2007 Hyundai Elantra

17810121331

Comments

  • rk2469rk2469 Member Posts: 30
    You know, the current Elantra weighs about 2800(+/-) lb? So, the new one, which is bigger would weigh closer to 3000lb?

    Optima has 3100lb.

    I think with Optima, I would loaded it with 4 cylinder EX, that would come closer to $20K. It will come with more than Elantra Lux Edition.

    If you add all the options on Elantra, would it come closer to $17K? So, About $3K difference...

    By the way, there is now a $2000 cash rebate or $1000/2.9% financing on Sonata.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    For $20k list price you can't get an Optima EX I4 with leather, as on the Elantra Limited. There are some features you can get on the Optima that you can't get on the Elantra, like ESC, adjustable pedals, auto climate control, and rear sunshade. The pricing dynamics between the Sonata/Optima and Elantra will be interesting. If Hyundai keeps up the big incentives on the Sonata, they will have to do the same on the Elantra or the price difference will be negligible.
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    you waited 6 years for what?? This engine cameout, late 2004 for spectra and elantra just got the use of this engine before its extinct. You think its easy to build engines? Hyundai has been keen on quality, and i'm sure this engine has that. Honda and Toyota make good engines, this engine is better compared to a Mazda 3(mazda 3 better power, slightly better mpg than mazda 3, better price)

    I'm sure it can do a good 27 mpg , and about a 8.7-9 seconds 0-60. Thats std

    But what we are forgetting is about this cars overall package, is just disgustingly good. Look at the interior, and the exterior, unique but good. Classy is the word, compared to the civics which is just utterly sporty and mass produced look.

    I'm sure when the GT comes it will have a bigger engine and by 2nd year it should get an upgrade to more power or dual vvt.

    This company has been giving customers so much bargain with hard work and crap, i don't know what else you want.

    And lastly you haven't told me, how about toyota and their 5 year engine carry over? What do you think about the jettas engine? Calibre may have a better modified engine, but i'll tell you one thing, it prob won't come close to quality crafmanship of the elantra in whole.
  • gary045gary045 Member Posts: 81
    I'd have no complaints at all if the Elantra had a higher quality paint job.
    Just got done waxing mine. All the flat surfaces like the roof, hood, and trunk have small blemishes coming through unlike the sides that still look new.

    But at least the paint isn't peeling off like the roof of a Chevy S-10 I had. LOL
  • gary045gary045 Member Posts: 81
    >You know, the current Elantra weighs about 2800(+/-) lb? So, the new one, which is bigger would weigh closer to 3000lb?>

    My 2004 with M/T has a svelte curb weight of 2635.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    If you buy a '07 Elantra with its reworked Beta engine and then for '08 they drop in the all-mew engine with more power and better fuel efficiency, I know you won't regret your decision in the least, right?

    I also don't want Hyundai to dump a good thing, like they are doing with the seat height adjusters on the Elantra and most other new models.

    When Toyota has an all-new engine, they use it--e.g. the 268 hp V6 in the Avalon, RAV4, now the Camry. And forget about 5-year engine carryover--the Beta engine dates back to the Gen 2 Elantra from 10 years ago; it was updated with CVVT heads for '04.
  • gary045gary045 Member Posts: 81
    I forgot to mention my one other gripe. The final drive ratio of 3.65.
    Cruising at 70mph at 2900 rpm is just too high. That gets me about 34-35mpg with a 5 spd.

    If Hyundai doesn't want to offer a 6 spd tranny, they should offer a final drive ratio of 3.42.
    There's plenty of cruising torque at 2700 rpm. It would probably increase the hwy mpg figures to 37-38 at 70 mph.
    38-39 mpg at 65. Up there with Toyota and Honda.

    I can't figure why there don't address this issue.
    I think they mentioned something about a torque converter lock-up for the 2007 auto to improve hwy cruising mpg.
  • danf1danf1 Member Posts: 897
    Curb weight w/manual trans is 2721 auto is 2747
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    the Beta engine dates back to the Gen 2 Elantra from 10 years ago; it was updated with CVVT heads for '04.

