By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
It's the many innocent American victims that I am concerned with.
TM
How exactly would you know "it doesn't work" then if not for the company failing on cash flow, like they are doing now? Car sales being dependent on the overall health of the economy, how exactly would "doesn't work" manifest itself when the economy is going well? In good times, companies can make money on all sorts of things. In fact, when GM was selling SUV's like hot cakes in 1998, the union struck and cost the company $4 billion. Was that a manifestation of "doesn't work"? The company managed to chug along thanks money coming in from GMAC credit card and mortgage financing. Do you think in your model some government official would have or should have stepped in to shut down the company and fire the UAW as a matter of governmetn fiat?
"I don't think we need to kill the patient to kill the disease. It makes more sense to get the patient healthy first, and then be in a better position to fight the disease head on"
Bankruptcy Court Protection under Chapter-11 filing is not killing the patient. It's a therapy for killing cancer cells that ail the patient. Constant blood transfusion is not the answer when the gaping hole in the body is not patched up first. The huge interest payment on corporate junk bonds and the labor liability are the two bodily wounds that are bleeding the Detroit-3 dry. In order to save them, we have to patch up the wounds and stop the bleeding first. Keep pumping blood transfusion is not going to save the patient, the only tangible result would be exhausting the blood bank, and leaving not just these patients but also many other patients dead.
They don't need a financial crisis as a catalyst for failure. They are perfectly capable of failing on their own, and have been heading in that direction for years.
The country doesn't need the extra unemployment and economic shockwave that would absolutely result from their collapse. While some might disagree, it's not even worth the risk.
And, any suggestion that they can continue on their collision course perpetually in a good economy doesn't hold water. We see that they were already committing suicide.
That's why I say keep 'em floating until the economy improves. Then let 'em sink or swim... and the side effects from their failure wouldn't be as devastating to a healthier overall economy, which would be more capable of absorbing some of the fallout. And, of course, there's always the chance for their success... and the entire restructuring process would be overseen as well.
This approach essentially changes the timing, and allows the potential for restructuring and success with less risk to badly-timed economic calamity. And the door would still be open to bankruptcy if they failed to implement a new successful business model. So that option would remain.
TM
I would like to see real changes tied to this loan program - examples would be union concessions, restructuring the P&Ls with more R&D spend and less G&A, and true pay for performance for anyone above middle management. And a payback period for the loans that would require them to be paid in full or file Chapt 11, a 36 month cycle would be fine with me. If they couldn't institute reforms by then, they deserve to go under.
TM
Yet, in defense of the Big 3, the world does actually buy their products in very large numbers. But... the companies have pathetic business models that don't turn a profit.
There are some real winners from GM... the latest Chevrolet Corvette is an awesome vehicle. The latest Silverado (and GMC counterpart) is terrific. The Escalade is a winner without a doubt... for those that like that sort of thing.
History has shown that Americans do like one vehicle above all others... the Ford F-150. This will change due to the recent gas situation, but the record is very long and consistent with regards to this truck from Ford. Also the Mustang is an icon, and the latest rendition should be even better. Ford has a good hybrid offering as well.
Chrysler's 300 is one of the best-looking sedans and is a good value.
Many Americans like to bash our own domestic auto industry, and for good reason. But, this current situation isn't about evaluating their products. It's about the current financial situation and how to avoid a calamity, and it's about forging ahead with a concrete plan that will address the concerns of the past and put the Big 3 on the right path.
BTW, good post. Thanks for that good laugh.
TM
VOR45, first of all I need to tell you that you are a terrific debater.
I have been out and about the past couple days and I'm trying to catch up on the many well thought of posts here and also keep on top of my New England Patriots and Boston Red Sox happenings
They look forward to you joining them! :shades:
"A bunch of those government officials and Wall Street bastards deserve to go to jail for what they've done. "
Tag, actually I understand. The WallStreet bailout I actually opposed, though as always I can understand why the government bailed them out. I agree with you and vote for the Wallstreet execs responsible for this mess to get canned for life. I stand by my beliefs of "Natural selection, survival of the fittest", but it doesnt apply in the financial crisis, there's just too much dirt around. If only Obama got the guts, he'll send the execs to jail in no time.
As for the D2 case, I'm faced with a dilemma. One side of my brain says drop dead. They're not responsible for the crisis, true, however the same goes vice versa, the crisis is NOT responsible for the D2's condition now. This is where natural selection comes in, they no longer fit to survive. Plus bailing out means saving UAW, I wont support salvaging a crate of rotten apples, hell no. Please note that a huge part of the reason the bailout goes bust is because the UAW refused the new wage contract, those pigs. However, the other side of my brain realize that there will be negative effects, no matter how slight, at this point it will still be significant enough to harm our economy even further.
There is one other way imo. The government gives not a bailout but instead buy and take over the D2. Pretty much current GM and Chrysler are worth about the same as their bailout request. Then we can force new contract with lesser pay for UAW. Take it or leave it. If the government takes this path, they have my support. I've said this and I will say it again: I will not support helping D3 under its current management. Not only Wagoner, the whole management board must go. I also think they shouldve done the same with Wallstreet.
