Subaru Forester (up to 2005)

189111314344

Comments

  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    We have a 2001 S that had a very bad rattle that took a couple of trips to have repaired. Although it sounded as if it were coming from the center vent area it was the compass mirror that was the cause of the problem. The glass was loose in the housing, the vibration was transmitted down the windshield. Replacing the mirror cured the problem.
  • bigfrank3bigfrank3 Member Posts: 426
    canadiancl - My 01 Forester manual says that if you connect the white wire down in the kick panel you can have passive arming. They don't seem to set them up this way by default.

    dgieras - I am a large 6'3" and find my Forester seat comfortable if I crank the front almost all the way up then lower the back of the seat bottom until I get enough of an angle to support my thighs. I then set the seatback itself to give a comfortable reach to the wheel. With the headroom in the Forester there is plenty of seat adjustment options for us tall folks.

    ijsoobfan - No manufacturer uses break-in oil nowadays, however I always do my first oil change at ~300 miles, and the second ~1300. I then use 3000 mile changes for dino oil until I get something over 7000 miles at which I change over to Mobil 1. The reason for the quick changes is not for the oil but for the filter. Freshly built engines have a lot of metal filings and core sand left over from the manufacturing process. I want to get this stuff out as soon as is reasonable. I remember when engines were not aluminum and I cut open a factory filter after 300 miles and stuck a magnet into it. There was so many filings that it looked like a chia stick-man!

    Frank
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    A factory rep from SoA answered that for us once, and she recommended doing the first oil change at 3k miles. However, I had already done mine at 1k and then every 7.5k, and mine's running great and averaging over 25mpg to boot.

    2002 will bring few changes, so if you want a 2001 there is no big reason to wait. 2003 will be a redesign but that's a long way off.

    If the seats seem low, try what I do - use the seat angle adjustments so the front is all the way up and the rear all the way down.

    You could even take the seat of the track and try to put spacers in there. Miata owners do this regularly, since it's a tight fit even for 6 footers (like me).

    pak6: I've tested towing a 700 lb trailer, and the Forester pulled well. 1500 lbs is a lot more, but I think the engine would do fine. Braking would be a bigger concern - does your trailer have brakes? If not I'd consider retrofitting them, in which case it would be fine.

    A check engine light being on is no big deal - it's usually something with emissions. A blinking light means a tru engine problem, so don't drive it if it blinks.

    -juice
  • canadianclcanadiancl Member Posts: 1,078
    Thanks for the info on the alarm. Subaru is the first that I've heard of that offers a choice that is user-selectable. Have you tried it?
  • bigfrank3bigfrank3 Member Posts: 426
    No, I haven't tried it. I looked into it because I expected my insurance company to want passive arming. They looked at the specs and never mentioned it. I have gotten used to it this way, and always lock and arm anyway.

    I shut off the "honk" acknowledgment for a while but found myself peering in through the window to see if the dash light was blinking. Easier to let it honk. I just look around like it was someone else.

    I miss the doors locking when starting the vehicle (and unlocking when shut off) as my truck alarm does, but I don't think that happens with the Soob alarm anyway. I keep trying to get out of the vehicle with the doors locked.

    Frank
  • canadianclcanadiancl Member Posts: 1,078
    I prefer the passive arming feature not so much for it to arm itself when I park and leave the car, but for it to re-arm/relock if I inadvertently disarm/unlock with the remote. I had a Maxima that did not have this re-arm feature. And there were a couple of times when I had parked it on the street right outside my office, and accidentally hit the disarm/unlock button. So the re-arm feature would be especially useful for someone who parks outside overnight at home.
  • tinindianatinindiana Member Posts: 46
    Is the 800 number/qsubaru@aol shown on your site thebest place to get parts? Thanks in advance!
  • bassistbassist Member Posts: 15
    The dealer reset the CEL for the 3rd time yesterday and told me this was basically normal behavior for Subarus. The light came back on
    on the way home from the dealer! So far the mileage is still poor as well (<19mpg) in the city.

    How many Subaru owners out there have NOT had the
    cel go off in the 1st year or so?

