Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I would consider the backup camera, though. Some times a small enhancement like that can make the whole ownership experience a lot better.
Example - I hated the high-profile tires on my Forester, but a Plus One set of rims with lower-profile tires fixed that and really let me enjoy my Forester's handling better. I've had it now for 8+ years!
-juice
it cant look up phone address
and I will consider the rear camera where would one get that?
phone numbers are like all other factory navs and only has businesses. its on the SECOND page of the destination input page is an enter phone number.
Link is on the left (and yes, we really are having one tonight, unless this post jinxes the server).
Steve, Host
I can't find it now, in fact I can't find the entire CarTech Blog? Anyone?
Here's another one on E-bay, not the same:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5781736918&category=32826
-juice
Steve, Host
not much else there but stuff on reseting your position if your NAV is off. and some test functions.
I've had several things plugged in simultaneously and have not had anything blow to date. TransPod FM transmitter for iPod (which also charges it), 2 phone adapters and radar detector all active most all of the time with nary a problem.
I have experimented with mid-grade fuel for a couple of months and my mileage has indeed dropped off a couple of points. Now that the $$ of gas is coming down, I am switching back to high grade premium and expect to get those MPG's back up a bit. Still, it's not great...
I have posted my woes with the rear hatch lift arms on the Subaru B9 Tribeca: Problems & Solutions Forum. My dealer says that Subaru is looking for a new vendor with a stronger part to replace these. Meanwhile I just duck :-)
As far as the seat comfort, I have read this several other places and I don't get it...I have driven nearly 12k miles and am always very comfortable (I have arthritis), as are my passengers. The lack of telescoping wheel might be the most significant contributing factor to some of the driver's discomfort, I think.
As for the Nav, the more you play with it, the more you'll figure it out. I haven't had too many problems with it, and it's been a joy and a blessing to have. I just figure it's smarter than I am :confuse:
One good thing I keep reading in various places is that the resale value is still quite good. If you want to trade, you shouldn't have too much trouble finding a buyer.
Good luck with all of this... -Karen in AZ-
When exiting, the bolster is too soft and collapses as you swivel to get out causing the hard plastic trim panel to cut into my thigh.
The Subaru regional manager that approved the in warranty replacement of my fog lights offered the same complaint.
The seat's poor design is more noticeable with men or larger drivers, Men in general have bigger butts and the seat is designed for a cute tush and men and larger woman who weigh more are victim of the collapsing bolster.
The lack of a telescoping steering wheels also makes apparrent the fact that the seat needs more adjustment.
Craig
Sales are looking good, as most here expected, unfortunately SIA had around 1,200 Tribecas damaged in last weeks tornado, so that could cause some delivery delays to dealers.
i see that liberty subaru is selling them from $25,950
Unless the non-Subaru version of the nav unit was available to copy a patch! I did something similar on the first industrial control computer about 50 years ago (same basic hardware as an existing office computer that came from the same source).
Any good software geeks listening?
Craig
The Canadian MRSP for B9 is from U$ 36,000 = C$ 42,000.
The difference is exactly U$ 10,000 = C$ 12,000!
Usually Canadians don't get huge discounts as Americans do.
Wow. Wow. Wow. I just envy American customers. You guys are just lucky.
these are TORNADO damaged vehicles (paint job, maybe glass, is damaged).
John
There is one person looking at building a tie into the rear A/V but at the head unit but that is a custom installation. The factory radio / Nav has no built in support for XM radio. probably get that next year model?
I spoke the factory rep and told him about the cheap cargo cover, the fog lights cracking, and the rear hatch struts not working in cold weather. he said thanks for the ummm feedback. but did say he will take the info back to the product people at subaru. I figure the more they hear from different sources the better.
does it need a little WD40???
CRaig
Is that a word? :confuse:
$26k is a deal if they fixed 'em to pass a safety inspection and they were never totalled in the first place.
Even so, that's risky, you never know the full extent of the damage.
