Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Chronic Car Buyers Anonymous (Archived)

126272931323236

Comments

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    Well, you're definitely throwing a curveball in there. The Suburban and Pilot are in entirely different classes. The closer comparison is the Trailblazer EXT to the Pilot. And, I can tell you from my first-hand comparison, although the Trailblazer seems much larger, the Pilot is roomier on the inside, especially in the 2nd and 3rd rows.

    If you are concerned about resale (which YOU should be), then there is only one choice. We bought our Pilot with nothing down on a 6-year note and we were able to trade it in just 2.5 years later for almost exactly what we owed. There isn't a chevy on the planet you could do that with.

    Oh, and we averaged 20-21 mpg along the way.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,348
    I assume you still have a trailer to tow? If not, a minivan is vastly more sutied for regularly carrying 7 passengers. Even a Tahoe has less usable space (rear seat and definitely cargo area) than our Odyssey.

    A Suburban just seems like overkill for normal use, unless you plan to tow a large trailer.

    But, after sitting in one at the car show, the new GM interior is light years ahead of the old one!

    Also pass on the TB. I remember reading about them, and aren't they every bit as big as a Tahoe (length wise)? And in real world use, don't really get better mileage.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • gussguss Member Posts: 1,167
    a Toyota Highlander. I am not a fan of the looks but resale and gas mileage are way up there,especially if you get the Hybrid.

    It is smaller than the Pilot.If you are only putting kids back there who cares if knees in their chins will stunt their growth.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    yeah, IIRC the Trailblazer is longer than the Tahoe, at least the outgoing '06 model. I don't know about the new '07 though. The Tahoe was actually pretty small for a full-sized SUV: I think around 198" long overall? The Durango's longer, too.

    Thing that sucks abou the TB though, is that to get a third-row seat you have to get that extended model, which has a wheelbase almost as long as a Suburban! Less overhang though, so overall it's still shorter. But it's also narrower inside, so you don't really get a whole lot of interior room.

    The '07 Tahoe/Yukon have a third-row seat option, so if you want a GM, you're no longer limited to the Suburban.
  • pernaperna Member Posts: 521
    If I lived down south where there was no chance of snow, needed room for 7, AND towing capability..

    I would buy a used full sized van (e.g. Ford E-150). No question. You can pick those things up for insanely cheap, they'll get the job done, and they'll run forever.

    Better yet, if you want to ride in style, get a 2-3 year old conversion van. You'll still pay a lot less than a new Burb, and it will be like riding around in a small apartment.

    I know full sized vans are, ah, less than sexy, but if money was tight that's what I'd do. I'd buy one at a price that I could pay off in two years, so instead of throwing money away on cars, you can do something that will result in positive equity; e.g., save up for a down payment on a house.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    if you're going to be staying in Texas and still want to go the SUV route, you might be able to forego the 4WD/AWD option, and just stick it out with whatever two wheels normally power the thing, save a couple grand on the purchase price, and maybe pick up an extra mpg or two on the EPA circuit.
  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,285
    2000-2006 Tahoe/Yukon also had a third-row seat option, but there's more legroom in the Suburban/Yukon XL. I expect the same will be true on the 2007 models. Prior to 2000, the short-wheelbase models didn't offer a third-row seat.

    Are you keeping the Titan or trading it?
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    Hey, I know someone who's got a Yukon Denali for sale. :)

    2WD, Pewter w/ tan leather, 3 rows, 20K miles on an '03, 20" chromed rims, rear DVD system, XM equipped. Pretty much loaded.

    Of course, the car is in San Diego. Heck, it might still be available when you're ready to pull the trigger!
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I went through a phase where I kinda wanted a Tahoe/Yukon in a fairly stripper configuration. RWD, cloth, minimal options, but with the bigger 5.3 V-8. IIRC it would've run around $25K.
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    I'm getting it again.

    I just spent the weekend driving to/from Cheyenne (130 miles one way). Third time in 6 weeks, all in the wife's VUE. Now, while the VUE has it's assets (250HP and AWD, for starters), for me it's not the most comfortable long distance vehicle.

    I'm thinking about a fairly generic sedan that has a high seating position -- one of the major complaints the wife has with the Saturn L300 is that the seats are so low to the ground.

    Ford 500/Mercury Montego would fit the bill, plus it comes with AWD as an option. And, for some odd reason, the Buick Lucerne is somewhat appealing (must be the lemko influence!). Am very curious about the new Saturn Aura coming out later this year, but don't know about the seating position yet.

