By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
:shades:
Obviously, reliability is not her top priority or she would not be considering a Mini. She will be at the Mini dealer for a lot more than just oil changes
She didn't want a Mini for reliability she wants one because it's Cute. Which is pretty much what I said above. She will NOT be getting a Mini because the dealer is just too damn far away to realistically service it or maintain it.
s far as reliability it's discussed on the Forums but they are generally reliable. They are not however as reliable as a Corolla. I would never buy a Hyundai, ever. I remember them from the early years and that was enough to keep me away from them for good. A long warranty is useless if it's always being repaired! I know lots of people who got suckered into buying one against my advice and only one guy was relatively happy with his and didn't have any major problems. They are disposable cars. No matter how the media spins it.
HYUNDAI
Hope
You
Understand
Nothing's
Driveable
And
Inexpensive
It might be cuter, and more fun driving, than a base Corolla? and if she wants the versatility of a hatchback.
I see that they have gone with standard ABS and six airbags across the line for '09. A very wise move IMO. I am intrigued that in the year 2010 Toyota will still be selling a compact car you can buy with hand-crank windows....
I'm glad they brought the roofline down a bit too. It was edging into clown car territory with the current model, although it wasn't quite there.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
But yes, lower is definitely good for handling. The decent skidpad and slalom numbers demonstrate some of the benefits of that change.
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Mack
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
Good idea, but she will need a car before November. I think that is when the new ones will be released.
If it was coming out in a month I'd probably buy her one and I might even like it if it had the Sport seats in it!
The regular seats are rock hard and uncomfortable for me.
For someone who posts a lot what age are you? Your reading comprehension could use some work! Did you even bother to read where I said the car was for my wife? No apparently not and your stab at me for my Hyundai joke is pretty silly. I mean I have those acronyms for almost every car make out there including makes I own and like myself.
If Hyundai was so great and it isn't. Then why does Toyota sell so many millions more Corollas than Hyundai? Because it is in fact very good at what the designers want it to do. For me I'd probably die of boredom driving it. But my wife is not interested in driving fast or any thing like that and she sure as heck wouldn't buy a Hyundai not after all the grief her friends have had with them.
I'm not a fanboy of any particular brand or car. Some years they are good, other years they bite!
The Corolla is perfect for someone like my wife, that hardly makes it a perfect car.
Come back when Hyundai has sold 30 million of any of their models worldwide and then we'll talk. Sheesh!
:shades:
Let's skip the confrontations and get back to the 09 Corolla, okay? Thanks.
At least, I have never said that Toyota is infallible.
You need not be infallible to be successful.
The crazy thing about the Corolla is that it is engineered to be a B+/B car. Toyota never intends it to earn an A grade, and they have perfected the art of getting a B+/B. Its "faults" are carefully calculated balance of engineering, sales, and profits.
You could even call it an art of engineered fallibility.
I think this is a huge mistake on Toyota's part because the similar-class Honda Civic sedan is such a vastly superior car in many ways, especially with a decent powerful (but still reasonably fuel-efficient) 1.8-liter I-4 engine mated to a very good five-speed automatic (which may become a six-speed automatic at the mid-model change (MMC) coming fall 2008) and an excellent suspension. I believe that Toyota should seriously look at putting in their new 2.0-liter I-4 Valvematic engine mated to a five-speed automatic for the higher-end Corolla models as soon as possible to better compete against the Civic.
When you look at the Japanese market, for instance, the old Corolla was outselling the new Civic by a margin of at least 6 to 1, sometimes as much as 8 to 1. Yes, this was the 9th-gen Corolla versus the current Civic. The vastly superior Civic has been absolutely no match in sales against an old B student called the Corolla. This is from a market where people, in my opinion, are far more sophisticated, knowledge-wise, about automotive technology on the average than in the U.S.
I don't have the exact numbers here, but even in the U.S. market, the current Civic has not toped the numbers that the old Corolla put up, except for a very limited number of months (more like weeks).
This issue has been debated already, but I tend to agree with the proposition that the most members of the driving public really do not care much about the technical gizmos in the way we the enthusasits do. If a 4-speed AT gets as many miles per gallon as a 5- or more-speed AT, that is all that they care about.