    The Elantra had a 1.8 liter up to 1998.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Yes, the Beta engine that debuted in the Elantra for the 1996 MY used to be 1.8L, then later was upped to 2.0L. But it was still the Beta engine, going back 10 years (actually a little more than 10 years now).
  • 747pilot747pilot Member Posts: 38
    At first thought the 07 Elantra looked kind of bizare. But the more I look at it the more I like it. Its definitely a real shocker over the current Elantra.

    I know when we the first photo's started showing up for the new Sonata a lot of people were in shock and a lot of the first messages about it were not very positive. However as time went on and people learned just how superior the new Sonata was going to be over the previous model most people never looked back. No doubt the new Elantra will be far superior over the current model and will likely have the same affect.

    This is not to say that I am not concerned about a few key issues. For starters it looks like Hyundai is getting a bit arrogant with pricing. I have seen it with the new Accent and now the new Elantra if its true. 18K to 20K for an Elantra is pretty high. Even a loaded one should not touch the 20K barrier. I know Hyundai has made great strides in quality but (and I hate to say it) they are still a Hyundai. People will look in price guides and see the Elantra priced at 18K to 20K and then see the same price for a Civic and will never give the Elantra a try. Sure the Elantra will likely offer large rebates but most people don't know about these until they stop at the dealer. I take it this is the hardest part is actually getting the customer at the dealer to try your product.

    It would be nice to see the Elantra debut with a new and more powerful powerplant. Especially if the new design is larger and heavier. However I am not sure if its such a big deal in reality. Its very common to see a manufacture stick with a proven engine for a very long time. Even in some cases practically forever
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Since a loaded '06 GT is a few bucks short of $18k now, I think it's pretty certain a loaded '07 Elantra will top that, since it will have more equipment (side curtains, XM radio, telescopic wheel, 16" alloys etc.). But also keep in mind that a Civic EX automatic with less equipment and much less interior room than a loaded Elantra stickers at $19,810. Still, the Civic has a more sophisticated powertrain than the Elantra, but for $1500 bucks difference (estimate; more if you don't go with leather on the Elantra, and then there's those Hyundai rebates) some people won't mind.

    One thing for sure though... with all the emphasis Hyundai put on the Elantra's safety features, the car had better score high in the IIHS crash tests. Hope Hyundai did their homework there.
  • pocono35pocono35 Member Posts: 89
    Hyundai did massive test marketing as they sought to design the new Sonata and when the results came in the Audi A6 was the benchmark design that was most liked by the American eye. The Fountain Valley design studio in California was given the task of design leadership. And so the Sonata was born as a knock-off of an A6. With the exception of a weak rear-end and pitiful alloys on the GLS, the exterior of the Sonata has a very substantial presence in this category.
    The Elantra, on the other hand was given to the Korean studio, like the Azera and Accent. Hyundai Korea has a habit of being a bit controlling and a little perculiar when it comes to their designs. I find them leaning towards 'frumpy jellybeans' rather than 'athletic' and 'lean' designs of their American and Europeon studios. If you have read anything about past designs, the first gen. Santa Fe was nearly nixed by the Execs in Korea because they thought it was far too aggressive. It is now a dated design and was a bit busy, but in hind-sight it was the right Santa Fe for the right time and put Hyundai on the map. Alot of people love that design(and alot hated it too) but it certainly garnered the attn. Hyundai needed upon release.
    I would have liked to have seen Hyundai follow the Audi-esque styling of the Sonata on this Elantra, but they didn't. I think they'll still sell about 100,000+ of these Elantras, but I also forsee a very quick refreshing of the front and rear ends of this car. The engine is not an issue because what is there now is fine. You have to make money on this redesign.
    Don't forget and Hyundai can't do this 24/7 and offer all new engines with all their designs. I also think they put new engines in the vehicles that will give them the most profit ala Sonata, Azera, Santa Fe. The Elantra is a bargain compact and they just cant go jackin the price way up on this. As it is, Hyundai is dropping about $250,000,000 on redesigns. Hyundai is also leading the worlds automakers in R&D spending with about 10% of their profit headed in that direction. When people think they know what Hyundai is or is going to be, just remember they will be changing quicker than is imagineable due to these percentages of R&D spending. Also, Hyundai has hired over 1,000 engineers to see them to this World's Top 5 goal. Just today, I read a report about GM and Fords best people being lost to Toyota and Hyundai.
    I think the interior is a complete home run. In fact, I like the Elantra interior better than the Sonata because the center stack flows better and looks like an advanced or evolutionary design of the Sonatas interior. If they would just touch up the front and rear end, they would have a huge car on their hands.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Ah, so that is why the new Elantra has a resemblance to the Azera! Maybe the perfect solution is to give the exterior design to CA and interior to Korea. ;)

