By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I don't know if I can go for that...like when people say "we rebuilt" Germany...of course, don't mention that Britain and France received significantly more funds than Germany...and now the latter is much more affluent than the former two.
We did provide some of the management theory used by the Japanese too too...of course, our shortsighted treacherous CEO class disregarded it, and now look at the result.
Of course the whole idea of single sourcing (one supplier) backfires in situations like the tsunami, because now no one else can make replacement parts, and there are parts shortages.
I guess Deming wasn't expecting 30 foot waves moving the island of Japan 8 feet to the East.
You're thinking of the Marshall Plan, which was aimed exclusively at Europe. AFAIK, we did practically no rebuilding in Japan.
Japan's big break was the Korean War. Suddenly, we needed a million little things to support an army of 300,000 troops - boot laces, blankets, etc. - and it was faster & easier to get that stuff from Japan.
Also, American photojournalists on R&R in Tokyo got to see just how good Japanese cameras & optics were. That was the beginning of the end of German dominance.
Japan's big break was the Korean War. Suddenly, we needed a million little things to support an army of 300,000 troops - boot laces, blankets, etc. - and it was faster & easier to get that stuff from Japan
We have a winner...Please select any stuffed animal from the top row...
This link fairly well explains post WWII Japan. In fact, it was, at one time, intended to be an agricultural-based economy.... Until the Korean "police action"...
http://www.applet-magic.com/japanrecov.htm
Prime Minister Nakasone Yasuhiro asserted that the procurement demand for the Korean War was like divine aid to the Japanese economy. The Allied Powers had originally envisioned a Japan agriculturally oriented with only light manufacturing. Instead the Japan that developed ultimately devoted itself to steel, cars, ships and electronics.
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/23/report-toyota-prius-v-launch-delayed-in-japan- -due-to-earthquake/
as of now, the U.S. and European launches of the Prius V are not expected to be delayed.
Good luck with that one. Fat chance it won't be delayed.
One of the key reasons for this delay is that one of the plants damaged in the earthquake, operated by Primearth EV Energy Co., supplies batteries for Toyota's hybrid vehicles. This plant has the capacity to supply enough nickel-metal hydride battery packs for up around 300,000 vehicles annually. With this plant offline, Toyota faces a 27 percent drop in hybrid production.
PS
No 7 passenger Prius for USA. Probably designed for little people.
Edit: yep, 9, here's a 2002 model:
If it doesn't embed, here's the URL:
http://images03.olx.com.ph/ui/13/97/98/1299649344_175158998_7-2002-Honda-CR-V-AT- - -Gen2-Philippines.jpg
RAV4 offers a 3rd row but at least they stretched the wheelbase for the US model (it's longer than the european one).
Li-ion has been out for a while. Toyota actually waited and isn't the first.
Read more: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110323/OEM01/110329940/1117- - #ixzz1HWXLQqoV
http://jalopnik.com/#!5785281
I can't get the DC government to fill pot holes in 6 weeks!
Toyota seemingly is prioritizing the restart of hybrid production lines amid worries about inventory depletion in the United States, where Edmunds.com data indicate consideration of the Prius, in particular, has swelled as gasoline prices continue to stay inflated
Six weeks would be wonderful for US in the People's Socialist Republic of California. Other than the Interstate highways, our roads are like driving in a 3rd world country. How long will a light suspension like used in CamCords hold up to the road abuse. Gravel would be better than pothole riddled streets. The worst part is we have the highest gas tax in the Nation. And Ahnold tried raising it before he left office. How does your state rank compared to Numero uno CA?
http://www.api.org/statistics/fueltaxes/upload/Gasoline-Tax-Map.pdf
I know this should be in $4 gas thread. Just comparing US to the Japanese on getting things done without a lot of red tape.
I'm more worried about sporty cars like my Miata, or cars with grossly oversized wheels (Nissan has some with 20"s).
DC would give Cali some fierce competition!
Just looked - 19" on the standard model, 20"s on the top of the line. Ridiculous.
I say put the smallest diameter wheel that fits over your brakes, for the least unsprung weight. As long as good tires are available in that size.