    The dealer wasn't completely useless though -
    They fixed the interior rattle. It was a loose piece of plastic inside the B pillar apparently.
  • rslnp1rslnp1 Member Posts: 29
    This is not normal behavior! Try to have your dealer replace all 4 of the cars oxygen sensors. When the light comes on there is a problem. It may not be serious but it should be corrected.
  • natescapenatescape Member Posts: 176
    I've had mine since early November (10k miles) and haven't seen the CEL at all.
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    They should do more than reset the light if it's anything other than a loose cap. OBD2 stores codes in the ECU, have them give you the code # and what that code signifys. I have a problem with one of my cars with the light coming on, but it is a worn out gas cap and I've been to busy to replace it
  • laurievrbalaurievrba Member Posts: 16
    I am going to get a forester soon. From what I know about these cars they have a horizontal piston arrangement.
    According to my father,(who once owned a subaru 15 years ago) he said these engines have two head gaskets and require much more maintanence than typical engines. Of course, he is talking about the car that he had 15 years ago.
    Does anyone know how things have changed with the engine since then?

    I believe that subaru has come a LONG WAY since then, but I need the evidence to prove this!
    thanx for any/all input
    ~Laurie
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    The number of head gaskets on a vehicle have no bearing on how much maintenance an engine will require, but could lead to an increase in repair cost if you have a head gasket leak. Any V engine-V6,V8,V12 wil have 2 cylinder head gaskets. Inline 4 or 6 engines will typically have 1 head gasket. Subaru's have scored very well with Consumer Reports and Consumer Digest as far as overall quality and reliability. Almost all vehicles are much better than they were 15 years ago.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Anyone read the recent Consumer Reports? They reviewed the new RAV4, Escape/Tribute and Santa Fe. All four models scored very well. In fact, the RAV4 has inched out the Subaru Forester as Consumer Reports top rated model. The other three come in after the Forester causing the CR-V to drop in relative rank.

    Ken
  • texsubarutexsubaru Member Posts: 242
    Weighing in a little late on this, but for whatever it's worth, my driving experience with my Forester is that its "pep" factor is excellent at the low-end, say, 0-30 mph. In highway-passing acceleration (speeding up from 55 to 75 mph or so), I'd say it is quite adequate, but admittedly nothing to wildly praise. Overall, the Forester is more than sufficient to merge safely and swiftly enough into freeway traffic, but it might not be what you'd choose to go drag racing.

    The major performance advantage of the Forester, in my opinion, is its rock solid handling -- there are undoubtedly SUVs that will get you to 65 mph quicker than a Forester, but there aren't a lot that you will feel more confident in than a Forester while driving on a tight, twisty mountain road at 65 mph.
  • marc40marc40 Member Posts: 3
    Well, I am hopefully one of the few on this list that will crash test his Premium 'S' Forester.

    I was going 55mph on Interstate 5 in Oregon when I hit black ice and spun in front of a semi I was passing. My car first smashed against a cement shoulder on the right side of the highway. It then bounced back in front of the semi (still sliding on ice) and now backwards as the semi's wheels rode along the left side of my vehicle. I finally ended up smashed in the Left cement center divider facing the other side of the highway.

    Damage: The drivers side window was gone, the drivers side of the windshield was smashed but not broken in. The left side of car was pushed in from front to end (This is where the truck tires road along side). There was a hard dent in the drivers side front window frame. Both sides of the back were smashed in slightly and the front of the car was completely mangled.

    Both front airbags deployed as well as the side airbags.

    Damage to me: Thankfully I was the only one in the vehicle although most of the damage was closest to the drivers seat anyway. I was able to walk out of the vehicle. (Actually I had to jump out of the (now open) drivers side window. I had a puffy left eye from the airbag. My left shoulder hurt as well as my body from the impact. I am recovering fine though and was quite impressed with the way the car protected me. (Although I'm sure I had some help from above).

    Anyway, thought you guys might be interested. By the way anyone recently purchased a Forester 'S' premium model? I would like to know what you paid if possible. I am planning on buying another one.

    Thanks,

    Marc
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Wow. Glad you are here to tell the story. Y'all be careful out there.

    Steve
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
  • hollimanholliman Member Posts: 2
    Tony, riskman,
    Thanks, it's reassuring to know I'm not alone! It certainly has got a lot better with time; I'm going into the dealer for a couple of things next week, so I'll ask them about the "click."

    Another question occurred to me about the "hill holding setup" in the AT. In order to take advantage of engine braking, I find myself having to downshift myself when coming down from the mountains. My impression had been that the AT would downshift automatically if I brake frequently--is this wrong? (My Forester stays in 4th gear sometimes even when I brake pretty frequently, on windy roads in which I feel much more in control in 2nd gear--perhaps I'm more conservative here than normal). Just wondering.

    thanks again.
  • natescapenatescape Member Posts: 176
    Glad you're OK! That sounds dangerous, and you're lucky to escape without major injury.

