By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Then I sip it slowly. Lagavulin has a distinctive peat-smoke taste that's perfect for nights when the sleet's bouncing off the windows.
What I was saying was that BMW/MB do not have that exclusive luxury cache that they have in the US. It is as you said like GM. Makes everything for everyone. But in US they dont have that image. They are though of exclusively as a luxury marquee.
And Cadillac a true luxury brand??Well, my local dealer sells Cadillacs and Kias under the same roof. It is a Cadillac,Kia and Mazda dealer. And the other one sells Cadillac and GMC. Both within 10 miles of each other in a town of 200k. Lincolns too are sold with Ford Focus and F150 next to each other. Not a sign of a luxury brand IMO.
Right now- only 2 major players there among mainstream models- Camaro and Mustang. Only the Mazda Miata from the imports atleast gave a shot. But the main [non-permissible content removed] 3 had no players here. I dont know - thats kind of surprising. Especially as the sales numbers can be pretty good. :shades:
Maybe the new Toyota FT86 is good. But I think thats one reason why Camaro and Mustang stagnated developmentally.Especially the Camaro. The Mustang too was new in 2001 and had a refresh in 2006 I think. The new redesign is in 2014. Thats a long time. They had no competition - so they stalled. Thats why I believe so much in competition and have no irrational or exclusive loyalty to a brand. I buy whatever is the best out there for me.. :P
And by the way , my answer to your question is D . I hope I am correct ! :shades:
So I suppose based on your statement - Lexus folks argue about books , BMW folks about music and Cadillac/Lincoln owners about Scotch !! Just kidding ! :shades:
My local Lexus dealer is on the same lot with his Chevy and Subaru sales. Not sure of the relevance. He also is in the news a lot as the dealer that brought Toyota down. Bob Baker Lexus is also the reason it is very unlikely we would buy another Lexus. They are a lousy dealership. Lying salesmen and ripoff artists in the service department. They could take lessons from both the BMW and MB dealers. Both owned by Penske. Much higher classed operations.
My local dealers sells the Kia Forte/Rio next to Cadillacs on the same lots next to each other and not as an adjacent dealership. Big difference there.
So... Can we assume that its your opinion that a luxury brand is determined based on the dealership arrangement? Thats what it seems, anyway.
I'm just attempting to understand the criteria you use to define what a luxury make is here...
Well, I would guess most reasonable folks would define a Corvette as a superior sports car, yet Chevrolet sells them next to Aveos.
While I see your point of view, I just don't agree with it.
A BMW 7 series would still be a luxury car, even if it was sold on the same lot as Chevrolets, or entry-level 4-cylinder BMW's (or MINI Coopers).
Dealerships don't make a car a luxury car. A Chevy Aveo would still be basic transportation even if the dealership sold only Aveos out of the Taj Mahal.
It may sound absurd , but thats the truth. Thats why the [non-permissible content removed] 3 created luxury brands. And its not the criteria I use - it's the industry wise criteria.
It may sound absurd , but thats the truth. Thats why the [non-permissible content removed] 3 created luxury brands. And its not the criteria I use - it's the industry wise criteria.
No.... That's YOUR definition and criteria.
And, I agree.... It is an absurd idea.
For example...http://www.gozimmerman.com/site/
Ford, BMW. Hyundai, etc... all located on the same site...4001 First Avenue S.E. Cedar Rapids, IA 52402
Are you saying BMW isn't considered a luxury brand?
Here's a fairly good link for an industry explanation of luxury vehicles...
http://wikicars.org/en/Luxury_car
That is true and Toyota rates consistently in the bottom half. Maybe little brother should teach big brother some lessons in customer service. As far as Bob Baker it is one medium sized lot with separate building for Lexus. With their used cars combined in the middle. Very dated dealership. Looks the same as it did when my wife bought her LS400 there in 1989. Not sure if Bob Baker owned it back then. It was Lexus of El Cajon at the time.
Ah, snob appeal is the criteria. We ran into that buying a new mattress. Two mattresses stores have the same Vera Wang Latex Beyond Tranquility. One the sales people wear ties and sport jacket. The other shorts or whatever. After going back and forth and shopping online we discover both stores are owned by the same people. The price at the snob appeal store was $1500 higher. We found it online for $1800 less than the fancy mattress store sticker price. Guess what, just like the bargain store they matched the online price and we had it delivered and set up the next day. We picked the snob shop because the satisfaction warranty was a year instead of only 90 days.
Snob appeal is ok as long as you don't let it sway your thinking, that somehow it is better than the others. It all comes down to the almighty dollar. Personally I would rather beat the car dealer down to bare minimum and let them kiss some one else's behind while handing them a donut.
Fair question, and I'm asking the same one.
Lexus proved they can, now just do it.
And I don't think the Tundra was affected by the stop-sell last year, was it?
Toyota doesn't build a pony/muscle car because it wouldn't be in their character to do so. Live axles and pushrods? Only on the fake Camry NASCAR race car.
Even when they do come out with a RWD coupe, it will be smaller and lighter, less brute force.
And the Mustang is getting beat up by the Camaro, by the way.
