2007 Hyundai Elantra

1111214161731

Comments

  • germancarfan1germancarfan1 Member Posts: 221
    Also, not to mention the outdated tranny in the 2007 Elantra. Want to know why the Elantra's mileage isn't competitive, look below. If I was in the market, i'd certainly pay $500-1500 more for these models that include 21st century transmissions and engines.

    2007 Elantra 4-speed auto

    2006 Civic 5-speed auto
    2007 VW Rabbit 6-speed auto
    2007 Nissan Sentra CVT
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    I am not sure that having a 5 or 6 speed over a 4 speed is enough of a selling point for me. I mean is it really any better if the ratio for the top gear is the same for a 4 speed as it is for a 5 or 6 speed?

    So I ask what are the gear ratios for those trannies?

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • germancarfan1germancarfan1 Member Posts: 221
    Elantra gear ratio: 4th gear: .71:1
    VW ratio: 6th gear: .67:1
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    I take it you get it kick out of posting VW stuff in a Hyundai thread :)

    I still don't know why you keep thinking the 2.0 is outdated; 138 hp & 136 lbs/tq. isn't shabby by any stretch). As mentioned previously, Hyundai targets and excels in what the demographics of typical buyers in the class - safety, features, value, price, warranty; with improvements in fuel efficiency, handling, ride, and comfort, plus an attractive design, in my opinion.

    I am not exactly sure why you keep bring up the Rabbit (maybe from your username, perhaps? :) ). While it will be a great hatchback and a fine offering from VW, we have been discussing a SEDAN in a HYUNDAI thread, please don't go overboard with inappropriate plugs. FACT is, the Elantra competes with the Jetta and other compact sedans in this class, but not Rabbit. As an aside, I am actually a big fan of hatchbacks, and am looking forward to the upcoming new releases.

    Overall, thew new Elantra does its job. I am almost certain it will be a volume seller for Hyundai - 100K+, I think, is conversative estimate.
  • germancarfan1germancarfan1 Member Posts: 221
    I own a 2004 Elantra so that's why i'm on this thread :)

    The problem with the 2007 Elantra boils down to the fact that Hyundai, rather than redesign the whole vehicle, has placed an updated exterior and interior on an otherwise outdated drivetrain.

    Its not so much that the HP and torque numbers are dismall, its the fact that the powertrain as a whole lacks refinement (and yes, better performance) when compared to its updated rivals. Hyundai needed to update the engine and transmission with something more competitive for 2007. When your compeitors come forward with smooth reving sporty engines coupled with 5 or 6-speed AUTO's or CVT's, its tough to compete. Back in 2001 (or even when I got mine in 2004), this was acceptable because an Elantra could be had for $11K. Now that same drivetrain will cost you a minimum of 15K.

    And the Elantra certainly competes with hatchbacks. At this low price point, consummers are shopping price, not necessarily configuration. No doubt consumers will be looking at the Honda Fit, Nissan Versa, VW Rabbit when they shop for an Elantra. Add in the fact that this price point is a favorite among college students and recent grads buying their first new car. Go look on any college campus and count the number of hatchbacks...there's a lot.
  • ukraguyukraguy Member Posts: 28
    >>

    I think Hyundai made a wise decision because people, including you, are not willing to pay "reasonable" amount of money for the Elantra. :) Why should Hyundai charge the Elantra less than the "Yaris?"

    No wonder the new Accent and Rio also don't have the Gamma engine.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    The 2007 Elantra's drivetrain will have a CVVT engine with more power and torque than the Corolla, 1.4% less power but more torque than the Civic and the upcoming Sentra, and overall fuel economy within 10% of those cars and very close to that of the B-class Versa. Is that best in class? No. Is it competitive? Yes.

    Also, we don't know that the transmission is not new. Kia introduced a new automatic tranny with smoother shifts and greater reliability in the Spectra for '06. It would make sense that Hyundai would use the same transmission for the Elantra, since they share the Beta engine. I think the specs you gave for the top gear on the Elantra are for the '06 model, right? The gear ratios could be changed for '07. Something had to be changed to account for the 4 mpg increase in fuel economy that Hyundai claims for '07.

    What I think Hyundai is doing is using the old marketing trick of starting off with a new design but not handing out all the candy at once. A year or so down the line, I think they will bring one or more all-new powertrains to the Elantra.

