By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
And I thought Honda would resist the bloat factor...kind of like the houses getting bigger. No surprise we use more electricity/gas to heat/ac, when they're all bigger, just like the fleet mileage not changing for 20 years as the cars get bigger/heavier/faster. At least the computers are keeping us even! Does make for a big window for what we now call subcompacts. No one would look at something the size of an original Civic these days.
edit - well, we'll see if Smart can do it :confuse:
The Mini's longer wheelbase probably helps it look sleeker and longer, too. Just going by those pics though, I wouldn't believe that the xA was 8-9 inches longer.
Well the height is the one thing you do notice...maybe the interior dimensions are smaller. The rear cargo area width certainly looks smaller in the MINI than it does in the xA. No way I'm getting the mountain bike in the back of the MINI without a cutting torch.
So yeah, 5 or so inches less in height, and inch or two in width, a buncha inches shorter, it all adds up for the human eye. When I look at a MINI I see in my brain a smaller car than my xA. When I see a SMART, I just laugh my head off and shake my head.
I've read where people hated early cars because the engines were under the floorboards. They could not see the "source" of the power. Once the engine went where the horses head used to be, they were fine with it.
So Smarts and Segways might just be too weird for the human brain and what it is used to.
Changing that sort of thing is done at one's peril. It's no accident that a modern bicycle looks a lot like a 100 year old bicycle, and all other attempts at a "new kind" of bicycle have been relegated to the curiosity shelf.
I haven't ridden a Penny Farthing since 1980 and haven't seen one for years. I never had an overwhelming desire to get a recumbent though - maybe it's that weirdness thing.
Think these would sell? (230 mpg)
Aptera diesel-electric hybrid
Sure that would sell in the circus maybe or at a Las Vegas lobby display for the new Galactica Casino and Spa.
That is what we always did when we had a project like that.
I have discovered that it is easy to dismiss people that have smaller vehicles with the words, "they only have."
When I had the smaller car and a larger one pulled in behind me the bigger vehicle could often dictate my speed. In other words I would most often speed up or evey now and then I would speed up and look for a place to pull over. Now I have noticed my driving style has changed and while it seems more relaxed I also determine my reaction to following vehicles based on their size. Another truck might get my attention but I am not concerned with how closely the smaller car follows me. Even when I pull into a parking lot I might look at the truck next to me and say, it is only a 1500. A Tacoma has become just another little truck.
I know, the attitude is dismissive but it amazed me how quickly I noticed the feeling I had now that I am one of the big boys on the block again. I feel like I have moved out of a private plane into a commercial transport. Yesterday we had a mild Santa Ana condition and I have been used to feeling the wind trying to move me from one lane into the next but I hardly noticed anything with the big heavy truck. I couldn't even feel the rain groves on the freeway last week.
I will say again, I am not saying it is the right way to feel but it is easy to fall into the mindset that dismisses any vehicle that is smaller than you vehicle.
Interestingly enough, I did get a slight bump by a lady a few years ago. She was driving an F250, the road was slippery, I was doing my thing and she was trying her best to stop (what looked like her little frame was standing on the brakes without much impact). I had run out of space between the car in front and mine, and she just touched my car's bumper. We pulled over, and there was no scratch.
I don't see a point to getting intimidated by SUVs and pickups in the rear view mirror.
As for intimidation, I'm in my own world when I'm driving. Short of spotting some highly aggressive or dangerous maneuver, I'm not projecting attitudes or emotions on other drivers based on what they drive.
Well, okay, someone driving in a Prius at 42 mph while wearing a big straw hat....yeah...I'm projecting onto that car....also speeding away from it, hopefully.
If I get a pickup truck, I'm going to install a gun rack and put a big pink umbrella in it :P
Y'know, it's funny you'd say that. Tonite, coming back from Costco, we saw this ancient dude in a Mercedes CLS500, or whatever it is they call that low-slung, coupe-looking 4-door thing. Didn't impress me in the least. If anything, I thought it was laughable. Now I could be totally off-base, but the perception it gave me was just some old dude trying to flaunt his wealth/credit, and attempting to appear "youthful" or "important", and probably overcompensating for the fact that he'd probably he'd probably have to mix his viagra with some heart attack-inducing drugs to relive his youthful days!
Now, maybe he was some well-off old man, at the point where buying that Benz was like me buying a $500 beater. But then, maybe not, who knows? All I know is that I wasn't impressed any more by that than by these kids who put these blingy $3000 rims on a $500 Caprice. He was driving really erratically, too, lane hopping all over the place but not really getting ahead anywhere.
In some ways it kinda made me sad, too, that here he was, probably in his 80's (or a really rough-life 70s), and driving around in a car like that. It made me think of the old adage about you youth is wasted on the young, and retirement is wasted on the old, or something like that.
It also made me wonder though, if the truly rich often suffer discrimination like that? Where us mere mortals see them driving around in those fancy cars and think they're trying to show off, when they're actually simply so well off that even with something like this Benz I saw, they're still living well below their means?
It's funny, but the older I get, and the more financially stable I become, I find that I want to spend as little as possible on a car.
I tried to pick a car that really fit my environment, needs, work, etc. If I lived in Canada, I bet I'd make another decision and in Florida and 85 years old, maybe yet another decision.
