Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
What is your driving style?
What are your driving conditions?
Hilly, flat, heavy traffic, ?? Distance and time for typical commute?
What is your typical load?
Are you using 87 octane GAS? Are you using an ethanol blend?
What state/city are you in?
Have you done the ILP? (see post 201)
What speed is comfortable for you to maintain on the highway?
These may seem like silly questions, but the answers can be helpful.
Also have you read as many of the posts as possible?
There are tips on getting better mileage scattered throughout this forum. Some of them may help you!
Kip
If anyone has successfully tackled this issue PLEASE share your info. I love the car but would have seriously considered something more economical if I knew 13-15 is the best I could get. Its funny that I hear Honda is thinking of increasing the fuel tank size for future models. This is hardly a solution.
I will be filling up 'The Beast' tomorrow and I'm looking forward to seeing what my mileage was. I filled up tuesday morning and drove up to Clearfield for the Fair, and made a few side trips over to Punxsutawney and then back down to the Hershey. My trip meter is reading 335 and I have about 1/4 tank left. This was an ALL highway trip.
Odie
Odie's Carspace
P.S. - The reason I haven't been around, I've been trying to get the house up and situated.
The rating for a 2008 2WD Pilot is 22 highway. (link). It was 24/highway under the old EPA ratings for the 2007, 22 for the AWD. I just looked up the base trim.
It's easy enough to check speedos with GPS's these days if you don't have one of those measured mile sections of highway near you.
It seems like in most every Real World MPG discussion, there's a few owners beating the EPA estimate by some percentage.
Who has said they are actually getting nearly 29 MPG?
What part of tank to tank and average are two different things, do you have trouble understanding?
TRUTH is, if you drive it at 80+ on the road it will get MUCH WORSE MILEAGE THAN DRIVING IT AT 65. That is a truth than neither you or I or anyone else can change.
You can believe that or continue to get poor mileage. Your choice.
Kip
How much to replace the speakers and are you satisfied with the way the stereo sounds now (Was it worth it?) I replaced the front two on our Odyssey last week with a set of $50 Pioneer and that made a nice improvement. I am thinking of replacing the ones in the Pilot now.
By the way, I haven't been able to get better than 22 mpg.
Odie
Odie's Carspace
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/chi-mxa0801tempofuelishaug01,1,4805141.st- ory
If you can crawl into a stop sign at a few miles per hour you can acieve 59 mpg by driving a Honda Accord. BUT it warned that do not try it at home.
Of course some of the guy's practices are down right dangerous and others impractical. However for real world drivers there is a lot to be learned.
Willingness is a major KEY to achieving better mileage from any vehicle we drive.
Interesting that over on the Civic or the Fit or the Accord forums, when someone reports they are getting better than average mileage, the others want to know how, why, and so forth.
On the Pilot forum, comments like absurd, can't be done, something wrong with the picture, and so forth are written more. :sick:
Thanks,
Kip
I started enjoying my Pilot a few months ago when I was determined to utilize the V-TEC motor to it's potential. I now routinely tach my motor to above 4300 rpm to feel and hear the different valve duration kick-in. Fun, fun ,fun! Then I usually return to my regular driving habits which includes 7 of the 8 items recommended in the article. (I use my air conditioning often). Still getting around 19 mpg in my regular carpool commute.
Joe
averagejoe - When I tach higher than 2500 rpm, I think I can actually see the fuel gage moving down. What happens at 4300? Have fun, Jimmmmmy
At 4300 rpm, a control module directs the VTEC system to switch intake valve operation to the high-speed mode. An electric spool valve opens to route pressurized oil to small pistons within the intake-valve rocker arms. These pistons then slide to lock the three rocker arms together. As a result, both intake valves follow a central high-lift, longer-duration cam lobe. The extra lift and longer duration provide the added air and FUEL the engine needs to produce high peak horsepower and a broader torque band.
In other words, it is when the Pilot starts to go "BRAAAAAAT" and I start to say "WOWEEEEEEEE".
I really try to drive both ends of the spectrum but have a difficult time keeping my RPMs under 2500 even when I try hard. I think it is the tendency of the vehicle.
Joe
Joe,
Your explanation of the HONDA VTEC operation is better than I have seen elsewhere.
I'm still trying to understand the advantage of overhead cams if rockers are used, other than the VTEC and similar devices used by other mfg. Which are fairly new on the scene. Originally the OHC purpose was to provide an "INLINE" operation to the valves from the cam and eliminate the rockers and long push rods from changing direction and so forth.
Is there a URL with Pictures and such illustrating the Honda operation?
I can usually understand pictures and slow moving animations! :confuse:
Thanks,
Kip
Sunday fill: 22.823 mpg, Around 180 highway miles, mostly flats and AC, probably 65mph avg. on highways.
Today's fill (not even half tank, but cheapest gas in a while)so filled up:
19.866 mpg, 120 highway miles, AC, 70+ MPH avg. on highways.
