Mazda's delivery charge on several other vehicles is $560, exactly the difference between $23,750 and $24,310. That explains the discrepancy in the FWD Sport's base price.
Just wondering where did you get these prices from? I heard the base price for a FWD Sport model is $23,750.
I'm affiliated with Mazda, thats where I got the numbers from. And, yes, I included destination, $560 as far as I know. If it's not $560, I'll let you know what it might be. I don't know why web sites post MSRP numbers without destination? When you get to the dealership, it's on the sticker. Makes no sense
Okay since you're affliated with Mazda.. Are they letting people sit in the cx7 at the detroit auto show? or just going to put it on a pedestal and not let people get close???
Do you happen to know the difference between 'sport' and 'touring'?
Sport: AM/FM/CD audio and digital, 4 speaker sound system, cloth seats, power windows with one touch open/close fromt windows, carpeted floor mats, center console armrest with lockable mulitfunction storage compartment, power door locks, keyless entry, AC, 12 volt power outlet, adjustable outboard rear seat headrests, front/rear cupholders, 6 way manual adjustable drivers seat. There are a few more standard features, but, I really don't think there is a need to list them.
Touring: Leather trimmed seat upholdstery, leather wrapped steering wheel, leather wrapped shift knob, 8-way power adjustable lumbar support, driver and front passenger heated seats, retractable cargo cover.
Grand Touring: Exterior: Heated body colored side mirrors, chrome door handles, Xenon HID low beam headlights with manual leveling, fog lamps, auto on/off headlights. Interior: GT leather trimmed seat upholdstry with sport seat stripe, GT interior trim accents, Electroluminescent gauges, automatic climate control, exterior temperature thermometer, indirect blue cabin illumination, leather wrapped steering wheel with piano-black accents
maybe I should clarify, I work for a Mazda dealer, not MNA. lol....I hope they let people get in it. They might because it is a production vehicle, not a concept.
I appreciate your well described note regarding differences between the sport, touring & G.Touring. One las thing, do you know the length of the CX-7? Again, thanks.
This CX-7 seems real pricy. It is far too easy to get the price north of thirty grand. I mean my goodness, it doesn't give that much of a performance advantage. $30K + is a good deal of money. The Pontiac Torrent which I think is a direct competitor as a premium CUV ranges between $23K and $30K.
Has anyone seen any sort of acceleration or handling numbers on the CX-7 yet? I'm amazed that it's available and no magazine has tested it yet.
Are they actually on dealer lots yet? I went to the Mazda site today and it showed a ton of them (90 or so) in the Atlanta area, but I didn't know if that meant they're in stock or just on their way?
Is it me or does the CUV only have 244hp but the pricing seem to have at least 350hp? I mean that price climbs like a mountain goat. The great thing is that EVERYTHING is an option. You want this, but not that, no problem. You want a foglights, a power seat, and satelite radio... no problem. You want the foglights and power seat, but want a 6 disc changer instead of the satelite... no problem. You don't care if you have to adjust your own seat, just give you a 6 disc and remote car start, that's okay too. Gotta love the variations.
Hello everyone and after viewing some great photos of the upcoming CX-7 I would have to say again that I love the front which resembles the RX-8 with the sweeping fenders. The side and rear are somewhat mundane to my eyes and break no new ground. It seems that the design team must have run out of money after doing the front end. I am sure that the CX-7 will be fun to drive and I look forward to it.
The knockout factor for me is the turbo four. Who would want a turbo four powering a 3800 hundred pound vehicle. The fact that manufactures do not offer turbo engines anymore says a lot about their durability. Mazda would have done better by charging more and offering a six cylinder in my opinion. They were probably trying to save money so they could offer the CX at a lower price point than the competition. I also hate that rotary engine that Mazda uses in the RX-8 which has no torque, gets lousy gas milage and has been plaqued with bugs. Mazda needs a great six cylinder.
The RAV4 in the base version offers everything that the CX-7 offers except the side and curtain airbags. If one likes the styling of the RAV4 it is a cant miss for about $21,000, for a base model and 30 MPG on the highway. Toyota rocks for resale value and great ergonomics, durability, etc.
