By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-Cj :confuse:
Honda may have plans to introduce diesel in a year or two instead. And that actually makes more sense.
My guess is around $28k. It would be nice to have NAV as an option in the EX w/cloth. Not a huge fan of leather...have it in my Ody because I wanted the NAV.
It's usefull if you are driving near a brush fire or behind a hay truck or by a cattle farm in cool weather and don't need A/C.
That's not a lot. A ton would amount to less than 1 vehicle!
New Release from American Honda Motor Company
2007 Honda CR-V (Fall 2006) made (built) by
Honda of America Mfg., Inc.
East Liberty Auto Plant
East Liberty, Ohio
2007 Honda CR-V Overview Part 1
"All-Around Class Leader in Style, Dynamics and Versatility with Advanced Safety".
2007 Honda CR-V Overview Part 2
Body Styles, Trim Levels and Options.
2007 Honda CR-V Interior Part 1
Advanced, Safe and Sporty Interior Space.
2007 Honda CR-V Interior Part 2
Part 2 overview.
2007 Honda CR-V Powertrain Part 1
Advanced Technology for Performance, Economy and Low Emissions.
2007 Honda CR-V Powertrain Part 2
Part 2 overview.
2007 Honda CR-V Body Part 1
Dynamic Styling with the Latest Safety Technology.
2007 Honda CR-V Body Part 2
Body overview part 2.
2007 Honda CR-V Chassis
Fun-to-drive with high safety content.
2007 Honda CR-V Specifications
Engineering and dimension specifications.
2007 Honda CR-V Features
Interior and exterior features.
2007 Honda Warranty Information (CR-V) :sick:
Bumper-To-Bumper Warranty (years/miles) = 3/36,000
Powertrain Warranty (years/miles) = 5/60,000
Corrosion Warranty (years/miles) = 5/unlimited
Emissions Warranty (years/miles) =
Federal: 3/36,000 and:
8/80,000 (specified major emission control components)
California: 3/50,000 and:
7 /70,000 (specified high cost emission control components)
I still do not understand why alot of the goodies from Europe don't make it here.
In Europe, a CR-V is very expensive as opposed to here, where it is a lower-priced model. Their bottom-end cars make ours look huge and luxurious (a Honda Civic is about relatively midsized for over there, so it gets the nicer gadgets; plus, the cost is just higher!).
The All New CR-V
The All New CR-V
Active Front Lighting (AFS), a system whereby the driver’s view of the road ahead is enhanced by the low beam headlamps turning in the direction the vehicle is turning, is also available on the CR-V for the first time.
Honda Motor Europe News
Does the USA, Canada & Mexico (North American Version) have AFS, signal mirrors, the power seat and 18 inch alloy wheels optionals on EX and EX-L available?
If not offer optionals in USA then I'll be disappointed because Euro Version is so jealousy. What if USA version will have offer in the new year of 2008 model and also refresh (will re-redesign) on front grill?
That's not fair because new European Version CR-V is (made) built by East Liberty Auto Plant in East Liberty, Ohio. They'll delivery to European countries starting in January 1st, 2007.
As I come across more pictures, I notice that the front lower grill takes on different looks from different angles, and with different colors and trim levels. It appears to get chrome strips on the EX and EX-L models, but is all black on the LX. We'll probably only get a good feel for it in person. I am thinking darker colors would look better on LX, and middle to lighter colors better on EX and EX-L. There is an "amphi-car" look from some angles (RDX has it too) because of the scooped out lower air damn, but that I'll have to see in person to get a real feel for.
Overall, this is looking like a real nice vehicle, and is much more compelling to me than the RDX (which was more or less a disappointment). There are two key factors for me, TBD on a test drive -- how does it handle, and how is the power. I have liked past CR-Vs except for those two factors. They always felt underpowered and tippy. If Honda improved on that, I would be preally pleased and might finally consider a CR-V. I also don't consider the reactive AWD system to be as good as some of the pro-active systems from other makes, but it's certainly enough for slippery conditions.
It's unfortunate you can't get heated seats on the cloth EX model, but I can't remember Honda ever offering heated seats with anything but leather. Dual zone climate control would be nice (seems like it would be a logical feature on the EX-L). Heated seats and dual-zone are two features that really improve my marriage on the road, and would be tough to live without.
I personally like the new front end becuase it stands very wide and is very thick, if only they got rid of those 3 chrome lines it would help a lot
" You would think they would have....."
"The front end is ugly"
" The front end looks good"
" Why didn't they offer a V-6"
" Who needs a V-6"
" They should heve included a ...."
" Oh, it's so much better now"
" Why did they mess it up?"
" What a beautiful color!"
" Oh YUCK!What a horrible color"
Last week. five of our guys want to the Ride and Drive for the new CRV and I have never seen such an excited bunch when they returned...EVER!
There will always be those who find fault but overall, it's going to be a big time winner!
Wondering if black cloth is offered this year again.
I'm surprised Honda kept the two-tone paint w/black.
The '07 CRV would look sweet in all white, no black accents - like the Odyssey.
I think a diesel as the 2nd engine option might be a better strategy as well, or perhaps a hybrid.
A V6 CR-V would cannibalize both the Pilot and the RDX.
A hybrid or diesel wouldn't hurt either of those. So even if volumes are low, they would be incremental sales.
Does the 2.2l diesel they sell in Europe meet '07 emissions standards in the USA?