    BTW, isn't the I5 on the Jetta and Rabbit a rather old design? Maybe that is why they can coax only 150 hp out of 2.5L, while Hyundai gets 162 hp from their smaller 2.4L I4.
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    While I would agree with you, in the sense college students favorite hatchbacks such as the Mazda3, and also coupes such as the Civic, we are still talking about a small % of total buying population. Sedans outsell hatchbacks and coupes by a wide margin.

    Regarding your price point, yes, these are all within a few thousands, comparably equipped, but only a small percentage are sold as hatchbacks. The majority buying population tend to go with sedans, as sales data are shown; hatchbacks, I would think, should still be considered as niche (nothing wrong of which), and the competition should firmly stand with hatchbacks vs. hatchbacks; sedans vs. sedans. Further, if price was the argument, then would it be fair to compare a 25K pickup to a 25K car?
  • njdevil1njdevil1 Member Posts: 45
    most people that have auto transmission mainly put it in drive and leave it there. it would be nice if the 2007 elanra offered 6 speed manual transmission. that would be great.as you probably know alot of the other makes have it.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Its important to note that mileage estimations are just that at this point, correct? Meaning.. they are only preliminary EPA figures. Remember what happened when Nissan offered preliminary figures on the Versa?

    ~alpha
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Yes, you are correct. We will need to see what the real-world fuel economy of the new Elantra is. I hope that it easily exceeds the EPA numbers as do my '01 and '04 Elantras.
  • azera25azera25 Member Posts: 45
  • craigmricraigmri Member Posts: 243
    Folks, I've come here as the only place I know where I can get some consoling and advice.

    I will be requiring a new car for my wife within the next few weeks. Up until now I've considered the following cars:

    Hyundai Elantra '06
    Kia Spectra '06
    Toyota Corolla '06
    Honda Civic '06

    And with the incredible incentives, the '06 V6 Sonata looks like the value of the year. At 30 MPG hwy its 235hp V6 sounds interesting.

    Now that I've spent the last week enjoying the pictures of the '07 Elantra, I've decided I really want one of those bad!!!

    What should I do? I was thinking about trying to find a 3 or 4 year old Elantra or Sonata, drive it until the '07 comes out in the fall and re-sell the used Hyundai. If Hyundai offers an owner loyalty when the '07 comes out I would then qualify assuming I bought the new Elantra prior to selling the used one.

    Is this good logic or should I consider another option? :confuse:

    Craig
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    I used this approach myself. I needed another car in the family last January and wasn't ready to buy a new one yet because several cars I was considering (Fit, Versa, Yaris, Accent 3-door, 2007 Elantra) weren't available. So I looked for a good deal on a used car in great condition, that I would be able to drive for 9-12 months and get pretty good resale value on (I wouldn't put many miles on it). I looked for an Elantra but couldn't find one that would still have warranty left in 9-12 months, for a decent price. So I got a 2000 Mazda 626 ES that was in exceptional condition.

    Then two things happened: first, my wife suffered from minivan withdrawal (we replaced her Grand Caravan two years ago with an Elantra GT 5-door). And I found a really good deal on an impeccable 2002 MPV with low miles. So I decided to get her the MPV, while I got her GT to drive for the next 2.5-3 years. Then when I went to sell my 626, my oldest son decided he liked the 626 better than my '01 Elantra GLS (leather, alloys, more of a "chick magnet"). So I sold my GLS to my sister and kept the 626.

    Sorry for the dissertation, but in short I think your plan is viable. The trick is finding something that won't cost you a lot in repairs over the next few months, and something that won't depreciate a lot. That means if you can find an Elantra or Sonata still under warranty at a good price, that might be a good way to go. Another option is something like a Civic or Corolla, as those cars have low depreciation and are in strong demand with gas prices going up.

    The other benefit of buying a "bridge" car is that if incentives aren't too good on the 2007 Elantra right from the start, you can hold onto the used car and bide your time.
  • wonderwallwonderwall Member Posts: 126
    what's with college students getting Mazda 3s? i drove a $3000 1989 Toyota Corolla when I was in college.
  • jaxs1jaxs1 Member Posts: 2,697
    Yes, and some 15 year-olds on a learner's permit drive new Lexuses and some college students have no car at all.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    At least, that is what hyundaiusa.com says:

    You’ll find ESC standard on Sonata, Tucson, Azera and the all-new 2007 Santa Fe and 2007 Elantra.

