Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
My 1996 Accord got 131k on the front pads, and currently has 178k on the rear drums (they're the originals). The first 100k or so of the car's life was a good bit of highway.
I'll check the rear ones on the next tire rotation as suggested. Thanks again all!
The car is very light (2855 lbs), and the rear brakes do little of the stopping. Also, for the first 6 years of the car's life, it did 70 miles a day of commuting, 55 of which were beltway interstate (I-459 in B'ham, AL). They've just never been heavily used.
The car is very light (2855 lbs), and the rear brakes do little of the stopping. Also, for the first 6 years of the car's life, it did 70 miles a day of commuting, 55 of which were beltway interstate (I-459 in B'ham, AL). They've just never been heavily used.
Ah I see... so lighter vehicle weight and excessive highway use has to do with the long brake life too. :P It's very impressive nonetheless!
That's one thing I can say I've never missed in my old LX. It has the drums, but has the stopping power to lock up on dry pavement, so I could never ask for more than that. Would they fade faster? Sure, but I live in an area where we don't have long mountain grades, and I'm not a hot-rodder (as evidenced by my brake wear, and in other forums, my achieved fuel mileage). What it amounts to is that I'm happy with the cheaper drums.
And yes, the excessive highway use is to "blame," if you will, for my long brake wear. I'm now at 47,000 miles on my 2nd set of front brake pads in the old LX, with no problems.
Thanks.
On your lighter 96 Accord, maybe yes! But would you rather have brake drums on your 06 EX or EXL? I believe the Accords nowadays (3200 pounds for LX and over 3300 lbs for the EX etc) are too heavy for the brake drums to be effective in certain circumstances. They are adequate in most cases, yes, but I tell you, there will be times you'd wish you had them if you don't. For instance, one time on a sunny day, I was traveling 65-70 mph on the highway, suddenly every car around me slowed rapidly and stopped! I didn't realize what was going(there was an accident somewhere ahead) on so I jammed my brakes and luckily, stopped just about 1-2 ft behind the vehicle in front of me but scared the crap outta me and my sister along the way(Mind you, I was keeping a 'safe distance' just like everyone else so that was not the issue). Would I think disc brakes would help? Definite yes!
Also, I almost failed to stop in time on a few occassions in some rainy days. Obviously, that could have something to do with the OEM tires' ability on wet (I kinda agree they're crappy in this regard) but I doubt the tires would be as much an issue if my car was equipped with 4 wheel discs. See my point?
Yes, as I select gear to R but without stepping on gas!
I never experience anything like this with other vechicles even with Honda Pilot!
So it seems there are so many benefits of disc brakes... easier for maintainence for DIYers, better stopping power and longer brake life as several of you mentioned. I think I'm liking them more
When you drive through deep puddles, disks expel most of the water by centrifical force as they spin, thus drying themseves relatively quickly. Drums keep the water trapped for a bit longer because it has to exit sideways. That causes longer and less safe stopping distances.
I did the swap myself. It took about ninety minutes including putting the car on stands, removing all the lugs with a crow bar, swapping out the parts, and putting everything back together again and on the ground. It was my first time... and I have disks all around.
I'm at about 75K miles now and all the pads are still fine. I can feel that the front rotors need turning. I haven't decided on how to do this yet. I hate to pay others for stuff I can do myself (stuff I like doing myself), but I'm reading that it might be better to turn the rotors while they're still on the car (as opposed to me taking them off and having them machined at a shop).
Any opinions?
You know those lugs have threads so that you don't have to pry them off with a crow bar.
It may dump from 1000 to ~1200 and then coming down below 1000 rpm.
Does it do that when you select R after starting the car in warmer weather?
It does that as well!
Again, it all depends on when to shift the gear into R position.
Any truth to that claim?
I've bought replacement tires for years at my local tire store, including Bridgestones and Michelins, and always assumed a Michelin was a Michelin, regardless of where you bought it. My main motivation has been price -- much (much!) better deals from the tire store than the Honda dealership. However, my Honda dealer is implying those tires are somehow inferior to Honda's supply of the same model tire. :confuse:
I'm rambling and I'm sorry, but one more thing, if a car manufacturer really does want to have a tire built to their own specs chances are they would market their own brand.
Your car is still under warrenty right? Again, I don't think it's an issue but if really in doubt you can always take it to the dealer and have them check over your car.
Any truth to that claim?
Yeah, there could be truth to that claim. Except it's their (especially made) tires that are inferior than the ones you can find elsewhere. I remember I read somewhere in other Honda forums that Honda made a deal with Michelin that gives them really good price (something like $10 a tire???). I don't know if that is entirely true but the point is if anything, the dealers get their tires cheaper than your tire store and if there is any difference, chances are the ones from your dealership will be inferior.
Like tankbeans said, you should be in good shape so long as you stick to a good brand and the right size.
If he's not cheaper, then I'd tell him to take a hike.
Thanks for this feedback. I'm inclined to go with my first reaction, that the dealers are just trying to get you to buy the tires through them. It wouldn't make any sense to me that Michelin, or any other tiremaker, would admit to giving local tire stores an inferior version of their product. That would damage their reputation a ton.
The Michelin Energy MXV4 is what's on my car now. In round numbers, the dealership is saying $860 to install four new ones, and my trusted tire store is giving me a $550 quote for the identical tires. I can't imagine how the dealer's Michelins could give anyone $310 more in value.
