By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Other questions...does anybody know if there are courtesy lights on the doors of the 2007 Elantra? Are all the power window switches still lit at night? I assume the side mirrors will still be heated.
I hope that Hyundai doesn't resort to decontenting the little (but much appreciated) items found on older Elantras in order to keep the price low.
If the '07 Elantra is 4 mpg overall better, that would put the automatic Elantra at 32 mpg overall, compared to 35 for the Civic. Enough to be competitive. But since we don't know yet what the Hyundai marketeers mean by "4 mpg more", let's wait until the EPA numbers come out before we beat this to death. Also keep in mind what happened to Nissan recently. They announced the new Versa would do 38 mpg combined, but then had to backtrack to 33.
I already mentioned a few posts ago that the torque of the Elantra's engine was one of its better features. Remember, I own two of them and have driven Elantras for almost 6 years. It's not like I hate these cars.
Unfortunately, Hyundai has already decontent the Elantra: no side strips, much less equipment on the base model etc. Everyone else is doing it, so I'm not too surprised.
Some of these may be trivial, but the overall effect was one of quality and upscale attributes that were usually only found on cars costing thousands more.
I know decontenting seems to be "normal" for any car company these days, but I am holding out hope that Hyundai will surprise us when the new Elantra finally hits the roads.
I have to say I am very disappointed with the Corolla styling and the high beltline on the new Elantra. Guess I will save my pennies for the Sonata, and enjoy my '01 Elantra in the meantime.
I totally agree with you. It would be a real shame if those smaller features you mentioned don't carry over to the new Elantra. I agree that the overall effect of them is actually quite significant, for the same reasons you mention. I don't want to be looking at the new generation of Elantra and be thinking, "what features does this not have compared to my 2004?"
Just coming back to topic, i think the elantra looks great, and the overall design especially the side part of the car prob took endless amount of time to perfect. Honestly the civic, mazda 3 look rather bland compare to this cars exterior.
Lastly hyundais engine i believe will churn out 28-29 for city that will be a good improvement of the spectras 25-26. Sounds like then it is quite comparble to the calibres 30mpg 1.8 dual vvt engine that has 140 horses and 120 something torque (dual vvt may not be something hyundai may want to pursure and already have their own cvvt)
No manufacturer will make those claims until the EPA comes out with their figures. When The EPA releases its numbers then, and only then, will Hyundai start talking about mileage. Seeing that legally they can only publish EPA estimates.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Exactly! Sure, we'll be getting some new stuff (standard disc brakes, ABS, side curtains), but what will the current Elantra owner lose in the process?
The Elantra in the photo looks great. I look forward to seeing the car in person!
Nissan did, on the Versa. Really backfired for them, too. Maybe Hyundai learned from their mistake.
Re the photos above, the side scuplting seems to look a lot more pronounced in a lighter color like silver, making the car look more avant-garde than the red car in the publicity photos. I suppose they used red since it is more exciting a color than silver.
Sure doesn't look like a Corolla, does it?
Elantra:
You're free to draw your own conclusion, but I really have to disagree that the Elantra is some kind of Corolla clone. IMO, it's in a different league, in terms of styling. When I look at these pictures side-by-side, the Corolla looks very antiquated.
It's funny that you commented on that at the same time while I was putting those two pictures together for msg #523.
I know . . . and I think a side-by-side comparison rubs that fact in. I think it's kind of offensive to the Elantra to say it looks only as good as the old Corolla.
I think the bright red was a poor choice of color at the auto show. I think a light and very reflective color would have really shown off the greatly improved contours.
The VW Golf (or Rabbit, now) is simply the hatchback version of the Jetta. Everything is the same except for the trunk/hatch.
Interior, engine, suspension, front end, etc, etc, etc. - all the same.
But the Elantra competes with the Jetta/Golf, but not the Golf/Jetta???
:confuse:
Seeing it in a lighter, metallic color makes the Elantra look much better. The bright red color seen at the auto show doesn't do this car justice.
The golf V has been available in Europe for the past 2-3 years and has received very high marks for reliability.
Even so, it has any better reliability than my 2004 Elantra (damn front end shimmy, rotors bad at 18K, accessory belt problems, rattles and squeaks, etc.) I will be happy.
