Toyota Highlander

1140141143145146211

Comments

  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    The RX and the HL will have 50/50 torque distribution F/R as long as traction is roughly equal F/R. They use an open center differential and you will find this to be factual anywhere you want to look/research.

    With an open center differential the "problem" occurs when traction is significantly lower at one end or the other to the point of breakaway, wheel slippage. In that case ALL of the effort will be expended at the end with least traction.

    This is where the HL or RX VC, viscous coupling, clutch, mounted across the two outputs of the center differential, is supposed to step in and overcome this shortcoming of the open differential.

    The basic principle of the VC is that as the two sets of interspersed clutch plates rotate at disparate rates the viscous fluid into which they are immersed will become heated and increase its viscosity dramatically. The increase in viscosity increases the coupling coefficient between the two sets of clutch plates forcing "equal" drive torque to the non-slipping end.

    The open center differentail is placed there to begin with because there are times when the front and rear wheels MUST be allowed to turn at different rates. All VCs are designed for some level of onset coupling lag, typically hundreds of milliseconds, for this very same reason.

    But in the case of the HL and RX the real problem is lack of complexity, the simplicity, of the VC design.

    If the HL and RX VCs were designed to "stiffen" to the point of actual 50/50 coupling and just about then you happened to need to step on your brakes in panic mode that would likely result in loss of control of the vehicle in many circumstances.

    Your front brakes will ALWAYS do about 80% of the work of stopping the vehicle when braking severely. What this means to you is that they will rotate a lot more slowly (ABS, remember?) that the rear during such severe braking.

    Now, if the front driveline were HARD coupled to the rear driveline (VC with HIGH coupling coefficient) at this particular time then the severe, hard, braking of the front wheels would control the rotational rate of the rear wheels, very likely locking them and causing you to lose directional control.

    So Toyota/Lexus chose the KISS route. Their VC is designed such that the F/R coupling is NEVER more than 25%, and this only under extreme conditions over an extended period of tens of seconds.

    So, unlike the Chrysler T&C AWD minivan series, they don't need an over-running clutch in the rear driveline for uncoupling the rear from the from during severe braking.

    That's why, on adverse roadbed conditions, the T&C AWD/VC system will outperform the HL or RX, head and shoulders.

    Let alone the fact that you can safely use snowchains on the T&C if the going gets really rough.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Actually works unless you darken the rear glass.
    But even though it "works", it's still typically not worth the money.

    If you happen to have a three position memory seat, mirror, etc, use the third position to tilt the mirrors down about 5 degrees at night. Works much better.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Leave it to you to tell us what is and is not worth the money. I am actually paying to have this mirror installed in my new Tundra WITH privacy glass. It still works and has the compass. Further, you may not have noticed, but the HL doesn't have memory seats so your suggestion would cost a lot more than the mirror.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    The question was whether or not the auto-dimming mirror was a gimmick or not. So my response that it isn't worth the money was appropriate.

    Before you have yours installed you might want to check about how well it will work with rear privacy glass.

    Nimrod99: Polite suggestion acknowledged but will be ignored, politely. Just because I went out and bought the HL owners manual and shop manuals doesn't mean I'll go out and purchase an actual HL in order to participate.

    highinkc: In some parts of the world the A/C can be used year-round to dehumidify the cabin's incoming airflow and thereby help to defog the windshield. The ability of the A/C to accomplish this task with any level of efficiency declines precipitously as the ambient temperature declines below 50 to 55 degree F until at about 35F it is non-existant.

    The idiot designers at NipponDenso, Denso USA, also forgot that once the Defrost/defog/demist function is turned off, and the A/C is subsequently turned off, any moisture just previously condensed onto the A/C evaporator vanes will begin to evaporator into the cabin airstream.

    Meaning that once you have used the A/C for defog assist you will soon need to use it again and again and ......

    Personally I disable the A/C entirely by unplugging the connector at the refrigerant pressure switch/sensor just in front of the condensor/radiator assembly in the fall and don't plug it in again until I discover I need A/C the next year.

