Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to learn more!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I think that filter is to absorb vapors while fueling up the car. I think it's been EPA mandated for quite a while. Or maybe I dreamed that. :confuse:
I am not aware of any other vehicles that call for regular replacement of the charcoal canister. I can only assume that, should it get too plugged up, it might trigger a check engine light.
It can be done. It is not routine. I cannot teach others how to do it and would not if I could.
Most car buyers are routinely unlucky.
A very few are not.
Even fewer are lucky repeatedly.
Here is my reply:
OK, thanks for confirming that the process you follow to get the best price is not teachable, meaning it is not repeatable and is based on factors outside your control.
Here is the thinking behind my reply: a human process (such as buying a car) that is repeatable, meaning it is a series of steps not subject to random factors, is teachable. It may be a complex process, difficult to teach, but it is teachable. Whether or not everyone is capable of learning that process is another matter, based on the complexity of the process and the ability of the teacher and the student.
Please help me understand how I misinterpreted what you said, because that was not my intention. I had trouble deciphering what you meant in the last three lines in particular.
wuts some of your opinions as for a really good color match for this car? anyone seen it in white yet?
There's a Gold Beige in my neighborhood, and it doesn't look nearly as sharp as the other colors when it passes by. It looks fine up close, but just doesn't present well on the road, IMHO.
If you meant that it could be taught but you are not capable of doing so, that's fine, but let's drop this back and forth and move on. Please.
2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick
So you are asking others not to enjoy the Deepwater Blue too?. You know it might be the best Blue ever?
averigejoe, ever have the feeling people don't understand you?. That's the story of my life!
You are looking at the published dealer invoice amounts. In fact, they are rubbish! Our Hyundai dealer claims they they are "losing" money on the cars. How can they lose money and stay in business? The fact is that dealer invoice amounts posted on the web vary from dealer to dealer. Some dealers can buy for significantly less. In the case of Hyundai, I have to wonder if most dealers can buy for significantly less. That is why my car is only worth 14500 trade-in when I take it to any dealer or CarMax, but on KBB it is supposedly 17500. The problem lies with Hyundai- and unless they stop this deceptive practice, no matter how good they make their cars, they will continue to be regarded as depreciating junk!!!
2. Don't trust the GLS V6 mileage numbers. Real-world town mileage is 18 MPG for normal acceleration. heavy acceleration will get you 17 MPG and grandma like pace will get you 19 MPGs. The car significantly eats gas on hills and on startup, so short trips get lower mileage. Highway mileage is about 28 with the AC at 80 MPH and no hills. You can get 32 with no AC at 60 MPH if you are careful not to accelerate quickly. Going up the mountain will get you sub-20 mpg, no matter the speed.
3. The cars have a problem with the windshield wiper resevoir clogging up. The trunk remote release can stop working if you aren't careful. Otherwise, the car is very nice.
That statement shows a misunderstanding of the numbers. Those are not "GLS V6 mileage numbers" or Hyundai numbers. Those are EPA numbers assigned to the car when EPA testing was done. They are a guideline only, and variance is not the fault of Hyundai.
I agree with your real-world mileage numbers. They are spot on. I have gotten as high as 32mpg, but never below 24mpg, because I have never driven in excess of 50% city miles on a given tank of gas.
Also, you need to take into consideration that the stock 17" wheels on the Sonata are low profile, and their ride is much STIFFER than the stock 16" wheels.
It is visible, but it doesn't look too bad. If you want a picture I can email it to you...
And you need to go to this site to compare the different Sonata trims:
http://www.hyundaiusa.com/vehicle/sonata/trim/comparetrim.aspx
And then you need to make a VISIT to the dealership, and ask for a comprehensive TEST DRIVE.
Only than you can consider yourself READY to make a decision...
Hyundai has their new incentives out. $2,500 minimum rebates for GLS V6 and LX models.
I finally broke down and bought a new 2006 Hyundai GLS V6 with an MSRP of $22,391 for....
....drumroll please....
...$15,248 plus TTL.
I drove the car for at least an hour over every road surface to make sure there was no K-thunk sound.
I know these cars depreciate FAST, so I am planning on keeping it for a long, long while.
About re-sale: I see you have bought in to the "Internet Expert" view of resale value for the 06 Sonata. Well, I have great news for you. Take good care of that GLS, and sell it privately and you can get top dollar for it in 3, 5, or 10 years.
Enjoy your great ride!
....drumroll please....
...$15,248 plus TTL."