Of course, there will be a point in the evolution of technology where the old technology is no longer marketable, in the way the 3-speed AT went away. My guess is that Toyota would very quickly switch over to 5AT (actually, CVT is more likely) for the Corolla, but if and only if the market reaction is such that 4AT is the reason the Corolla does not sell. If it sells fine with 4AT, they will go with it for so long as it is marketable.
I have agree with jacksan1 here that this vehicle is engineered to be the lowest cost and most efficient if not best handling vehicle in the class. The market needs basic and reliable. The others don't really want to satisfy this subsegment so they add features to appeal to the upper-level subsegments. This leaves Toyota and probably Hyundai with the lower and medium level subsegment.
All the players have been doing this for a long time so it's not revolutionary. It's intentional. Toyota may have a hard time breaking into the enthusiast subsegment but Mazda and the others have an equally difficult time cutting their costs to fight for the $16-17000 buyer. This is Toyota's niche. It's just that this niche is the largest of all - up to now.
In this industry everything revolves around volume and Toyota has hogged the greatest part of the volume by cutting cutting cutting yet keeping the reliability rock solid.
From your post:
I don't know who comes up with these upgrade packages, they should just make the stuff standard since just about everybody these days wants cruise and power windows, locks, and mirrors. Now try finding a CE on any lot without the upgrade package.
From a few posts ago:
We've had the standard model in the previous gen with roll up windows am fm radio, and ac. No power mirrors. They sold to the "I don't need that stuff, it's more things that can break" crowd.
I suspect that my prior assumption is true... if people buy a Corolla w/o things like power locks/windows/mirrors etc., it's not because they wouldn't like to have them, but rather that's all the Corolla they can afford. But leaving them off the base Corolla allows Toyota and their dealers to advertise a low "starting at" price, which rises quickly once you add features that almost everyone wants.
1) Those who want power things and are willing to pay for them and buy a well-equipped version;
2) Those who can afford power equipment but don't want to pay for them and buy a stripped version instead;
3) Those who cannot afford power things but want to buy the car and do buy the stripped version.
I have personally been in all three subclasses listed above.
If any Type 2 buyers exist, I think there would be very few of those today, for a 4-door sedan like the Corolla. Especially since it appears from other posts that it is near impossible to buy a Corolla without power windows/locks/mirrors. And there are very few other new cars in its class available without these features.
In CAT
7 o/o 106 CE 5M ( 1801 ) models are strippies ( i.e. no Cruise and no power pckge )
13 o/o 700+ CE 4AT ( 1802 ) models are strippies. ( ditto )
But now with a $1000 rebate these both are lower in MSRP and transaction price than the original 1801s and 1802s that came out back in Feb 2002.
The current gen I have seen one and it was dx'd in for a customer. So I don't think there's a big market for that type of car, that's what's usually advertised as a loss leader to get people in the door. It's our job to sell them that car or move them to the next trim level.
Personally I hated the screamer ads my store used to run. Most people still wanted to negotiate the price. Whenever I ran into that type of customer I would make a quick sale by telling them that is the price no negotiating, I have blue, black, silver and gold available which one would you like to take home?
Mack
I think you are right. We are now at a point when you basically have to special-order a sripped version if you want to hand-crank the windows, if that is an option at all. Does the current iteration of Elantra even offer a hand crank?
Whoops, this is a Corolla thread, isn't it?
There's about 150 dealers and most Corollas turn over in 20-30 days. There are relatively few of them now because the pricing has come down making the effective 'extra' for the power windows and cruise Zero.
However, you are forgetting that Toyota does have a car that satisfies low-cost buyers--the Yaris.
In short, by being "too cheap" Toyota is going to end up losing buyers to the Honda Civic, which is a better car even now with better handling, a good drivetrain, and good-quality interior materials (I've read a few reviews of the new Corolla and there has been complaints about the new interior).
Mackabee :shades:
Cheap plastic complaints that had been more normal to expect in reviews of GM cars.
Toyota interior quality is going down in multiple recent Toyota models.