The Murano to my eye is a much more attractive vehicle than the CX-7 even after four years on the road. The VQ engine in the Murano has been consistantly rated as one of the top engines ever made by Wards Automotive. To my eyes the Murano is a much more upscale looking vehicle for about $3000,00 more, probably less money because of incentives. The Murano also has 82 cubic ft of storage space compared to the CX-7 which has 58 cubic ft. Mazda does have a better standard warranty though and this model is made in Japan which is a plus. The Murano had the best month ever for sales last month with over 8000 units sold which is amazing give that it has been out for four years.
There is such an proliferation of exciting new models in this crossover categories we have a lot to look forward to.
Who would want a turbo four powering a 3800 hundred pound vehicle..
if the HP and torque is there does it really matter how it happens?? Of course we all know folks who need a big V8 on the side of the vehicle to help with their ego..LOL
The fact that manufactures do not offer turbo engines anymore says a lot about their durability
Before you make such a strong statement of fact you might want to consider that Mazda, Saab, Volvo, Audi, VW, Ford, Chevy, Porsche, Subaru, renault, peugeot, Alfa Romeo, etc are currently selling turbo's
Since you mentioned that the Nissan engine is one of Wards automotive rated engines..than I'm sure your aware that the Mazda 2.3 DI is also listed as one of Ward's 10 best engines and that 4 of the ten are turbo's.
It seems that CX-7 may not be suitable for you. Someone has already answered your question about the turbo engine several days ago, I suggest you to read these answers first.
Has anyone seen any sort of acceleration or handling numbers on the CX-7 yet? I'm amazed that it's available and no magazine has tested it yet.
Are they actually on dealer lots yet? I went to the Mazda site today and it showed a ton of them (90 or so) in the Atlanta area, but I didn't know if that meant they're in stock or just on their way?
No performance numbers yet.
Also, dealers have ordered their alocation last month, so, some will show on dealer websites. They will no be in showrooms until late March, early April
hi everyone, I really like the looks of the CX-7 but still think it's a bit pricey (starting over $24000). I saw photos of the Buick Enclave & Ford Edge for the first time today and really like what I see there too. Any idea what those 2 are going to run (cheaper or more than the CX7)? Many thanks!
Have you looked at the anticipated prices of the Acura RDX? It seems like a direct competitor with a "turbocharged and intercooled 2.3-liter, four-cylinder i-VTEC mill makes 240 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque" RDX
The RDX is estimated to start in the mid 30's. I prefer the styling of the CX-7 and the engine specs are strikingly similar. At over 10k more, I don't see how Acura expects to compete, although acura has better brand reputation. If the CX-7 and RDX are similarly equipped, it's a no brainer.
These cross overs are getting out of control. The pricing is unbelievable. I don't see why I'd buy the Acura at $10K more for something the is basically the same size and same speed. I don't think that the Acura's interior will be that much more luxurious. I think the CX-7's starting price is way high as well. Starting at $22K or $23K with destination would be reasonable. Somebody has got to draw the line. I hope the Ford Edge is priced more compeitively. I don't know why anyone buys a Murano at the price they sell for. What is the Hyundai Sante Fe going to come in at. This should get interesting.
Starting at $22K or $23K with destination would be reasonable.
Holding new car prices to a "resasonable" standard would eliminate half the models for sale today.
Mazda is promoting their new vehicles as ones that you will enjoy driving. The Mazda3 is consistently rated top of class. It costs more than other vehicles in the class, but the result is a great driving car with styling and features that some people are attracted to.
The CX-7, and the Kabura concept, seem to be aiming for the same fun to drive with style mix.
Make sure you compare similarly equipped vehicles, lets say if the RDX is priced at around $30,000 as suspected the Mazda similarly equipped would run pretty much the about the same price. Acura sells there cars loaded, then goes from there, not to mention it will have SH-AWD. I personally prefer the CX-7 and I honestly think that its price is better then I suspected. I am shocked that people think it is over priced.
I wonder where you get your information about release in the 4th quarter of 2006.. That doesn't agree at all with the other information that Mazda has released.. It's in March/April.. not fall..
Mazda is promoting their new vehicles as ones that you will enjoy driving. The Mazda3 is consistently rated top of class. It costs more than other vehicles in the class, but the result is a great driving car with styling and features that some people are attracted to.