    Of course, I would like it if the Impala came with the V8 in something other than the SS trim level.

    Just dreaming at this point, but I know one of the most favorite pastimes on this board is spending other people's money and arguing over our opinions.
  • woodywwwoodyww Member Posts: 1,806
    I'm just curious......what years, trans, engines would you look for? 460, 351, 6 cyl?
  • woodywwwoodyww Member Posts: 1,806
    If you can get crazy money for a TDI with 145K, go for it! You can put in on fee-bay, &.......do a 10 day auction. And/or--do a "BIN"--price it well, lots of great pics, etc.

    Owning bmw's w/o losing your shirt.......I'm one of those nuts who thinks that's possible. Most of the truly crazed bmw nuts seem to own 10-15 y.o. 3-5-7 models that aren't even that great.....

    *It can get expensive to own bmw's.*
  • pernaperna Member Posts: 521
    If you're towing with a full size van, you'll probably end up with a V8. The engines they put in those things aren't made for speed, they're made for hellacious torque, since it's a vehicle designed for carrying around thousands of pounds of chickens or lord knows what. :)

    As far as brands, it's really a tossup between Ford, GM, or Dodge. They're all older than dirt (you'd probably be hard pressed to tell the difference between a 2005 and 1995), and dead reliable. The only "real" advice I have is to not buy new, unless you're going to drive it for an eternity (since you'll find that 200k miles is nothing for one of these guys, plan on it!).
  • zodiac2004zodiac2004 Member Posts: 458
    Owning bmw's w/o losing your shirt.......I'm one of those nuts who thinks that's possible. Most of the truly crazed bmw nuts seem to own 10-15 y.o. 3-5-7 models that aren't even that great.....

    Here's one way.
    Buy a late 80's/early 90's 7-series (either the 735 or 750) after doing the usual checks.
    Do nothing but required oil changes/tires/brakes. Nothing more. Don't worry about any dash lights that come on. If something electrical breaks don't fix it.
    Drive it until no longer driveable.
    Repeat this process until the fever passes - or until you find an example that goes on forever.
    (This is pretty much my approach to car buying - except I don't buy beemers).
  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,285
    I think the GM (Savanna/Express) is the newest design (1998 or so), followed by the Ford Econoline. They are all very similar--you still have the engine sticking out of the dash in between the front seats in all of them.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    that the current Ford vans date back to 1975! IMO, they really don't look all that different, although they've been reskinned.

    The Chevy van is the newest design, AFAIK. The older style, which ran from the early 70's to mid-late 90's couldn't hold a big block in its engine bay, which was a strike against it in heavier applications. That's the main reason Dodge and Ford used to pretty much own the Class-C motorhome market back in the day, although Dodge started to lose their reign once they quit making big blocks.

    As for the Ram van, which they just quit making in the past couple of years, I think it also dates back to the early 1970's. They gave it a more modern looking nose around 1996 or so, but didn't update the sheetmetal to nearly the extent that Ford did.
  • akanglakangl Member Posts: 3,282
    The Pilot today and LOVED it. What a neat SUV, only thing I didn't like about it is a little bit of lag when I jumped on it, but the salesguy said that was just the engine switching back to 6 cylinders from 3.

    Big difference from the Titan, was very nimble and fun to drive. The Titan is fun in its own respect (I love my truck don't get me wrong), but its big and a major bear in parking garages or anywhere else for that matter.

    The price difference between 4WD and 2WD is less than $800 from what I could tell. I drove a 4WD EX-L, very nice, I really liked it.

    Legroom was a little tight, but the second row seats move forward to give the 3rd row extra room, was pretty cool.

    Anyway, I think if I do trade the Titan the Pilot is going to win out. Only drawback is it can't tow much, which is fine for a few years.

    BTW, I've had the Titan for 15 months and she has 39k on her. Still being a pretty good truck, can't complain really. Last I heard Zippy was doing fine, has around 53k on her, she is coming up on her second birthday in July, I miss my little car.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    If you drove an AWD, the salesman is blowing smoke. Only the FWD model comes with cylinder deactivation.

    In any case, I'm surprised you felt any lag. I found ours quite peppy and responsive. But they have made some changes since our '03 model, so who knows.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,348
    If you are used to a big V8, it sounds as if something is happening when you hit the gas, even if the Pilot is actually faster.