--- How does a (brand new, I must guess) car with an MSRP of $22,391 been sold for $15,248 (before taxes, I must guess) -- IS BEYOND ME.....
It is a good car, but you have to be willing to pay the price for gas. I would recommend it for an area with mostly highway, not a lot of traffic, and low gas prices. In those types of places, it would be a great car. But in crowded SoCal with $3.35/gallon petrol, this is not the car you want to be in if you are going for the value proposition that Hyundai presumes to be selling. It would be fine if they gave a reasonable trade-in so that I could get an elantra or something... but my dealer tried to do the bait and switch by giving me a falsely high resale value to get me to drive out there. I wrote Hyundai and they said they don't care, it's the dealer's fault and they don't have control over their dealers. Great cars, but if that is how they handle problems, I don't want to have to deal with Hyundai for a large purchase again.
Your dealer and Hyundai just don't understand you.
A. The TripTech is nice, and USUALLY quite reliable, but you can't take it as a "scientific" tool... It's good for an AVERAGE reading which becomes more accurate over 100-200 miles. I once drove for 3 miles, at a steady 45 mph while resetting the TripTech -- and got 48 mpg on the screen...
B. ANY car will waste gas when starting and warming up. ANY car will get lower gas mileage in cold weather. ANY car would get MUCH worse gas mileage in city driving.
C. ANY V6 car would waste MUCH more gas in city driving, compared to an I4 car. That's why the V6 (of ANY model) would make more sense for buyers who mostly commute on highways. Those who live and work in the city would make better sense of buying a 4 cyl. car.
D. What you portray here about your dealer is typical to MANY -- if not ANY -- car dealer in the country. They all (ok, most) do those "little tricks", no matter if they sell Fords, Hondas, Dodge or Toyotas. So making it into a "Hyundai" issue, is neither realistic, nor fair. Also, dealers TRY to play games, but they don't FORCE you to join them in their games.
E. Resale value of the Sonata is still debatable. The car is way too NEW to establish a firm number. So far the Sonata got rave reviews, and no major reliability issues. The expectation is for it to retain a good resale value, just as the previous generation Sonata has proven to have. And, btw, you check ANY car and compare its trade-in value between KBB and CarMax, and you'll be AMAZED at the difference... Just last August I was checking about our '96 Volvo 850... CarMax offered me $2,500, while KBB was about $6,500... I sold it to a private party for $6,500....
...Enjoy the car... Hope this all helps...
Congrats, Joe, on your bargain price!
You may have the record for a GLS V6 with a $22,391 MSRP.
Nice going. Enjoy!
-Loren
"Overall mortality rates for patients with pelvic fractures can be as high as 55%, depending upon the severity of the fracture and the other injuries. Hemorrhage is a frequent complication, and mortality rates from pelvic fracture with hemorrhage can be as high as 40%. Associated injuries and multiple organ failure related to sepsis account for most non-hemorrhagic deaths."
Doesn't sound like something I'd like to do in my Sonata! So the perception of safety has some weak spots. If you look at the new Honda Civic, a much smaller car, it gets better IIHS safety ratings for side impact. As I mentioned in an earlier letter, I believe that Toyota and Honda use superior materials and metallurgy. That's why I pay $15 more per month for insurance on my Hyundai vs. a Civic- because my insurer has records showing that these cars are less safe overall, despite government ratings.
2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D
In a real-world accident, a highly rated small car may be less safe than a lower rated large car. Don't be mislead or fooled into a false sense of security in a small car which has a high rating. Likewise, don't necessarily feel unsafe in a large car just because its rating is not as high as some small car's rating.
For example, in a side impact test the same sled hits the car whether it's a Fit or an Escalade. So for an impact by a vehicle of the size/weight simulated by the sled (a mid-sized car for the NHTSA, a small pickup or SUV for the IIHS tests), 5 stars or a "Good" for a small car is just as good as the same rating for a large vehicle. Certainly, if a large vehicle hit a small car in the side, e.g. a Hummer hit a Fit, it might not hold up as well as if a Hummer hit another Hummer. But size isn't everything in crash tests. Intelligent safety cage design and judicious use of high-strength steel is a factor also. That's how a small car like the Civic can outperform many larger cars such as the Sonata on the IIHS side impact tests.
Sorry Backy, take it up with IIHS since that is what my post was about.
"...don't compare ratings across vehicle size groups because size and weight influence occupant protection in serious crashes. Larger, heavier vehicles generally afford more protection than smaller, lighter ones..."
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/default.aspx