Hybrids & Diesels - Deals or Duds?

14950525455100

Comments

  • gogogodzillagogogodzilla Member Posts: 707
    Frankly, I'm surprised that our US coal producers haven't stepped up to the plate to build coal gasification plants, since our oil companies haven't.

    :shades:
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I'm surprised that our US coal producers haven't stepped up to the plate to build coal gasification plants,

    It may be that Mr. Peabody has all he can do producing 50% of our electricity. Good question though.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The Clinton Administration (remember them?) made a deal with China to (export) supply USA coal for their modernization. Needless to say, China's old and new power plants tend to be coal fired, until of course they intergrate the nuclear ones.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    As in "BTU" ? :)
  • moparbadmoparbad Member Posts: 3,870
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    A whole bunch of posts ago in the Hybrid Vs Diesel forum I found a Hyundai car with a 1.5L 3 cylinder diesel (licensed from our friends, VM Motori), that got 65 mpg on the road sans hybrid add-ons. It got a pretty good write up as I recall. It was tested in South Africa.
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    Someone mentioned that a news article about Willie Nelson's biodiesel business was going to be on NBC. It was at the end of the broadcast. Was a good news item and very upfront about the good and the bad of biodiesel.

    Not only will it help our farmers, it will reduce the amount of waste in our landfills, help cleanup the air (except for NOx), pinch the oil companies a little bit, and reduce the funds being sent over to middle east terrorists.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    But diesel's image in the United States lags far behind reality, said Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas.

    "The U.S. consumer is very uneducated about diesel. There is still a mindset from the 1970s and 1980s that diesel is dirty, has poor performance, is loud and not reliable," he said, when in fact the opposite is true of modern common-rail diesels.
    Daimler has said diesel's U.S. market share could quadruple by 2015 from around 3 percent now and is itching to use its European diesel expertise not just in Mercedes-Benz cars but also to expand offerings in U.S. brands like Jeep and Chrysler.

    Ford Motor Co is also keen on the technology, hoping to gain a competitive edge over hybrids from Japan's Toyota Motor Corp and Honda Motor Co.

    Proponents note that diesels cost less to produce than hybrids -- about 15 percent more than a conventional gasoline car versus 25 percent more for gasoline-electric hybrids, according to Tokyo-based Yano Research Institute.

    Hybrids also need stop-and-go driving for top efficiency, while diesels thrive on U.S.-style wide-open highways.


    Diesel
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I would be willing to bet - just based on the fact over half of the vehicles on the road are V8 trucks and sport utilities

    Yes, that is true. I was going by the CAFE standard which says the automakers average vehicle should get 27 MPG. We know that is kind of ambiguous because of all the PU trucks that are not close to that. So far no one has come up with a hybrid solution to the truck needs of the nation. Toyota says it will but has some BIG problems to overcome. Like being able to tow heavy loads.

    Now to your 25% hybrid solution. I would say they would be replacing similar sized cars. The reality is the hybrid solution is more like 10-20% better FE, over comparable gas only. If you compare it to comparable diesel cars they are a wash. Giving hybrids the benefit of the doubt and 20% increase in fuel economy. That would mean you have a net gain of 20% of the 25% highest fuel efficient cars in the fleet. I would imagine that 25% you replaced only use about 15% of the gasoline. That means you may save about 3-4% of the overall usage in the USA, with the added 25% hybrids to the fleet. That does not take into consideration the potential pollution that all the dead batteries may cause in the years to come.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I am not an expert when it comes to the 20 or so million new cars manufactured per year for the USA market. However for the purposes of illustration it might be useful to talk in terms of two products: Prius say 50 mpg and Toyota Landcruiser say 18 mpg. So if the "average" is 27 mpg then Toyota to achieve that "average" in making one Prius can now make two Toyota Landcruisers. (50+18+18/3=28.7-27= 1.7 mpg left over)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I think instead of Land cruisers it will be Tundra trucks. The plan is to double production of the Tundra in the new San Antonio plant. Here is the question. They sold 126k Tundra trucks in 2005 and want to sell 250k this year. IF they maintain the 170k Tacoma trucks they will need to sell about 400k Prius to overcome the CAFE standard deficit. The way I see it Toyota is selling more vehicles under the 27 MPG average, than over.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Yes, actually you are more technically correct. Indeed the TLC is a MUCH lower production truck (grown to something like 8,000 per year in the states) The first one I was involved in buying was something like 1500 (1974 TLC) My 1987 TLC was claimed to be app 2,000 in the USA.