    I know that our Ody gets up and scoots. If there is ever a lag, it's when the trany is in a high gear for the speed, and needs to downshift to get any serious motivation going. hauls tookie on the highway though.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    Our VUE has the 3.5L Honda V6 with the 5 speed auto in it .. of course, since the VUE is only 3700 lbs versus the 4000+ pounds of the Ody or Pilot, it really gets up and goes!

    Maintains a pretty solid 80MPH on the interstate, but is blown around by crosswinds quite a bit. North of Fort Collins on I-25, it's like God's own wind tunnel. Goes from zero crosswind to a steady 35-40MPH.
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    (I know, that often leads to trouble)

    Anyway, I was driving to work one morning and thought about how my current car ('03 Focus ZX5) is similar to the car I first bought when I moved to Colorado ('93 Honda Accord DX). I mean, they're both burgundy with a grey interior, both have stick shifts, similar engine size and power (2.2L and 125HP for the Honda, 2.0L and 130HP for the Focus).

    So, I decided to get onto Edmunds site and do a little comparison:

    Focus Accord
    Curb weight 2699 lbs 2778 lbs
    Torque 135 lb/ft 137 lb/ft
    EPA city/hwy 25/32 24/31
    Length 168.1" 185.2"
    Wheelbase 103" 107.1"
    Height 52.8" 53.9"
    Front headroom 39.3" 38.9"
    Rear legroom 37.6" 34.3"

    Now, the Focus has A/C, ABS, power windows and locks; the Accord had none of that.

    Still, seems interesting that in 10 years, I could be driving two cars from different manufacturers that are so similar in many ways.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    makes me wonder (somewhat pessimistically) if there will be anything around the 2700-pound, 130 hp/tq mark available new in 2013...

    Cars are bulking up so fast, I dunno....maybe the smallest cars will still be that light then.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    yeah, that's what I was sort of thinking. 10 years ago, the Accord was considered a mid-size car, while the Focus is a compact.

    Smaller dimensions, same weight, same HP/torque, basically the same mileage.

    And, IIRC, pretty much the same price! I think the Accord was the last DX they had on the lot (the '94 redesign was just coming out) and they let me have it for around $14K. The Focus, OTOH, was fairly well loaded (we had to go to 4 different dealers to find a ZX5 with ABS) and stickered for something like $17-18K, but with the X-plan and rebates, we ended up paying around $14K for it as well.

    Doesn't sound like progress to me. Guess we'll have to see what happens in 7 more years!
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    the Echo I just bought weighs just shy of 2100 pounds (curb weight), and I would bet anything you like I will never again buy a car lighter than this one. I like light cars. :cry:

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,285
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the Pilot and Ody are designed to put out slightly more power when using premium fuel (recommended for towing). Perhaps this could be the reason for a lag?

    I really like the way the Focus drives. The most demure thing about my Altima was the way the power steering was overboosted--the Focus' steering has a nice, firm feel. I wish they would bring over the current model from Europe, though.
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    I've heard that Ford may bring over the redesigned Focus in '07 or '08 .. my understanding of why they didn't originally has to do with, what else, money.

    Since the Focus is Ford's bread and butter car in Europe, it made sense for them to get the new model as quickly as possible. Here in the US, the Focus is Ford's "entry level" model, and they are perfectly content to sell the old model (albeit with the new 2.3L engine) for a few more years as the tooling is already bought and paid for.

    I do agree with you about how the Focus drives -- quite a bit more fun than most compacts. However, it's not like we drove a lot of different cars and decided on the Focus. We got a letter from Ford indicating that they would pay off the remaining lease payments on our Explorer if we bought or leased another Ford product.

    Convinced wife that we could reduce the payment size and increase the gas mileage if we traded down - the other idea was that our daughter would be driving it. Spent a very long Saturday visiting 4 different dealerships before finding the car we ended up buying. Payment dropped from $580/mo to $320/mo with no cash out of pocket (gotta love X-plan and rebates!).

    27 months and 36,000 miles later the only things the car has required is oil changes and a new set of tires at 33K.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I didn't realize the 1990-93 Accord was so lanky in the wheelbase! Maybe that's one reason I always liked that style...long-ish wheelbase, but not a lot of overhang made for a nicely balanced style. Made it look a little bigger than it really was. In contrast, the 1994-97 is only marginally shorter overall, and the wheelbase shorter by such a tiny amount the naked eye probably couldn't catch it, but just something about the style makes it seem so much stubbier to me.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    The early-90s Accord was the last of the "low-line" Hondas, which helped them look longer than they were. By contrast, the 94-97 Accord was basically an overgrown Civic with the higher beltline and trunklid to match.
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    Yeah, I always liked the looks of the 90-93 Accord, too. Especially the 92 and 93 models, when they got away from the motorized belts and added an airbag.

