Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Wow. I've only raced my friend (2003 Acura TL) I never knew so many people were so open to race. Also, even if you do race, you have to account for the imperfections on the road. The person beside you may have more pot holes, or a rougher surface.
Agreed, in a drag race from a dead stop, or accelerating from most any given speed the 2 cars should probably run neck and neck or very close to it. I am not arguing that point as I said before. In a drag race the gas pedal is floored and the cars run up through the gears to about redline and then shift to the next gear. Likewise, in a 40 to 70 mph run that allows downshifting no real measure of lower rpm torque is really tested. My argument is about lower rpm acceleration, not near redline. Near their redlines, each motor makes nearly identical torque.
To find out for sure about mid-range rpm (which some call real-world) performance, I'd like to see several tests of top gear roll on tests from various road speeds and engine rpm. It would be those tests which should prove whether my expectations are valid.
Think it through... if what you said before about similar 0-60 times and similar elapsed times for the quarter mile are true, then it is does not follow that the Accord would blow past the Sonata once both cars reach 60. If either blew past the other for the rest of the quarter mile for instance, one would be far ahead of the other at the end of that race. But that is not possible if the 1/4 mile elapsed times are nearly the same. But maybe that Car and Driver test is unusual compared to other ones somehow.
Haha, dare I even think it? ...That I trust the government for anything at all? In this case yes. I think the EPA fuel economy tests are good for comparison purposes. That is precisely the reason for the tests! And there are people on the Sonata board who are also achieving 30+ mpg. I think I read recently one over 32 mpg. It may have been in the gas mileage sedans board, but I think it was right here in Sonatas.
Also, does anyone out there have torque vs. rpm charts for the Sonata and Accord V6's? Post a link if you do.
I never said you will always get a better conditioned road. What I said is "Also, even if you do race, you have to account for the imperfections on the road. The person beside you may have more pot holes, or a rougher surface."
Also, the car beside you may have their Traction control system on, or A/C at a higher speed. You also may not know if he/she is applying full throttle. All I was saying is, if you want a more accurate 0-60 rating, you have to take into account all of these small details.
I'm betting that 4 years after your purchase of a new 2006 Sonata, the resale value will then be as good or better than any 2006 car which was competing for your $$ back when you bought it. The Sonata's high resale value as a percentage of original purchase price will result because of its generous list of standard equipment, style, performance, reliability, actual and perceived quality, good dealer service, rebates which lowered its purchase price, and the fact that many will still have factory warranty left for the new owner. Also, by then the price of a new 2010 Sonata will not be the same smoking bargain it was back in 2006. (Remember back in 1989 when a brand new Lexus LS 400 was only $36,000 MSRP? It was a better car but undercut the established competitors' prices by 20% or so. But in five years or so, that huge price advantage was evaporating.)
And a slight difference in gas mileage between two cars means ABSOLUTELY nothing. Obviously people drive what they like more than what they think is more efficient.
Here is just one cite:
According to Jeff Plungis / Detroit News Washington Bureau:
EPA will continue to use the same test it has used since the 1970s. Known as the "federal test procedure," it is run inside a lab, on a dynamometer, at a maximum speed of 55 mph, with the air conditioner off.
This entry is directly from the 2005 EPA pamphlet:
Each vehicle in this guide has two fuel economy estimates.
City represents urban driving, in which a vehicle is started in
the morning (after being parked all night) and driven in stop and-
go rush hour traffic.
Highway represents a mixture of rural and interstate highway
driving in warmed-up vehicles, typical of longer trips in free flowing
traffic.
EPA miles-per-gallon (MPG) estimates are based on lab testing
and are adjusted to reflect real-world driving conditions for an
average U.S. motorist. Vehicles are tested in the same manner
to allow fair comparisons.
According to JOSEPH B. WHITE, Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL:
The EPA said methodology used to calculate city and highway gasoline mileage estimates includes a highway mileage segment, during which vehicles average 48 miles per hour. The EPA method assumes motorists spend 55% of their time in city driving.
And: The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a Washington-based trade group, spokesman Eron Shosteck said "Current (EPA) test procedures provide motorists with generally reliable estimates of what their gas mileage will be... They take into account various factors that motorists may encounter in typical driving situations, in both city and highway traffic."
Here's my original statement:
The Sonata has not only a higher torque peak, but at a much lower rpm than the Honda. So, if both cars are being driven at that same lower rpm, the Sonata should have much more power unless the transmission downshifts.
Is it that with which you still disagree?
(What made me wonder was that you kept giving examples of performance based on high rpm situations, such as when you floor the gas and make the transmission downshift. And that was not in line with my original statement.)
Performance
0 - 60 Time (seconds)
1/4 Mile Time (seconds)
1/4 Mile Speed (mph)
Braking 60 - 0 mph (ft.)
Hyundai Sonata GLS - V6 3.3L (235 hp) 5A + ABS 7.25 15.61 93.60 132
Hyundai Sonata GL - I4 2.4L (162 hp) 5M (no ABS) 8.44 16.67 86.10 No data
Hyundai Sonata GL - I4 2.4L (162 hp) 4A + ABS 9.67 17.30 83.80 138
Might pick one up Monday.
