By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-juice
Hey, there's no accounting for taste. I happen to think Ford SUVs are the best looking. Why? Good proportions, lines... no exaggerated features... minimal. I love Audi wagons for the same reason.
I love the look of the new BMWs- I almost bought a 540i (but got an FX45 instead) and have loved the look of the new 7-series since I first saw it.
- Uh, the Forester XT is second fastest SUV on the market next to the Porsche Cayenne Turbo.
I will give Infiniti this, the FX has road presence whether you like the looks or not. They definitely stand out.
As for being stuck in neutral, that's what X3 and FX drivers seem to be when XTs go blasting past. The XT provides more smiles per dollar than anything else in the category.
SUVs? An SUV that tries to make a fashion statement is about as attractive and ridiculous as some fat slob who shows up on a beach in leopard-skin Speedo.
I'd grant that the latest Explorers are definite improvements over the earlier ones, but I'd never, ever mention them in the same breath with the breathtaking Audi Avants. Now those are clean, classy, sophisticated designs - unlike anything new lately from BMW.
And make no mistake- form does follow function here - an SUV this big that grips the road and handles like a sports car must be doing something right.
I put the FX in the same category as the Apple Macintosh (shouldn't have opened that can of worms!), Mini Cooper, etc... Think outside the box–don't drive one!
Please tell me you don't have a Mac. If so I'll throw mine out the window right now. ;-)
As for the FX or X3, I simply don't have a strong enough stomach to own either one.
You just went from being Albert Einstein to Curly in my mind. Just kiddin'
If you were in a creative profession, you'd be saying the same about a PC. In advertising, graphic design, etc., MACs rule.
Bob
I do think the FX is among the most stylish SUVs, now that can be good or bad, depending upon your own tastes.
I'll give the XC90 props for managing to be both stylish and practical, though.
-juice
Furthermore, I work intensely on BOTH Mac and PC platforms and am here to tell you that PCs are Yugos, Macs are Lamborghinis!
Bob
Bob
The Bud ad in this year's Super Bowl with the horse that farted... THAT was in bad taste.
Bob
Nothing but agreement from me on that. This year's entire crop of ads was pathetic. When was the last time you saw an ad in which a vicious mongrel dog jumped up and clamped its jaws on a woman's breast? Yet somehow it's suppposed to be funny, to some retarded element of the populace, when it happens to a man.
Heads should (and, I predict) will, roll.
Story...
I have a friend who was a militant non-smoker, yet he was an Art Director on the Winston account. Compromise your principles? Happens every day in the advertising world.
On the other hand, I know of people who have left the profession rather than be hypocrites.
tidester, host
tidester, host
I have no quarrel with the Mac, although I also have no interest in it. I don't even have a problem with Mac users, except when some of them sneer at the allegedly self-evident low IQs - knuckledraggers, don'tcha know? - of anyone using anything else. My issue is with the collective mindset, from top to bottom, of the company that makes Macs.
tidester, host
When I was in design school (20+ years ago...YIKES) we were asked by our packaging design instructor to come up with packaging for a new brand of cigarettes that would be marketed to children.
We all spent the next week designing endless variations on that theme. Hours and hours of design concepts... When we arrived for our class the following week, as usual, we all pinned our sketches on the wall for our instructor to review.
The instructor came in to the room, walked up to the board and tore up all of the sketches. We were stunned. He then turned around, looked us in the eye and said, very seriously. "You have to draw the line in this business - and know when to say NO".
It was a very powerful lesson....
Nah. Of course not. What was I thinking?
Bangle will be mocked plenty when the stack of negative sales figures rolls in, but not as much as BMW for going with his trash.
Don't believe me? Study the art and times of Monet, Manet, Renoir, Van Gogh, Picasso, and many others. Their art was despised by much of the public in their day. Today their art is considered priceless.
BTW, when I was in college (30+ years ago), I had a teaching assistantship teaching several classes in art history, one being modern art history. Art history I found to be a fascinating way to study (regular) history, because you really have to understand the customs, political climate, and social standards of any given time period to understand the art of that time and its relevance. So, in many ways, I see this criticism of Bangle and other provocative car designers as being nothing more than history repeating itself.
Bob
Bangle's work is utterly pedestrian by comparison.