By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
And one day I decided try the #93 gas instead of #87 I used for years. You know what, I am now trouble free from 'Engine Power Reduce' problems for over 30000 mils. And my engine light never light on again and my Yukon runs like a charm.
If you still have ''Engine Power Reduce' problems, please try #93 gasline, and you might find yourself a solution.
I hope everyone ready form can share this information, it might help you and your friends.
Thanks.
And one day I decided try the #93 gas instead of #87 I used for years. You know what, I am now trouble free from 'Engine Power Reduce' problems for over 30000 mils. And my engine light never light on again and my Yukon runs
If you still have ''Engine Power Reduce' problems, please try #93 gasline, and you might find yourself a solution.
I hope everyone ready form can share this information, it might help you and your friends.
Thanks.
And one day I decided try the #93 gas instead of #87 I used for years. You know what, I am now trouble free from 'Engine Power Reduce' problems for over 30000 mils. And my engine light never light on again and my Yukon runs
If you still have ''Engine Power Reduce' problems, please try #93 gasline, and you might find yourself a solution.
I hope everyone ready form can share this information, it might help you and your friends.
Thanks.
Dont buy GMC anymore!! They are worse and more negligent than cadillac that cant make a bumper stay on their cars which is much less hazardous!
We need to stop them before someone dies
Until i noticed a plu where the battery is all the way passed the fuse bax theres this thing bolted to the frame.theres 2 plugs one was unplugged.plugged it in its been good for 2 days so far.
I have a Tech 2 analyzer, and did capture one REP event. Still looking over the data, and trying to determine what the tolerance is for the redundant control circuits to "agree".
The Tech 2 actually retains data for a few points in time during the event. At the time of the event, the Accelerator Pedal was calling for 30%, the TP Desired Angle was 27%, and the TP Indicated Angle was 32%. So some big differences.
More detailed info is available in other screens around the event. One data point in the instant after the code was thrown:
Throttle Position Desired Angle was 12%
Throttle Position Indicated Angle was 17%
So I would agree that a 5% difference is enough to throw the code. The accelerator pedal was off at that time, because I let up (0% on each) -- with the voltage at the pot of .55V on sensor 1, and .57V on sensor 2. These pretty consistently track .02 to .04 V off from each other, which I think is probably OK for an analog voltage in a car that's 16 years old. (but only 118,000 miles.)
So the Throttle Body was either sticking open, not closing fast enough, or there was a wiring fault that reared its head at an inopportune time. Removed the TB and cleaned it thoroughly, replaced. Did the 'tug test' gently on wiring at the TB connector. It ran better for the next day or two when it was cold and dry, but once the rains returned, we're back to a couple resets per trip. (I have a reader plugged in all the time, so I can do it while driving -- but it's still not fun.)
Various internet browsings have targeted the cause to be wiring, not sensor related. I'm going down the path of making sure all my wiring is good before replacing the sensors.
I should note here that my other 'car' is a 50+ year old British sports car, that is no stranger to electrical gremlins. Experience has shown that most sudden onsets of weird problems in normally-unrelated systems boil down to bad grounds. Grounds are usually designed 'geographically', grounding whatever circuit is nearby, rather than being functionally segregated. (Audio systems are the usual exception to this.) On more modern cars, the attempt seems to be to carry grounds to the device, rather than rely on local grounds. This is good and bad -- few things are more robust than the frame of the vehicle, but making a rust-free connection to the frame can be an issue. (Which is the issue I think I have.) Carrying ground wires in the harness is the other approach, but then you're running grounds thru contacts in a connector, which increases possibility of failure.
I'm going to clean-up the frame and tighten grounds at the point below the driver's door hinges (based on internet remarks) and attend to the back-of-engine grounds too. Then I'll begin the hunt (on the internet) for the location of other ground points outside of the engine bay. We'll see how that goes.
I'm toying with the (ill-advised) idea of eliminating the redundancy of the position sensor system, and hard-wiring the wipers of each pot together (temporarily). The redundancy exists to prevent a bad potentiometer from giving you full- or no-throttle. But connecting them together would result in only slightly more open or closed throttle positons, not full-on or full-off. You may be left with fast idle, or have to 'give it more gas', but you'd have more than 10% power. Not a long-term solution of course, but it would let me wait until it's warmer than -6 or so to work on it...