    I don't recall that fact mentioned in the launch or anyplace else for that matter. If true, it would trump all of its competitors in its class.

    http://www.hyundaiusa.com/abouthyundai/ourcompany/know.aspx
  • thefafthefaf Member Posts: 12
    Quote:
    You’ll find ESC standard on Sonata, Tucson, Azera and the all-new 2007 Santa Fe and 2007 Elantra.

    I don't recall that fact mentioned in the launch or anyplace else for that matter. If true, it would trump all of its competitors in its class. End Quote

    Well, almost all, if you include in the class the Scion xB. But to be fair, the xB doesn't have Elantra's complement of airbags.

    Mark
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    The xB is a class below the '07 Elantra.
  • sonatabeansonatabean Member Posts: 201
    What the heck is ESC?

    Electronic Suction Control?

    Evacuation Socket Coupling?

    Eviscerating Steering Components?
  • sonatabeansonatabean Member Posts: 201
    Electronic Stability Control.

    My bad for posting before drinking enough AM coffee.
  • delta4delta4 Member Posts: 138
    I concur. This is going way over the top. Kirstie please take the appropriate action.
  • sonatabeansonatabean Member Posts: 201
    Yeah, delta, you'd think someone with an ID tag "German Car Fan" would have at least enough nacches to know "Hyundia" means "Korean" and the folks here are interested in a Korean car.

    Whatta noodge!!!
  • sonatabeansonatabean Member Posts: 201
    And I still notice we have no estimated fuel-suction numbers despite gas again spiriling upwards (with the jump to over $75 a barrel last week, we're up to $3.19 a gallon in my part of NY).

    I hope Hyundai USA is not gonna let us down!
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    We have an estimated fuel-suction number, just not an official one. Hyundai has stated the 2007 Elantra gets 4 mpg better than the '06. What we don't know if that is on city, highway, combined or going downhill during a full moon. We also don't know if that estimate will hold up under EPA testing or in the real world. One thing we do know is that the 2007 Elantra will probably retain its title as the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid mid-sized car sold in the U.S.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    I think its absurd that Hyundai touts the EPA size classification of the Elantra. Do people looking for a mid-size family car really think...."Let me cross shop Accord, Camry, Altima, Elantra, Fusion".

    I hardly think so.

    Thats like the Subaru Baja as the most fuel efficient Pick-Up. It may be, but given its paltry sales vs. that of real midsize trucks, it doesnt matter much, and it sure doesnt seem that the classification means anything real.

    ~alpha
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    Every automaker does it - it's called marketing. It's a fact regardless.

    Actually, Hyundai never promotes the Elantra to compete with the midsize crowd. Every media outlet I've seen points to Civic, Corolla, Senta, etc...
  • sonatabeansonatabean Member Posts: 201
    Actually, I've grown to despise product marketing: these are the people who, at their worst, SPAM our E-mail boxes with promos for pills to give us bigger boobs *AND* bigger phalluses. At their best, they . . . well, do the sort of foolishness we're discussing here.

    Twits.

    Give me a good product that speaks for itself and let me decide using my own mind.
  • sonatabeansonatabean Member Posts: 201
    We have an estimated fuel-suction number, just not an official one.

    Oh - and thank you for replying!
  • averigejoeaverigejoe Member Posts: 559
    What's your complaint?
    The EPA size class dividing line has to be somewhere, right?
    Since the Elantra makes it into the mid-size class, of course it should be touted. It is a bigger car inside than the smaller classed cars. That is important to a lot of buyers. It is a measure of value to size-conscious shoppers.
    If the other manufacturers don't like it that Elantra is mid-sized and that Sonata is large-sized, that is tough for them. Let them design their cars to be bigger inside so they can be more competitive size and price-wise with Hyundai.
    And if a shopper does not care about size he can just ignore the EPA size class ratings.
    Hyundai is doing a great job at providing roomy, comfortable, well performing cars at very reasonable prices.
    Value!
    What's wrong with that?
    Rather than complain, maybe you should admire what Hyundai is doing. More and more people are doing just that lately.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    I wasn't complaining about Hyundai as a company, I was just making an observation on the marketing. Call it a midsize car, thats fine, but the most fuel efficient midsize car is somewhat misleading. Most midsize cars are significantly more powerful than the Elantra, are noticeably bigger inside, and some like the 166 hp 34 MPG highway Accord- are barely behind in fuel efficiency!