Huge wheels force all sort of trade-offs - more rotational inertia so you actually accelerate slower, more unsprung weight so it does not handle as well, and more weight to stop so braking is adversely affected. Plus the stiff ride.
You gain steering feel, and possibly higher performance tire selection, but that's about it.
I bet anything my Sienna rides a lot better than a Venza.
I wonder what a 20"x7.5" rim weighs? Probably a lot.
Also imagine the tire costs.
And you can change the choice of tire brands and performance tire types more often with the damage that occurs due to damage to tire and rim with shallow sidewalls.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Then again, I hear complaints about run-flats from all brands (BMW, Honda, etc).
Lexus should have the GS concept, hinting at the next Lexus GS.
I had not heard about an updated Camry, though.
I doubt you can get a decent set of tires for that thing installed for 3 figures anyway
Funny you should say that. All the local tire resellers here have a huge inventory of aftermarket rims for sale. Not cheap either and if you look closely they are ALL made in China. I see the Walmart model is catching on.
I'm not so sure.
Just quickly glancing at a few alloy wheels on tirerack.com, I found the difference between same width 16"and 18" wheels is about 5.5 lbs/wheel. It wouldn't be too difficult to lose that amount of weight in rubber in the lower profile tires between 16 and 18" wheels.
I'm not advocating the larger wheels, but just stating that the weight differential is probably negligable for the average vehicle application.
I realize this isn't any sort of scientific analysis, and I'm not inclined to do much more research on the topic....Just sayin' its probably not anything significant from a weight standpoint.
Now it makes some sense as they all had the bling.
OEM alloys are usually not light - they're made more for durability and appearance.
I bet the 20"s on a Venza are a good 12+ lbs heavier each than the 16" alloys on my Sienna.
There was an interesting article with a Civic that measured acceleration with all sorts of rim sizes, from 13" to 17" or so, and while the 14" didn't create a measurable slow down, the largest rims certainly did, and it was a BIG difference.
I'll try to Google it now...anyone else read that article?
I've asked in a Civic wheel thread, I bet those guys will remember.
Read more: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110324/OEM01/110329933/1492- #ixzz1HcMOw2Ne
Read more: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110324/OEM01/303249730/1492- #ixzz1HcMgjayW
Road Wheel Weights Can Affect Your Vehicle's Show...and Go
The heavyweight aluminum alloy wheels used in this test were selected because they were designed to emphasize a trendy fashion style without regard to overall weight. The heavyweight aluminum alloy wheels on our BMW test car weigh 27 pounds each (ten more pounds per wheel than the lightweight wheels).
http://www.tirerack.com/wheels/tech/techpage.jsp?techid=108
They lost 1.7 mpg with a Plus One heavyweight wheel.
Imagine going from 16" to 20".
I wonder what the 24"+ wheels some idiots like to put on SUVs and donks weigh...and how they impact performance and mileage.
I would imagine though, even with the ride height of those, the slighest hump would send one of those things up through the wheel well...
But the gangstas who drive those things probably have their routes mapped out to avoid them :P
For some reason I can't find it. Maybe the owner was too embarrassed and complained.
The highest and lowest weight wheels with the same tire don't show a large fuel mileage difference.
Impala SS on 26
I wonder how an Avalon would look with these.
I've got 32's, but that's on my combine (30.5-32)..............
Now that would be a sight to see, a blinged out combine. By the way I love your handle. You have to be from Indiana.
Here's a wagon wheel style Fleetwood I saw in Atlanta a couple weeks ago (no, I wasn't driving)
No bling.....does have green paint and yellow wheels....gets about 3 gpm (gallons per mile) when working. Think there are several unconfessed Indianians lurking here.
However, the outside tire circumference could have a sizeable impact. With consistent gearing, it takes more energy to turn a wheel 24" in diameter than a 12" one...or a 22" one.
So, if one goes with larger wheels, yet at the same time uses lower-profile tires to keep the same outside tire diameter, overall it should have a minor impact on mileage and performance (think acceleration/braking, not cornering/handling)... generally speaking.
Lucky for Toyota's image, they don't make any recipients of such personalization. It is very much a GM thing, others far behind.
The roads in Atlanta were actually excellent compared to here - at least on the highway. I'd dare say city streets were even worse.