    I am one of those who think the current Santa Fe is pretty ugly. :)
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    hyundai will never sell elantra that high. most likely 3+ grand cheaper than the civic.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    the aggresive lines looks like a 1st gen tibby. i think it would look better in person.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    You can do the math yourself. I would be shocked beyond belief if the '07 Elantra, equipped similarly to the Civic LX, started at only $14k including destination (i.e., with power windows/locks/mirrors and stereo). Same for a more loaded Elantra (with high-zoot stereo, moonroof, alloys) priced at only $16k. Those prices would be below where they are today. I think the new Elantra looks good enough (on paper at least) that it doesn't need to list for $3000 less than the Civic to sell. It still needs to be priced significantly lower, though, until the resale value comes up.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    "I think the new Elantra looks good enough (on paper at least) that it doesn't need to list for $3000 less than the Civic to sell."

    I totally agree.

    ~alpha
  • chidorochidoro Member Posts: 125
    While the rear reminds me of the Azera a bit, the profile looks like the IS to me. Honestly, I really like both the exterior and interior. Yeah, the powertrain seems to be lacking and the rear seat bottoms looks a little flat which may make it a little uncomfortable for rear passengers, but I really like it.
    Hyundai already was conservative (stately) with, both, the Sonata and Azera. The Elantra should really be aimed at a younger demo so they work through the reat of the lineup as they age. Put a little emotion into the purchase. It worked like gangbusters for the Civic.
    I particularly like the Accord-like steering wheel and gauges. The center stack also looks pretty clean with nice large buttons.
    They're not going to have to undercut Honda that much any longer, certainly not 3k. This car's looks will stir some emotion so people are going to want to buy it as opposed to having to buy it.
  • germancarfan1germancarfan1 Member Posts: 221
    "I think the new Elantra looks good enough (on paper at least) that it doesn't need to list for $3000 less than the Civic to sell."

    You kidding me? With the same 2.0 Beta engine that is in my 2004 Elantra that is noisy, underpowered (same 138 HP at 6000 RPMS), gets only decent mileage, and generally a bore to drive??

    And to hear this model will sticker decently equipped at 16-17K??? Apparently, Hyundai forgot about the new Civic, Mazda3 and new Golf (Rabbit).

    And you guys are excited about this???
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    "Excited" is too strong, for me anyway. "Interested to see it up close and drive it" is more like it.

    I agree the engine looks like the big weak spot right now. But I have a hunch that Hyundai will remedy that problem in the not too distant future. One thing about the Beta engine, though... it has good torque, so it's a flexible engine, and doesn't need a lot of stick-rowing to get it underway. And it can cruise easily at 1800 rpms. As for noisy, I only find it gets noisy over 4000 rpms--where I seldom need to take it.

    As with other Hyundais, I don't pay much attention to the sticker price, but the out-the-door price. I expect some dealers will try to get full sticker for the car for awhile after launch, but "rebates will come, Ray; rebates will most definitely come."
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    The golf is not even considered compactly priced car anymore. Prob 3 to 4 k more expensive than the elantra. If you want why don't you get a kit to increase the power and fuel on this already decent engine?

    To be honest with you, i hate the civics engine sometimes, especially as a sedan where you may have to carry lots of people. Its torque being at 120 something is too low. And mazda does have a good engine, but the car is 2 to 3 k more expensive.

    I don't know what kind of power you are looking for, but i have been on my friends spectra5 and it was a very good performaning car. Its engine was smooth, and it pulled good enough.

