thanks.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,733
    hmmm... that sounds kinda scary. Sounds like you got a spike somehow.

    So you were driving when it happened and then what? Were you able to drive the rest of your trip without incident, but then once it was shut off it won't start again? What exactly is it doing? Is it cranking but just not kicking over?

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    could be battery isn't connected well to its terminals, terminal corrosion, a loose negative strap connection at the body/frame, a blown or loose main fuse, an ignition switch failure, some other electrical problem. that's the short answer.

    the long answer / suggestion is a bit involved, depending on you experience working on vehicles... these are only suggestions which i have, other's may have other suggestions for you. read them and see if they make sense.

    verify the battery terminals are clean and connected to the battery very firmly. you can clean the battery posts and terminals. to un-install the terminals, you would remove the battery terminal from the negative post (-) of the battery first. second, you remove the positive (+) terminal (often colored red with a rubber or plastic covering).

    later, when your work is done, when re-attaching the terminals to the battery, you reverse the process and you re-install the positive (+) terminal first, and the negative (-) or ground second.

    removing and re-installing the terminals to the battery in this order reduces the likelyhood of allowing current from the battery to flow through your body, and potential electric shock. you see, your body can complete the circuit between the + and - legs of the battery. if the negative leg of the battery is connected to the vehicle body (in most vehicles, this is the case) and if a part of your body (a hand or leg) is in contact with the car frame (often it is when working on a car) and you touch the positive leg of the battery with your hand, or your hand and a wrench with un-insulated grips, current will flow.

    disconnecting the negative (-) terminal from the battery means the only way for current to flow would be for you to physically touch the (-) post of the battery and the (+) post of the battery at the same time, and you're not likely to do that now are you? ;)

    ok, this is important- since your vehicle may have some anti-theft feature with special code for the radio (and a special procedure to re-initialize the radio with the code following battery re-installation)... you might want to skip the step of removing the terminals, specially if you are uncertain about this...

    i write this as a pre-caution. it's possible, because of an electrical issue, your radio is going to need re-initialization anyway at this point. if it were me, i suppose i'd assume the radio code will have to be re-entered at this point. you'll have to make the decision.

    now you can still clean up the terminals and make sure they are tight to the battery. just make sure you aren't using a wrench on the (+) post of the battery, with the (-) strap still attached AND your body making contact with the body of the car somewhere...

    i hope i haven't scared you or confused you. if i have, i apologize.

    you should make sure the negative battery strap going from the (-) post of the battery to the body / frame of the vehicle is connected to the frame firmly.

    you can also check in the area of the positive (+) battery terminal to see if there is a main fuse which may have blown or become loose. use an appropriate plastic fuse puller / installation tool (often manufacturers include one in the fuse compartment in the engine area). this is the sort of thing i'd do with the negative terminal / strap from the battery removed first.

    qbrozen suggests a possible spike. that's possible i suppose, maybe your alternator's voltage governor (typically i think they are some diodes) may be defective and the alternator put out too large of a voltage.

    or maybe you have a ground somewhere which literally shorted the positive and negative of the battery. was it raining at the time?

    or maybe you have a faulty ignition switch. when you turn the switch now to the accessory position, do you see lights on the dash? can you wiggle the switch and get the lights on the dash to come on?

    i hope this helps you. good luck.
  • philbert91941philbert91941 Member Posts: 2
    I HAVE A 94 explorer and i have replaced the clutch and presure plates but i dont know if i have a mitsubishi or mazda trany they call for diferent fluids how can i tell them apart?
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,669
    >removing and re-installing the terminals to the battery in this order reduces the likelyhood of allowing current from the battery to flow through your body, and potential electric shock. you

    The 12 volts (12.6 actually) of a car battery will not give you a shock. It's the same as holding both terminals of a 9 volt battery, e.g. You will not be shocked; you will not be affected by a 12 volt differential flowing through your body. It requiers much higher voltage to be perceptible.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The only electrical device that can hurt you in terms of shocking you is your ignition system, which can really put out a nasty jolt to your body.
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    sorry guys, with all due respect to both you and shifty, this is one i'd prefer to err on the side of being cautious.

    people think it is voltage that kills you, but in reality it is the current, and generally the path it takes through the body, the worst of two paths is either across the heart, or across the brain.

    just 1mA (1.0E-3amps) can be felt. 10mA (1.0E-2amps) can cause muscle contractions to the point it makes it difficult to impossible to let go. 100mA (1.0E-1amps) is enough to change the rythm of your heart, put you into defib and kill you.

    do not believe it is solely or primarily the voltage that has the potential to kill you please. :sick:

    don't believe me; ok by me; google it.

    the body is a pretty good conductor because of water and salinity. its resistance though will be a function of what part of the body makes contact, how much of the body is contacting, if you are sweating, etc. etc.

    i believe the precautionary remarks are warrented.

    as for the 9V transistor battery, imidazol97 - here's an experiment just for you to try: please pull one out of your fire detector or clock-radio and stick your tongue on it. lemme know what you discover. :surprise:
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    imidazol97 will hopefully report on the effects of the seemingly innocuous 9V transistor battery.

    but i don't disagree with the potential for the ignition system to shock you. as it being the only device in your vehicle capable of hurting/shocking you, i have a different opinion.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,669
    If you're planning to put your tongue (to each his own :blush: across the terminals of a lead-acid battery, I'd recommend you to google that. Pb in the form of PbSO4 and metallic Pb will not be good for your tongue nor body. The makeup of the corrosion on posts I have determined chemically, but I'd assume it's based on Pb salts.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    This is a very unsafe statement to make.

    If someone without basic knowledge of electricity starts 'touching' both his battery posts (or the positive post and a good ground on the auto), and happens to touch a post with a ring or metal watch band, that person could have a finger totally burned off or significant skin, muscle, and nerve damage with resulting scaring.

    You've got only 12 volts, but a large amperage available in a auto battery. With a low resistance path (metal), a large amount of energy can be discharged in a fraction of a second which will convert to heat and a big burn.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,669
    You're way off base. The original comment was a person touching... Let's keep the discussion on point here.

    "removing and re-installing the terminals to the battery in this order reduces the likelyhood of allowing current from the battery to flow through your body, and potential electric shock."

    Obviously you don't connect screwdrivers, wrenches, etc., across battery terminals unless you wish to create a short circuit.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,733
    as for the 9V transistor battery, imidazol97 - here's an experiment just for you to try: please pull one out of your fire detector or clock-radio and stick your tongue on it. lemme know what you discover. :surprise:

    you mean this wasn't a common thing to do for EVERY kid? I was probably around 3 or 4 years old when my older brother introduced me to the joys of licking a 9-volt. Considering it did no damage or even make me cry, for that matter, I don't think an adult will be bothered much at all.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    obviously you didn't have braces. :blush: i've seen a 9volt battery take and keep an adolescent down. :shades:

    i'm not proud.

    anyway - people have died from electric shock where the voltage source was far less than you get from a wall outlet.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Yes a shorted out 12V battery could burn you, and a spark near one could blow your face off....but I can't see how one could shock you...it's only 12 volts.

    A modern ignition system could actually kill an older person. Not me, however. I'm always the one in the driver's seat when someone under the hood shouts "Okay, try it now!"
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    it's current, not voltage that dictates the physiological response. I = V / R
Sign In or Register to comment.