Volkswagen Passat 2006+

1171820222345

Comments

  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    How long of a time are you talking about?
  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    Point.
    However, when they mix the option packages up, they may take away the manual too. :mad:
  • cllawcllaw Member Posts: 32
    It is more then 10 sec... I have a 97 saab in the past and I feel that the new Passat take even longer time to crank up... it really concern me because the last 2 "cranks" are very loud.... seems like the car need an "extra push" to start up. I understand if it is a 97 car, but for a new car... this is something fishy. what do you think rwatson?

    Thanks for your help ;)

    Alex :confuse:
  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    I think it's time to see the service dept. I asked, thinking it was maybe 2 or 3 seconds longer than most cars, because VW's tend to do that. But over 10 seconds is not normal.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    I am not quite pleased with my B6 2.0T Passat's faux carbon fiber dashboard trim and would like to replace it with another finish.

    I know that a faux wood trim is available as an option # however, I note that European Highline models have a brushed aluminum finish which is far more appealing look if you have the lighter trim.

    Does anyone know if there is a US supplier who sells such an item? Or can anyone suggest any other alternative. B6 Passat options are scarce right now.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    Has anyone else noted what appears to be a poor fitting of the bottom of the dashboard trim (faux carbon fiber) just below the fuel and temperature gauge extending all the way to the pop-out change tray? The finish is so loose that when pressed with my index finger, it bends very easily.

    I was about to complain about it to my Service Manager when I noticed the same effect on all the models (both 2.0T and VE) on the same dealer lot.

    Has anyone noticed it or brought it to VWoA's attention? Am I being too critical?
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    Has anyone had any experience/feedback to share on the quality and effects of the APR ECU Upgrade for the 2.0T Passat? What part of the warranty is voided?

    I am seriously considering going for it after the 5,000 mile break-in period (recommended).

    With the chip, I can push up performance to 246hp/282lb-ft (91 Octane) or 252hp/303lb-ft (93 Octane). That is phenomenal performance. Fuel economy could improve too. That's for a reasonable price.
  • ivan_99ivan_99 Member Posts: 1,681
    Pretty cool...the APR upgrade for the Passat 2.0T is higher than the A4 upgrade.
  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    I thought they came with that cheesey looking faux brushed aluminum. As for the wood trim, if I'm not mistaken, VW uses real wood.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    I do like the wood finish (real or faux, it matters not) but the center console (which I do not wish to replace) is of a lighter silver faux carbon fiber finish which would be complemented by a brushed aluminum finish. Ultimately, I might have to go for the wood if that's all that will be available. Anyone else know if there's an accessory kit in the offing?
  • cllawcllaw Member Posts: 32
    Agree, and I already schedule an appointment... hoping that it won't take me long to check out. I also notice that there some vibration when I press the brake on the downhill road.... Man, I start getting concern and I will read the lemon law porvsion tonight... the car is great when it runs but it will be a headache when it coems to repair.... Please pray for me and my passat :sick:

    Alex
  • feilofeilo Member Posts: 128
    Has anyone had any experience/feedback to share on the quality and effects of the APR ECU Upgrade for the 2.0T Passat?

    APR is a well-established tuner of Audi/VW engines and they have chipped a bizzilion 1.8T engines.

    What part of the warranty is voided?
    Depending on how mod-friendly you dealer is - from just the ECU (like mine) to the whole engine/car (I have only heard ....). So it boils down to how risk-averse you are.

    With the chip, I can push up performance to 246hp/282lb-ft (91 Octane) or 252hp/303lb-ft (93 Octane). That is phenomenal performance. Fuel economy could improve too. That's for a reasonable price.
    For a turbo engine. chipping provides the best bang/$ IMHO. Tell us how you get on.
  • danpadanpa Member Posts: 27
    What is the procedure for "unchipping" the ECU? How complicated is it, if even possible?
  • feilofeilo Member Posts: 128
    What is the procedure for "unchipping" the ECU? How complicated is it, if even possible?