Thanks!
TM
TM
Yes got them down to 36,200 then add tax and tags. its an 08, new last one. Black on Black (not what i would have picked but hey) awd, R350 gas with some options. pk1, heated seats, sunroof, ipod and a few other things.
In your recent post you wrote:
I now have a 60,000 mercedes
What was the $24,000 discount for? In your recent post you state that you noticed that the vehicle was dinged and scratched as soon as you got home from the dealer. I can't help but wonder how you missed the damage at the time you picked up the vehicle and that perhaps you were able to get a $24,000 discount because of this damage.
When taking delivery it was practically your last chance to reject the car, thorough inspection should've been done by then. However I wont ask any further as eyesight is a factor here as well (I'm not trying to call you blind or anything, btw
Be careful when anyone (be it Ford, Mercedes, Lexus or even Ferrari) say they will fix a damage in the 1000 mile service. You should always demand immediate service and, if possible, document your complaints, take pictures of the damage. Time is very essential in such case. If impossible you should at least demand an official document, letter of agreement or something like that you can keep as evidence. If you have no legal documents from MB, this can be troublesome for you in taking legal actions.
Here's what I know, in many states if a car has been exposed to weather anomalies like hail storms, its mandatory for the manufacturer and/or dealer to put the car under "Salvage" title. Depending on state laws it is still possible to sell the car as new, however the salvage title should be on the documents. If no such document is present then it'll be easy to file a lawsuit. However, once again I must remind you this varies by state. Check your state law for more infos.
An old friend of mine bought a new Nissan Maxima in 2003, and the car he bought had been previously damaged from a hailstorm that hit the factory. Nissan provided the salvage title documents but dealer sold the car as new and clean. Filed a lawsuit against the dealer and he received a replacement unit in 3 weeks.
Goodluck.
This has happened before, does anyone recall Toyota's sudden sales drop when the revived Nissan dropped the "2002 Altima bomb" on them? It handily took a whole chuck out of Camry and Accord's sales.
Check this out: GM decided to build the upcoming Cruze in a "new" plant in Shenyang industrial area, China. I have no online source, it's just something I watched in the news. All this BS talk about keeping Americans in jobs hence the need for aid, while at the same time they remove a plant to China to cut production costs. I wonder, how is that relevant to keeping employees from getting laid off????
GM board of execs definitely have a hidden agenda behind this bailout proposal. Though I must ask how stupid can they be doing this the same time they still expect the bailout proposal to get accepted? Or perhaps GM is pulling a threat on congress, "give us money or we produce somewhere else"? To me it only makes my point even more obvious, GM has neither plan to restructure nor to avoid BK.
Still think GM deserve a bailout? Comments, anyone?
I'll be interested in hearing if this car had a $20K+ discount on it, which would go a long way toward explaining some of this.
By the way, paragraphs are good things.
Try Range Rover.
...
:surprise:
Sorry. I just threw up in my mouth a little bit. :sick:
Try Range Rover.
Sorry. I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
Range Rover...Range Rover...Range Rover...Range Rover...Range Rover.
There ya' go, Derrick... now you should have puked your guts out. LOL
TM
Regards,
OW
Dum dee dum dum... :sick:
Is the beginning of what will be even worse.. or the end of the what has been the worst?
TM
No loss, IMO. They have many programs. They can call them anything they want. They will use some of the technological and performance gains they have acquired from the "NSX program" and transplant it to one or more of their other projects... like their electric supercar, for example.
And, who knows?... maybe some day one of these projects will develop to the point that a simple executive decision will name it the NSX all over again.
TM
Yessirree! If boxy floats your boat, then this is what you've been waiting for.
I like to drive not float!
Regards,
OW
If you gave me the money to buy one of these things, I'd spend it on a 3-series coupe or sedan configured according to God's will - with RWD & a stick. There'd be a lot of money left over, & I'd spend that fighting the recession in all sorts of vaguely immoral ways.
I believe it's neither. Its the beginning of the end of what's been the worst.
PS: I'm serious.
Call me crazy, but I really like the Touareg!
If you say something like "I really like the Aztec", now that needs professional help.
TM
I don't like SUVs, but if I had to get one, the Touareg (V8) would be #1 on an extremely short list. The other plus for me is, as you mentioned, it's actually offroad capable and has a hefty tow capacity to boot (7600 pounds; significantly more w/ proper chassis bracing (747 jumbo jet, anyone?)) I'd love to have that V10 TDI, but the price of entry on one of those is heart-clutching!! :surprise:
Now back to that interior. Don't laugh, but have a good look at the interior of the new Kia Borrego and tell me if it doesn't seem oddly familiar.
Ugh, no thanks. I think I'd rather walk than drive that 5,300lb. pork machine. The Q5 is about the only SUV I would even consider driving myself. I'm not going off road, so keep your thousand pound differentials off, please.
'21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)
Show up in a Hondajet. Richard Shelby ought to get a kick out of that.
TM
Unless, of course, she sold my watches for downpayment money for her Porsche...
'21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)
Pardon me my curiosity , which model?
Regards,
Jose
'21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)