Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Just as an aside, a big selling point to the BMW was the "free" service. I am being told that my car due to the fact it was not driven hard does not qualify for a free oil change until 23,000 miles!!!!!!!!
Owner6
Who is your dealer? Mine says they can't do anything(and I purchased 2 BMW's there in the past few months, a 3 and a 5)
I took delivery in October. At no time did the dealer disclose that the run flat tires would make for a noticeably rougher ride or that they would start off as somewhat noisy and with 5,000 miles wear become unbearably noisy (somewhat like the sound of tires on my 1 ton truck). Nor was I told that my first blowout would require me to rent a car since no one including the dealer had a run flat in stock. Most importantly no one mentioned that the tires would need to be replaced every 5,000 to 6,000 miles ($1,000 each set) or approximately 6 times as often as my previous BMWs. I thought I was buying another excellent "touring car". If I had wanted a race car, I would have bought an M-series.
I have read many of the earlier positive reviews. My research seems to narrow the problem to just the "06 330xi (all wheel drive) equipped with Bridgestone tires. So consider yourself fortunate, if you are not having the same problem.
The most amazing part of the story is the way both the dealer and BMW have handled the matter. In 28 years of brand loyalty, I never would have expected the company's official stance that "no problem exists" and/or I should have expected a greatly reduced tire life with such a high performance tire. Research has shown that these tires are not high performance and that tire life should not vary from non-run flats getting 30,000 to 40,000 miles.
My attorney has advised me that BMW may eventually be looking at a federal case which also may contain a degree of fraud.
I will never purchase another BMW, not because of the run flat tire situation, but because of the deceptive and defensive approach that BMW n.a. customer service personnel have taken.
Steve Gray Portsmouth, NH
Tom
Replying to: rfl (Jun 09, 2006 11:13 am)
I am right now on the phone with (name withheld per board etiquette), Customer Relations of BMW NA-they claim the tires are NOT their problem, they do not warrantee the Bridgestone tires and accept no responsibility for any problems with them. He is sending me an email stating such, and I will be happy to post it. I He has been on the phone with my dealer, Prstige BMW of NJ, who also accepts no responsibility for any problems.
STAY AWAY FROM BMW!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Can we do something about this? [topbiz]BMW's Stance by topbiz Jun 09, 2006 (2:43 pm)
Replying to: topbiz (Jun 09, 2006 2:37 pm)
Thank you for contacting BMW of North America, LLC regarding the tires on your 2006 325i. I am sorry to hear of the experience you had with the tires on your vehicle.
The amount of safe driving your tires may be expected to provide is determined by a number of factors, such as tire inflation, wheel alignment, driving style, road conditions, and suspension settings. We do not have the ability to advise you in a technical matter via e-mail.
I apologize for the inconvenience this problem caused you; however, BMW does not manufacturer or warrant tires. I suggest contacting Bridgestone for additional information or warranty coverage. Bridgestone tire company can be reached at 800-367-3872.
If you have any further questions, please respond to this e-mail or contact the Customer Relations and Services Department at 1-800-831-1117, Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., Eastern Standard Time. Again, thank you for contacting BMW.
Sincerely,
(name withheld per board rules)
Customer Relations and Services
Representative
I have an 06 330i. I have no tire noise issue but have experience handling problems on uneven surface and in wet pavement. However the issue I have most concern about is that these run flat tires don't seem to live up to the claimed security and safety they are supposedly to provide us. It seem the replacement availability is sparce at best and very experience too boot. If one experiences failure in a remost area, say during a ski trip in the mountains, one may not be able to find a shop/dealer within the distance the tire can safely be driven.
The most disappointing matter is BMW responses to owners that called their customer service. The expeience with most seems to be one of "not our responsibility" and ignore the stated problem. This is a far cry from my past experience with BMW. For my first BMW owned, a 86 325e, BMW initiated, totally on their own, the free service to remove carbon built up in the pistons due to the "bad" gas in America then. Then for my 94 325i, BMW voluntarily replaced the Michelin tires as OE tires somehow generated "electric shocks". They replaced two of the tires for remedy free. Then my son who owned and still owns a 98 318ti received a letter a couple years ago from BMW stating some experienced "premature" failure of the cat converter in his model, so they voluntarily extended the warranty for the part to 10 years! Guess what brand of his replacement car will be? I have been tremendously impressed by BMW's practice of taking responsibility and stand behind their products. Not only I have been a very loyal customer since 86, but also used my experience to tell my cynical friends that there is integrity in some business' practice. This most recent RFT situation appears to indicate changes in BMW's business practice and I do think this will lead to significant customer disatifaction with averse impact on customer loyalty in the long run. A sad observation on a company's change from an outstanding to a "me, too" co now.
For reference, I also own a 2004 Toyota Sienna. When I bought the car, I didn't even know they came with run flats and didn't know anything about them (but the ride was also unusually rough/noisy). When I prematurely had to replace them, I was told I could use normal tires so I did. If you go on to the Toyota Sienna message boards you will see years of issues with the OE RFTs. Well, finally this week I got a letter from Toyota agreeing to pay for any tire replacements due to RFT problems. Specifically, the letter says, "... Although the tires are normally covered by the tire manufacturer's warranty, we at Toyota care about your overall Sienna experience and want to reassure you that we stand behind our products. To this end, we have made arrangements for a special supplement to your vehicle's warranty coverage". Maybe if we all keep complaining, we'll here something similar from BMW. But unfortunately the experience is already tarnished.
http://www.tirerack.com/accessories/conticomfortkit/index.jsp
Anyone interested in a 2006 325i or 2006 525xi w/obvious low miles? I will never deal with this Mickey Mouse comnpany again.
If you have any further questions, please respond to this e-mail or contact the Customer Relations and Services Department at 1-800-831-1117, Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., Eastern Standard Time. CustomerRelations@bmwusa.com
That was the email sent from BMW NA Customer Relations.
Tom
Owner6
I will continue to fight these bums and will never buy BMW again.
If the article truly reflects the majority opinion of BMW owners, these tires will stay as original equipment for years to come. I am just curious about the discrepancy between the sentiments in the article and those expressed in this message board. The timing of this article is also interesting. Get hold a copy from your friends who are CCA members to read this interesting article.
The service manager asserted that
(1) RFTs may not be repaired by law
(2) Using non RFTs on my 325i would void the vehicle warranty.
What is the deal?
I will drive my wife's 2005 Accura TL. Interesting to note that it sports Bridgestone 235/45 R17 93W Turanza EL42 non run flat tires. The tires are very similar to the ones on the BMW but have a higher speed rating and slightly different sidewall width. The car rides as smooth as silk, handles nicely and is whisper quiet on the highway.
As Clint Eastwood would say, "I know what your thinking..." They are two different cars with distinct design features but I submit they are similar enough to compare the tires and, in fact I have!!
Love the forum and I appreciate all the input from the experts.
Related question: will the low-pressure sensor work with non-RFTs?
Thanks...
So the measuring with the ABS system would mean that you are not gunking up anything if you try to fix a small puncture by injecting the latex stuff mentioned in post #228. That is a key issue when replacing with non RFTs in my mind.
Thank you.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Compare1.jsp?width=205%2F&ratio=55&diameter=16&sor- tCode=44950&minSpeedRating=H&ratio=55&width=205%2F&diameter=16&minLoad=S&vehicle- Search=true&startIndex=0&search=true&pagelen=20&pagenum=1&pagemark=1&manufacture- r=Continental&speed_rating=HR&speed_rating=VR&speed_rating=ZR&speed_rating=WR&sp- eed_rating=YR&RunFlat=RunFlatOnly&x=75&y=7