    On the ECUs where you physically replace the chip, they are socketed so you can replace the performance chip with the stock easily. The other way is to get a spare stock ECU. A lot of the "chipping" these days are done with reprograming the ECU via the OBD port so there is no physical removal of the prgram chip - this of course can be reversed when you re-flash the stock program back.

    Check here for a writeup on chipping.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    Here's the part in the writeup that worries me:

    "For a turbocharged car, tuners will also modify the boost map for more significantly power gains, though over-aggressive turbo tuning will force the compressor to operate outside its optimal efficiency range."

    Does that mean that an increase in the probability of turbocharger damage exists?
  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    Yeah, you're talking about bad medicine there. I imagine you could achieve too much boost. And I imagine there would be the possibility of back pressure across the turbo's impeller, that is if the waste gate doesn't open when it should. In other words, it would have a turbine version of a "backfire" or compressor stall of some sort. And that could mean a shredded turbo charger. Don't know if I'm on the right track with that but, I figure someone has already thought that through.
  • jimvm_jimvm_ Member Posts: 1
    I just signed a lease on a 2006 Passat VE - $0 at signing for $270/mo for 39 months (39,000 miles). I agree with the previous post about the wheels ... my only real complaint about the car is the steel wheels with covers ... it would be nice to have the alloys, but I simply cannot justify the added expense ..... I was told that the lease rate on the package 1 (with alloys) would be $366/mo. This is going on $90 more/mo ... over 39 months this represents nearly $3,600 ... sorry, but I'll live without the alloys for that kind of money.

    In considering other available vehicle options, I felt that the Passat represented the best value for the money. Good exterior looks (w/ the exception of the above referenced wheels), solid feel, good attention to detail, reasonable power, and leather detailing.
  • danpadanpa Member Posts: 27
    Nice deal! Those payments include tax and everything else?

    BTW: leather detailing on the VE--are you sure?
  • vwagossevwagosse Member Posts: 1
    I have been feeling vibrations ( specially from 60 to 90 mph) and getting more road feed back from this 06 passat which I took delivery 3 weeks ago. I previously owned a B5 A4 ( sport package 17") I know how a euro should ride.

    My dealer keeped the car for 4 days ( balanced wheel and change 2 of 4, done alignement, installed winter tires, checked everything). Local Rep. from VW Canada tried it and admited that my car vibrate. :confused: He even confess that is own Passat 2006 vibrates Mine is worst. We even tryed one car stock from the dealer and it vibrates too... They don`t know what to do about this. They submited my case to some engineer From VWOA. Still no news...

    No one seems to talk about this.. Am i the only one with this problem??? Please Help.
  • birdboybirdboy Member Posts: 158
    Currently own a 2002 1.8t. have test driven and like very much the 2.0 t. I have negotiated a good price, I think, and now find out that the small advertising brochure is mostly for the 3.6 6 cyl. I have just found out that the 2.o even with premium pack 2 does not have auto dim mirror( which I can live without despite it being an inconvience and it does not come with fog lights, it is not even an option. The fog lights have been very useful both from a saftey advantage as well as a convience. I find the current headlights on my 2002 not to be bright enough. Please tell me if anyone knows if the headlights have been improved? are they brighter? I drive a lot of dark back country roads. as always, thank you for any info.
  • jazzspotjazzspot Member Posts: 5
    Hey 'birdboy', the lights on my 2.0T are a definite improvement on the headlights I had on my 1999 Audi A6. So for me, the lights are just fine.
  • kris15kris15 Member Posts: 3
    Can we add bluetooth to the Passat 06, 2.0T ? Does it come with a factory installed or dealer installed? The dealer who I visited could not give me a proper answer.
    Anybody has an idea?
  • rayainswrayainsw Member Posts: 3,192
    http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_id=10247&page_number=4

    I have not seen a link to this C+D test here.

    I am pretty impressed with the Quarter Mile time + terminal velocity! (14.3 @ 101)

    As one who drove a Passat W8 for a while, I am now really curious about impressions from owners and \ or road testers of the 3.6.