-juice
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
I'd rather have squared off windows on my wagons but I suppose you'll get used to the visibility when backing fast enough. That doesn't sound right - but if you back up fast enough, then the heck with seeing where you are going, lol.
A flatter roof line would be my preference too, but roof racks should be able to accomodate the slight slope of the roof. The slope might even make it easier to load canoes from the rear.
More room under the second row of seats would be nice for sliding paddles and skis/snowboards in the back; the photos I've seen don't show much clearance there, if any. That's easily solved by leaving one of the split seats down.
I had a narrow shelf in my minivan; it was pretty useless and I threw it away after a year or so. A full size one may be ok and it'll hide the stuff under it. But putting stuff on top without a net or bungies is just asking for flying projectiles in an emergency stop.
30 mpg highway on regular with the 2WD is sweet, but a stick option would be sweeter.
Do I have to mention that the lift up tailgate and no spare hanging off the back gets two thumbs up? :shades:
No TMV yet but I bet it stays pegged at MSRP for the opening blitz.
I expect it to be a big winner... Still offers a lot of utility for the dollars..
Truthfully, I never thought either Gen1 or Gen2 was especially attractive.. I doubt there is anything in this model that will hold down sales..
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
The current model has this feature. It is not new.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
V6 eating sales from other models isn't really a valid concern since Toyota has similar overlap...
I'm curious as to why you feel that way. Is it simply a function of the price difference? I can't think of anything else since the RDX is clearly the superior vehicle in terms of performance, features, technology, luxury, prestige, and even the subjective issue of styling.
Because Europeans will pay for them.
The RDX is a dedicated sport CUV. It excels are being sporty (as much as a CUV can). There's simply not much utility in it.
I think the CR-V is a more well-rounded player. It's more of a jack of all trades. And I suspect that's the same reason why C-Hunter may prefer it.
I remember when the new Civic was just coming out and the spy photos were making the rounds...holy cow you'd a thought that Honda had gone off the deep end.
The CR-V will sell well...very well. For me that's what matters the most.
My wife and I are a two CR-V family. I have a 2001 SE and she has a 2004 EX w/manual.
Looking at the 2007 I see where it has some real advantages over our cars, so I am very excited to actually have them in the dealership.
And the current Accord at it's debut (the back end specifically), the now previous generation CR-V (the front end looked "cartoonish") etc. It's the nature of the beast. People need to complain.
So the accords or Tl's v6 will work well in the CR-v and will put it with the Rav-4 and Santa fe/ Sorento.
Btw, Honda may offer us a diesel. Since honda already said that there will be no hybrid SUVs, i highly doubt we'll see one.
-Cj
And would completely overpower their Pilot (247 hp)& RDX(240 hp) models.
Personally, I don't feel that what Toyota did was too smart; they are just robbing Peter (Highlander - approx 220 hp, no 3rd row, more expensive) to pay Paul (RAV4).
Honda offers LX, EX and SE grades
People should have the choice - do I want a bare bones CR-V or an upscale version with leather, signal mirrors, heated mirrors, head lamp washers etc.
So Honda has decided for me - that I can't afford it?
Yep, the Crave page is a form of subliminal advertising directed at those of a certain age (low number) and equal IQ. You must not qualify!
Considering that the fog light kit lists for $319, looks like another $4-500 install depending on the dealership.
It sounds like Honda is (more?) actively courting the female vote here.
Bob
To sum it up, yes toyota did good by offering up a v6 but messed up because the v6 is too strong. The Rav-4 should have used the Camry's old V6. Honda has a great 4cyl but messed up by not having a v6 at all.
IMO, the Cr-v and Element need a v6 and diesel since both are almost too heavy for their current engines (An element weighs almost 3,600lbs) but both have neither. Honda should have one but doesn't. I'll talk about the pilot and MDX later and elsewhere.
-Cj
Diesel version would be interesting, but I've never had the feeling that my '05 CR-V EX auto is underpowered. I don't use it to tow, haul six chubby passengers or pull stumps. I've been told the R stands for "runabout" and for that it fits the bill perfectly. If I needed a vehicle for those other tasks there would have plenty to choose from.
The CR-V is nimble in traffic, doesn't feel like the Queen Mary in a mall parking lot, has no problem safely accelerating to merge on the highway and easily holds 70 for hours when asked to. As long as the '07 can do those things, it should find appreciative owners, homely snout and all.
A somewhat off-topic thought -- I've read that in the summer of 2007, the redesigned Mini-Cooper will offer the option of a twin turbo, four cylinder diesel. (plus a non-turbo and turbo version of the premium gas-powered four) I think it's a tremendous plus that motorists are beginning to see small displacement but powerful engines that offer improved fuel economy. I applaud Honda's determination to get power out of a high-revving four, rather than just opt for more displacement. I wish my crystal ball could show what's a few years down the road.
Low on utility in many ways. It's more like a big hatchback than an SUV/wagon. Smallish cargo area.
Though there's good legroom for the driver, the wide center console makes the overall cockpit a bit cramped.
Significant turbo lag off the line, so the power isn't as great as expected from marketing claims. At the same time, the gas mileage is a mediocre 19/23. I keep wondering what the point of the powertrain choice is.
I still like the RDX overall, and will revisit it as street prices drop a bit and we get some real world gas mileage data. It just wasn't a slam dunk with me on the first impression.
For substantially less money, the CR-V looks to offer better gas mileage and much more utility. The downsides compared to the RDX will be much less power and probably worse handling. These two factors need to be evaluated in a CR-V test drive of course....