    The world engine will be in by the 2 or 3rd year into production, prob late 2007. Its all stratgegy and costs
  • mike91326mike91326 Member Posts: 251
    I have a couple of questions. First, let me say that I have had my 2001 Elantra GLS 5-speed for five years and it is without a doubt the most reliable car I have ever owned, and I have owned quite a few in my 30+ years of driving. I took a leap of faith with Hyundai and have been so impressed that I bought the wife a 2003 Sonata LX. That car has been equally reliable and is a huge improvement over the POS Buick it replaced. But, back to my questions. I understand that Hyundai will drop the 4-speed auto and go with their 5-speed auto on the 2007 2.4L Sonata. If that is true, why not put the 5-speed in the Elantra? Also, why no man-u-matic feature? Further, I hope they did away with the timing belt in favor of a chain.

    I want to give my GLS to my daughter this fall and get a new car and Hyundai is at the top of the list. Of course, that may be easier said than done as my daughter doesn’t want to learn how to drive a stick. What is it with kids today? When I turned 16 I begged my dad to let me have a stick. In fact, my first car was a “3 on a tree” (column shift). If she doesn’t take my car maybe I’ll wait a little longer. Who knows, with my current commute maybe I’ll pick up one of the new diesels in a year or two. Are you listening Hyundai?
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    All indications are that the engine in the '07 Elantra is the same engine as in the '06 Elantra--meaning it has a timing belt.

    I wondered about the transmission choice a few posts ago. Maybe Hyundai thinks they can get away with a 4-speed auto on the Elantra because few competitors offer more than that right now.

    I too had plans to turn my beloved '01 GLS 5-speed over to a child, my oldest son, at this point. Only 40k on it, lots of warranty left. But he goes to a private school and there apparently is a stigma associated with Hyundais. I told him to get over it, but after he broke the clutch on it last summer ($1300) I figured maybe it wasn't such a bad idea getting him something else. So he has a 2000 626 I4 automatic and loves it.
  • germancarfan1germancarfan1 Member Posts: 221
    Your facts are wrong. The 2007 Rabbit will start at $14,900. Comes standard with 150HP/170 lbs 2.5 liter, ABS braking system, traction control, active front head restraints, front side airbags, air conditioning and anti-theft alarm system with remote locking.

    I imagine the Elantra will be roughly the same price if not more.

    Touch decision :)
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    then you buy your rabbit. Vw though substancially built is wacked for quality.

    I don't believe cars at this level the mid compact have timing chains. Expensive tech.

    Man i saw the edmunds video for this car. Pure luxury in make. The interior absolutely destroys anything like it right now.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Off the top of my head, the Aerio, Civic, Corolla, and Mazda3 all have timing chains. Maybe others too? So does Hyundai's new 2.0L engine.
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    Golf/Rabbit does not exactly compete with the Elantra - FYI, the Jetta does. Oh by the way, Jetta's price range: 18K - sub 30K, depending on options.

    Golf 2 door base price starts at 15K; but I would imagine once comparably equipped (4 door for starter), and with options added, it would top over 20K. Elantra will not.

    Based on the value factor alone, the Elantra is a good buy. Adding to that the vast improvements over the outgoing model, this will easily sell over 100K/year :)
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    First, let me say that I have had my 2001 Elantra GLS 5-speed for five years and it is without a doubt the most reliable car I have ever owned,

    I will say that my 2000 Elantra is also without a doubt the most reliable car I have ever had. It is a good car and will be a strong contender to replace my daily drive when it finally dies (hopefully many years in the future).

    If that is true, why not put the 5-speed in the Elantra?

    Not sure that adding another gear is the best way to go. Most times the final gear ratio is pretty much the same either way. I think what Hyundai needs to do is offer a CVT.

    Also, why no man-u-matic feature?

    If you want to shift the Elantra does come in a manual.

    Who knows, with my current commute maybe I’ll pick up one of the new diesels in a year or two.

    Actually I am somewhat interested in the Accent Hybrid thats supposed to come out soon.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • smith20smith20 Member Posts: 256
    I like the looks of the new Elantra, both inside and out. The engine (old one?) issue is a little weird. But interestingly, at the press conference they said the car will get 4 mpg better than the current model. So that would be an improvement to about 28 city / 36 highway, which is pretty good for a 2.0 liter engine. I guess we'll find out more details in the coming months, but I'm a fan of the styling . . . especially when I see the car in motion in the video clips.
  • acronisacronis Member Posts: 29
    "At first thought the 07 Elantra looked kind of bizare. But the more I look at it the more I like it. Its definitely a real shocker over the current Elantra."-747 Pilot.