    Anyone????
    - Ray
    Wondering how VW accomplished this acceleration . .
    2022 X3 M40i
  • ivan_99ivan_99 Member Posts: 1,681
    Wondering how VW accomplished this acceleration . .

    Probably the direct injection...look at the IS350 results.
  • rayainswrayainsw Member Posts: 3,192
    "Probably the direct injection...look at the IS350 results."

    = = =

    Well, yes, in the sense that the direct injection is part of what allows a 12.0 to 1 Compression Ratio and therefore over 250 HP from 3.6L (220 cu. In.) with reasonable torque.

    More specifically, I am wondering how they achieved a higher Quarter Mile trap speed (and the same ET) in C+D’s testing as my 2005 Grand Prix GXP.

    The 2 have very close to the same curb weight (3,600) but the GXP’s 5.3L V8 is rated at 303 \ 323, vs. the VW’s 3.6L rated at 276 \ 266. And 1 could argue that they are 4-door sedans with similar missions – driving enjoyment with accommodations for more than 2 and reasonable fuel economy. And (depending on your view of the amazing $5,500 Sport 2 Option package) they are somewhat similarly priced.

    Biggest difference I see is in gearing. The GXP’s 4-speed automatic, vs. the Passat’s 6-speed and the final drive difference – GXP = 2.93:1, Passat = 3.45:1.

    Interesting too that the Passat’s 14.3 Quarter includes 3 automatic shifts and has the trans. in well into third gear, where the GXP is still in second through the lights.

    And (possibly related) the Passat’s higher EPA ratings – and (much) higher actual C+D observed fuel mileage. (Passat: 19 \ 28 & 20, GXP: 18 \ 27 & 14)

    Just a very interesting comparison \ contrast (to me) of 2 very different approaches resulting in very similar acceleration results . . .
    - Ray
    Pondering the significance . .
    2022 X3 M40i
  • rayainswrayainsw Member Posts: 3,192
    "the trans. in well into third gear"

    Edit: The Passat is well into ** fourth ** gear at the end of the Quarter.
    Sorry.
    - Ray
    Math challenged (obviously)
    2022 X3 M40i
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    "Math challenged (obviously)"

    Nah! What you meant to say was "...the trans. in well into the third gear change" ;-)

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • vwdriver2vwdriver2 Member Posts: 54
    I did inquire about the bluetooth as well and VWOA called me back to tell me that it was now available at the local dealer. The dealer told me that it was about $599 (including installation) and would be incorporated with the control on your steering wheel, if equipped.
  • vwdriver2vwdriver2 Member Posts: 54
    I read a while ago that someone had a problem with starting their 06 Passat 2.0T. Yesterday, I ran into the same problem...It was about 30 degrees the night before and when I tried to start my new 06 Passat...it took like 6 tries to finally get it started...anyone else having problems with starting the car in the cold weather??
  • cllawcllaw Member Posts: 32
    vwdrivers2:

    Mine got the similar thing but my always started up. It just the "cranking time" is unusually long. I need to bring it to Service to check it out since the weather in NYC start getting cold. I think you should do the same and keep us in post ;)

    Good luck

    Alex :)
  • newvwownernewvwowner Member Posts: 2
    I've had my 2006 Passat 2.0T for about 6 weeks now and have not experienced the problem you've described. In fact, when I first had the car - my 1st euro after a succession of Nissan and Mazdas - I would sense acceleration to about 50 MPH and then would glance down to see that I had crept to 70-75 MPH without realizing it. I set the speed alert to 80 now to help avoid tickets.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    Good news! The B6 Passat scored the second highest points (251) in the 2006 European Car of the Year. The Renault Clio III (with 256 points) is rated as European Car of the Year.

    Some posts have been maligning the B6 Passat's quality. I think this award speaks volumes about its positive points. Personally, I hold the European automotive quality control in the highest regard.