Totally true. Mazda's slogan and is "always the soul of a sports car" Also, with the new pricing of the 2006 Honda Civic, the Mazda3 is no longer considered too expensive. If you take both cars and do a comparo with the same options, they are the same price, and, in some instances, the Mazda3 is better equiped at a lower price!
I don't see the CX-7 pricing as excessive. The key for me is what does the vehicle offer as std equipment at $24K. Mazda offers a high level of equipment at this price. Step up to a $26K Touring model and I'll have everything I need. Just avoid the "Technology Package". This is $4K that pushes the car into another league. I'll spend my $26K for a CX-7 Touring when I find one with the right colors.
Right, however if the RDX is starting in the mid 30's, I don't think the price of the CX-7 will reach that point even fully loaded.
The CX-7 seems to have a touch screen nav system while the RDX has this funky iDrive like knob to control it from the video clip. Touch screen seems more intuitive to me. SH-AWD seems interesting for RDX and both have almost identical specs for the engine so they might have similar driving characteristics. We won't know that until we get some test drives. Anyone know the epa mpg of the RDX?
CX-7 does have keyless entry and rear view camera, two things that I didn't see in the RDX press release. However, the RDX does advertise an aux in jack. Hopefully Mazda will spend the $0.30 to add a jack in a future model.
The CX-7 looks really nice. My wife is in love with the vehicle so if it drives nicely we'll probably be getting one (we're going to be in the market for one later next year). I don't mind paying more for a crossover if it offers the features I want. We've got a CRV right now and it was cheap, but its a complete piece of crap. I'll never buy another Honda SUV (but that's another story).
The car looks great from front, quarter, and side views, but the rear view is unfortunate IMO. Mazda absolutely did the right thing to avoid using a stinking Ford engine. Being based on the Mazda6 chassis is a good thing as long as they have remedied the Titanic-like turning radius of that model. Having been driving a Volvo S80 for the past six years with an abysmal turning radius (and wretched reliability), I'm looking for something easier to maneuver in tight quarters. If the CX-7 can turn a lot shorter than the Mazda6 chassis its based on, I'll consider buying one. Another caveat for any Mazda car is resale value. The Mazda3 seems to holding its value as well as first-tier Japanese competitors, but you can steal most other Mazda cars as used. Bottom line is they're great buys as used, but depreciation queens for the first owner. I've always been amazed at Mazda's ability to build some of the most compelling niche cars in the market, and miss so badly with their mainstream vehicles. I think the CX-7 will be a benchmark crossover car for them. Good work!
Just got an email from my dealer telling me that they have a few cx7 in stock and i am going to go and test drive one tomorrow morning. I test drove the Rav4 and Highlander this weekend and will let you know how it compares.
Comments
I'm affiliated with Mazda, thats where I got the numbers from. And, yes, I included destination, $560 as far as I know. If it's not $560, I'll let you know what it might be.
I don't know why web sites post MSRP numbers without destination? When you get to the dealership, it's on the sticker. Makes no sense
Sport:
AM/FM/CD audio and digital, 4 speaker sound system, cloth seats, power windows with one touch open/close fromt windows, carpeted floor mats, center console armrest with lockable mulitfunction storage compartment, power door locks, keyless entry, AC, 12 volt power outlet, adjustable outboard rear seat headrests, front/rear cupholders, 6 way manual adjustable drivers seat.
There are a few more standard features, but, I really don't think there is a need to list them.
Touring:
Leather trimmed seat upholdstery, leather wrapped steering wheel, leather wrapped shift knob, 8-way power adjustable lumbar support, driver and front passenger heated seats, retractable cargo cover.
Grand Touring:
Exterior: Heated body colored side mirrors, chrome door handles, Xenon HID low beam headlights with manual leveling, fog lamps, auto on/off headlights.
Interior: GT leather trimmed seat upholdstry with sport seat stripe, GT interior trim accents, Electroluminescent gauges, automatic climate control, exterior temperature thermometer, indirect blue cabin illumination, leather wrapped steering wheel with piano-black accents
For the record, I'm a lousy photographer, so yes - it looks much better in person.
Are they actually on dealer lots yet? I went to the Mazda site today and it showed a ton of them (90 or so) in the Atlanta area, but I didn't know if that meant they're in stock or just on their way?