    Well said Pilot. I agree. This Hyundai Elantra I have been reading about all over different boards. From the reaction the exterior has received a lukewarm BUT by far the interior has received most positive accolades of them all.

    I really think that this is arguably one of the best looking interior that I've seen from this manufacturer to date. I see Hyundai stepping upstream with this re-design in this segment.
  • germancarfan1germancarfan1 Member Posts: 221
    I'd say the Rabbit competes very well with the Elantra.

    And the 2dr Rabbit is pretty much optioned out as standard. Not really any options to buy:
    image

    image
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Another weird thing is that the summary of the '07 Elantra in InsideLine says the engine is "new", even though it has the same numbers as the "old" engine--except the fuel economy, that's the first news I've seen of the fuel economy. Is that info posted on the Web anyplace? Another 4 mpg would put the Elantra closer to competitors like the Civic and Corolla.
  • tsgeiseltsgeisel Member Posts: 352
    I'm just wondering if I can wait for '06s to come down even more in price than they are now...

    But the point may be moot tomorrow, if the dealer can match the very lowball offer I'm about to make on an '05 GT...
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    Let's be fair here, Golf is a hatch and Elantra is a sedan so they serve different markets. The closest VW product competing with the Elantra is the Jetta.

    Curious to find out why are you posting all these VW info? This is the Elantra forum last time I checked.
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    If you read its press release info sheet, there isn't much news about the engine either meaning it is the same old engine and nothing much to brag about or they do have something up their sleeves. If this car does indeed make another 4 mpg i wouldn't be suprised. Remember kia cars may have similiar core components shared with hyundai, but hyundai is the upper brand and of course will message its cars components.

    backy are you happy now?? with 4 more mpg that leads it to 28-29 mpg and put it simliar to the civics 140 horses and 128 torque(vs 138 horses and 136 torque). Rumor has it on a korean car site , the new gema engines won't be in these cars till mid-late 2nd year or early third year of this cars life(makes sense when it wants to compete with the new 2008 corolla). Hyundai does not care about competeing against any other companies but toyota at this point. I presume the new engines will have dual vvt and up to 33 mpg which will be a good level against the corolla. (remember also the gt which is coming in the mid late 2nd year or early 3rd year, will get a good 170 horses).

    My lease is up end of next year, i'm definitely eyeing this car, its exterior is not regular, but definitely modern. It makes you want to look at it for a while
  • bamacarbamacar Member Posts: 749
    What makes you think the new Golf will have a base 3k cheaper than the Jetta? A 2 door hatch versus a 4 door sedan - not very comparable. Will it also have the 2.5 lousy 30/22 fuel economy like the Jetta? Even the much larger Honda Accord gets 34/26. Forget the Golf unless you want a diesel or a GTI -otherwise it is not competitive with anything in the market.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    "Your facts are wrong. The 2007 Rabbit will start at $14,900. Comes standard with 150HP/170 lbs 2.5 liter, ABS braking system, traction control, active front head restraints, front side airbags, air conditioning and anti-theft alarm system with remote locking."

    VW was one of the most unreliable cars for last decade and that's why it didn't sell.

    hell, everything about VW is overpriced. jetta, beetle, passat, toureg, golf, and phaeton.

    all of them are overpriced just because they are german.

    however, i'm sure elantra will be significantly cheaper than the golf.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    golf is for europeans. hot hatch doesn't do well in america.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    VW is the most unreliable and overrated brand in the world. i had tons of friends drove jettas and passats and almost all of them were junks. almost all of them had major problems before 40k miles!!!!
  • lightfootfllightfootfl Member Posts: 442
    Sorry to disagree, but I do. Just because they were overpriced before doesn't mean they should continue to increase their prices. Realistically speaking, they should be able to cut at least 4-5 thousand dollars off of the prices and still be ahead of the game. It is ridiculous to have to pay $20,000 for a small "economy" vehicle. What would ever be wrong with something in the $15k range? I know they have all of the latest goodies, etc.. but why?? The accent even should be well below the $10K range.. Oh well, I guess today's society demands that all of we rich Americans just throw away our hard earned dollars anyway. hmmmm guess the tax thing has me in a bad mood.. :mad:
  • lightfootfllightfootfl Member Posts: 442
    This page is distorted and with that, and the side bars, a lot of the messages are so messed up that it is a real pain to read them.. Can you help??
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    The Elantra isn't anywhere close to the Civic's engine even with 4 more mpg--which I will believe when I see. The Civic averages 35 mpg EPA for the 5-speed automatic. If Hyundai really cares about competing only with Toyota, as you assert, they should pay attention to the fuel economy of the Corolla.