Don't forget the Hyundai Genesis coupe, the RX8, 370Z, and G37 coupe. If you include AWD models the list doubles.
None of those are muscle cars, though. Asia takes a different approach, and that's fine. Variety is the spice of life.
I find it hard to believe that the same person who wrote this is offended by the word "bigotries".
On a lighter note, maybe you can laugh at yourself once you see these new ads from Audi's campaign against old/stuffy luxury:
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/02/video-audi-super-bowl-ad-features-kenny-g-as-- - prison-warden/
Mercedes and BMW are becoming "Snooki-Ized" in the U.S., a reference to MTV's "Jersey Shore," and the star castmember "Snooki" who drives a BMW.
OUCH. That hurts!
Audi's A8 ads are pretty funny...what kills me most is how much those things cost nowadays. Used to undercut the competition, not anymore really. The same stuffy money will buy those things as the competition...the opinion of Audi drivers on "Top Gear" is becoming reality on this side of the pond too....heading for the BMW image, and that's not a nice thing to say (like snooki and the Jersey style douches)
How many RX owners have you met? Why so judgemental?
I don't buy in to the stereotypes. The RX owner I know collects Corvairs, explain that.
Plus, it's not like Lexus is selling value (Hyundai is with the Equus), it's the other way around - the Germans have retreated upscale. They're simply not able to market a large luxury car at the same price level as Lexus.
The Germans don't have to play at that level, they can make their money at a higher price. That level seems to only exist in NA anyway.
Who knows if the LS is even being sold at a profit here?
You don't see me concluding all German car drivers are that way.
Also - I bet RX owners had previous good experiences with a Toyota. Not so for the young douches buying Benzes.
Let's also remember that in Germany you can get much smaller engines in an S class. Didn't Princess Di die in an S280?
Edit: Yep...
That may be a large determining factor in some areas, but not here in the Southeast.
Folks buy what they deem a luxury brand product because of the product, not who is selling it.
I guess I know over 200 folks who buy their cars new, with many of them being BMW's, MB,s, Lexus', etc., and I would bet $$$ that not a single one would say that the determining factor in buying their "luxury" car was due to dealership "exclusivity".
Like you and your mattress purchase, you look for the best deal on the product you want to buy.
I don't doubt that the country has some, however, that view the situation differently, though.
Last time we drove Pacific Coast Highway on a Sunday afternoon I was amazed at the percentage of luxury vehicles. A high percentage were SUV types. And what caught my attention was the number of Range Rovers. The RX I believe is more popular in the lower class subdivisions. Laguna Beach and Marina del Rey seem to have more luxu barges than anyplace I have ever been. BMW 7s probably the top seller along that stretch of multi million dollar homes. I don't have any statistics only what I saw in that small window of time. Driving a Sequoia Limited felt like I was really in the cheap seats. Though I was bigger than most.
It is all about the luxury brand. So you sell a BMW 7 series as a Suzuki 7 series and folks would buy it and consider it a luxury car. Ya right! :shades:
Some would think maybe but you know the truth.
Luxury cars are about opulence and status and less about affordability. My rationale is - if you cant get your serviced at the dealership then you should not be buying that brand - this is for new cars and cars for maybe 3 yrs old or less. Ya right - a BMW /Lexus would like to get his car serviced at a Ford dealership !! :P
Let's also remember that you can also get smaller engined Lexus there than here, along with models from just about any make. What does the smaller engine have to do with anything? They aren't cheaper than the competition, or what get here.
I'll bet RX owners are RX owners because it's the preferred Stepford Wife chariot. I wouldn't doubt many of them have no idea it is a Toyota company. I'd even put money on it.
Relatively speaking...
They ain't cheap. Most are well in to the 40s nowadays.
The last generation seemed like an Avalon competitor. They did have nice interiors, so they started to show signs of grandeur...
The new one will be legitimate. Each new Hyundai model is light years ahead of the car is replaces.
He has a trophy wife he bought it for? :shades:
They all look dated--clothing, car... etc.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
My Sequoia had an MSRP of $51K+, and it is just a lowly Toyota. New Sequoia comparable to mine lists for $61K. Making the RX a cheapo wannabe SUV for the Stepford wives.
I would keep my 2007 Sequoia over anything new ToyLex has to offer, thank you. I don't buy into the paying more for less they are pushing on the masses in NA.
They still look like an egg decorated for Easter.
Actually it looks like a staged photo for the movie Stepford Wives.
It may sound absurd , but thats the truth. Thats why the [non-permissible content removed] 3 created luxury brands. And its not the criteria I use - it's the industry wise criteria.
Care to post any supporting documentation for that comment?
As you said, everyone is entitled to their own opinion... Just not their own facts...
RX seems to have a lot of detractors, but consumers love them to death. It's still creaming the competition despite only minor changes from the original formula.
They invited us to an open house - mostly women who work out with lots of makeup and designer fitness wear.
No particular make stood out in the parking lot, though.
A friend of ours is a member and it's funny - the instructors actually ask her if she can wear nicer outfits and makeup. Funny stuff.