The knockout factor for me is the turbo four. Who would want a turbo four powering a 3800 hundred pound vehicle. The fact that manufactures do not offer turbo engines anymore says a lot about their durability. Mazda would have done better by charging more and offering a six cylinder in my opinion. They were probably trying to save money so they could offer the CX at a lower price point than the competition. I also hate that rotary engine that Mazda uses in the RX-8 which has no torque, gets lousy gas milage and has been plaqued with bugs. Mazda needs a great six cylinder.
The RAV4 in the base version offers everything that the CX-7 offers except the side and curtain airbags. If one likes the styling of the RAV4 it is a cant miss for about $21,000, for a base model and 30 MPG on the highway. Toyota rocks for resale value and great ergonomics, durability, etc.
The Murano to my eye is a much more attractive vehicle than the CX-7 even after four years on the road. The VQ engine in the Murano has been consistantly rated as one of the top engines ever made by Wards Automotive. To my eyes the Murano is a much more upscale looking vehicle for about $3000,00 more, probably less money because of incentives. The Murano also has 82 cubic ft of storage space compared to the CX-7 which has 58 cubic ft. Mazda does have a better standard warranty though and this model is made in Japan which is a plus. The Murano had the best month ever for sales last month with over 8000 units sold which is amazing give that it has been out for four years.
There is such an proliferation of exciting new models in this crossover categories we have a lot to look forward to.
The XC90 seems to do fine with turbos on a much heavier vehicle.
if the HP and torque is there does it really matter how it happens?? Of course we all know folks who need a big V8 on the side of the vehicle to help with their ego..LOL
The fact that manufactures do not offer turbo engines anymore says a lot about their durability
Before you make such a strong statement of fact you might want to consider that Mazda, Saab, Volvo, Audi, VW, Ford, Chevy, Porsche, Subaru, renault, peugeot, Alfa Romeo, etc are currently selling turbo's
Since you mentioned that the Nissan engine is one of Wards automotive rated engines..than I'm sure your aware that the Mazda 2.3 DI is also listed as one of Ward's 10 best engines and that 4 of the ten are turbo's.
184.1 inches
Turbocharging is on a major comeback!
Are they actually on dealer lots yet? I went to the Mazda site today and it showed a ton of them (90 or so) in the Atlanta area, but I didn't know if that meant they're in stock or just on their way?
No performance numbers yet.
Also, dealers have ordered their alocation last month, so, some will show on dealer websites. They will no be in showrooms until late March, early April
Those of you who have spoken to the Mazda guys must have asked about the upcoming CX-9. Any new information on this model?
B.
The RDX is estimated to start in the mid 30's. I prefer the styling of the CX-7 and the engine specs are strikingly similar. At over 10k more, I don't see how Acura expects to compete, although acura has better brand reputation. If the CX-7 and RDX are similarly equipped, it's a no brainer.
Holding new car prices to a "resasonable" standard would eliminate half the models for sale today.
Mazda is promoting their new vehicles as ones that you will enjoy driving. The Mazda3 is consistently rated top of class. It costs more than other vehicles in the class, but the result is a great driving car with styling and features that some people are attracted to.
The CX-7, and the Kabura concept, seem to be aiming for the same fun to drive with style mix.
B.
Totally true. Mazda's slogan and is "always the soul of a sports car" Also, with the new pricing of the 2006 Honda Civic, the Mazda3 is no longer considered too expensive. If you take both cars and do a comparo with the same options, they are the same price, and, in some instances, the Mazda3 is better equiped at a lower price!
The CX-7 seems to have a touch screen nav system while the RDX has this funky iDrive like knob to control it from the video clip. Touch screen seems more intuitive to me. SH-AWD seems interesting for RDX and both have almost identical specs for the engine so they might have similar driving characteristics. We won't know that until we get some test drives. Anyone know the epa mpg of the RDX?
If the CX-7 can turn a lot shorter than the Mazda6 chassis its based on, I'll consider buying one.
Another caveat for any Mazda car is resale value. The Mazda3 seems to holding its value as well as first-tier Japanese competitors, but you can steal most other Mazda cars as used. Bottom line is they're great buys as used, but depreciation queens for the first owner. I've always been amazed at Mazda's ability to build some of the most compelling niche cars in the market, and miss so badly with their mainstream vehicles. I think the CX-7 will be a benchmark crossover car for them. Good work!
after I put in the color it kicks me out.