    The best, most sure way to defog your windshield and keep it defogged in cold weather is to apply heated airflow. Turn up the heat and blower level when, just before, you activate the defog function.

    In order to achieve higher MPG ratings AND use the A/C year 'round Toyota/Lexus severely restricts the outflow of cabin air.

    I have had instances wherein with four people in an LS400 in the wintertime with the OAT so low the A/C was automatically locked out the interior humidity become so high my only recourse was to lower the rear windows slightly. This in the dead of winter on a snowy high mountain pass.

    LS400: absolute best car/value in the world and can't defog its own windshield.

    And yes, I'm well aware that the HL doesn't have memory seats, but some of us, maybe many of us, own more than one car/vehicle. So it was only an OT helpful hint.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    I did. I've driven several as a matter of fact and they work are intended. Further, even if the auto dimming feature didn't work, I would have still purchased it for the compass and outside temp gauge. I suppose you are going to tell me that isn't worth it either. You have such a firm grip on my values and checking account that you can make that determination.
  • stuartcstuartc Member Posts: 33
    The dealer selling to me at invoice is Toyota of Nashua in Nashua, NH (near the MA border). Their web site explains what they're selling at invoice. Their site also details the pre-configured models that Toyota sells to all dealers in New England. They provide the MSRP and Invoice price (which I confirmed is correct with other sources) I'm dealing with Tina Decker. Give her a call and mention my name. (Is it ok to post their website address and her phone number?)

    I checked with most of the dealers in the immediate Boston area that are near me (Woburn, IRA, Lexington, Watertown, Boch). I found one that would sell for $300 over invoice; a couple for $500 over and others for more. Let me know if you want any specifics.

    Another NH dealer that offers near invoice is Autofair in Manchester. They have a nice website that provides their bottom line price, which is slightly above invoice. Their no-haggle pricing is better than any of the pricing I got after haggling with the Boston area dealers.

    What dealers are you dealing with and what kind of pricing are they giving you ?
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    No, I only have a firm grip on my own values. And this dialogue started because another party asked if auto-dimming was useful or just a gimmick. I took the middle of the road on that one, but I did add the information, voluntarily, I hope of value to some, that adding privacy glass, or film, to the rear would reduce the effectiveness of the functionality of the auto-dimming feature since the rear looking photocell would be "filtered".

    But I do agree with You. While I value the auto-dimming feature of little use, I find having constant or ready access to the OAT of utmost importance in the wintertime. I never use cruise control with the OAT below 40F. Not to denigrate your need or use of the compass feature in any way, but the only need I have ever found for a compass "on the ground" is while hiking out in the Northwest woods in an overcast.

    But to ease your mind even further, maybe, I just recently purchased an aftermarket mirror just as you describe, but primarily for the OAT feature.
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    (Is it ok to post their website address and her phone number?)

    We suggest that you not provide detailed contact information as it conflicts with the solicitation and promotion section of our Terms of Use. Naming a dealership is fine or even a web address but providing the name and phone number of a specific salesperson crosses the line.

    tidester, host
  • landdriverlanddriver Member Posts: 607
    "4. It says there are 8 speakers in the stereo system. I only count six. Are there two subwoofers hidden somewhere. Also is there a separate amplifier apart from the head unit."

    The rear speakers are coaxial, meaning that they contain both a woofer and a tweeter.

    For the eight speaker sound system there is indeed a separate amplifier apart from the head unit.
  • cmunizcmuniz Member Posts: 604
    I would like one, just one, actual Highlander driver whose actual driving experiences agree with wwest's techno-babble to speak up. If that person exists, then I'll start paying attention to what he says. If that person doesn't exist, then his words are just noise to be drowned out by real-life experiences of our famliy of HL drivers. So far my driving experiences in foul weather don't even come close to what he says and I even like the auto-dimming mirror even though my Limited has the outside temp on the dash. The only comment he has made that is valid for foul weather driving IN MY OPINION is that you can not put chains on the rear wheels. That is a problem if you are trying to cross Donner Pass on I-80 (and others) in deep snow. My 2 cents.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Thank you for completely changing and retracting all your previous statements on auto dimming mirrors.