    If the new GEMA engines do appear for 2008, or even 2009, that will be just about right for my buying timeframe. :) Gotta try out that driver's seat though...

    One thing to note: marketing people aren't idiots. If the engine in the 2007 Elantra were "new", as the Edmunds capsule summary says, then I think Hyundai's marketeers would have found some way of mentioning that fact in the detailed press release they issued the other day. No mention of a "new" engine there, however. Also, if that new engine, or even the old engine, were tuned for 4 mpg more fuel economy, I would think they would have mentioned that too, if not with numbers then in some other way. Not a word on that.
  • smith20smith20 Member Posts: 256
    Another weird thing is that the summary of the '07 Elantra in InsideLine says the engine is "new", even though it has the same numbers as the "old" engine--except the fuel economy, that's the first news I've seen of the fuel economy. Is that info posted on the Web anyplace? Another 4 mpg would put the Elantra closer to competitors like the Civic and Corolla.

    Go to the official 2007 Elantra site and watch the 6:45 "Press Conference" video in the gallery section. The presenter mentions the mpg improvement there.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    I don't understand how you think Hyundai could cut the Elantra's price by $4000-5000 and still make a profit. That would put the Elantra starting at under $10k. No other car in its class comes anywhere close to that kind of price. Hyundai's costs aren't that much less than other automakers. And the Elantra will still be less expensive than cars like the Civic, Corolla, and Mazda3. And of course the TL, to which Hyundai compared the Elantra. ;)

    There will be a 2007 Elantra in the $15k range. But it may not have all the equipment of today's GLS. Yet it will have other nice features such as side curtains, more room, and a much nicer interior. As for an Accent below $10k, the Accent GS 3-door will start at $11.5k with destination, so it might be possible to find one around $10k if there's a rebate on the car.
  • smith20smith20 Member Posts: 256
    Just to follow up on the mpg improvment, I watched the press conference video again to make sure . . . he mentions it between 5:30 and 5:40 on the clip. It's a mystery to me as well why they didn't put it in print.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Thanks for the reference, I listened to the clip and heard the remark. One thing though--he didn't say which EPA measurement is up 4 mpg--it could be overall, or city, or highway. (Marketeers can be tricky like that.) Also, there was no mention of a "new" engine.

    I was glad to hear at the beginning of the video that the '07 Elantra will be the "safest sedan in its class." Which means I will expect Good/Good/Good on the IIHS crash tests, like the Civic. It would be the first Hyundai to score that well--unless the Accent, Azera, Santa Fe, or Entourage does it first.
  • averigejoeaverigejoe Member Posts: 559
    It could be the sum or city and highway improvements. 2 mpg better in the city PLUS 2 mpg better on the highway EQUALS 4 mpg.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    I think that would be moving from "tricky" into "dishonest" territory.

    The other thing about the "safest car in its class" claim: I wonder if Hyundai is planning to add electronic stability control to the Elantra's options list, to match the Corolla? ESC is considered an important safety feature by many. If Hyundai really is seeing Toyota as its main competitor, that would be a natural move and in keeping with the claim of "safest car in its class."
  • choe13choe13 Member Posts: 348
    http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2006_Honda_Civic.shtml

    I hope you mean overall wise because there is no way that hyundai does not do 28-29 city and 35-37 highway being in the range of 33mpg.

    Its engine has more torque meaning it won't be as fuel efficient, but better pulling from the start(imp if your car is bigger or if u gonna have passengers).

    And hyundai has rather mention the word "new" has called this eninge advanced. Big diffrence in words.

    If you just take a look at the overall package(we should see about the test drive), this car should hurt the civic and mazda 3.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.