By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
For some real fun, put some hi-test in a Briggs & Stratton mower engine that wants regular.
Steve, Host
Premium fuel can be ignited earlier in the cycle because it doesn't detonate as explosively, slower flamefront travel, as a lower octane would.
Does the 3rd seat on fold completely flat ???
did any one remove the bottom plastic cover to reach it. thank.s
_____________________________________________
I'd love to know that myself. I have a friend who owns an engine dynamometer business on the side. He's also a physicist. I'm a logistics engineer in missiles. We've both toyed with cars and engines for decades. I have my theories and he has his about detonation, but we both agree that flamefront travels at speeds independent of octane rating. When a fuel/air mixure reaches the ignition point caused by the increasing temp/pressure, it will detonate. Introducing a spark really close to that ignition point may cause it to denonate rather than conflagrate. That would explain the detonation while the piston is still on the compression stroke. But retarding the spark a few degrees would have no significant affect on that - it would seen that you'd still get detonation. Gotta go have a cup of coffee with my old buddy and hash this out. Also, maybe there's more on this since the last time we discussed it.
Thanks
Perhaps a new thread entitled 'Flamefront Up Your Tailpipe' should be started for those that want to engage in esoteric discussions regarding detonation and pre-ignition.
Toyota recommends 91 octane for the HL but its ok to experiment with other grades of fuel and make a decision based on price, performance, and fuel economy.
Thanks
What's a good price? Got almost a $4K spread between Edmunds TMV ($28.3k) and Kelly Blue Book retail ($24.6k).
and
Real-World Trade-In Values
are two recommended links.
Steve, Host
I'm seriously considering the highlander as my next vehicle, although, I'll probably wait for the hybrid version. Anyway, I can't decide if the AWD is worth the extra $ and decrease in mpg. I was thinking this is probably one more thing that could go wrong and/or require regular maintenance. Is this true.
I live in the Washington DC area so I don't do any off-road driving.
I plan to own this vehicle for 8+ years or so.
Thanks in advance!
Jack
I'm a fan of the Toyota Extra Care. Keep in mind, that is what I do for a living so take that opinion for what its worth, but I actually believe in these things. I don't think I could work in a dealership that sold aftermarket plans. I've just never seen one that comes close to the ease and clarity of the Toyota plan.
Gas mileage is around 20-22 MPG in mixed driving so I am giving up 1 or 2 MPG's for the 4WD. A small price to pay for me.
One caveat: Our HL came with Bridgestone tires that were the absolute worst for snow traction. I just spent $550 for four Michelin Cross Terrain tires - problem solved.
did any one remove the bottom plastic cover to reach it. thank.s
While he's correct in describing the poor life of the OEM tires, upsizing from 225 to 235 is risky. As I found out, there is very little space between the wheels and the wheel well. A wider tire may rub or trap objects as small as pebbles, a very risky possibility!
does the panel come down with only the visible screws or are there plastic plugs which are re-usable?? by the way, i do the oil changes from the top and once you get the hang of it, it is very quick and easy. avoids the removal time and trouble. thanks. rr70
With Toyotas Corolla is descent and great for in-town use and short distance trips. Matrix engine was too loud and sounded like my old Camry when it developed a small hole in exhaust system. Didn't like Rav for its bumpy ride primarily and instrument panel design. That left me with the option of getting a Highlander. I liked the ride, handling, almost everything about it. Obviously the V6 is more powerful than the 2.4L 4 cyl engine which was not bad at all. I felt the 4 cyl HL performed more like my old Camry which also has 4 cyl eng. Even the base model of HL comes with ABS, Vehicle stabilizer and traction control systems which is what I am mainly looking for.
If I don't care for the power of the V6 engine, is it OK to go with 4 cyl model with 4x4 drive. Or should I go with the FW drive only with 4 cyl engine. Is the 4 cyl engine too small for 4x4 drive ? I don't need 4x4 for towing or any such thing. It is for added safety! I plan on using this for long distance driving.
Also, what should I expect to pay for these models of HL. Appreciate you feedback. Thanks in advance.
For me, I have an 03 V6 4WD. I live in Western PA where 4WD [and the V6] comes in very handy - and not only for snowy conditions. The grip that 4WD provides in the wet is comforting as well. Plus, it's hilly around here and the 4 cylinder seemed to struggle when pulling uphill - especially with the A/C on and 2 or 3 passengers. That's a lot for a 4 to lug around.
My suggestion would be to drive them both until you feel comfortable in making a decision. After owning ours for 6 months I can tell you it has exceeded our expectations in every way.
As for pricing, check out the Highlander topic "Prices Paid and Buying Experience". That should help you to get a feel for what kind of prices are out there.
I realize I will be giving up some toys with the HL vs the RX, but the noise was unacceptable. What have HL owners noted about different tires and noise?
Also, the FWD HL had a lot of torque steer. I have never had that in my 4wd RX. Is that a FWD issue?
Thanks!
Torque steer is most noticeable when accelerating and turning, hard acceleration and tightly turning would make it most pronounced. Since the left halfshaft is shortest they will always torque steer, "pull", to the right.
Some have said that the newer models, 04, do not exhibit (as much??) torque steer.
I'm a little surprised that you found the HL noisy, as many consider it quiet compared to alternatives such as Pilot and Murano. I'm not so sure that the GY Integrities are the source of the noise as their strengths are soft ride, low noise, high mpg. Many would say that they also have weaknesses around rain traction and treadwear. They are something like a value version of the Michelin Cross-Terrain, with emphasis on value, heavy emphasis.
Did you drive a 4-cyl. or 6-cyl. HL? There are pros/cons to both, but the 4-cyl. certainly generates more engine noise than V6.
I would like to get the feedback from some fellow board members. I'm planning on trading in my Accord for an SUV. I am looking for an SUV with full independent suspensions, 3rd row seats for the kids in a pinch (1 and 5 year old), a V6, AWD to go skiing and a tow hitch to haul my stuff to the dump once in a great while. Based on the above, I narrowed it down the HL and the Pilot. I am interested in hearing about what others think the main differences are between the HL and Pilot, to help out in my decision.
I personally felt bad for the Honda Rep. He put a lot of time and a decent deal on the table. But the choice was hers and 4 months later she is still pleased. We also got a Great deal on the Highlander thru buycar.com .
My $.02
Based on the feedback you all are providing me, I need to drive the HL again.
I agree with the feedback. The RX is nice, but that nice will cost ~$6-8k. So, if the HL is quiet enough (I am somewhat deaf, so quiet means I can hear peole talk) then the HL is the deal.