    At first you said: "[auto dimming] Actually works unless you darken the rear glass."

    Now you say: "that adding privacy glass, or film, to the rear would reduce the effectiveness of the functionality of the auto-dimming feature since the rear looking photocell would be "filtered""

    So, you now admit that auto dimming mirrors can work but with reduced effectiveness. You say this as if the designers were unaware of the existence of privacy glass and I would still be curious to know how you came to such a conclusion. Beyond that, I do appreciate the retraction.

    You then stated: "But even though it "works", it's still typically not worth the money." and "So my response that it isn't worth the money was appropriate"

    This was followed by: "No, I only have a firm grip on my own values" I'm sorry, where in those previous quotes did you indicate anything beyond a flat statement of fact, rather than opinion?

    Finally, I have to ask you about one last quote: "Not to denigrate your need or use of the compass feature in any way, but the only need I have ever found for a compass "on the ground" is while hiking out in the Northwest woods in an overcast." Why would you even say that? What is the point of this statement? You have no idea how I use my vehicle, where I use it or anything else so why even bring up the fact that you don't have a use for a compass in a vehicle? It seems a rather pointless statement... oh yeah, its you so I guess I should be used to pointless statements shouldn't I?
  • toyotakentoyotaken Member Posts: 897
    For those who are reading this forum, wwest seems to be the only one that has had the types of issues he's talked about on his RX300 and by default, he seems to feel that he's an expert on the Highlander. I'm sure that he's actually taken apart the viscous coupling and the whole drivetrain to measure the 50/50 split and 95/5 split of power front/rear.

    This is all in the face of pretty much every other owner of these vehicles who see and feel very different results. We have about 4" in snow here in Buffalo today and, again, closely watching the wheels of many of the AWD Highlanders here in stock, when they spin their tires, there is one front and one rear tire that spin if they do spin the wheels before getting traction.

    NONE of wwest's comments are supported by real-world experience from other owners or by people with any technical expertise on the systems used in these vehicles.

    Just a notice to take comments with a grain of salt.

    Ken
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    I'm not taking sides here but some of this is a bit over the top:

    cliffy1: Why would you even say that? What is the point of this statement?

    I believe it's called discussion. What exactly is wrong with wwest commenting that he doesn't have a need for a compass. Methinks you were taking personal offense where none was intended or even expressed.

    toyotaken: Just a notice to take [wwest's] comments with a grain of salt.

    One might apply that advice to all posts.

    The topic here is not wwest or any other individual. The topic is the Higlander. Let's stick to it!

    tidester, host
  • kybillkybill Member Posts: 44
    It's easy to get caught up in details, rhetoric, conjecture and techno stuff. That's all well and good, but I, for one am more interested in real world stuff and my fellow owners' experiences. Generally, when spending the kind of money we do for vehicles at this level, one should do a fair amount of research. But, it ain't rocket science and there is no perfect.
    Based upon my needs and my reasoning for purchasing this SUV, I am quite satisfied with its performance so far. Are there some minor questions or annoyances? Sure, but again, they are minor and aside from pointing them out to other potential owners, there is little I can do about them.
    As far as this site, I enjoy the information being shared, but I think it's time to get back on point and put the personal stuff behind us. No offense - just my opinion.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Didn't need too. Put all four wheels off the ground, in gear, engine at 2000 RPM, verified I could stop the rear wheels from spinning with simple hand/palm pressure, and then meassured rear torque with standard torque wrench.

    Due to questioning on forum validated my findings on an actual 4 wheel dynomometer.

    Now if someone wants to really argue that the HL is different than the 01 AWD RX I tested then I will not dispute that except to say that the two sets of shop manuals are exactly the same in these areas.

    Now as you know, I own an 01 AWD RX, traded up from an 00 AWD RX to get HID and VSC. I will likely trade up again if the 330 is "attractive" enough. I don't have a real problem with these limitations as long as I know of them and thereby do not allow them to get me into trouble, no trips over donner pass in the wintertime.

