By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I'm affiliated with Mazda, thats where I got the numbers from. And, yes, I included destination, $560 as far as I know. If it's not $560, I'll let you know what it might be.
I don't know why web sites post MSRP numbers without destination? When you get to the dealership, it's on the sticker. Makes no sense
Sport:
AM/FM/CD audio and digital, 4 speaker sound system, cloth seats, power windows with one touch open/close fromt windows, carpeted floor mats, center console armrest with lockable mulitfunction storage compartment, power door locks, keyless entry, AC, 12 volt power outlet, adjustable outboard rear seat headrests, front/rear cupholders, 6 way manual adjustable drivers seat.
There are a few more standard features, but, I really don't think there is a need to list them.
Touring:
Leather trimmed seat upholdstery, leather wrapped steering wheel, leather wrapped shift knob, 8-way power adjustable lumbar support, driver and front passenger heated seats, retractable cargo cover.
Grand Touring:
Exterior: Heated body colored side mirrors, chrome door handles, Xenon HID low beam headlights with manual leveling, fog lamps, auto on/off headlights.
Interior: GT leather trimmed seat upholdstry with sport seat stripe, GT interior trim accents, Electroluminescent gauges, automatic climate control, exterior temperature thermometer, indirect blue cabin illumination, leather wrapped steering wheel with piano-black accents
For the record, I'm a lousy photographer, so yes - it looks much better in person.
Are they actually on dealer lots yet? I went to the Mazda site today and it showed a ton of them (90 or so) in the Atlanta area, but I didn't know if that meant they're in stock or just on their way?
The knockout factor for me is the turbo four. Who would want a turbo four powering a 3800 hundred pound vehicle. The fact that manufactures do not offer turbo engines anymore says a lot about their durability. Mazda would have done better by charging more and offering a six cylinder in my opinion. They were probably trying to save money so they could offer the CX at a lower price point than the competition. I also hate that rotary engine that Mazda uses in the RX-8 which has no torque, gets lousy gas milage and has been plaqued with bugs. Mazda needs a great six cylinder.
The RAV4 in the base version offers everything that the CX-7 offers except the side and curtain airbags. If one likes the styling of the RAV4 it is a cant miss for about $21,000, for a base model and 30 MPG on the highway. Toyota rocks for resale value and great ergonomics, durability, etc.
The Murano to my eye is a much more attractive vehicle than the CX-7 even after four years on the road. The VQ engine in the Murano has been consistantly rated as one of the top engines ever made by Wards Automotive. To my eyes the Murano is a much more upscale looking vehicle for about $3000,00 more, probably less money because of incentives. The Murano also has 82 cubic ft of storage space compared to the CX-7 which has 58 cubic ft. Mazda does have a better standard warranty though and this model is made in Japan which is a plus. The Murano had the best month ever for sales last month with over 8000 units sold which is amazing give that it has been out for four years.
There is such an proliferation of exciting new models in this crossover categories we have a lot to look forward to.
The XC90 seems to do fine with turbos on a much heavier vehicle.
if the HP and torque is there does it really matter how it happens?? Of course we all know folks who need a big V8 on the side of the vehicle to help with their ego..LOL
The fact that manufactures do not offer turbo engines anymore says a lot about their durability
Before you make such a strong statement of fact you might want to consider that Mazda, Saab, Volvo, Audi, VW, Ford, Chevy, Porsche, Subaru, renault, peugeot, Alfa Romeo, etc are currently selling turbo's
Since you mentioned that the Nissan engine is one of Wards automotive rated engines..than I'm sure your aware that the Mazda 2.3 DI is also listed as one of Ward's 10 best engines and that 4 of the ten are turbo's.
184.1 inches
Turbocharging is on a major comeback!
Are they actually on dealer lots yet? I went to the Mazda site today and it showed a ton of them (90 or so) in the Atlanta area, but I didn't know if that meant they're in stock or just on their way?
No performance numbers yet.
Also, dealers have ordered their alocation last month, so, some will show on dealer websites. They will no be in showrooms until late March, early April
Those of you who have spoken to the Mazda guys must have asked about the upcoming CX-9. Any new information on this model?
B.
The RDX is estimated to start in the mid 30's. I prefer the styling of the CX-7 and the engine specs are strikingly similar. At over 10k more, I don't see how Acura expects to compete, although acura has better brand reputation. If the CX-7 and RDX are similarly equipped, it's a no brainer.
Holding new car prices to a "resasonable" standard would eliminate half the models for sale today.
Mazda is promoting their new vehicles as ones that you will enjoy driving. The Mazda3 is consistently rated top of class. It costs more than other vehicles in the class, but the result is a great driving car with styling and features that some people are attracted to.
The CX-7, and the Kabura concept, seem to be aiming for the same fun to drive with style mix.
B.
Totally true. Mazda's slogan and is "always the soul of a sports car" Also, with the new pricing of the 2006 Honda Civic, the Mazda3 is no longer considered too expensive. If you take both cars and do a comparo with the same options, they are the same price, and, in some instances, the Mazda3 is better equiped at a lower price!
The CX-7 seems to have a touch screen nav system while the RDX has this funky iDrive like knob to control it from the video clip. Touch screen seems more intuitive to me. SH-AWD seems interesting for RDX and both have almost identical specs for the engine so they might have similar driving characteristics. We won't know that until we get some test drives. Anyone know the epa mpg of the RDX?
If the CX-7 can turn a lot shorter than the Mazda6 chassis its based on, I'll consider buying one.
Another caveat for any Mazda car is resale value. The Mazda3 seems to holding its value as well as first-tier Japanese competitors, but you can steal most other Mazda cars as used. Bottom line is they're great buys as used, but depreciation queens for the first owner. I've always been amazed at Mazda's ability to build some of the most compelling niche cars in the market, and miss so badly with their mainstream vehicles. I think the CX-7 will be a benchmark crossover car for them. Good work!
after I put in the color it kicks me out.