    The Toyota Tundra is probably one of Toyota's best selling V8 trucks and it is a most excellent product.

    (If I had need for it, I would want a turbo diesel Tundra !) :)

    And of course it is done IAW CAFE regulations!!!

    Now the very interesting thing is in Europe they do not have an equivalent " USA CAFE" system. So in a very interesting way they can actually manufacture cars like the VW Jetta TDI, whose EPA is 42/49 and with unofficial data on the www.fueleconomy.gov gets 43-63 mpg. combo of 48.6 mpg. In terms of mpg, very AVERAGE over there. Of course for here the only one that might come close is the Toyota Prius.

    So as I said in a prior post, I would not be for increased CAFE regulations, as it will further delay higher mileage vehicles; that the public would drive in droves, if they could buy them.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    VW Jetta TDI, whose EPA is 42/49

    In reality the Jetta TDI would get better than that if it were not for the added pollution control to compensate up for lousy diesel.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I am eyeing the .205 injectors! :)

    MORE POWER AW AW AW!

    But,... oxymoronically, if I do not "get on it", as you have mentioned: BETTER FUEL MILEAGE!!! What is there not to like??!!! :)
  • iluvmytoyota39iluvmytoyota39 Member Posts: 1
    VW is at the bottom of the list as far as reliability is concerned. Porsche ain't gonna turn them around.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    "VW is at the bottom of the list as far as reliability is concerned. Porsche ain't gonna turn them around. "

    This is an interesting take.

    I bought a used 1970 VW Beetle in 1971 for 1800 dollars and drove it for app 250,000 miles. The only unscheduled maintainance I had on the thing was a clutch at 109k miles for 135 dollars at a VW specialty shop and a case of Heineken. (hot in Miami, FL) Of course did the 1.5k-3k oil changes (geez that was a lot of oil changes) (over 84) shocks, brakes, alignment tires, balance. the reason why I sold it was it was a CA VW with no A/C, lived in Miami, FL at the time. :(

    Fast forward to a 1985 Toyota Camry. I had 3k in JUST unscheduled repairs (less than 95k miles) and it would have easily been much more if it were not for the "secret" warranty. My guess on the secret warranty retail cost 2,450(new brake pads, rotors, drive line transmission components, springs,shocks and struts, alignment and tire balance) Even with 5450 in rehab, I was so frustrated with it, I sold it (4500, which by the way was an EXCELLENT price) :(:)
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    Eh... not only were those Beetles simple cars, but they hadn't changed much since the '40s. VWs weren't unreliable until they started making modern cars. (Lately it's been really bad, and I can't figure out how they let things get that way.)
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Well when the Japanese cars started coming over, I was not a fan at all. As a matter of fact, you could not pay me money to drive them!!! As late as the 1978 Honda Accord I was less than impressed. Again CR had a good write up. There indeed was a whole shopping list of defects. Moving to a 1982 Honda Accord, it ran literally like a top! CR had a dynamite write up and we took a chance on the 1985 Toyota Camry and unfortunately it turned out to be a dog. However to Toyota's credit, they did offer the secret warranty. Now on the other hand I had been buying Toyota Landcruisers and they have almost literally been bullet proof. Through an interesting anomoly they are made by Arakawa (or some such).
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    California has the nation's most stringent air-quality standards, but with advancements in technology, diesel passenger vehicles are capable of meeting California standards, Moulton said.

    The timing of the new diesel fuel is good, considering President Bush's warning last week about America's addiction to foreign oil. In his State of the Union address, he called on consumers and automakers to help reduce the nation's Mideast oil imports by 75 percent by 2025.

    Bush also called for an alternative fuels program, which could include biodiesel, a blend of regular diesel and soybean or other vegetable oil.

    The National Biodiesel Conference, sponsored by a trade group, is being held through tomorrow at the San Diego Convention Center.