    While I understand a line must be drawn somewhere, the Elantra simply doesnt measure up in fuel economy (the current model, not the revised one whose REAL figures we know not), in comparison to the better vehicles in the class that the Elantra is most often shopped against. The Elantra is mid-pack at best, and I will tell you outright that I am very skeptical of 4 MPG bump in efficiency.

    I certainly commend Hyundai for making bountiful strides with their recent vehicles, I just simply don't care for the moinker of most fuel efficient non hybrid midsize....

    ~alpha
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Look it up on the EPA rankings--the Elantra IS the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid mid-sized car. Complain to them if you don't like their classification scheme.

    I don't recall seeing Hyundai touting the Elantra as being the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid mid-sized car, that was from an announcement from the EPA. But I think it's conceivable Hyundai will jump on this with the '07 model, given it is more into mid-sized territory than the older model. And is it a bad thing that there will soon be another choice for a car with mid-sized room, high fuel economy (for a mid-sized car), and a lower price than most mid-sized cars? I don't think that is a bad thing.
  • pocono35pocono35 Member Posts: 89
    Has anyone considered the reality of North American life when considering Hyundai's move towards larger cars? Consider the fact that 60%+ of Americans are overweight and need bigger cars. We looked at a Corolla a few years ago because of reputation, but bought an Elantra because it was so small. I am 6'1 180 and my wife is petite and overweight isn't an issue, but there was NO ROOM in that car and the Elantra was cavernous in comparison. Hyundai is showing their American focus and by designing larger cars that will be sold all over the world but are very appealing to Americans. I believe the Sonata and Santa Fe were designed at their Fountain Valley Studios and the Sonata is a huge hit.
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    And, just to add along, Sonata is considered a large car by EPA and is the most efficient car in the class :)
  • aneeshaneesh Member Posts: 43
    image

    image
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    i don't see any similarities. i see some 3 series and corolla, but not IS.

    side looks original(1st gen tibby), and front is consistent with azera's and upcoming santa fe. hyundai is still searching for a design identity, and i think they are getting there.
  • germancarfan1germancarfan1 Member Posts: 221
    yeah, the top picture looks like a cheap Corolla knockoff and the bottom looks like a 35K automobile.
  • tsgeiseltsgeisel Member Posts: 352
    They both look rather generic to me.
  • jaxs1jaxs1 Member Posts: 2,697
    Looks ok. Not so bad as to be a reason to avoid buying the car, but doesn't look as good as the current Elantra did when it was new several years ago.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Yeah, I really do like the rear end of the '01-'06 Elantra sedan. But the overall look of the '07 Elantra is sleeker, and doesn't have the styling cues from the Impala that the old Elantra has. And the new car's interior is way better than the old one--I think the best car interior Hyundai has done to date.
  • doohickiedoohickie Member Posts: 949
    Personally, I luv my 05 Elantra interior. The dashboard is a bit dated, I'll give you that. But I don't see recent "chunky" center console dashboard styling (in all new cars these days) as an improvement. In fact, I rather dislike the look.

    The outgoing Elantra is clean and classic, inside and out. The new Elantra is following the pack to keep up with the Joneses.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    image

    kinda ricy chop, but how can anybody like the last gen elantra over new one?
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    image
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    The current dash is nice and simple, isn't it? Good ergonomics. And I'll bet it has more padded surfaces on it than the '07 will--that is another trend in new cars, lots of hard plastic.

    I particularly like the instrument cluster on the '07 Elantra--a big improvement over the GLS' green gauges, and looks at least as nice if not better than the GT's purple gauges IMO.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    i no longer see a corolla. the side looks a lot like the first gen tibby.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    image
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Wide photo alert! Wide photo alert! ah-OOOOOO0-gah!! :)

    That greenhouse sure looks like a Taurus, doesn't it. But also similar to the Azera. I think this car really looks good in silver, unlike some cars that have no interesting lines and thus are boring in silver. The lighter color brings out the character lines.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    whoops. i'll reduce the size :)
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    image
  • ukraguyukraguy Member Posts: 28
    >>

    Yeah, right. :D The new IS looks like a 17K automobile to me.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.