    I paid a hair over $23k for my S+ at Metro Subaru in Somerset, MA. The only extras I got were the alarm and cargo cover (both of which I feel should be standard on the S+).
  • mrbill808mrbill808 Member Posts: 14
    My dealer told me that I shouldnt worry about changing the oil x amount of times before 3000 miles. He said Subaru supposedly runs each of their engines 1/2 an hour and is drained before the car ever gets into your hands. Therefore, the most damaging elements in the engine/oil have been eliminated and 3000 miles on the 1st change is adequate.

    Then 7500 miles for the 2nd, and then every 4500 miles after that. Says that the way engines are made and treated it is not necessary to drain oil so quickly anymore. However, changing the oil is the most effective way to take care of your engine. Im not sure what I will do yet, as I have under 300 miles on mine so far.

    Sounds like if your engine light doesnt come on, your wheel bearings stay in, and you have no alignment problems, you should have a problem-free forester.

    Ive read that Consumer Reports put the 2001 RAV4 ahead of the Forester. However since I just finished test driving both, I have to disagree. If any potential Rav4 buyers are looking here, make sure you go test drive a Subaru before you buy something. Listen to the interior noise levels and make sure you can live with that every day you drive it for the life of the car. That noise is NEVER going away.
  • riskman11riskman11 Member Posts: 11
    Marc - really glad to hear you are okay after that scary accident. Hope all heals well. Did your Forester get totaled by insurance? FYI, our S+ with auto trans, Option Grp III (I think that's what it is called), wheel locks, center arm rest, rubber mats and tweeter kit was on the road for $23,900.

    Bill - haven't driven a RAV4 but did drive a CR-V. I agree, noise was a BIG issue! One of the things I love most about the Forester is the quiet and feeling of solidity that it imparts.

    You all may be interested in this little tidbit I learned from the service manager at the dealership where I bought my Forester as well as all my VW's: 20% of the work they do on Subaru's is warranty, 80% is maintenance. On the VW side, 60% is warranty work, 40% maintenance. As much as I love my VW's, I do recognize that they are a little more high maintenance and the potential for problems is a little higher.
  • natescapenatescape Member Posts: 176
    I fully agree, MrBill. I thought the Rav just seemed flimsy compared to the Forester. It felt lightweight, cheaply made, and less surefooted than the Sube. I just got into a debate with a Rav owner on one of the boards and he insisted that the tighter turning ratio was more crucial for him, and that's great. But give me security, more surefooted handling, and better accelleration anyday. :-D
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    I doubt that they retested each vehicle head to head, I'm sure they had the RAV4 to drive but were just going off of their notes for the others. It's amazing after reading Car mags over the years, how they can rave about a car one year and trash it a year or two later.
  • norm949norm949 Member Posts: 28
    Mark: Glad to hear you're ok. I'm sure all the other Forester owners are glad to see that our vehicles will protect us well in case we ever need it. FYI, I paid about $300 over invoice, about $23.4 for my S premium with AT, rear diff protector, fender flares, feature group III, air filtration and tweeter kits, rear dust deflector, cargo net and wheel locks. FWIW, I live in So Cal, where supposedly the deals aren't as good as other parts of the country (where AWD is a real benefit).

    As for the Consumer Reports/RAV-4 thing, I used to be an avid CR believer, but over time I find that their ratings are often to be taken with a grain of salt, especially when it comes to electronics, computers, and cars. I agree totally with mrbill808 and tincup47 -- I can guarantee you that they didn't purchase a '01 Forester to compare with the new RAV-4 they tested; if they did they would have come to the same conclusion they did years ago. In fact, although I do read CR for their car reports, the only thing I have faith in is their reliability ratings.
  • tlimatlima Member Posts: 124
    Matt:

    Yes, the Subaru AT should downshift on long grades when applying the brakes. There are, however, a specific set of conditions that will make this occur. Some owners of older Subarus complained about this as it was occurring abruptly and very often. Subaru then went ahead and "detuned" it on newer models. Maybe someone here can provide technical details.

    I wouldn't be suprised that you can't make it happen. I've put over 6k miles on mine and never encountered the automatic downshift.