    Stephen L. Johnson, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, will address the group and view some of the new diesel cars today.
    DaimlerChrysler's Mercedes-Benz will introduce five diesel models next year, beginning with the E320 BlueTec sedan.

    BlueTec uses an oxidizing catalytic converter and a diesel particulate filter, among other engine modifications, to minimize emissions. Combined fuel mileage rating will be 35 mpg, compared with about 22 mpg for the gasoline-powered E350 V-6.

    The same technology will be available for other DaimlerChrysler vehicles, such as the Chrysler PT Cruiser, Jeep Liberty SUV and Jeep Grand Cherokee.

    Honda, Nissan and BMW also showed diesel technology at the Detroit show.

    Diesels are less complex than gasoline-electric hybrid systems and easier to install. The price premium is less, too, usually $1,000 to $1,500 for passenger cars.


    Diesel conference
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    soy beans!!

    The history channel had a special on this true American pioneer. One of the truly revolutionary uses ( of literally hundreds of revolutionary uses of both the peanut and soybean (both crop and renewable resources was using soybean oils for "biodiesel" (they didn't call it that back then)
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    I will try to watch this program over the weekend. Sorry I missed it.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    SAN DIEGO - Country singer Willie Nelson introduced California on Wednesday to "BioWillie," his brand of clean-burning fuel made from soybeans.
    BioWillie went on sale at an alternative fuel station in San Diego where the 72-year-old singer drew a crowd as he filled his tour bus from a pump emblazoned with a picture of himself strumming a guitar.
    "It is the future," Nelson said. "Through biodiesel, we can reduce dependency on foreign oil and adopt an energy source that's clean renewable and helps family farmers find new uses for their products."
    Actress Darryl Hannah, who drives a biodiesel-powered black Chevrolet El Camino, joined the singer at Pearson Ford Fuel Depot, where drivers can also fill 'em up on propane, ethanol and natural gas.
    Biodiesel is America's fastest growing alternative fuel, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. sales of biodiesel tripled last year to 75 million gallons, but account for less than 1 percent of the diesel fuel sold nationwide, said Jenna Higgins, a spokeswoman for the National Biodiesel Board, which is hosting a conference on biodiesel in San Diego. More than 600 filling stations sell biodiesel to the public. Nelson first learned about biodiesel three years ago when his wife, Annie, purchased a biodiesel-burning car in Hawaii, where the star has a home. The biodiesel that powered her Volkswagen Jetta was made from grease collected from restaurants. He bought a diesel Mercedes and then began filling his tour buses with biodiesel.


    http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13824770.htm
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    The more the merrier! If they sold biodiesel in my neck of the woods, I would buy in a heartbeat.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I, for one before buying the VW Jetta TDI was leery as the VW's in general seemed to have a much higher % of "lemons." It also has more nit noy things that indeed goes wrong. However this is where the homework (either embolden me or let me pull the wool over my own eyes :) ) was key. The upshot was the TDI engines did not nearly have the volume and % of the issues the 2.0 and 1.8T gasser engines did. Further research also uncovered the TDI engine has a design life of 20,000 to 25,000 miles. So at an average of 50 mph, that can micro out from 1M 1.25M miles. Now you put that together with a rust warranty of 12 years.....that is quality you can not see!

    So as an anecdotal, the car has literally been flawless. with a bit over 2.5 years and 70,000 miles.
  • jkinzeljkinzel Member Posts: 735
    Saw this on Marketwatch.com. Ethanol? Why not Bio-Diesel.
    This is not the entire text.

    COMMODITIES CORNER
    Ethanol's poised to fuel a drive for corn
    SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Corn's looking particularly tasty these days -- at least for investors looking to cash in on the ethanol craze.
    The renewable fuel comes from fermented sugar -- which can be derived from all kinds of biomass, including corn. As the world's largest producer and exporter of the crop, it makes most sense for the United States to use corn to produce ethanol.
    "Corn futures have the potential to explode higher due to increased demand from ethanol production," said Chris Kraft, an analyst at CKFutures.com.
    Demand for the alternative fuel has already helped sugar prices double in the past six months to trade over 19 cents per pound on the New York Board of Trade -- their highest levels since 1981.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Why does J.D. Power believe that diesels will grab a much larger share of the market than hybrids for fuel-efficient cars?
    The problem with hybrid cars is they have an expensive power train. Hybrids have two engines connected by an expensive electronic kit. They're likely to always cost more than a clean diesel power train. Once consumers add up the costs and benefits for hybrid cars, they aren't likely to do as well over the long term. There will always be people willing to pay more for an environmentally friendly car. But people who are constrained by costs and still want a fuel-efficient car will opt for clean diesel.