Any problems to watch for? I test drove one today that seemed to need a wheel balance. Kind of a shuddering above 55....
You worry about gas money, and have to buy GL. I don't think you can afford a Corvette.
Live your life as you want to be. I will live my life as I want to be.
Motor Trend did a comparison test between the Honda Accord EX V6, Ford Fusion SEL V6, Hyundai Sonata GLS V6 and Toyota Camry LE V6 in their December issue that just hit the newstands The Sonata ended up in third place, but at least it beat out the Camby. 0-60 in 6.8 seconds, that's amazing for a mid-sized sedan, IMO. The Accord managed the same test in 6.6 seconds, but the cheaper price of the Sonata more than makes up for that .2 seconds.
GLS V6 last night, and we headed for the casino. Only a one hour
trip, but I had a terrible cramping type pain from upper thigh to knee.
I noticed I had the seat all the way back, even though I am only 5'8".
And I had the seat down the lowest possible. Anyone have any ideas
for adjusting the seats, or should I get some kind of cushion.
BTW, the seat adjustment felt fine on my 15 mile test drive. Of course,
they may have changed it when they went through pre-delivery.
A higher seating position is more comfortable for most people. Also try moving the seat a bit forward. "All the way back" seems a stretch for someone of your height, unless you have exceptionally long legs in proportion to your total height.
or back. But I raised it up, and moved it forward, so I'll see what happens
tomorrow, when I go on a 300 mile trip. Thanks for the help.
Two hundred miles so far, and have found no problems. I've gone over it pretty
well, and have not found any missing pieces or anything else. No rattles, or hesitation going into any gear. Discovered the little hook by passenger seat, which is great for litter bag. So far I am impressed with the build quality, but will see how this trip goes. Since I got this car for more comfort on these 300 mile trips to
see my grandkids, I sure hope I can adjust the seat so it feels better than
it did last night.
On my two Elantras, I set the front height all the way up, then use the back knob (manual) to tilt the cushion just the angle I like it. I prefer to have the front raised up relative to the rear, for better thigh support. Also, that way, with the seat higher, I can move the seat a little more forward, for a more comfortable reach to the pedals and wheel (and giving more room in the back seat).
Check it out again and tell us if you found a comfortable position.
What is it you have against faster family sedans? Power is good to have, especially if you need it sometime. Lots of people welcome the extra power and don't begrudge the lower gas mileage of the V6 compared to the I 4.
BMW, Daimler-Chrysler, Cadillac, Lexus, Toyota, Infinity, Jaguar and many other makes have fast family sedans. Why shouldn't Hyundai have 200 or 300 or 400+ horsepower too?
It's almost as if you think it is a noble gesture to buy the 4 over the 6. It is not.
Or maybe owning the 4 cylinder is just an ego thing?
I just don't get it. Let each buy and enjoy what he likes.
The worst thing about the GL and GLS Sonatas is that the seat cushion in not independently adjustable for height at the front AND rear of the cushion.
The Elantra seats are much better in that regard. But when the new Kia Spectra came out, it had the same non-adjustability that the Sonatas (except the LX) have now.
It is a deal breaker for me. No GL nor GLS for me. Possibly an LX. But I really want to take the Azera for a ride before buying anything.
You can verify for yourself that the manual seat has two seat-height adjustment knobs by looking at TSB 05-80-003, which covers the installation of manual seats. There is a picture on p. 1 showing the two knobs. The TSBs are available on the Hyundai Service Tech website, http://www.hmaservice.com/ (need to register to use).
But no, the manual simply says you use the lever to raise, or lower the
seat. In an LX though, you can raise or lower the front or the back. Maybe
I should have gone for the LX. But almost every review I've seen, here and
other places say that the seats are comfortable. I do have a cushion I
will take, just in case. I drove cross country in my 2000 Accord 3 years ago,
had no problems with the seat, but it was a power seat, with front and
back adjustability, as well as lumbar, and side support. I wish I had
that seat in the Sonata. The 2000 Accord LX-V6 cost about 2 grand
more than my current sonata. But I sure wish I had taken a 100 mile
road test before buying.
Every vehicle ever invented was raced shortly thereafter.
Some guys just like it.
I never received any letter recommending 91 octane.
I think that would hurt Hyundai if they started suggesting that.
I am not getting the best of gas mileage. I only have 2600 miles on it, hopefully it will improve with mileage.
This has happened about 4 times in the first 2500 miles. The noise is a one, or two whump noise when it does happen.
I looked uder the car - can see no marks to indicate it was hit with anything. I'm stumped. Will be bringing to dealer for first maintenance check, so will bring up this item.
Car is very quiet - I do not notice any road noise associated with the tires that others have spoken about. I do, however, notice that the wind noise on the passeger side - by the mirror - is much too loud.
Anyone else with these issues?
Any other advice anyone?
I noticed a similar effect for the first time today. I was carrng a bicycle in the trunk with the rear seats down and the sunroof open. At city driving speeds of 40 to 60 kpm I experienced a strong thrumming feeling that was very uncomfortable. I guess the resonance was changed by the larger volume of air with the trunk included. This has never happened before to me with any window/sunroof settings.