    As far as US-available cars, the B6 Passat is the number one car in this category. The BMW 3 Series (4th with 203 points) and the Mazda5 (5th with 198 points).

    http://www.caroftheyear.org/pages/Voting06.htm

    Consider these facts: This is the Passats track record for the European Car of the Year since 1964:

    1989

    Third place with 46% less points than the 1 spot: Fiat Tipo. For US-available cars, the Passat was #1 in this category (#2 spot: Opel Vectra). The Passat appears in the top three for the first time in a quarter century.

    1997

    Third place with 39% less points than the 1 spot: Renault Mégane Scénic. Again, for US-available cars, the Passat was #1 in this category (#2 spot: Ford Ka). The Passat appears in the top three eight years after its first appearance.

    2006

    Third place with only 2% fewer points than the 1 spot - only 5 points less than the Renault Clio. Again, for US-available cars, the Passat was #1 in this category (#2 spot: Alfa Romeo 159). This is the third showing of this car since 1964 - remarkable.
  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    I'm still circling around this thing. I'm giving it some more time for the manual to show up before I make that 100 mile drive. I've been reading these posts about hard starting in cold weather. Now that really amazes me since this machine comes from a country that isn't exactly mild in the winter. I've experienced some summers over there that were several degrees from snowing in July. I find it odd that it wouldn't have this problem de-bugged from it. I just wonder if the turbocharger has something to do with it, being in the direct line of fire of the exhaust.

    But you know what really scares me the most? I make this trip up there to the dealer and end up getting the Jetta GLI. Wrong board, but have you seen and read about this one? Ooooh. It has better option packages and I don't think anyone will look at you like you just jumped off the banana boat for inquiring about the manual either. Edmonds used it to disassemble the accura TSX in their comparo test. Ooooh. I like that one.

    Now, I just gotta figure out which one I like best: The Passat 2.0T at age 40, or the GLI at age 40?

    So at what age is it acceptable to start a mid-life crisis? :)
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    I make this trip up there to the dealer and end up getting the Jetta GLI. Wrong board, but have you seen and read about this one? Ooooh. It has better option packages and I don't think anyone will look at you like you just jumped off the banana boat for inquiring about the manual either.

    An even better comparison with the Passat 2.0T may be the Jetta 2.0T. It's more sedate than the Jetta GLI, but you can get it optioned out in ways you simply can't outfit the 2.0T (including xenons, seat memory, dual-zone climate control, etc.). The new Jetta is very close size-wise to the previous Passat.

    I'm disappointed on the lack of more options in the Passat 2.0T. This has been discussed here at length, so no need to hash deeply into it. To me the main issue is the lack of xenons -- now that I've had them in a leased 9-3, I just don't want to go back to regular headlamps. My nightvision isn't getting any better, sadly. In theory I can add "illegal" ones aftermarket but I'd rather not. There's a shop 135 miles up from Seattle in Vancouver that will put in the European Passat xenons to a 2.0T, but it's very expensive (over $1,500 USD, I believe).

    Otherwise the Passat 2.0T would be the clear choice for me. Nice size, great crash-test results, otherwise nice features, European feel, more than enough power. But for now, I'm shopping another 9-3 or the Jetta 2.0T.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    I was exactly in the same position as you. Age 40. Passat 2.0T or Jetta (except mine was a TDI)? Eventually it came down to this realization: until now, the VW 's I've driven were Golfs, Beetles and Polos. Isn't it about time I deserve to sit inside an elegant car? I've done the pocket-rocket thing -it was fun, sure but 90% of my driving is the commute so I sacrificed the DSG and ended up in a Passat. I have never looked back.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    I just want to set your expectations at a realistic level here. In my experience, vibrations come in two types.
    The first is probably fixed within the first or second visit (re-balancing, rim\tire replacement, steering rack adjustment/replacement).

    The second type ends up in no resolution at all. Eventually even the most accommodating dealer will run out of fix attempts. At this point, it seems, the automotive industry follows the same protocol. The manufacturer goes into a defensive mode. Subsequent test drives with technical specialists will result in the finding that the vibration is a normal operating condition (even if it is plainly obvious that it is not). This is a defensive call to preempt a lemon law case. Invoking a lemon law on a defect the manufacturer does not recognize will drag out the proceedings and wear down the consumer.