    http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/feb2006/bw20060208_589016.htm
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    US President George Bush’s call to wean the US from its addiction to foreign oil may help European automakers market their diesel-powered cars to Americans, but it won’t be a quick or easy sell.
    Widespread misperceptions of diesel as dirty and loud, regulatory hurdles and diesel engines’ extra cost will make it a challenge to pitch the vehicles in the US market, even though their fuel consumption beats petrol engines hands down.
    It is that 30% advantage on fuel economy that the Europeans, led by DaimlerChrysler, are counting on to convince Americans they can still afford to drive the big, heavy vehicles they love, even if fuel prices stay high for years.
    “The US consumer is very uneducated about diesel. There is still a mindset from the 1970s and 1980s that diesel is dirty, has poor performance, is loud and not reliable,” he said, when in fact the opposite is true of modern common-rail diesel.
    Bob Lutz, head of product development for General Motors, knows where the badmouthing of diesel started.
    “They have a reputation of being noisy, smelly and breaking down a lot, and we have General Motors to thank for that,” he told a recent industry conference. “We did some diesel engines about 20 years ago that were an absolute disgrace.” – Reuters


    more diesel news
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    This is why DIESEL will ALWAYS be hand in glove with unleaded regular.

    What Does One Barrel Of Crude Oil Make?

    QUICK STATS
    - One barrel of crude oil contains 42 gallons
    - About 46% of each barrel of crude oil is refined into automobile gasoline
    - In the US and Canada an average of 3 gallons of crude oil are consumed per person each day
    - The US imports about 50% of it's required crude oil and about 50% of that amount comes from OPEC countries


    Product Refined Gallons/Barrel
    Gasoline 19.3
    Distillate Fuel Oil (Inc. Home Heating and Diesel Fuel) 9.83
    Kerosene Type Jet Fuel 4.24
    Residual Fuel Oil 2.10
    Petroleum Coke 2.10
    Liquified Refinery Gases 1.89
    Still Gas 1.81
    Asphalt and Road Oil 1.13
    Petrochemical Feed Supplies 0.97
    Lubricants 0.46
    Kerosene 0.21
    Waxes 0.04
    Aviation Fuel 0.04
    Other Products 0.34
    Processing Gain 2.47
    Source: EIA March 2004 Data

    http://www.sanjosegasprices.com/crude_products.aspx

    Where it differs markedly from petro oil is diesel can be refined from MANY other ways

    1. Crops (renewable resources)a. soy beans b. rape seed c. crops raised for cooking oils d. etc

    2. Waste streams such as 40,000 gals of bio diesel refined from waste oils delivered to the Berkeley CA "DUMP"

    3. Waste streams from estabilished farming operations

    4. refining does NOT require a multi billion dollar refining facility as petro oil does a. biodiesel can be refined in your back yard if so permited/required/wanted b. no way Jose with petro oil.
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    In the Washington Post there is an article in the metro section concerning issues surrounding the incentives/perks involving hybrids. They are starting to backfire.

    Go to Washingtonpost.com.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    Winter2, "backfire"???

    There is ZERO DOWNSIDE to pomoting clean cars with government incentives. it is one of the jobs of the govt to keep the air clean. Zero Downside.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    It would be helpful to illustrate how many #'s of sugar yield how many gal of 100% ethanol. So given my EIA post which breaks down a barrel of oil both vol and (one can calculate) % wise, this puts per gal of unleaded regular/#2diesel at 1.45/1.49 per gal. (61 per barrel)

    http://www.bloomberg.com/energy/
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Alternative fuels such as bio diesel, 100 % ethanol, can and are domestically produced!!! Also waste stream recycling (production) such as used veggie oil and animal products, find a commercially viable use in place of hazardous waste disposal procedures would have been the norm.