    I actually owned two of those models -- one being a '92 LX that my first wife and I bought after she totalled her Protege and the second being the '93 DX, which I leased not long after moving to Denver. The first wife got the LX in the divorce - she kept it for a few years, then traded it in on a Dodge Ram pickup.

    While I was leasing the DX, I thought seriously about trading it in for a '95 or '96 LX Coupe. Dealer would have taken the DX in trade and the payments on the LX coupe would have been somewhere around $300/mo. At the time, I was financially strapped, so I passed.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I also like the 1987-91 Camry, and the Mazda 626 that ran from around 1988-92. So if I ever get a strong desire to re-live the early 90's, I'm gonna have a hell of a time deciding which one to pick!
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,626
    Two words... motorized seatbelts..

    Other than that.. I agree wholeheartedly..

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    Motorized shoulder belts never bothered me, mostly because I got in the habit of unlatching them before I opened the door. It was just a second belt to latch and unlatch.
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    NO stupid engineering tricks for me, please.

    NO idiot belts.
    NO upshift lights.
    NO undefeatable daytime running lights [OK, got me there]
    NO self-locking doors, either.
    NO manual transmissions with skip shift [Camaro etc.]

    Ugh. Who comes up with this s[uperfluous stuff]?

    -Mathias
  • gussguss Member Posts: 1,167
    No climate control (got it now, hate it)

    I agree with the self-locking doors. Have you ever locked a one year old in a car with the motor running? Yes I did, but have not told his mother yet.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,348
    Did you at least get him out? If not, you probably will have to tell her soon. :blush:

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    A 92 Accord Coupe EX 5 speed with 150K. I'll only cost me about $2300. I'm mulling it over right now. It'll make the perfect companion to my new (to me) 1996 Civic EX sedan. Decisions decisions.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    this begs the question, is there ever such a thing as having TOO MANY cars at once? :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • gussguss Member Posts: 1,167
    I paid the locksmith $40 to open it, after about an hour.

    Of course the locksmith had to ask "can't your son unlock it?". Why didn't I think of that?

    He's 2 1/2 now and doing fine. He face twitches a little though whenever I hit the remote button. I wonder what that could be? :confuse:
  • steine13steine13 Member Posts: 2,825
    Good question.
    Why don't we suspend your posting privileges for a week while you think about an answer.

    Sheesh.
    This is CCBA, Dude. It's not that kind of a support group.

    -Mathias
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    Progreesive allows 4 on our coverage. It's like having a $20 bill in your pocket. That extra spot is begging for a car.

    Some people just don't get it.

    The only thing I like more than cars is trance and drum & bass music. That's another expensive habit.
  • m2kappm2kapp Member Posts: 16
    LOL, well I'm not sure what you mean? Although I have only read the few proceding posts from my original in this forum.

    The Aviator IMO is a fanatastic truck and my wife loves it, that's what counts most. We were coming out of a Caddy SRX to put some perspective on that. (She got 3 speeding tickets in 3 weeks in the SRX so she had to go, the SRX, not my wife ;) )

    The Amanti, well it won some kind of most appealing award if that counts for anything in your mind. And if one were to sit in one and drive it with an open minded, non biased opinion they may be surprised... For the price of a new mid-level Civic, I am laughing all the way to the bank ;)
  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,285
    I like a well-designed climate control system. Some of the early auto climate systems were not very intelligent. If you started the car in the summer, the fan would immediately change to its highest setting, and begin blowing hot air in your face. If you started the car in the winter, the fan would do the same, only this time, it would blow cold air on you. The newer ones are a little more self-aware and slowly ramp up the fan speed after the car is started.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    hey folks, I was kidding! You did know that, didn't you?

    I do get it, and just for the record I have had more than four at once on many occasions through the years. And I'm just me, no spouse to blame a couple of them on! ;-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    my Intrepid's doors are supposed to lock automatically once the car hits a forward speed of 15 mph. And they're supposed to unlock...I know I should know this, considering I've had the car for 6 years and 114,000 miles now, but I can't remember if they unlock when you put it into Park, or when you turn it off?