- 22 MPG, 90% highway 65 mph and moderate rolling terrain, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MI, WI, MN
- 17.6 MPG, 100% city, 0-50 mph, flat terrain, half loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN
- 18.5 MPG, 100% highway 80 mph, moderate terrain, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN, IA
- 20.5 MPG, 100% highway, 85 mph, flat terrain, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, NE
- 20.6 MPG, 90% flat highway 80 MPH then 10 % slowly up 2000' in elevation, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, CO
- 22.2 MPG, 90% flat highway 70 MPH and 10 % slowly down 2000' in elevation, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, CO
- 21.4 MPG, 100% flat highway 84 MPH, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, CO, NE
- 21.0 MPG, 100% highway medium terrain 82 MPH, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, NE, IA
- 22.2 MPG, 100 % highway medium terrain 78 MPH, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, IA, MN
- 19.7 MPG, 100 % city driving with a LIGHT-LIGHT foot, half loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN
- 16.8 MPG, 100% city driving, 0-50 mph, flat terrain and more stop and go, half loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN
I'll keep you posted. Jimmmmmy August 10, 2007
I had some individual experience with my traded 03 Camary SE (V4), 20 for the first 2 years, 18k (75% city, even that is quite low)! Eventually reach 25+ when I started long commute for a year, finally reaching close to 30 by the time I traded around 50K miles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcT_ZyY3F0k&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q24D0xv49d4&watch_response
Joe
There are many components that provide information to the computer. If a few of them get close to being out of specification then the computer will not be providing the optimum air/fuel mixture. Since this engine is a ULEV, it is very sensitive to the readings and may over compensate for what it senses as a excessive emission.
Thanks!
Are there 2 cams in each head? One for intake and one for exhaust.?
Kip
Clear as mud, right?
Joe
- 22 MPG, 90% highway 65 mph and moderate rolling terrain, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MI, WI, MN - July 6, 2007
- 17.6 MPG, 100% city, 0-50 mph, flat terrain, half loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN
- 18.5 MPG, 100% highway 80 mph, moderate terrain, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN, IA
- 20.5 MPG, 100% highway, 85 mph, flat terrain, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, NE
- 20.6 MPG, 90% flat highway 80 MPH,fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, CO
- 22.2 MPG, 90% flat highway 70 MPH, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, CO
- 21.4 MPG, 100% flat highway 84 MPH, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, CO, NE
- 21.0 MPG, 100% highway medium terrain 82 MPH, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, NE, IA
- 22.2 MPG, 100 % highway medium terrain 78 MPH, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, IA, MN
- 19.7 MPG, 100 % city driving with a LIGHT-LIGHT foot, half loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN - July 30, 2007
- 16.8 MPG, 100% city driving, 0-50 mph, flat terrain and more stop and go, half loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN - Aug 10, 2007
- 22.2 MPG, 100% highway medium terrain, 65 mph, fully loaded, 100% AC, dry conditions, MN, WI - Aug 13, 2007
I'll keep you posted......... Jimmmmmy August 13, 2007
I would think that if you are doing a lot of stop and go city driving, then you are are okay. If you are driving only highway miles then 15 would be low.
Keep track, see if things improve.
Joe
Some get decent mileage from the start, others need a break-in.
Next door neighbor just got a new Ridgeline. Basically a Pilot with a bed. Local driving, no heavy traffic, but a lot of short trips yielded 18.01 mpg for 1st tank. He has a pretty light foot.
Kip
The last trip I took impressed me!
354 miles 1/4 freeway, 1/4 hilly country, 1/4 flat country, 1/4 suburban. AC on, 70+ on all freeway, 65 + on flat country.
23.6 Not bad at all.
My (Nissan) minivan averaged around 15/16 mpg the first 4,000 miles of city driving over the winter. Then I did a long road trip and got the lifetime up to 19 at 10k and 21 mpg over the next 20,000 miles. It's been a little better than 21 overall since 30k (now at 119,000 miles).
So 10k may still not be enough to get that extra one or two mpgs out of the drivetrain.
That is good mileage?
How many miles on the clock now?
Kip
Thanks,
Kip
I have no reason to doubt the MPG figures posted here and it gives me something to shoot for. I got 61 MPG out of one tank in my old Civic HF.
I agree with whomever it was that wrote that we should be enjoying our vehicles more than we seem to. Thanks for posting; I have really enjoyed and learned from the reading.
Some dept that could answer questions concerning fuel mileage, octane when towing, etc...
I tried customer service and got absolutely nowhere!
Thanks,
Kip
Filters, oil and tires well maintained.
I keep my speed usually under 70 mph on the HWY
-quite pleased to be getting 22 mpg with a great engine in a SUV that can carry alot and run on 89 octane.
Joe
Kip
I'm guessing the lower speeds (lower than on the interstate hwys) on the two-lane roads help the MPG but the hilly terrains costs some. Would like to try some flat roads at these speeds/conditions, probably would do better on the MPG. But hard to find flat roads around here, unlike when we used to live in Fla!
Went to the dealer the other day, noticed the '08 AWDs now are posted at 15/20 MPG EPA estimates due to their recalculations. Pretty much the same mechanical specs, just different estimates on MPG?
Thanks to all the posters who contribute their MPGs here, it really helps to see how we're doing in this age of $50-$60 fillups! feet2fire
15 MPG for the trip driving at 60-65 MPH, no cruise control used.
I thought that was very good considering the load. BTW, I installed a Tru-cool transmission cooler before the trip. I needed it on those southern Missouri hills.
The pilot is a great vehicle for my needs with 3 boys, 3 different sports depending on the season and my weekly need to stock up at Costco. It is the best in price, cost of ownership and utility for my life right now. Besides I didn't want them trashing my Acura RL anymore!
Cheers!
Just did a trip from Tucson to Alberquerque on one tank (459 Miles).
Temp: 90-98F
Elevation 2500-5000 (going up)
Load: full
Road Conditions: %95 highway
Speed: 70-80mph
Fuel: 89
Tires: 37psi, 60% worn (original)
AC: on 90% of time
MPG: 26.6
Avg: city/surburban driving: 20Mpg
Only mod to car is: Heat reflecting tape around entire airfilter box. (reflects 95% of heat radiation from engine)