    No GASSER hyrid advocates have articulated a viable way to get OFF unleaded regular except to mantra on that less needs to be used. I woule indeed say the vilification makes it almost certain future and FURTHER dependence ON foreign oil!! Well the math would indicate that for example, if 12-15% % of the vehicles ran on bio diesel and 10 %ran on ethanol and 10% ran on LNG, ALL of which again by the way can be DOMESTICALLY produced, that indeed would structural shift the demand from unleaded regular. The math would indicate given the example, 35% reduction in demand for unleaded regular !!!!! ?????
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    I have nothing against promoting cleaner cars. The issue I have is allowing these cars in HOV lanes with only the driver. That is something the article points out. Did you read the article? By looking at your reply, it appears as if you did not.

    Hybrids should not be granted special dispensation to drive in HOV lanes with only the driver. First, it defeats the purpose of HOV lanes, namely to get vehicles off of the roads. Three or four hybrids with driver alone will pollute more (adding their emissions together)than one non-hybrid with three or four people in it.

    Again, promoting cleaner cars is not the issue here. The issue is allowing them to use HOV lanes with the driver only.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The people in charge of the highways disagree with your simplistic view of hybrids. As the resentment grows against hybrids the Prius could become a target, just like the Hummer.

    "We're concerned about the unrestricted growth of hybrids because if HOV stops working for one class of vehicles, it stops working for all classes, including buses and carpoolers," Transportation Secretary Pierce R. Homer said.

    Many commuters recognize the dilemma.

    "The whole point of HOV is to get fewer cars on the road," said Bill Faith, an Annandale resident and sometime carpooler. "To allow them to come in as single cars doesn't make any sense. Don't let them clog up roads and have more traffic. It's just silly."


    Too many hybrids
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The prostitution of the so called commuter lanes aside(so called inclusion of the SINGLE driver(properly stickered hybrid car) , if you believe the froth of the hybrid advocates, indeed the hybrid should be confined to the lanes that experience the most STOP and go traffic.

    WHY??

    Lets hear the froth from the hybrid mantra-ists!!??
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    Below is from that article. I have nothing against the hybrid except for this and the main fuel source it uses, gasoline, a one way fuel.

    According to statistics maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency, the cleanest and most popular hybrids, the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic, emit half as many smog-causing pollutants as a standard Honda Accord, Ford Explorer and other popular models.

    In most cases, that clearly favors hybrids. But in carpool lanes, where two or three passengers are normally required, the benefits are negated. A car such as the Explorer with three people in it, for instance, pollutes less than three hybrids with solo travelers.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The fact that a big percentage of hybrids are bought to circumvent the HOV lanes purpose, is what is disturbing to me. It is counter productive from several aspects.
    First it takes a spot in the lane that a carpool vehicle should have. It also negates the mileage that the vehicle is capable of. If the hybrid keeps up with the HOV lane traffic he will be traveling 70-75 MPH. That kills the MPG that the car was designed to achieve. It encourages commuters to buy a separate car instead of car pooling or taking mass transit.
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    "Three or four hybrids with driver alone will pollute more (adding their emissions together)than one non-hybrid with three or four people in it. "

    Turns out that's not necessarily so. Going by the California Air Resources Board's website, SULEV vehicles (which include all the hybrids and some other cars) emit only 30% or less as ULEV vehicles do.

    So three Priuses (SULEV) pollute less than one Explorer (LEV II / ULEV).

    But the list of Cleanest Cars includes a lot of non-hyrids. I guess the government decided it was worth giving manufacturers an artificial incentive to further develop hybrids. And it's a way to limit the clean cars allowed into carpool lanes; they're still pretty free-flowing, but after a while they'll stop the carpool lane stickers (they do regular reviews of the program).

    In any case, it's not like a parent-child carpool takes any vehicles off the road either.
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    I went to the EPA site and did some quick research. Turns out you are right, but just barely. Three Prius put out 10.5 tons of greenhouse gases while the Ford Explorer puts out 10.8 tons of greenhouse gases per year.