    This is one of the reasons why I prefer a manual transmission, but manuals and traffic do not mix. Crawling in traffic (almost everyday), however, reminds me that I made the right decision with an auto.

    -Tony
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    tincup: I could not agree more. Whatever is new is best. It's actually shocking that the Forester remains in 2nd place, above the newer V6 Escape and V6 Santa Fe.

    Tom: yes, I use Darlene, and usually call her at 800-287-1281.

    CEL: none for me. Are there really FOUR O2 sensors?

    Marc: first and foremost, glad you're OK. Being pushed around by a semi ain't fun, and neither is losing your beloved Soob, which gaves its life to save yours. A moment of silence...

    I'd look at new ones, but I'd also take a peek at WRX wagons (oops, did I say that in a Forester topic?).

    -juice
  • christa824christa824 Member Posts: 17
    Does anyone out there own a 1999 Forester?
    I have seen a couple in the classified ads around here for about 2grand under the blue book value. Most have very low miles (about 15-16K). I just wondered if anyone heard of any problems with the 1999. I am thinking seriously about checking one of these out. I am in grad school now and I don't want to have a new car car payment if I can help it. I also need something reliable-I drive 40 miles to work. Any info. would be appreciated.
    thanks!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Mine's a '98.

    The '99 got the Phase II engine, with better low-end torque and more peak torque, but a lower redline. It also went to a SOHC head.

    There is a particularly good or bad year for the Forester, so a few grand under book should be a good find.

    Plus you should have 2-3 years left on the powertrain warranty.

    -juice
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    Hi Marc,

    Glad to hear you're OK! My Forester S Premium also protected my family from a Ford SUV ramming into the back. Both insurance adjusters and a body shop guy told me that the smart location of spare tire saved us all from that truck. Unlike yours, mine was not totalled though, and I'm suffering of waiting for my Forester to be fixed (for > 2 months already).
    Take care, and post pix of a new Forester that you bought.

    --Kate
  • oregonmanoregonman Member Posts: 60
    I can't believe that consumer reports didn't downgrade the RAV 4 for not having a real back bumper. I crossed the RAV 4 off my list for that reason. Even in a low speed rear ender ther is going to be a lot of damage. I have been rear ended in just about every car I've ever owned, including my 99 Outback on the second day I owned it. Fortunately it was just a tap. I got rear ended in my 95 Legacy wagon. It felt pretty hard and I thought for sure there would be damage, but there was not a scratch. If I was in a RAV 4 I'm 100% certain there would have been serious damage.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Christa,

    Some Foresters had a few problems in their first model year ('98) but have been quite stable since.

    I can't think of anything major in the '99 line-up.

    Ken
  • rick127rick127 Member Posts: 3
    Anyone have experience seeing the brush quard on a black s+ in person? Or can I get black grill Edmonds seems to show as an option? (Refining my thoughts toward selecting a new Forester) Thank for your thoughts.
  • kwelsskwelss Member Posts: 21
    Hi all,

    I've been lurking on this board for a while, just reading what you all thought of your Foresters before making a commitment to one. Well, you convinced me.

    As of three hours ago, I'm the proud owner of a Sedona Red 2001 Forester S+ with manual transmission, Feature Group III, and a hood deflector. (Got it for $22,891... thanks to Edmunds.com and the wonders of getting bids from dealers via email.)

    I'm so excited about my new car-- it's been almost 11 years since I purchased my Honda Civic, and while the Civic is still running dependably at 143k, I started getting worried about how small it was vs the Suburbans, Expeditions, Explorers, and other king-sized SUVs crowding the SF Bay Area freeways these days.

    My buying experience was great, too. Very stress-free. Four email messages swapped with the Internet Sales & Fleet Manager at Downtown Subaru in Oakland, and I knew exactly what I was getting and how much I'd have to pay for it.

    Then I went in during my lunch hour to sign the papers and pick up my keys.

    I'm looking forward to reading my owner's manual tonight and learning how to operate the moon roof. *g*

    And I'm totally jazzed about the smooth ride, quiet but powerful engine, and the silky transmission. Oh, and having all of the cool little features-- power mirrors, power windows, compass, the very lovely stereo and CD player, and I even have seat heaters! (Not that it really gets cold enough in Calif. for the heavy-duty defrosters, but, hey.)

    cheers,
    Karin in California
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    The bun warmers are nice even on warm days! Welcome aboard.

