By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I hope Honda takes note of all the posts about this and fixes it soon. Maybe shorten up the handle an inch or so? Or move it over to the passenger side of the console?
My dent doctor confirmed with me that Honda has the worse sheetmetal in the business.
You can get the acorn dings cheaply fixed wiht PDR paintless dent removal. My entire MDX had over 300 dings from hail all PDR and perfect...
Not sure I would make that statement either. The 06' Civic has been out for what , two months? Even though Edmunds provides links for the 06 Civic the data used could be skewed. Or they could have been comparing the outgoing model??? And it's also only one organizations perspective.
And no they didn't make a mistake and compared the 2005 model, and yes its only one website, the website you are posting on so give some respect to it.
Give it a few months & I will ask you again what you had predicted?
As for the edmunds saying that the '06 Civic is the "best thing since sliced bread".. Kind of premature for that, sounds like Honda paid them off to say this just to hype up sales. Have you seen their review of the Mazdaspeed 6? Just a rehash of a news release. Edmunds has a knack for that lately. Kind of sad.
Fact is, it will take some time for the truth and REAL owners (not some marketing scheme) to speak out about how they like or dislike the new '06 Civic..
But for all this "Civic is better than tC".. They both have decent features.. Some like the Civic better, others prefer the tC.. Neither is bad..
---------------------
I looked at the Mazda, and went for the Civic instead. Better looking in my opinion, no matter if the Mazda is a little faster. No big deal for me since we still have speed limits in this country, and the reliability factor of the two goes to the Civic way over the Mazda.
As far as the other poster stating that the different tinting may mess with the Nav system, I doubt it. The Nav receiver is ontop of the car next to the rear window and should not be a problem. The radio antenna is in the window itself.
2005 Accord LX $17,500 (Auto)
2006 Civic LX $17,700 (Auto)
The Accord seems like a better deal to me, since the gas mileage that my sister gets with her Accord EX Auto is about 28 mpg in 95% city driving.
What am I not looking at?
As far as comparisons user, even though a link was provided for the 06' Civic as stated before limited data points to an unreliable review. If you prefer the TC over the Civic thats great, Toyota products are some of the best on the road today. I personally wouldn't compare the two, TC is only available in a coupe and gets worse fuel economy, Camrys and Corollas fair much better in that department. A better comparison may be the Civic SI to the TC.
The factors that decided me in favor of the Civic were:
(1) Better mileage (30/40 vs 24/34)
(2) Shorter and easier to park (177 vs 191)
(3) At least as smooth a ride
(4) Dashboard, especially the digital speedometer
(5) Very nice interior
The factors in favor of the Accord (all standard on the SE trim line) were:
(1) Alloy wheels
(2) Rear disc brakes rather than rear drums on Civic
(3) Better CD changer (6 vs 1)
(4) Greater weight of 450 pounds should provide some additional safety in a crash.
I am 6'2" and have no problem with leg or head room. The seating is firm but comfortable. I've only put on about 280 miles so far, mostly highway and got 39 mpg on the first tank of gas. Very pleased with the ride stability and relatively low road noise.
The reason I selected the LX over the EX was that all EXs have a moon roof, something I definitely did not want. I would like alloy wheels on the Civic but the cost of replacing the steel wheels seems exhorbitant. I've owned mainly Toyotas, including a Camry, Cressida, Avalon, and 2001 RAV4. Thus far I am very positive on the Honda Civic.
-------------------------------
Right now I really don't know what that do-hicky thing is ontop of the car. Thought it was for the Nav, but now the XM radio thingy is possible. Why not for both I wonder ? A small thin antenna in the rear glass for the Nav is a question mark, when I see hand held Nav systems that have a larger and thicker antenna, which makes me think the antenna ontop is for the Nav. Anyone know for sure ?
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
GPS antenna is inside the car on the dash near the bottom of the windshield.
XM needs a stronger signal to work reliably, so they put it outside the car.
I hate when people make me think.
05 Honda Odyssey ($33k loaded one) was $220 with same company. Civics must be high loss rate and Odyseey must be a real low loss rate considering it costs twice as much and insurance is 50% less!!!!!!
When you buy a car you buy the other people that drive that car as a major factor toward the rate. That is why a toyota Avalon is so cheap to insure for instance.
What is the name and address of the dealership who quoted you that price? That sounds like a really good deal to me.
This seems like the best site I have found for a real performance rating of the Civic EX coupe...
Does 0-60 in the 8.2-8.5 second range sound right to you ?
Plus, to those saying earlier that the engine seemed more powerful that 140 hp, their test seem to indicate 150-155 hp and 135-138 lbs-ft of torque...
Does anyone else have similar numbers ?
IMHO, the sedan looks much better
about 25,000 vehicles affected. The vast majority of them haven't been sold yet. Call you dealer for details