If I was in the market for a Elantra or equivalent, I would defn. cross-shop with Civic, Corolla, Jetta, Mazda3, Spectra, and other sedans in the class. That said, I like what I see with the Elantra, who knows, I might strike a deal down next year, it seems like a GREAT deal
What we have here is competition envy. The new Elantra looks sophisticated and upscale compared to the current Corolla. No doubt Toyota's re-designed Corolla will be in the current flavor of the new '07 Camry.
The Elantra's interior appears very upmarket and modern. I have to say that I would much prefer to see more consistentcy in Hyundai's interiors. For example the Sonata should have a more upscale looking interior to mirror its upscale exterior.
Hyundai is making strides and delivering on quality and this new Elantra shows it through and through.
they really should sell it for under 15k otherwise no one will buy it in america
VW needs to prove themselves they can make a reliable cars to have success in america. i think new models are much better though. time will tell.
Craig
1. If you own the photos, please re-size them first.
2. Post a link to the photos instead of using the "img src" tag
3. Upload the photos to your CarSpace album, then post a link here to your CarSpace page. CarSpace does the re-sizing for you.
I've had to remove several posts because the photos were just too wide - sorry!
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
Mike
The golf V has been available in Europe for the past 2-3 years and has received very high marks for reliability.
Even so, it has any better reliability than my 2004 Elantra (damn front end shimmy, rotors bad at 18K, accessory belt problems, rattles and squeaks, etc.) I will be happy.
Are you still posting on this thread?
There will be a comparison thread soon enough. I did look the Golf when I bought my Elantra last year, and the last-gen Golf was too expensive relative to the last-gen Elantra. I don't expect that to change for the next gen.
Now please, take your sales pitch for VW elsewhere.
1. If you own the photos, please re-size them first.
2. Post a link to the photos instead of using the "img src" tag
3. Upload the photos to your CarSpace album, then post a link here to your CarSpace page. CarSpace does the re-sizing for you.
I've had to remove several posts because the photos were just too wide - sorry!
4. In the img src tag, RESIZE the photo from another forum. The best width for the forum is about 480 pixels. If you change the width to 480, the height needs to be (OldHeight) x 480/(OldWidth). For example, if the new height turns out to be 360 pixels, the image tag should look like this:
<img src="http://www.webpage.com/image.jpg" height="360" width ="480">
Just two problems, first is that they are going for slightly over $16K and thats the basic with a manual (a fully loaded Elantra GT with auto can be had for less), so good luck getting one at under $15K. Secondly the one thing I keep hearing about VW is that they are unreliable. So why go there?
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
from BOBAEDREAM.CO.KR
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
Elantra on the road:
http://file1.bobaedream.co.kr//national/national1145277845.jpg
http://file1.bobaedream.co.kr/national/national1145277845_2.jpg
Elantra in a reflective silver color, front (repost of the message that was deleted):
http://file1.bobaedream.co.kr//national/national1145207460.jpg
Overall interior shot, two tone:
http://file1.bobaedream.co.kr/national/national1145227861.jpg
Elantra in a dark red, front:
http://file1.bobaedream.co.kr/national/national1145084262.jpg
Elantra in silver, side profile:
http://file1.bobaedream.co.kr//national/national1145108583.jpg
And I do not think it looks like a Corolla.
http://www.hyundainews.com/presskit2007/photos/07Elantra_11.jpg
hyundai is following their new design philosophy , good for them for trying to be different but not too radically.
This is the prototype they are using for all their cars now and in the future
http://www.diseno-art.com/encyclopedia/concept_cars/hyundai_hcd8.html
see the resemblence to the azera, santa fe and elantra? This was the hyundai 2004 concept and will be how most hyundai cars will be designed like and will be very similiar to the next 2008 tiburon
And for anyone who missed my directions on how to resize that I made a few posts back,
4. In the img src tag, RESIZE the photo from another forum. The best width for the forum is about 480 pixels. If you change the width to 480, the height needs to be (OldHeight) x 480/(OldWidth). For example, if the new height turns out to be 360 pixels, the image tag should look like this:
<img src="http://www.webpage.com/image.jpg" height="360" width ="480">