    Anyway, there have been times when it would lock itself the moment you put it in gear. Or sometimes even when it's just sitting there, in Park, idling. When I used to deliver pizzas, I'd leave the car running. I worked a fairly safe neighborhood of mostly single-family homes, so usually I'd be right up in the driveway. I know, still not a good idea! :blush: Well, there were a few times that the car would lock itself while it was sitting there, idling. I was just fortunate that every time it did it, my window was down. I'd usually have the driver's window down, especially at night, as I was looking for an exact house address. And those hot-bags would really heat up the car and fog the windows, so sometimes even in the winter I'd at least leave a rear window cracked.

    As for automatic climate control, my Grandma's '85 LeSabre had it. It was smart enough not to engage the fan until it was ready to give you the temperature that you wanted, but it had some other annoyances. For one, it only had two fan speeds you could select. Low or High. There was a middle button called "Auto", but when you pressed that you were at the mercy of what passed for a computer. The display was cool looking, a flat membrane surface that was almost futuristic looking. It had buttons on it that were flat, similar to those on an old Intellivision II hand controller. I know I'm digging into the past there, but that was the first thing that popped into my mind!

    Another thing that was annoying was how you set the temperature. It had a range that went from something like 60 degrees to 90 degrees. There was a button on the left that made it colder, and a button on the right that made it hotter. Where with the old fashioned type where you just slid a lever, you could go from full-cold to full-hot in a fraction of a second, here you had to sit and hold the button, and it would beep and a spot on the control would light up for every degree. I'd say it probably took about 30 seconds to get that sucker from full-cold to fulll-hot, or vice versa!
  • corvettecorvette Member Posts: 11,285
    I've never experienced an auto-locking mishap, knock on wood.

    My Altima did not have automatic locks, but the manual lock for the door had very little resistance and was positioned right on top of the handle so that it was easy to bump (and lock the door) after pulling the handle to open the door. Several times, I inadvertently locked the driver's door on my way out, with the keys in the ignition--thankfully, the other doors were unlocked each time this happened.

    My grandparents' 1987 and 1990 Park Avenues had the same climate system--I remember the membrane control panel, and the two fan settings, but didn't remember that the system was smart enough not to fully spin up immediately. I also remember that it had an external thermometer, but you had to push a button on the membrane to view it (Ext Tmp or some other abomination [like Check Gages]).
  • ubbermotorubbermotor Member Posts: 307
    I currently own 4, 5 if you count the parts car (I don't). My high was 8.

    1955 Packard Clipper Custom
    1955 Packard Clipper Constellation
    1961 Chevrolet Apache 10 Long Stepside
    1965 Plymouth Barracuda S
    1965 Dodge Coronet 440 (with the 361)
    1965 Dodge D100 Flatbed
    1968 Plymouth Valiant
    1968 Pontiac Lemans
    1969 Cadillac Deville
    1970 Ford Maverick Sport
    1970 Plymouth Duster V8
    1972 Volvo 142S
    1973 Chevrolet Vega GT Kammback
    1973 Ford Pinto Wagon
    1973 Cadillac Eldorado
    1975 Chrysler Cordoba
    1975 Dodge Dart Custom
    1975 Dodge D200
    1975 Plymouth Duster Custom
    1975 Plymouth Gran Fury Suburban
    1975 Plymouth Valiant Brougham Hardtop
    1975 Plymouth Valiant Custom
    1976 Mazda 808 Coupe
    1976 Chrysler Cordoba
    1977 Datsun 200SX
    1977 Dodge Aspen
    1977 Datsun 620 Deluxe Kingcab
    1978 Ford Pinto Wagon
    1978 Ford Fairmont
    1978 Chevrolet Nova Concours
    1979 Chrysler Lebaron
    1979 Chrysler Cordoba
    1981 Ford Escort GLX
    1981 Mazda 626
    1983 Chevrolet Impala 9C1
    1986 Oldsmobile Calais
    1988 Mazda B2200
    1989 Plymouth Acclaim
    1993 Geo Metro
    1995 Nissan Hardbody XE Kingcab
    1996 Chrysler Sebring SLX
    1996 Dodge Neon
    2002 Dodge Caravan SE
  • gussguss Member Posts: 1,167
    You need to get together with andre,you have alot of Mopar on your list(I have only two on mine.)
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Great list!

    What are the 5 you still have?

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    that is a helluva list.

    1978 Ford Fairmont

    I had the sister to that car, a '78 Mercury Zephyr. Mine was the 2-door with the 200cu.in. I6 and 3-speed auto. For some bizarre reason, I have fond memories of that car.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Wow, I'm definitely impressed! And even though I have a Mopar tendency, for some reason that '83 Impala 9C1 caught my eye! I've always liked those. Any memories of that one? Fond or otherwise?
This discussion has been closed.