    My CRD puts out 9 tons of greenhouse gases per year. A 2006 MB diesel puts out 6.9 tons, while the VW Golf puts out 5.3.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Three Prius put out 10.5 tons of greenhouse gas

    A more realistic comparison would be a Camry with 3 people. And they are available as SULEV II. That would make the 3 Prii big polluters. Now if a Prius was used as the car poolers transportation I can see some real advantage to the environment. Otherwise it is a poor piece of legislation.
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    The only reason I used the Ford Explorer is that it was used as the example in the article. Even my CRD is cleaner than the three Prius' mentioned.

    I agree that it is a poor piece of legislation. They should have no special dispensation for use in HOV lanes. It appears as if some of the legislatures have been politically bamboozled!
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "Further research also uncovered the TDI engine has a design life of 20,000 to 25,000 miles. So at an average of 50 mph, that can micro out from 1M 1.25M miles."

    Not following here, did you mean 20,000 - 25,000 hours?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Miles= (typo)HOURS.
  • moparbadmoparbad Member Posts: 3,870
    Honda and Toyota Diesel and Hybrid philosophy

    I like the article. Will be interesting to see what the future holds.
    Honda has a superior diesel engine in it's 2.2 i-CTDi than any diesel Toyota offers IMO. And no one, Honda included, has demonstrated the ability to match Toyota's hybrid technology.
    Honda Accord Tourer with 2.2 i-CTDi is the diesel I would most want to see Honda offer in USA. It would be excellent competition for the Camry Hybrid.
  • moparbadmoparbad Member Posts: 3,870
    check out Honda's UK diesel info. site

    If Honda brings diesel to US/Canada, I hope they brind their UK advertising agency too!
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    Rather interesting article. Honda is taking a more open view and spreading different kinds of eggs over multiple baskets.

    Toyota, on the other hand, is putting all of their eggs into the hybrid basket. It looks as if Toyota is counting on or even possibly promoting hatred toward diesel power. The comment about the cost of diesel is smoke and mirrors. Hybrids are not cheap and neither is that technology. I think that Toyota may have gone out on a limb with the hybrids and if diesels take hold, they could get slammed.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "I think that Toyota may have gone out on a limb with the hybrids and if diesels take hold, they could get slammed."

    I suspect that if diesels take off with the advent of US low sulfur diesel fuel, the hybrids will lose some sales, but the two will probably about even out due to the consumer reluctance to use diesels here. Older drivers will hesitate to embrace diesel. Blame GM - their early 1980's gas-derived diesel engines were an absolute disaster.

    I see from the UK advertisement that Monty Python is alive and well...
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    In some way, Toyota is feeding that bad GM memory.

    What people do not realize, and Toyota does not want them to realize, is that technology, be it hybrid or diesel costs money. The statement by that guy from Toyota about the cost of diesel, shows that Toyota wants to smother diesels. Hybrid technology costs several thousands of dollars per vehicle over the non-hybrid siblings. Diesel costs more than gas but not several thousands more. In a Jetta, s diesel is a sub-300 dollar option. In the Jeep Liberty CRD, it is less than 900 dollars.

    The emission systems on a diesel will cost a bit of money so hybrid people will harp on that. The issue they are missing is that they are paying for the complex emission systems on their hybrids as well as the non-hybrid siblings. They will grouse about the noise a diesel makes. My CRD is pretty darn quiet at idle.

    As to Monty Python, I miss them.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The other thing that gets left out of the discussion and or debate is the fact that diesels can and do last SO much longer than gassers, gasser/hybrids. We all wonder about whether or not the gasser,gasser/hybrid systems can go 250,000 miles. (I am going to SWAG yay)

    However the design life of the VW TDI diesel engine is @ 25,000 hours. So figuring on 45-50 mph, that puts the design mileage between 1,125,000 to 1,250,000 miles.

    Now given the yearly auto salvage rate of 7-7.5%,(NHTSA estimates of 235.4 M vehicles) average mileage of 12,000 to 15,000 and the average age of the vehicle fleet of 8 to 8.5 years old, that swags the mileage between 84,000 to 127,500.

    So, why buy ONE diesel vehicle when 10-15 gasser, gasser/hybrids vehicles will do? :(:)
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.