By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
also, I can't help but wonder why everyone one the planet know that Fords new triplets are based on the mazda 6, yet not too many are willing to mention this...
Also, on the Mazda it says VVT, but i read someware that says fords 3.5 does not use it, or uses a modified version of it. I know they could tune the engine to mazda specs, but its still the same thing.
Am i wrong? Thanks.
I don't have anything specific but I suspect it will be the same system found in the CX-7 technology package. voice activated and touch screen.
* Are they mandatory on the Grand Touring package?
* Is the increase in harshness vs. the 18" significant?
My car came with 17 in wheels, which I switched out to 18 in. Less sidewall, but did not notice much difference in ride or comfort.
Mine, CX-7 GT, AWD, Tech package, Homelink, winter mats, mud guards, etc...Copper Red...and loving every minute... :shades:
DVD based navigation system, rear view camera, Mazda's advanced keyless ignition and entry system, power open and close hatch.
The Mazda CX-9 most likely uses an AWD system, as opposed to 4WD system, designed by Haldex. Same application found in the CX-7 and numerous Volvo vehicles.
This is a front wheel drive based system that is more or less AWD on demand. There is no manual control for the driver to operate the system. The benefit is increased gas mileage and longer tire life.
Since the computer reassesses (spelling?) it's self several times every millisecond, the system is very responsive.
Most articles I see do mention the design platform of the Mazda6 being the under pinnings to the FoMoCo vehicles.
The CX-9 is all Japanese, except for the Duratec35. Tranny, platform, design, electronics all japanese design.
I find that the moonroof is a "nice to have" option, but not all that necessary. As well, whenever our 2 year old gets in the car now, he always wants the darn thing open, even when it rains!
That is incorrect. The Bose Audio system is not packaged with either the Touring Assistance Package, or the Grand Touring Assistance package.
You must have either the Touring or Grand Touring models equipped with the moon roof/ Bose Audio system (1MC) before you can select either assistance package. This is a different set up then the CX-7.
Can we consider you a reliable source on this stuff? We certainly need one.
I'm interested in the top of the line model with navigation and assistance package. I don't need moon roof or the Bose system. What's the least expensive way to get there?
I'm interested in the top of the line model with navigation and assistance package. I don't need moon roof or the Bose system. What's the least expensive way to get there?
Top of the line would be the Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring. If you want the Grand Touring assistance package($2,500), you must have the moon roof/ Bose Audio system package as well ($1,760).
If you opt for just a Grand Touring, they list at $34,470. If you go for just the moon roof/ Bose Audio package, your total is $36,230. If you add the Grand Touring Assistance package, you will pay $38,730. That's a total option price of $4,260, which is similar to the Tech Package on the CX-7 ($4,005), however, you do get a power lift gate in the CX-9. On the CX-9 GT the Advanced Keyless Entry and Ignition system is standard, it is packaged in the Tech Package for the CX-7.
I would expect to pay in the $38,000 range, depending on what type of deal you work out with your local dealer. Some may discount, some may not. I know when we get our first few, we will not be discounting.
I'm not completely clear yet. Here are my specs:
* Grand Touring
* Assistance package
* Navigation system
Is this combination possible, or must the moonroof or Bose system be included?
There's a little article in the newest Motor Trend about it. Generally they seem to really like it. They said that they engine had a wonderful power curve and estimated 0-60 at under 8 seconds which is pretty good for it's class.
And, because of the very broad application of this engine, it will become attractive to after-market producers to offer perfomance enhancements.
Pioneer AVIC-Z1 navigation head unit $1,569.99
Pioneer GEX-P10XMT tuner for XM radio & Nav-Traffic $169.99
Pioneer WD-BT1 Bluetooth unit for the AVIC-Z1 $134.99
Pioneer ND-BC1 rear view camera $189.99
PAC SWI-PS steering wheel control interface $49.99
Interface to turn on Ford Audiophile amplifier from
http://www.sminntech.com/ampinterface.html $11.99 + shipping
The total comes to $2,127 for a system far superior to the factory offering.
You could also buy a portable navigation unit from Garmin which has XM NavTraffic.
I drive all over southern CA (35,000 plus miles per year for business), and think that the NavTraffic will be very helpful, as none of the traffic reports on the radio are really good enough, and the AVIC-Z1 will integrate the NavTraffic information into the route planning / guidance.
It was definitely not operator error, or incorrect setting of preferences. I have 5 years experience with automotive GPS units, and consider myself a GPS enthusiast.
This was the worst error we found. During our trip from Liberal to Green Valley, the unit continually re-calculated the route, directing us northward.
An unforgiveable error occurred during our southwest driving on Rt. 54. The unit directed us to take a gravel road to another gravel road, then back to paved Rt. 54. In other words, two sides of a gravel triangle, ignoring the paved hypotenuse.
Also, the voice guidance sounds like Frasier's wife Lilith with a sore throat. The "repeat" button gets a LOT of work.
lateralg- I forgot to ask - do you have an AVIC-Z1, Pioneer's latest and greatest, or some other / older model?
XM Navtraffic would be excellent for deciding what to do based on traffic flow, and the AVIC-Z1 integrates it nicely:
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/v3/pg/division/0,,2076_310069609,00.html
We have a laptop which can access the Internet to reach the live traffic data maps over the cell phone network, but holding a laptop in a car is really ackward, it takes a substantial amount of time to boot it and connect to the internet, and the cell connection to the Internet is not reliable enough.
I have the OEM Pioneer nav. system in my 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.
As long as Ford has a business relationship with Sirius, it would be unreasonable to expect to find XM NavTraffic or XM anything offered by Ford. Of course, I think that Ford needs to see that XM has NavTraffic, something which people want, and offer a choice of XM with NavTraffic or Sirius without it.
On my current car, I had a company install "remote start". About a year later my ABS light kept coming on. I brought it in to the dealer. When the service guy went under the dash and saw that the remote start "unit" was under the dash,(resting against the ABS unit) the first thing he said was "well, somebody's been messing with the wires down there and COULD HAVE affected the ABS and I should go back to the guy who installed the remote start to check it out".. It did work out o.k. in the end, but it could have been a "situation".
The MDX is surely the easy way to have Nav-Traffic (and there are other vehicles), but at $8,000 more than the comparable CX-9, it will have to be clearly superior in many more ways than that before I could justify it. Also, the Acura navigation system is NOT touch screen, but has one of those knobs.
These 2 reasons alone are likely enough for people not to renew subscriptions when they buy cars that come with satellite. If it wasn't for that darn iPod, I'm sure both companies would be doing better...
I cancelled the Sirius sat radio subscription that came with our Jetta TDI. Listening to the classical vocal station was unbearable and low-fidelity. IMHO it's worse than AM or mp3. I think the advantages of sat radio might be worthwhile if I were a long-haul trucker that needed to listen to major league team games coast to coast. You are correct: an iPod with music recorded via Apple Lossless is far superior w/o the monthly $12.99 hit.
Jay
As for music, I personally enjoy would enjoy a feature Rockford Fosgate employed in one of their CD players. It was a hard drive unit that could be placed in the trunk that could make a wireless connection to your computer in the house. That way you could park in your garage and download music to your car via your computer.