    In order to force the manufacturer to acknowledge the defect, NHTSA's Office of Defect Investigation (ODI) requires the public to log a significant number of cases for the same defect to approach the manufacturer. At that point, the manufacturer can voluntarily initiate a recall - the government-enforced recall option would be a PR disaster.

    Good luck with your vibration issues. I was a victim of the type 2 defect with an 04 Nissan Quest. Oddly enough, Nissan voluntarily voided a two year balance on the lease of the car shortly after I informed Nissan of the NHTSA ODI case number I created on-line.
  • jefferygjefferyg Member Posts: 418
    I looked briefly at the Jetta when we were looking for a new car. My brother sells VW's in Memphis and he pointed out to me that I could by a loaded out Jetta for about the same money as a Passat 2.0T with Package One. It was tempting I must say, same payment, even quicker car, more features. The only thing I didn't particularly like about the Jetta was the dash around the stereo and a/c. The Passat is way ahead in this area. But what it really came down to was size.

    The Passat works better for us at 35 with two kids (5 and 7). It's got ton's more room in the back seat than the Jetta and the main reason we were trading is because we were tired of being kicked in the back in our 03 Civic. You can just look at the back doors of each car and see the difference.

    If you have kids of any age or if you and your wife often go out with friends and share a ride, the Passat is probably the better choice. Despite the negative press the cars have recieved from other posters, the only beef I have with ours is that the compass won't calibrate and I hate that ugly litte antenna for the satellite radio. Otherwise, it's perhaps the best car we've ever had.

    Our Passat is smooth, quiet, REALLY FAST, and offers the features that a growing family needs. And I love all the little hiding places for stuff. Believe me, the car is worth the 100 mile drive. We went almost 300 to get ours. :shades:
  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    Jeff (may I call you Jeff?),
    When you went 300 miles, was that to find a VW dealer, or to find the deal you wanted? Don't worry, I will be making a hundred mile journey. My problem is this: I want a fun to drive VW with a manual transmission without having to deal with a dealer telling me they can't (or won't ) get one in. This is what I have dealt with for the past two cars. I feel cheated out of good customer service from this treatment. I also feel cheated out of the car I really want. Why? Because the car is made in Germany by Volkswagen AG. Right now I have a Passat screensaver from the German VW site. It shows a beautiful manual 6-speed shifter, and in the background of that shifter are the controlls for the climatronic system. This means they will load their manual transmission cars, but the company that really over-torques me is telling me I'm not good enough for that option because I want the manual mixer. No,it can't be VWAG. It is VWoA. Now, enter the GLI. Why shouldn't I drool? According to the VW site, the DSG is a stand-alone option. Now, the Jetta grew. From what I understand it is now comparable to the last generation Passat. Is this true? If so, then I already have an 04 Passat 1.8t, so the GLI (notice I don't say Jetta) would be little sacrifice. Maybe I'll wait. Maybe VW will detect something amiss here. Well, then again, maybe I'll find a singing frog too.
    I'm done venting. Hug, anyone? ;)
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
  • birdboybirdboy Member Posts: 158
    My decision to go with the passat 2.o over the jetta 2.0 was very difficult for the reasons mentioned above. I will miss the 12 way seat , however I found the passat seat comfortable, I will not miss dual climate as I never had it on my 1.8, I am beyond disssapointed that both fog lights or zenons are not an option for me as good night lighting is a safety issue where I drive, however I test drove both cars several times at speeds of 70 and found the passat to be much quieter with less wind and tire noise. It also felt alittle more steadfast. The jetta 2.0 was a rocket , however at 50+ years old I felt the passat was better choice for me. Lucky will be the ones that get the options deserved with the passat. My gosh even the new sonata comes with fog lights, dual climate, full power seats, and oh yes auto dim mirror for much less.! However as nice as it drives it does not drive like a VW and there is 0 fun factor..
  • americanyonamericanyon Member Posts: 10
    I bought my '06 Passat about a month ago and put 1,000 miles on it. There's a lot of road noise, vibrations, and rattlings that I can't tell where they're coming from. My Passat has more road noise, vibrations, and rattlings than my '01 Corolla. I love the handling of the Passat, but the road noise really bothers me. Last week, I took my Passat for its first defect. Bad key slot. My Corolla, 94k and never been in a shop.
  • pierpier Member Posts: 79
    Nice post. I wholeheartedly agree with you. In my comparison research:

    The Passat 2.0T had better fuel consumption that the Jetta 2.5. The Passat seats are more comfortable. The doors are wider and open wider as well. I am 6'2" 260 pounds so, ease of mobility is important. Also, the Passat has that device to lean the brake disks during bad weather. What really did it for me is the odd driving position in the Jetta as well as the strange plastic wall where the windshield and the dashboard meet. I understand its purpose: to provide a recess to hide the windshield wipers. The net effect made me feel like I was looking up through the windshield, not down. I guess it hit home then. Why affect a driver's view of the road for cosmetic purposes. The Passat design seems to be more "intelligent". This is all subjective, of course.
  • jefferygjefferyg Member Posts: 418
    Jeff is fine.

    We drove the 300 miles to Memphis, TN b/c that's where my brother who sells VW's lives. If I need service, I have to take my car to either Jackson, MS or Baton Rouge, LA. I called my brother and told him a little about your dilemma. He said to get the dual zone climate control AND 6-speed manual you will have to go with a 3.6. However, I checked vw.com and I can't find any info about a manual transmission, even though my brother says they are available. :confuse: BTW, He said he'd love to talk with you about the car.

    I don't know what the policy is here about sharing information. If the host could enlighten me I'd appreciate it. ;)
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    A 3.6 VR6 and a 6-Speed Manual??? Oh geez, if that's even remotely true, I may have to re-evaluate my next purchase. ;-)

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • jefferygjefferyg Member Posts: 418
    O.K. I just got the low down from my brother. You CANNOT get the manual transmission on the 3.6 in any version. You CAN get a manual on the 2.0T.

    But here's something interesting. He said they just got in a 3.6 4-motion yesterday with Sport package 2 and the paddle shifters on the steering wheel. He said he took it for a "test drive" this morning. He said he started up the ramp onto the freeway and nailed the throttle with the transmission in sport mode. He made 110 in 3rd gear before he got to the end of the ramp GOING UPHILL!!! :shades: He said it shifted into 4th when he let off the gas at the top of the ramp.

    If you have a need for speed and you want it for under 40 grand, VW's got your car.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    "O.K. I just got the low down from my brother. You CANNOT get the manual transmission on the 3.6 in any version. You CAN get a manual on the 2.0T."

    Sorry, not interested. If a new car wants to attract my attention, it needs to sport three pedals under the dash, steering wheel paddles just ain't the same. As for the 2.0T, it cannot be had with a number of options that I really want, and as such it seems that it too is failing to catch my eye.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    my Legacy GT can achieve similar times under 30 grand and you can have 5MT.

    Krzys

    PS Legacy is slightly smaller than new Passat
  • jefferygjefferyg Member Posts: 418
    Yes, but you are talking about the baseline GT in the Subaru. I'm talking about a loaded out Passat. The Passat 3.6 4-Motion starts at $31,900 and has all the same features as a 2.0T with Package 1.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Email me with your questions - I'll be glad to help. Just click on my name to get the address.
  • andrewuandrewu Member Posts: 1
    I've had my Passat for about a month now, and have had several minor problems that have been resolved except for the Sirius satellite radio. Every now and then when I start the car I get a "NO SAT RADIO" message on the screen. Turning radio off and on, restarting car can sometimes bring it back on or sometimes it will work after driving for awhile. It only happens when I initially start the car. If I start the car and the satellite radio is working, it will continue to work the whole time. Anyone else have this problem. Dealer is still trying to find the problem. It isn't losing signal, that is a different message. Thanks for any help. :confuse:
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.