    Bob
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    Karin, welcome to the world of happy (mostly) Forester owners. Please post the pix of your baby, and also tell us if you like service in Downtown Oakland dealership. I bought a car from them in 1993 and back then they were terrible; hopefully now they are better.

    Stay in touch

    Kate in SF Bay area
  • kwelsskwelss Member Posts: 21
    I found the sales staff at Downtown Auto in Oakland very low-key. No BS, and they followed through on all the promises they made on the phone and over email. I have to admit I was pretty nervous about the whole car-buying thing-- one of the reasons I put it off for so long.

    Haven't tried the Service Dept. at Downtown Auto Center yet, but I'll let you know when I do, Kate.

    The Finance guy pushed the extended warranty pretty hard-- I declined, but I was wondering whether anyone has any opinions about its worth. The three-year included warranty seems pretty comprehensive, and from what I've heard, Subarus are very reliable if maintained properly.

    cheers,
    Karin in California
  • ckfreundckfreund Member Posts: 24
    We took a look at Foresters last weekend and generally liked what we saw. One slight concern is that the back seat doesn't fold down flat. We go on long camping trips and fill up the cargo area on our 1990 Pathfinder. What do others out there have to say about this?
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Karin,

    I bought my Forester there too. They were very straightforward with no BS. The shop there is not just for Subarus. I believe they also cover Toyota and Saab, if I'm mistaken.

    Ken
  • marc40marc40 Member Posts: 3
    Thanks for all the well wishes. May my forester rest in pieces (I mean peace).

    I'll let you guys know what I end up getting.

    Cheers,

    Marc
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Rick: the grille guard installs against the bumper and doesn't offer much protection. It's really more a cosmetic item. Your call.

    Karin: congrats. And it's not just a CD player, it's a CD changer! :-)

    You can always buy the extended warranty later. The main powertrain is covered for 5 years already. Give yourself more time to think about it.

    CF: the 2000 and earlier models have different rear seats that do fold flat. They also recline, forward and back.

    On the other hand, the 2001's rear seat is more comfortable, has a 3rd head rest and shoulder belt, and has adjustable anchors for the outer seats.

    -juice
  • jackleungjackleung Member Posts: 79
    Anyone has install these air filter on their 2001 Forester? I want to know the part number of it.

    Thanks
  • norm949norm949 Member Posts: 28
    Marc-
    Correction on that price: it was $23.9, not $23.4 (I guess it was wishful thinking on my part) for my S+. Still thought I got a good deal considering all the options and the lack of competition in the area. Good luck!
    Norm
  • jackleungjackleung Member Posts: 79
    Anyone has install these air filter on their 2001 Forester? I want to know the part number of it.

    Thanks
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Ken has one and ought to be around any minute now.

    -juice
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    CELs- I've had two in the past month on my 2001 with less than 12k. Both for bad air/fuel sensors. My sense from reading these boards is that the Forester is prone to the CEL coming on but the vast majority of the time it is for minor emission problems. Still, it's a pain to keep taking it back to the dealer.

    Consumer Reports mini-SUV comparo: I read the article twice and still can't figure how they justified rating the RAV-4 higher than the Forester (besides the obvious new model bias). The RAV-4 is still slower, not as safe, has a worse mpg rating etc. I'm very dissappointed in CU.

    Rear seats not folding flat- They must come pretty close since I've never noticed that they didn't fold flat (you have to take off the headrests of course).

    -Frank P.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    juice -- did you call?


    Jack -- I have an Amsoil air filter on my 98 Forester S, but I believe it's a different part number. I've read here that the 2001 takes the part# S-1992. I'd check before buying, however.


    Ken

  • christa824christa824 Member Posts: 17
    Thanks all for your input. I do think I am going to check the 1999's out.
  • baltbobbaltbob Member Posts: 1
    My dad has to use a scooter when he goes out and is wondering if without the back seat will the Forester have enough room to put a scooter in with the use of ramps? If any one has experience with this would appreciate a reply. Thanks
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Bob,

    If you're thinking about transporting the scooter upright, the height might be a limiting factor. I can get my mountain bike upright in my Forester with the front wheel off, but I need to lower the seat.

    I don't have the height handy -- maybe someone else does?

    Ken
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    According to Consumer Reports 2000 edition the"maximum cargo box" size is 59x36x29 inches. Hope this helps.

    Ross
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.