Here's a related question -- have any of you dealt with the online store at www.handa-accessories.com? When I get these new tires, I'm thinking of ditching my LX steel wheels with their plastic covers and installing Honda alloys. My dealer has them for $218, while handa offers them at $155 and says they are a genuine Honda wheel, which to me would mean OEM equipment.
Anyone have any dealings with this online store and know about the quality of their stuff? Thanks. For what it's worth, I do remember that my dealer actually referred me to this store once for something that dealers no longer stocked -- Accord carpets or something like that.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Thanks for all your feedback.
I have purchased from them once before. Great prices, great products (all OEM, even have Japanese characters on them ) and packed well! Shipping time was relatively quick too.
One thing to be aware is the shipping cost if you are going to buy the wheels, not that they'd overcharge you on that but at 10lbs each x 4 wheels, you are likely looking at pretty steep shipping cost depending on where you live (they're located in CA I believe).
Another reason I want to do it this way -- they're telling me the 16" alloy wheel for the '04 EX is the same, as far as fit goes, as the 16" accessory alloy for the LX, which I don't like the appearance of nearly as well as the EX wheel. They (the parts guy and a mechanic, who have installed them on an LX before) say the center bore, offset, and so on are fully compatible with both the LX and EX. So, if that's true, fine. If there's a problem, the wheels are theirs and they will have to make good on it. But it sounds pretty straightforward.
"Dealerships will tell you anything...."
Sad, but (mostly) true. Isn't it a shame that car dealerships have created the cynicism many of us have about what they tell us. I've been lied to and misled by both the sales and service departments over the years. I feel like I have to really be on my toes when I'm dealing with them, to avoid getting ripped off. Your anecdote about the battery is exactly the scenario I'm getting about the Michelin tires -- "Buy them from us because Michelin makes them in a special way just for your car." BTW -- I heard back from Michelin this morning that they got my question on this subject and will respond within one business day.
In spite of that, I continue to take my Accord to my dealership for service. I've bought into their policy of preventive maintenance (all the inspections, etc., every 10,000 miles), which is expensive, but at least I feel the car is well taken care of. I still don't know if it's a waste of money or not.
This is in contrast to my previous car, a 1996 Buick Regal, that I drove for 7 trouble-free years and just had maintenance done when necessary. Much less expensive to own, actually, than my Accord.
Here's a direct quote from their response:
"No, there is absolutely no difference between what is sold at your local retailer and what is sold at your local dealer."
And, of course, any reasonable person would have to ask, why would there be?
So, my parts department fellow at Honda says I'll get a different (and a LOT more expensive, BTW) Michelin if I buy from him (same model, specs., etc.), and Michelin says, no, that's not true.
You know, I think I'll go with the horse's mouth on this one. And just what other part of the anatomy of the horse would that make my dealer?
I must add, that I found Michelin's website to be very user friendly, and their response to my question very prompt and to the point. These kind of email questions often get lost in the corporate fog, but not with Michelin. I'm impressed with them as a company now, as I have been with their tires for many years.
I don't know if this is allowed on this thread, but if it is, I'd be happy to forward the email response I received from Michelin to anyone who's interested. It doesn't say much more than what I quoted above.
Great. Now you know for sure your dealer was messing with you. :P
In spite of that, I continue to take my Accord to my dealership for service. I've bought into their policy of preventive maintenance (all the inspections, etc., every 10,000 miles), which is expensive, but at least I feel the car is well taken care of. I still don't know if it's a waste of money or not.
What do you mean preventive maintenance? Besides oil change(which doesn't have to be done at dealer) there is no need to take your car back to dealer every 10,000 miles unless you suspect something is wrong.
Did you purchase an extended warranty when you purchased the car? If so you absolutely don't need to worry about their 'preventive maintenance' policy as long as you do all the regular maintence (oil changes, tire rotation etc).
At 30,000 miles, there was an oil change and filter, rotate and balance tires, new air cleaner, replace automatic transmission fluid, new pollen filter, brake inspection, and various other inspections of belts, exhaust system, fluids, etc.
The 10,000 and 20,000 mile services were much less -- mainly oil and filter, rotate tires, and inspect brakes.
When I leave my headlights in the "on" position, they automatically turn off after shutting the door. I always lock the car. They are supposed to come back on when I press the unlock button on the key fob, but lately, they only do so intermittently. When I open my driver's door, they come on instantly.
Any thoughts on the issue here?
I have 29,350 miles on the car.
My first Honda Accord was a 2001 model and, even at the end of my ownership when it had 180,000kms, it never consumed even one drop of oil. For Honda to say that this staggering consumption is normal is very disappointing. Perhaps this benchmark was OK for vehicles 20-25 years ago, but not for modern technology. It should also be noted that I checked with Toyota and Nissan and they BOTH also have the same guideline with respect to oil consumption. Has anyone ever heard of this or had any experience with this ridiculous standard?
However, what is more concerning to me.... is that your oil consumption changed drastically. That means something happened. You may not be able to get them to find and fix it given the high mileage you have and still technically 'in an acceptable range', but you should be concerned until you can figure out exactly what is happening, and what you are going to do about it (fight their ruling, dump the car, fix whatever is wrong yourself, etc).
I think I'd start first with doing a compression test, to see what kind of pressure each cylinder has, and pay particular note to the status of each plug when you pull it. One plug burning oil (I suspect), all plugs burning oil. Also check your PCV valve.
key fob. After that the headlights are off again.
I tried my 03EXV6. last night. They still work.
This is not normal!