    Knowledge IS POWER.
  • shl72953shl72953 Member Posts: 53
    wwest - how does it feel to be the weakest individual on earth? :-)
  • toyotakentoyotaken Member Posts: 897
    Just to keep your Knowledge up, the situation you're describing has very little to do with real-world applications for the AWD systems on these vehicles. The Torque/speed differential between front and rear driveshafts is HUGE when you're driving them and a wheel starts to slip. This large differential in speed causes the clutch plates to start turning at the same speed. The speeds that you're describing are similar to those when making a turn and the systems are designed to allow a large difference in number of turns of the driveshaft at lower speeds to allow turning without binding the driveshafts. The viscous coupling does not start making a difference until quite a bit more speed is involved. You were describing the vehicle turning the wheels at basically idle speed, or about the speed you'd be using when making a U-turn in a parking lot. If the viscous coupling came into effect at those speeds, the drivetrain would be binding every time you made a turn.

    Sorry about my earlier post, but while Knowledge is power, a little knowledge taken out of context and without "the whole picture" is dangerous.

    Ken
  • stuartcstuartc Member Posts: 33
    Hi Tidester:

    Thanks for the clarification on what dealer/salesperson info is ok to post. I didn't want to cross that line.

    -stuartc
  • nimrod99nimrod99 Member Posts: 343
    I have a 2003 AWD V6 Ltd (note its AWD not 95/5 WD)

    Auto Dimming mirror
    Works great even though my rear windows are dark (privacy tint).
    I like the feature very much - especially when people in Excursions or other big trucks are behind me.

    Chains
    You shouldn't put chains on the rear anyway. Chains should go on the front wheels (AWD vehicle). Reason - you need to be able to steer and brake and chains on the front allow that.

    VC works when the fluid heats up? The HL tranny drives both front and rear drive trains all the time - it doesn't magically happen when the fluid heats up? In reality - viscocity decreases with temperature.
  • stuartcstuartc Member Posts: 33
    Hi all:

    I just signed papers for the purchase of a Bluestone Limited that I was able to buy at invoice. I felt that the safety aspect of the VSC option was worth the extra money. Additionally, I felt my wife, who will be the principal driver, deserves the extras that the Limited offers. I really feel good about this purchase.

    The Auto-Dimming mirror was one of the options that was included with this Highlander, so I'm getting it whether I wanted it or not. This option still feels like a gimmick to me, but since I've never experienced this type of mirror, I'll reserve judgement on it.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Where to start...

    IMMHO AWD is of most value to john q public when just starting out in motion. Once you're moving momentum/inertia often takes the place of good traction, unless what you're trying to do is STOP that is.

    As I said earlier a pure open diff'l, ONLY, allows any level of disparate rotational rates between its two output shafts, used in center, front, rear, whatever.

    Almost ALL VCs are designed to have significant LAG time before firming up and increasing the coupling coefficient between the two diff'l output shafts. Oftentimes this delay is accomplished by adding a gas/air bubble within the hermetically sealed VC case.

    Viscosity vs temperature. Basically you are correct, viscosity of any liquid does ALWAYS decrease with rising temperatures. VCs actually work by increasing the EFFECTIVE viscosity as temperature rises.

    HOW? BLACK MAGIC!

    The formulation of the silicon based viscous fluid is such that viscosity itself remains relatively flat over a wide range of temperatures. What does happen as the fluid's temperature rises with disparate rotational rates of the VC clutch plates is that the viscous fluid EXPANDS.

    Remember that gas/air bubble? As the viscous fluid expands the bubble of air is compressed until it resembles a small black hole. Only after the bubble is "fully" compressed to black hole size by the rising fluid pressure will the increasing fluid pressure begin to increase the coupling coefficient of the two sets of VC clutch plates.

    Want to test all of this by yourself?

    Get into any vehicle that can actually LOCK the center diff'l and drive it in a tight circle,very slowly, on dry pavement. Be sure and keep your thumbs and fingers outside of the steering wheel rim. What you're going to feel is the kickback in the steering wheel due to driveline windup from the front and rear drivelines being forced, by the locked center diff'l, to turn at equal rates.