In the 90's and earlier Toyota frequently had the nicest, highest quality interior materials compared to the competition.
Now the Camry interior is a level below Chevy Malibus and the 2009 Corolla is now going down that same road.
I guess my point is that I wouldn't write the Corolla's interior off just yet, especially since I've not been in it.
The climate controls are taken right out of the Yaris/xB/xD Why they don't use the climate control as on the european and asian versions of the car is beyond me. Take a look:
Very true, Mack. One thing that is nice is the price of cars has remained about the same, at least the Corollas and Camrys that I am most familiar with, but the safety features are way up. Something has to give, or else prices would be up.
The reason the Corolla for the U.S. doesn't have auto climate control is the same reason other cars in this class have features like auto climate control in other countries but not in the U.S.: in other countries, the Corolla is not considered an "economy" car, so folks in other countries are willing to pay more for a Corolla. Here, Toyota needs to keep the price down so the Corolla can fulfill its mission as an economy car. So we get "pizza cover" HVAC controls, lots of hard plastic, roll-down windows on the Standard trim, beam rear suspension and 4AT on most trims, no more faux wood on the LE etc.
Lester
Mackabee
Starting with the Mechanical & Performance & Safety
We have the 1.8L Dual VVT-i ENGINE, Mac struts, front disc/rear drums with ABS, BA, and EBD. Tire pressure monitoring system. Electric power steering. Airbags all the way around except knee airbag. Active front seat headrests. Engine immobilizer.
Exterior: and this is a good one! Color keyed FOLDING outside power mirrors. Color keyed front and rear underbody spoilers, chrome exhaust tip.
Interior: A/C with clean air filter, am/fm/cd WMA/MP3 player with 6 speakers, AUX audio port AND XM Satellite antenna. (still need the add on receiver) Combination meter with illuminated ceremony speedometer with outside temp :shades: display, Tilt and telescoping leather steering wheel.
and the usual 60/40 split rear seats, height adjustable driver's seat, digital clock, in trunk release for seatbacks.,etc,,etc,
Now the options on this car are:
CK, SR, SX, VS, CF which I will decode for you.
CK all weather guard package (also known as cold package) includes heavy duty heater with rear seat heater duct, Anti-chip tape and Color keyed heated outside mirrors.
SR tilt and slide power moonroof
SX sport package, inlcudes 16" alloy wheels with p205/55/r16 tires, rear deck spoiler, power windows with drivers side one-touch down, Remote keyless entry w/key transmitter, cruise control
VS vehicle stability control with traction control and cut-off switch
CF carpet floor mats
this one is being built in Cambridge Ca
Mack
An XLE will look very similar sans the body kit and spoiler.
It appears that in the standard equipment the XM antenna is standard but there's no word on the actual receiver.
Options: CL, EJ, CK, SR, VS
CL .. Cruise Ctl
EJ .. JBL 6CD, w/ 8 speakers and XM with a 90 day trial subscription; Bluetooth with steering wheel audio controls and hands free controls ( BT)
CK .. All weather guard package
SR .. Tilt/Slide Moonroof
VS .. VSC + Trac w/ disable switch
CF .. Carpeted floor mats
Pricing .. TBA
Lester
Dang!
On a separate note, can you get Sirius in a new Toyota, or is XM the only sat option?
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
http://xmradio.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=1527
I like having traffic service available, but not being able to control anything by voice makes it much less useful. You will have to pull over and park to do everything since Toyota locks out the buttons when driving and you can't just give a command by voice like "nearest gas station" or "nearest fast food" when you need to find places to stop on long road trip.
mack, kdh - what are the codes for leather and NAV, and which models will they be available on? from Toyota's materials, it seems like both options will be available on S, XLE, XRS, and I hope thats so.
lls57 - maybe I'm the only one confused, but what do you mean "remote trunk release'? If you mean a button on the keyless entry fob to open the trunk, I don't see a reason why the new Corolla wouldn't have this. Doesn't the 2008 remote keyless have this feature?
Lester
Leather is normally LA and the Navi option is normally NV that is unless they are grouped together in a specific Upgrade Package.
Initially it appears that the entire first wave is without Leather or Navi.