-juice
I'm suprised these are finding their way onto the market.
$26k is tempting, but that's a lot of money to spend on an unknown quantity. Resale will be awful, too, if you end up not liking it.
-juice
If they are only paying a small or modest portion of the cost - then the factory would have to eat millions if they scrap the cars out.
If the insurer paid SOA their full cost, then the insurer owns the cars and has the right to sell.
Very often they would negotiate with SOA to sell them through their network at a reduced price and the insurer then pays SOA the difference
I would think that other than physical body damage exclusions these cars would be covered under a factory warranty on the power train. It was a tornado after all not a flood.
Oh I realize that. But if the insurer is paying Subaru the full cost, then the vehicles should be sold with salvage titles and no warranties because they are totalled.
In the case mentioned, it's being sold without a paint warranty. That alone raises warning flags for me. If the vehicle was repairable, it should have a full warranty. It should also be sold at market price - not discounted of course. After all, manufacturers repair defects at the factory all the time.
Craig
Yes minor line defects are repaired not physical damage. It would be impossible for a factory to repair physical damage at a reasonable price and even if they could which they can't do it without totally disrupting their manufacturing operations causing chaos, quality problems and on an on.
It is unlikely the insurer paid the full price but even if they did that fact does not mean the car is a total loss in the terms you mean. It just means that it is cheaper than fixing it. Remember a car that has a sticker price of say $30,000 probably has a bill of materials cost with labor of no more than 10 or 12K.
So they get say 10K for the damage - discount it 10K with a limited warranty and everyone can get a deal.
It's call making lemonade from lemons.
You do the math.
No I am not - are you?
I find it hard to accept that paint and body damage isn't fixed at the factory prior to shipping. I know that dealers do it all the time so I would expect the manufacturer to do it as well. I'd be happier if it were fixed at the manufacturing plant as opposed to the local body shop.
I realize it's not a total loss in the way we see it but I find it hard to believe that the insurer would pay off the BOM cost of $10-12K and let Subaru keep the vehicle and sell it.
It all about dollars, efficiency and quality control - non of which are improved by putting tornado damaged products back in your factory.
-Karen in AZ-
-Karen in AZ-
-Curious Karen (now in AZ)-
I am sure this not case of superfical damage. Also who knows what the discount range is. I would be surprised if all vehicles have the same discount. For my purpose $10K was for illustrative purposes.
Of course the physical damage would cost less than the $10K discount being offered.
Who in their right mind would buy a damaged vehicle if the repair cost was equal to the discount.
American manufacturers have ethics and will not or can not lie about what happened to the car.
They just want to get the problem behind them - so they come up with a number they can live with and hopefully the public will accept.
It is really very logical.
Apparently the paint damage was only visible with a special light (black light maybe?), but it was enough that they could not honor the paint warranty, and it had to be sold as a used car.
-juice
I presume you meant an automotive manufacturing plant and that is what I geared my answer towards. If not, then yes I am somewhat familiar with the workings of modern manufacturing plants. Rework of products is common int he industries I'm familiar with as opposed to scrapping or selling seconds.
I still can't see why Subaru would risk it's reputation selling "new" vehicles that have been repaired without a warranty - even at a discount. Insurance is there to cover incidents such as these and write-offs cover what insurance doesn't. I have a feeling these vehicles are being resold by the insurance company at auction. In that case, Subaru has no control over them,
-juice
That I understand. What I don't understand is the lack of a warranty. If the damage is minor, the factory should be able to repair it and offer a complete warranty. As I noted, dealers often have bodywork done when the vehicle is damaged upon arrival - many times without the need to disclose it. If it can be done well at the dealer, then the factory should be able to do an even better job.
I'm starting to lean more to that it's the insurance company selling the vehicles at auction and dealers are picking them up on the cheap.
I'll post to Terry and ask.
-juice
Ah juice - when was the last time you were in a body shop? I unfortunately have had a few incidents in the past couple of years and all the paint was allowed to cure in a heated booth.