    Now get into any vehicle that truly has AWD of the VC type and do the same thing. My (perfect) example would be any AWD Chrysler minivan. It might take more than one complete circle before that gas bubble is completely compressed but then you should start to feel the same steering wheel "kickback" effect as you felt with the fully locked center diff'l.

    Now try the same test in ANY HL or RX.

    Be aware that some Jeeps have U-joints at the front and if so this will exacerbate the kickback effect with the center diff'l locked. And DO NOT perform this locked center diff'l test for an extended period nor under hard acceleration, you can easily damage the driveline that way, permanently.

    20MPH speed. Toyotaken: You're perfectly correct of course. It's the time period of/for which the two drivelines have disparate rotational rates that's important, not the actual speed at which this occurs. And it is very true that the lower the speed the longer it will take to heat the VC fluid to the point of increasing the coupling.

    I stated the 20MPH only as a circumstance/parameter of my testing. The important point is that I had the rear wheel fully stopped using the torque wrench (forgot to mention that the opposite rear wheel was blocked from turning by a 2X2) for many seconds.

    And please, NO ONE should try this test of/by themselves. I did lots of preliminary testing to assure myself that I could use the torque wrench in this manner safely.

    Snowchains only on the front. If you care to peruse your HL or RX owners manual you will find a section on the use of tires with winter treads. Your owners manual advises that you should NEVER run the vehicle with winter treads on the front and not the rear. I think it says something to the effect of "loss of control of the vehicle can result from this".

    What "this" actually is is greater traction on the front than on the rear, a really, REALLY, easy way to get yourself quickly buried in a snowbank, or worse.
  • dano42dano42 Member Posts: 11
    Recently took delivery of a silver non-limited HL. We love it! After taking several weeks and comparing the Honda Pilot, the GM SUVs, Subaru's, and the new Nisson Marono, we felt the HL offered the highest quality and the best value.

    The only complaint is with the speakers. They certainly do not measure-up to the quality reputation that Toyota has built.

    I installed Polk GHX365 speakers with no additional modifications to the system. What a difference... it sounds great! The four speakers cost $150.

    In response to some questions about cargo and floor mats... I went to a home center and purchased a 4'x 6' rubber carpet mat and cut the mat to fit the cargo area. The gray color matches the interior, looks very nice and cost only $15. I also purchased a piece of carpet runner for $8 and cut it to fit the rear floor area. I then bought front & rear rubber mats for under $30 at a club store. The result is a complete set of mats that provide plenty of protection, look good, and cost little.
  • schneidoschneido Member Posts: 1
    I own a 6cyl AWD 2002 HL non-ltd. I have inquired to my dealership in Milw about the auto dimming mirror and was told that the outside temp feature would not work - only the auto dimming and the compass. Is this true?
  • nimrod99nimrod99 Member Posts: 343
    Dealer is wrong - sort of.

    If you buy the "Mito" auto dimming mirror - you can get compass and outside temp on the same mirror. It should come with the outside temperature probe which you will have to install.


    http://www.mitocorp.com/nvsmirro.htm
    http://www.mitocorp.com/mirror_installation.htm

  • nimrod99nimrod99 Member Posts: 343
    Excuse me wwest - but how / where did you come up with all this stuff on VC and AWD etc? Do you really seriously believe all that stuff you write?

    I would love to see a link to a site that confirms your hypothesis.

    thanks
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    I have nothing to prove.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    and read stuff by Eliot Lim
  • likesgagetslikesgagets Member Posts: 1
    I enjoy my auto dimming mirror. It makes night driving easier because it keeps the headlights in the mirror muted.
    I also like to read my compass situated on the mirror.
    Had my Ltd '02 since Feb. '02 and am very pleased with it.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    ...leave him be...the tests he has performed may or may not accurately mimic real-world driving conditions, but really, I don't think Toyota ever made a pretense that the AWD system in RX/HL was anything more than a light-duty system for a little bit of the wet stuff and a little bit of snow...it may not work well for heavy snow or going up that almost-vertical driveway after the ice storm, but it does the most important thing, which is to help maintain traction under a moving vehicle on plowed wet roads.