But for whizzing through traffic, sipping gas, hauling stuff around with multiple stops, low maintenance, reliability, competing for tight parking--- I obviously picked a practical "metro car for the man on the go". I could have bought my friend's pristine BMW 750iL for the same money (they don't change much year to year) and looked a lot richer but it would have been a really stupid choice for me (and a good one for my friend at the time).
That generally is not an issue. Most "hatchbacks" have lids that cover from the back of the rear seats to the base of the back window creating a trunk. The only time you see into the trunk is if you remove the lid. In general, that is when you have a very large load. In such cases, you are generally going fairly directly from point A to point B and are not going to be sitting around in a shopping mall much. I guess if you really had to keep such a load in your vehicle, you could cover it up with a big blanket, but that might not avoid theft if the crooks decided to take the chance on the possibility of finding something worthwhile under the blanket.
The Chevy HHR and Malibu Maxx have "lids" which can be mounted low or high. If they are mounted low, you get a small hidden compartment under a flat floored bed. If you mount it high, then you get a really big trunk. But that is not implying that other manufacturers are not as good. I just happen to know those two products because I was looking at them recently.
But to be honest the cars I notice the most fall into just a few examples. If the driver is driving differently from the rest of us, too fast too slow or changing lanes too much. I notice other vehicles just like the one I might be driving at the time. I notice flashy cars and exotic cars. I notice cars I dislike. My two least favorite vehicles on the road today are first generation xBs and Elements. Sometimes I notice VWs but only when they are out of the shop so that doesn't happen that often. :P
Well honestly, I noticed him because he was driving like Cruella DeVille trying to run down a stray Dalmatian! If he was just going with the flow of traffic, I probably wouldn't have noticed.
I mean, I also noticed the limey green '77 LeSabre Custom sedan with the white vinyl top and the faded hood and trunk that passed by us on the way to the store. :P Oddly, the thing that draw my attention to it was that the decklid was peeling almost how those clearcoat cars tended to in the late 1980s/early 1990s. I've never seen a 70's car do that. I've seen them do other bad things, but this was a new one on me!
I usually tend to notice cars that are driving erratically, cars that are old, or cars that I happen to like (which are often old, anyway). Or, if it's something that's been discussed here on Edmund's, it may stick in my mind more when I see one on the road.
Even Shifty has indicated his xA could use a few more ponies and that making it bigger when it became to xD made it almost perfect, and he like small cars. But our culture says if a little is good then more is better. we have developed this idea over 231 years and it isn't likely to change in the next 20. We would much rather spend research bucks on how to keep our vehicles bigger with more HP than to invest in small light weight cars. Scion should be a prime example of that when they added the larger engine to their smaller selling cars. The tC out sold the other two right out of the gate and it came with the bigger engine from day one.
The Compact has kept its place pretty well for the last few years but it isn't likely that the Sub Compact will become the standard for the American consumer in my lifetime. IMHO.
Off post, but I'm responding to the Hosts' post
I think we enjoy the myth of believing we are the best way to live because advertising has drummed that into our heads since we were infants. But direct observation suggests holes in that myth....that it's a partial reality. If we were so happy we wouldn't be so hungry and insatiable. A Yaris would be our limousine, gliding us around like kings on soft rubber tires, taking us wherever we wished to go at 75 mph for only pennies per mile. Why, it's like a magic carpet from fairy tales!
But NOOOOOO, we need seat heaters and NAV and little wipers for our headlights and a power tailgate of course, of course.
Did you like the way I got back on topic?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzLLMa3eOXE
lol!
With a catchy song, no less. Fahr mit mir!
That said, I personally would much rather have a Mini (or some older German vehicle that isn't practical for daily transportation in the "real" world).
You need to drive a Yaris, really. Great bang for the buck.
Are you still thinking little cars are those crap cans from the early 90s?
I don't think things sucked that bad even back then. I spent a lot of time in SR20 powered Nissans (Sentra SE-R, NX2000, Infiniti G20) and they were a lot of fun. I also liked the CRX and Civic SI. Even the 323/Protege wasn't that bad of a ride.
I think the mid-to-late 80s Toyota Tercel EZ turned a generation off from sub-compact cars.
And she's not the first. I have had three or four similarly detailed inquiries in the last few months, and the most recent purchased a Yaris as a result. I'm convertin' 'em one buyer at a time! ;-)
2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)
To this day hatchbacks have not shed that cheap image.
I don't know that the Escort was that unfavorable to the Corolla/Tercel of the time. I remember the early 80s Corollas deteriorating when exposed to sunlight. The Omni had some redeeming qualities because it could hold 4 people comfortable, and actually had a little room for stuff left over.
I think the Chevette was a very sad time, especially by the mid-80s when it was an 8 y/o design.
Personally, for a person who needs to get to work and back, I want a no-frills car that is cheap to maintain. I would like to own a similar vehicle without all of the fancy garbage (especially electronics) that run up the operating costs of the vehicle.
When I need a car for a long trip, the no-frills commuter car goes into the garage, and off I head to Hertz/Avis/Alamo and pick up a more comfortable drive.
I will agree that GM cheapened the car each and every model year and the 1986 version did not compare with the 1980 version.