    And if it helps with the driveway scenario as well, well then that is probably more than the Toyota literature ever claimed it would do, so then that is a plus.

    Toyota offers several trucks in its line-up with a more heavy-duty 4WD system than this one, and if that is what you need, then that is what you should buy.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • rainbow24rainbow24 Member Posts: 26
    After looking a Highlander and a Honda Pilot, I bought a Pilot. The Highlander was way overpriced, had crappy acceleration compared to the Pilot. The Pilot's safety was the best in class, and Consumer Reports rated the Pilot #1 SUV for 2003. The Highlander is a Pinto compared to a Rolls Royce Pilot. If you buy a Highlander you are stupid and don't do your homework.

    Also the Toyota dealers acted like they were doing me a favor by selling me a piece of crap overpriced Highlander. The Pilot has more room, a bigger engine, netter transmission, and better resale value. The Honda dealers were more receptive and acted like they were friends for life.

    Toyota can SUCK IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    As Lee Iacocca often said: "If you can find a better car, buy it!" :-)

    tidester, host
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    you found one bad dealer, decided bigger was better, and plagued us THREE TIMES with your Pilot purchase news?! LOL

    Good and bad dealers are everywhere, HL's size makes it easier to park in the city, and for comparably equipped vehicles, it seems real-world prices on HLs are a lot less than Pilots.

    Hey look, I only wrote that once! :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Refreshing the page before going elsewhere after posting will often cause repeats. I zapped the "extras" :-)

    Don't forget the Nissan Pathfinder vs Toyota 4Runner vs Dodge Durango vs Honda Pilot vs Toyota Highlander - please advise! discussion for this type of comparision.

    Steve, Host
  • dougweaverdougweaver Member Posts: 48
    It seems to me if you were 100% sure of your purchase you would be spending your time on the Honda and Pilot pages and not here. I think you are still having problems with your decision and so you are still trying to convince yourself that you didn't make a mistake. For me the HL fits our needs completely. Seating for five with a lot of storage in back. If I needed the extra seating I would have considered the Pilot. dpw
  • rainbow24rainbow24 Member Posts: 26
    Both the Toyota and Honda were nice. The safety and issues with Toyota and sludge in their engines made it overwhelming for me to buy the Pilot. Plus the better price & performance. Everyone I talked to thought the Highlander looked like a woman's vehicle also, the Pilot looked more manly.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    The RX330 drops the inadequate, more expensive and uniquely T/L "flaccid" VC design, in favor of an ML type (brake, braking, implementation, via the VSC ecu) torque distribution and traction control system. As good as the Sequoia? Or too "soft" (non-aggressive) for the real world so as to accommodate the needs/desires of soccer Moms? We shall see.

    Hopefully the HL will get the same upgrade which will likely mean VSC/Trac will become standard.

    No longer any reason to settle for FWD!
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    just to play devil's advocate for a moment, I can't help myself...what are the safety issues associated with the HL?

    And as far as sludge, did you stop to consider the Honda transmission recall that affected more than 15 times as many Hondas as the sludge thing? LOL IIRC, that recall included the MDX, which uses an almost identical powertrain, and the same transmission.

    I won't even touch the gender security thing....

    On a serious note, I am very curious to know if you priced out a comparably equipped HL, or if you stopped when you were treated rudely by the dealer...I would be very surprised if a comparably equipped HL could not be had for less than the Pilot.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    http://www.autosite.com/editoria/asmr/svsuv.asp.


    HL is outselling Pilot even though Pilot is the brand new model! Just thought I would mention that...in the midsize segment there is an awful lot of competition...

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • nimrod99nimrod99 Member Posts: 343
    Glad you got what you feel is a better vehicle.
    I looked into the Pilot before deciding on my V6 AWD ltd HL.

    If you go to the nhtsa.gov site and look at the service bulletins on the 2003 Pilot - you will see quite a lot listed, There are zero for the 2003 Highlander.
    My reasons for NOT getting a Pilot
    1) Red rear turn signals (Inherently unsafe compared to amber rear turn signals)
    2) Too wide (77" is way to wide to park without getting door dings)
    3) 3 rows of seats (I only need 1 row - maybe the second row gets used 1 day per year?)
    4) Too heavy (240 hp for 4,440 lbs = 18.5 lbs/Hp
    Highlander is 220 hp for 3880 lbs = 17.6 lbs/hp)
    5) No traction control (VSC)
    6) No moon roof
    7) No heated side mirrors (for cold weather)

    As for the sludge issue - its just lazy owners who don't change their old according to the maintenance interval. Granted - the engine may be susceptable to sludging only if you don't change the oil.
  • peter78peter78 Member Posts: 284
    After reading the various sludge forums on Edmunds Town Hall, it became evident the sludge issue was more than just lazy owners. I am glad Toyota now has a 8 year warranty for the owners that are effected by this problem. Please note that you still have to have regular oil changes for the new 8 year warranty to be effective. The people that finally got Toyota to honor their warranty had to show evidence of oil changes.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Since when did you start allowing posters to call other posters "stupid?" Further, I had been under the impression that references to sexual acts were forbidden ("Toyota can suck it"? Suck what?). If the user agreement has changed, let me know.
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    The user agreement has not changed. While the phrase you cite is somewhat suggestive it is also sufficiently ambiguous to place it firmly in the gray area. In any case, I suggest avoiding the use of such phrases.

    tidester, host
  • hsvillagehsvillage Member Posts: 36
    People buy vehicles for different reasons,rainbow24 wanted a manly SUV so he gave up his Geo and bought a Pilot. There are a lot of men who try and prove their manhood by buying big cars/Suvs and then ruin the illusion by opening their mouths. There has been a lot of useful information in this discussion, in fact I bought my HL after visiting here for 6 months. Calling people stupid reflects an immature personality and does nothing to gain support for his opinions. Having a bad experience while shopping for a vehicle is not unusual and "venting" is also to be expected but to castigate all Highlander owners is way over the top. From now on I will have to treat rainbow24 like wwest and hit the "page down" button when I see their posts.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    Fair enough. Its your site. I was just a bit shocked to see something like that not only left up but actually responded to by the hosts.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Home engineer?

    I would like you to know that NASA continues to communicate with Pioneer 10, now almost 8 BILLION miles from earth, compliments of this "home engineer".

    cliffy1:

    How is it that you can denigrate, disparage, and question the information I post, and " beat up on willard" if you ignore my posts by simply paging down?

    Telepathic communications?
  • kybillkybill Member Posts: 44
    Must be lots of owners selling those "wonderful" Pilots to other unsuspecting folks, if there are already big resale totals!! I find that quite interesting, especially for a brand new model.

    As for belittling other people, that will do nothing to strengthen your argument or increase the respect others in the forum might have for you. It's OK to disagree, just don't become disagreeable.
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    What are you talking about? I'm not the one who said they scroll past your inane posts. That was hsvillage.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Cliffy1

    would it help if I double up on my apologies?

    Not paying close enough attention am I?

    Guess this means you're not telepathic after all, DAMN and all those messages wasted. Oh, well, probably just as well.
  • nimrod99nimrod99 Member Posts: 343
    What's the likelihood that the 2004 Highlander will get the same engine as the RX 330 (3.3 liter V6 230 Hp, 242 ft-lb)
    the EPA mileage is 18/24 (AWD) vs the 18/22 currently for the Highlander and the 2003 RX300

    When does the next design cycle start for the HL

    Thanks
  • toyotakentoyotaken Member Posts: 897
    Toyota typically uses a 5 yr cycle for the vehicles between major redesigns. They often have "freshened" designs such as the redesigned center console on the Highlander between 2001 and 2002, but for a total redesign, they usually use 5yrs. If that is the case, the current design of the Highlander should stay the same through the 2005 model year with a redesign for the 2006 model. That isn't set in stone, however, so they could "change their minds".

    Ken
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.